There is no reason to compare them to the 2010 Packer if you are focusing on the #6 seed as the Giants were a 5 seed.
"Nonstopdrivel" wrote:
Were they really? Now I feel foolish.
My main point still stands, though, as what I was mainly trying to do is point out that the Packers are one of the most talented
wildcards in recent memory, perhaps ever.
I also can't compare them to the 9-7 Cardinals of a couple years ago, because they were a division winner. So I guess my analysis was wrong headed on all fronts.
Anyway, thanks for the correction, and I'm looking forward to this game.
"wpr" wrote: