My biggest objection (and the point of
this thread) is not about what Obama did or didn't do.
My biggest objection is that
we think what the President (Obama, Bush, whoever) says/does at these moments should be important just because he's the President of the United States.
I think its great that someone gives a great eulogy at someone's funeral. I think it's great when someone is willing to give a eulogy for someone who has died. But should it matter to me who it is that gives the eulogy?
I don't think so.
I don't think we as Americans should be expecting our president to come out and do the eulogy thing. I don't think we should be expecting our president to say something of significance whenever there is a shooting like this.
This is very different from asking what the president should or should not do on a national holiday of rememberence (the Arlington debate, IIRC, was all about what was done on Memorial Day, was it not?). AND its different from asking what we should do or say about what the president does/doesnt do on such a holiday.
In my opinion we should evaluate how Barack behaves at a tragedy like the one in Arizona with how your average citizen behaves. No higher standard, and no lower ones. No different standards.
If he behaves like a boor or a barbarian (see Phelps), we should chastise him the way we'd chastise any other boor or barbarian. If he behaves like a ordinary neighbor supporting those who are mourning, as what little I've read about this suggests he was doing, then we should not.
But the fact that Barack happens to be the president shouldn't enter into it.
In any way, shape, or form.
And do not be conformed to this world, but be transformed by the renewing of your mind, that you may prove what is that good and acceptable and perfect will of God.
Romans 12:2 (NKJV)