Trade blows up in face of Brad Childress, Vikings· Page 3

Cheesey
Preferred Member

14 years ago

#21

He "body slammed" it!!!!LOL!

Wade
Veteran Member

14 years ago

#22

Ventura has a hand in this topic? How?

"Zero2Cool" wrote:

Because we went off topic, of course.

So there.

:pottytrain2: :pottytrain2: :pottytrain2: :pottytrain2:

:birdman: :birdman: :headwall: :headwall:

:danceme: :danceme: :neener: :neener:

:neener: :neener: :neener: :neener:

:rr:

And do not be conformed to this world, but be transformed by the renewing of your mind, that you may prove what is that good and acceptable and perfect will of God.
Romans 12:2 (NKJV)

Zero2Cool
Elite Member Topic Starter

14 years ago

#23

lol

longtimefan
Registered

14 years ago

#24

http://sports.espn.go.com/nfl/news/story?id=5755561

That explains the Moss' tirade on Friday, post practice meal in more depth. And in which case, I can stand by Chilly's decision.

Oh, just for shit's n' giggles:

Moss' name did not appear on the league's official waiver report Monday

"Formo" wrote:

Yeah, according to the NFL, this isn't official. You DO know what official means, right LTF?

Again, I'm not saying it's not going to happen. I'm only saying it's not official.

article wrote:

When the head coach says he is gone

when the OFFICIAL web page of the VIKINGS says he is gone

To me he is gone

What you were basing your douchebagginess on towards me was a TECHNICALITY

You do know what a technicality is right?

Zero2Cool
Elite Member Topic Starter

14 years ago

#25

Until he was officially removed from the roster, it's not official. It's a formality, yes, but the owner could have simply said at the last second, Childress, you're out, Moss we're keeping you.

longtimefan
Registered

14 years ago

#26

Until he was officially removed from the roster, it's not official. It's a formality, yes, but the owner could have simply said at the last second, Childress, you're out, Moss we're keeping you.

"Zero2Cool" wrote:

and the Viking web site said he was gone???

That is my point

Anyways

YES FORMO is RIGHT in terms of legality it wasnt official

My god the amount of douchebaggness that goes on sometimes is mind boggling

Formo
Veteran Member

14 years ago

#27

Until he was officially removed from the roster, it's not official. It's a formality, yes, but the owner could have simply said at the last second, Childress, you're out, Moss we're keeping you.

"longtimefan" wrote:

"Zero2Cool" wrote:

Thanks to TheViking88 for the sig!!

Zero2Cool
Elite Member Topic Starter

14 years ago

#28

My god the amount of douchebaggness that goes on sometimes is mind boggling

"longtimefan" wrote:

I fully agree and hope you're looking in the mirror because it goes right back at you. Official means it's said and done. Brad Childress announced that was a move they were going to make. They said Randy Moss will no longer be with the team.

As I said before. It was NOT official. It could have still been changed because the owner could have fired the head coach and retained Moss.

What's so hard to understand about this? Oh, I get it. You need something to argue about to be happy.

The whole official and what not is so petty. I can't believe I've wasted yet another post on this pathetic ass topic that you won't let go. I mistakenly thought I could word it in a fashion you'd understand. Big failure on my part. Wow.

Pack93z
Select Member

14 years ago

#29

Well, after hear more of the details of Moss's BS last Friday.. even though I think Chilly is still a Bozo of a coach, I have a bit more respect for him as a person for cutting Moss if Friday was the decision point.

Moss lands on the Packers.. I lose a ton of respect for Mike McCarthy and Ted.. there are ways to win beyond adding that Jackass and pathetic waste of skin.

"The oranges are dry; the apples are mealy; and the papayas... I don't know what's going on with the papayas!"

Zero2Cool
Elite Member Topic Starter

14 years ago

#30

The Packers will not claim, or sign Randy Moss. Driver will be back. We do not want to lose Jones, Jordy and even Swain. (I hope I don't need to mention Jennings there).

If we signed Moss, we'd have 6 WR. We tend to suit up I think 4 most of the time, sometimes all 5. There's no room for Randy Moss. If Moss were to play to his talent, you make room. Thing is, he doesn't and isn't worth the hassle.

As I see it, the Packers will not do anything to obtain Moss.

Important Information:

The PACKERSHOME uses cookies. By continuing to browse this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. More Details Close

Fan Shout

Zero2Cool (3h) : Merry Christmas!

beast (11h) : Merry Christmas 🎄🎁

beast (19h) : Sounds like no serious injuries from the Saints game and Jacobs and Watson should play in the Vikings game

packerfanoutwest (24-Dec) : both games Watson missed, Packers won

Martha Careful (24-Dec) : I hope all of you have a Merry Christmas!

Mucky Tundra (24-Dec) : Oh I know about Jacobs, I just couldn't pass up an opportunity to mimic Zero lol

buckeyepackfan (24-Dec) : Jacobs was just sat down, Watson re-injured that knee that kept him out 1 game earlier

buckeyepackfan (24-Dec) : I needed .14 that's. .14 points for the whole 4th quarter to win and go to the SB. Lol

Mucky Tundra (24-Dec) : Jacobs gonna be OK???

Zero2Cool (24-Dec) : Watson gonna be OK???

packerfanoutwest (24-Dec) : Inactives tonight for the Pack: Alexander- knee Bullard - ankle Williams - quad Walker -ankle Monk Heath

packerfanoutwest (24-Dec) : No Jaire, but hopefully the front 7 destroys the line of scrimmage & forces Rattler into a few passes to McKinney.

packerfanoutwest (24-Dec) : minny could be #1 seed and the Lions #5 seed

Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : We'd have same Division and Conference records. Strength of schedule we edge them

Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I just checked. What tie breaker?

bboystyle (23-Dec) : yes its possible but unlikely. If we do get the 5th, we face the NFCS winner

Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : Ahh, ok.

bboystyle (23-Dec) : yes due to tie breaker

Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I mean, unlikely, yes, but mathematically, 5th is possible by what I'm reading.

Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : If Vikings lose out, Packers win out, Packers get 5th, right?

bboystyle (23-Dec) : Minny isnt going to lose out so 5th seed is out of the equation. We are playing for the 6th or 7th seed which makes no difference

Mucky Tundra (23-Dec) : beast, the ad revenue goes to the broadcast company but they gotta pay to air the game on their channel/network

beast (23-Dec) : If we win tonight the game is still relative in terms of 5th, 6th or 7th seed... win and it's 5th or 6th, lose and it's 6th or 7th

beast (23-Dec) : Mucky, I thought the ad revenue went to the broadcasting companies or the NFL, at least not directly

Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I think the revenue share is moot, isn't it? That's the CBA an Salary Cap handling that.

bboystyle (23-Dec) : i mean game becomes irrelevant if we win tonight. Just a game where we are trying to play spoilers to Vikings chance at the #1 seed

Mucky Tundra (23-Dec) : beast, I would guess ad revenue from more eyes watching tv

Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I would think it would hurt the home team because people would have to cancel last minute maybe? i dunno

beast (23-Dec) : I agree that it's BS for fans planning on going to the game. But how does it bring in more money? I'm guessing indirectly?

packerfanoutwest (23-Dec) : bs on flexing the game....they do it for the $$league$$, not the hometown fans

Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I see what you did there Mucky

Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : dammit. 3:25pm

Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : Packers Vikings flexed to 3:35pm

Mucky Tundra (23-Dec) : Upon receiving the news about Luke Musgrave, I immediately fell to the ground

Mucky Tundra (23-Dec) : Yeah baby!

Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : LUKE MUSGRAVE PLAYING TONIGHT~!~~~~WOWHOAAOHAOAA yah

Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I wanna kill new QB's ... blitz the crap out of them.

beast (23-Dec) : Barry seemed to get too conservative against new QBs, Hafley doesn't have that issue

Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : However, we seem to struggle vs new QB's

Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : Should be moot point, cuz Packers should win tonight.

packerfanoutwest (23-Dec) : ok I stand corrected

Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : Ok, yes, you are right. I see that now how they get 7th

Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : 5th - Packers win out, Vikings lose out. Maybe?

beast (23-Dec) : Saying no to the 6th lock.

beast (23-Dec) : No, with the Commanders beating the Eagles, Packers could have a good chance of 6th or 7th unless the win out

Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I think if Packers win, they are locked 6th with chance for 5th.

beast (23-Dec) : But it doesn't matter, as the Packers win surely win one of their remaining games

beast (23-Dec) : This is not complex, just someone doesn't want to believe reality

beast (23-Dec) : We already have told you... if Packers lose all their games (they won't, but if they did), and Buccaneers and Falcons win all theirs

Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I posted it in that Packers and 1 seed thread

Please sign in to use Fan Shout

2024 Packers Schedule

Friday, Sep 6 @ 7:15 PM

Eagles

29 - 34

Sunday, Sep 15 @ 12:00 PM

COLTS

16 - 10

Sunday, Sep 22 @ 12:00 PM

Titans

30 - 14

Sunday, Sep 29 @ 12:00 PM

VIKINGS

29 - 31

Sunday, Oct 6 @ 3:25 PM

Rams

24 - 19

Sunday, Oct 13 @ 12:00 PM

CARDINALS

34 - 13

Sunday, Oct 20 @ 12:00 PM

TEXANS

24 - 22

Sunday, Oct 27 @ 12:00 PM

Jaguars

30 - 27

Sunday, Nov 3 @ 3:25 PM

LIONS

14 - 24

Sunday, Nov 17 @ 12:00 PM

Bears

20 - 19

Sunday, Nov 24 @ 3:25 PM

49ERS

38 - 10

Thursday, Nov 28 @ 7:20 PM

DOLPHINS

30 - 17

Thursday, Dec 5 @ 7:15 PM

Lions

31 - 34

Sunday, Dec 15 @ 7:20 PM

Seahawks

30 - 13

Monday, Dec 23 @ 7:15 PM

SAINTS

34 - 0

Sunday, Dec 29 @ 3:25 PM

Vikings

Saturday, Jan 4 @ 11:00 PM

BEARS