dfosterf
14 years ago
Jersey Al wrote this blog piece a day or two ago. He did his homework on this one.

His intention in this blog post is to convince the reader that James Starks did well with what he had.

My intention of "forwarding" it to here is to remind everyone that will listen that our offensive line is still a major weakness of our team, and have stated repeatedly when criticizing Brandon Jackson that my caveat regarding that criticism always includes the concept that Jackson isn't good enough behind "our" line, as configured.

Some say (in retrospect, after we lose) "Well, what happened to the criticism when we were winning, why bring that shit up now?"

My answer (in advance, win or lose)

I'm bringing it up NOW, while we are winning, and our offensive line is still no friggin' good, at least to the standards I would like to see.

Jersey Al wrote:


Im guessing Bob hadnt re-watched the game again when he wrote this. Because if he had, he would have seen an offensive line whose run blocking could best be described as sieve-like.




Anyway, it's a very well done piece, imo--even if you think O'l Foster just wants to rant about the o-line again. :thumbleft:



Jersey Al-- Film study 
Zero2Cool
14 years ago
Wait, our offensive line is crap? YOU DON'T SAY!?!?!

You're not telling anyone anything we don't already know, except that McGinn is under the impression our OL preformed better in the playoff game against Atlanta, than the regular season meeting. I think that's a crock, both games our RB was hit behind the line, both games our QB was running around.

The difference is Starks could get back to line some times and/or fall forward where Brandon Jackson has that as a weakness. Oh and Rodgers lit their shit up.
UserPostedImage
Wade
  • Wade
  • Veteran Member
14 years ago
Thank you.
And do not be conformed to this world, but be transformed by the renewing of your mind, that you may prove what is that good and acceptable and perfect will of God.
Romans 12:2 (NKJV)
Zero2Cool
14 years ago

Thank you.

"Wade" wrote:



I do what I can, you're welcome.
UserPostedImage
dfosterf
14 years ago
Which game was it that Colledge went out and (Lang?) went in and we got ??!!worse??!!

This keeps me up at night.


Why bring it up? Because in either 2 wins or 1 loss friggin' soccer-boy 🙂 is going to want an OLB, diva loving Dhaze 🙂 is gonna want a GD WR, Porky is gonna want his annual BPA, there will be 20 mocks on here ignoring our offensive line in the early rounds, Pack93z is gonna tell us why his beer drinking buddy Tausch is good to go for next year, or worse, that Lang can play LT 🙂

...And Foster will be criticized for still wanting to hold Ted Thompson responsible for failing to address the offensive line soon enough, well enough, and our success this year will be thrown up as in defense of that position.

Ted made amends with his draft of Bulaga. Bulaga is a prime example of what I mean by saying Ted was "late". He is in the natural progression to take over at LT, but as we all know, he is shaky at RT (we all HOPE that it is because he is playing on the "wrong" side, for him)

Cliffy to the pro-bowl--Judas H Priest the pro bowl is a joke, Colledge sucks, Cliffy sucks, our middle gets pushed backwards, and on, and on, and on...

It could have all been Lang's wrist. Really. A line is so many moving parts in synch that can look SO bad configured one way, yet turns around (very positively) if configured another...

...And now we can't get rid of the coach, because we did too well this year, and there will be no hue and cry heard at 1265 to do so.

Small example--What if Bulaga is a great LG? This comes to my mind as real possibility, and sady, we will probably never know.

What I'm trying to say is that we need more linemen. :)

...or possibly an absolutely premier running back (And I don't think there is an AD/AP (Adrian Peterson, Zero 🙂 ) in this draft.

The good news is that since our o-line has been pretty shitty since the day Aaron tooks the reigns, he has developed a Big Ben - like ability to negate a shitty line... Different skill set, but very similar in the end results. That makes him even better than the credit he is already getting, imo
Pack93z
14 years ago
I firmly believe the focus will continue next season on fixing the offensive line.. starting with competition for Wells.. who IMO is a solid player.. but doesn't get a ton of push of this the center spot in running plays.. and drags over to the left with Colledge.

Sitton and Bulaga IMO are the only two long term answers on the line..
"The oranges are dry; the apples are mealy; and the papayas... I don't know what's going on with the papayas!"
Zero2Cool
14 years ago

I firmly believe the focus will continue next season on fixing the offensive line.. starting with competition for Wells.. who IMO is a solid player.. but doesn't get a ton of push of this the center spot in running plays.. and drags over to the left with Colledge.

Sitton and Bulaga IMO are the only two long term answers on the line..

"Pack93z" wrote:



I'd like to add to this, just a tad because I do NOT like Bulaga at RT.

LT - Bulaga
RG - Sittion

I'll go with this as long term answers. Clifton - old, Wells - needs to lose his job before becoming above average, Colledge - lacks motivation and consistency.


I don't know OL too well, but that's my opinion.
UserPostedImage
zombieslayer
14 years ago
Cliffy doesn't suck. He's been solid this year. He did get burned by Abraham last game though.

Cliffy's close to done though. He's not long term.

I'm with Foster. I do want a RB and a WR drafted but OL comes FIRST.

On another thread, someone was saying that our OL was decent (I don't think it was one of us, I think it was a quoted sports writer) and I disagreed, saying that was all Aaron dodging bullets. I don't want Aaron to have to do that all day long.

Our pass protection needs improvement and our run blocking is a joke. Thank goodness for James Starks who is filling in admirably for Ryan Grant. Now do you all believe me how good Grant really is? 1200+ yards 2 years in a row against THAT OL? He should get a medal.
My man Donald Driver
UserPostedImage
(thanks to Pack93z for the pic)
2010 will be seen as the beginning of the new Packers dynasty. 🇹🇹 🇲🇲 🇦🇷
Zero2Cool
14 years ago

Now do you all believe me how good Grant really is? 1200+ yards 2 years in a row against THAT OL? He should get a medal.

"zombieslayer" wrote:



Preaching to the choir. I've said several times Grant is better than we give him credit for. Yes, he pisses me off with his running into team mates and running with his head down, but 1,200 back to back in our pass happy offense with our *cough* OL *cough* I think is pretty good.
UserPostedImage
Pack93z
14 years ago



On another thread, someone was saying that our OL was decent (I don't think it was one of us, I think it was a quoted sports writer) and I disagreed, saying that was all Aaron dodging bullets. I don't want Aaron to have to do that all day long.
l.

"zombieslayer" wrote:



It was I.. and I stand by the comment that in pass protection they did a solid job. The Falcons did a nice job with some of their stunts and blitz packages.. I think the slot blitz for examples was missed by Arod and doesn't fall on the line.

Sometimes a defense is going to do a decent job in scheme to create matchup issues.. I remember seeing another blitz the Colledge failed to pick it up.. but overall I think pass protect was solid last weekend.

In the run game however.. they couldn't get past the front line of the Falcons and struggled with the initial burst in the run game.
"The oranges are dry; the apples are mealy; and the papayas... I don't know what's going on with the papayas!"
Fan Shout
beast (47m) : Someone pointed out, with Raiders hiring Carroll, the division games between Carroll and Jim Harbaugh are back on (who can whine more games)
beast (6h) : I'm confused, Pete Carroll and Brian Schottenheimer? When Todd Monken, Joe Brady, Kellen Moore, Kliff Kingsbury and Zac Robinson are availab
Zero2Cool (8h) : Any reason I'm catching a shot here about my intelligence?
Martha Careful (25-Jan) : thank you Mucky for sticking up for me
Martha Careful (25-Jan) : some of those people are smarter than you zero. However Pete Carroll is not
Mucky Tundra (24-Jan) : Rude!
beast (24-Jan) : Martha? 😋
Zero2Cool (24-Jan) : Raiders hired someone from the elderly home.
dfosterf (24-Jan) : I'm going with a combination of the two.
beast (24-Jan) : Either the Cowboys have no idea what they're doing, or they're targeting their former OC, currently the Eagles OC
Zero2Cool (23-Jan) : Fake news. Cowboys say no
Zero2Cool (23-Jan) : Mystery candidate in the Cowboys head coaching search believed to be Packers ST Coordinator Rich Bisaccia.
beast (23-Jan) : Also why do both NYC teams have absolutely horrible OL for over a decade?
beast (23-Jan) : I wonder why the Jets always hire defensive coaches to be head coach
Zero2Cool (22-Jan) : Still HC positions available out there. I wonder if Hafley pops up for one
Zero2Cool (22-Jan) : Trent Baalke is out as the Jaguars GM.
dfosterf (22-Jan) : Jeff Hafley would have been a better choice, fortunately they don't know that. Someone will figure that out next off season
Zero2Cool (22-Jan) : Aaron Glenn Planning To Take Jets HC Job
dfosterf (22-Jan) : Martha- C'est mon boulot! 😁
Zero2Cool (22-Jan) : Thank you
wpr (22-Jan) : Z, glad you are feeling better.
wpr (22-Jan) : My son and D-I-L work for UM. It's a way to pick on them.
Zero2Cool (22-Jan) : Thank you. I rarely get sick, and even more rarely sick to the point I can't work.
wpr (22-Jan) : Beast- back to yesterday, I CAN say OSU your have been Michigan IF the odds of making the playoffs were more urgent.
dfosterf (22-Jan) : Glad to hear you are feeling a bit better.
Zero2Cool (22-Jan) : I've been near death ill last several days, finally feel less dead and site issues.
Zero2Cool (22-Jan) : It is a big deal. This host is having issues. It's frustrating.
Martha Careful (22-Jan) : just kidding...it was down
Martha Careful (22-Jan) : you were blocked yesterday, due to a a recalcitrant demeanor yesterday in the penalty box for a recalcitrant demeanor
dfosterf (22-Jan) : Was that site shutdown on your end or mine? No big deal, just curious
beast (21-Jan) : That way teams like Indiana and SMU don't make the conference championships by simply avoiding all the other good teams in their own confere
beast (21-Jan) : Also, with these "Super Conferences" instead of a single conference champion, have 4 teams make a Conference playoffs.
beast (21-Jan) : Also in college football, is a bye week a good or bad thing?
Martha Careful (21-Jan) : The tournament format was fine. Seeding could use some work.
beast (21-Jan) : You can't assume Ohio State would of won the Michigan game...
beast (21-Jan) : Rankings were 1) Oregon 2) Georgia 3) Texas 4) Penn State 5) Notre Dame 6) Ohio State, none of the rest mattered
wpr (21-Jan) : Texas, ND and OSU would have been fighting for the final 2 slots.
wpr (21-Jan) : Oregon and Georgia were locks. Without the luxury of extra playoff berths, Ohios St would have been more focused on Michigan game.
wpr (21-Jan) : Zero, no. If there were only 4 teams Ohio State would have been one of them. Boise St and ASU would not have been selected.
Zero2Cool (21-Jan) : So that was 7 vs 8, that means in BCS they never would made it?
Martha Careful (21-Jan) : A great game. Give ND credit for coming back, although I am please with the outcome.
Mucky Tundra (21-Jan) : FG to make it academic
Mucky Tundra (21-Jan) : and there's the dagger
Mucky Tundra (21-Jan) : ooooo 8 point game with 4 minutes to go!
Mucky Tundra (21-Jan) : ooooooooohhhhhh he missed!
Mucky Tundra (21-Jan) : Ooooo that completion makes things VERY interesting
Mucky Tundra (21-Jan) : Game not over yet
beast (21-Jan) : Oh yeah, Georgia starting quarterback season ending elbow injury
beast (21-Jan) : Sadly something happened to Georgia... they should be playing in this game against Ohio State
beast (21-Jan) : I thought Ohio State and Texas were both better than Notre Dame & Penn State
Please sign in to use Fan Shout
2024 Packers Schedule
Friday, Sep 6 @ 7:15 PM
Eagles
Sunday, Sep 15 @ 12:00 PM
COLTS
Sunday, Sep 22 @ 12:00 PM
Titans
Sunday, Sep 29 @ 12:00 PM
VIKINGS
Sunday, Oct 6 @ 3:25 PM
Rams
Sunday, Oct 13 @ 12:00 PM
CARDINALS
Sunday, Oct 20 @ 12:00 PM
TEXANS
Sunday, Oct 27 @ 12:00 PM
Jaguars
Sunday, Nov 3 @ 3:25 PM
LIONS
Sunday, Nov 17 @ 12:00 PM
Bears
Sunday, Nov 24 @ 3:25 PM
49ERS
Thursday, Nov 28 @ 7:20 PM
DOLPHINS
Thursday, Dec 5 @ 7:15 PM
Lions
Sunday, Dec 15 @ 7:20 PM
Seahawks
Monday, Dec 23 @ 7:15 PM
SAINTS
Sunday, Dec 29 @ 3:25 PM
Vikings
Sunday, Jan 5 @ 12:00 PM
BEARS
Sunday, Jan 12 @ 3:30 PM
Eagles
Recent Topics
9h / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

20h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Martha Careful

25-Jan / Random Babble / Martha Careful

21-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / Mucky Tundra

21-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / Mucky Tundra

20-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / Martha Careful

20-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / bboystyle

20-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

20-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

19-Jan / Random Babble / Martha Careful

18-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

17-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / bboystyle

17-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

17-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / Martha Careful

16-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

Headlines
Copyright © 2006 - 2025 PackersHome.com™. All Rights Reserved.