Offense=Suckage· Page 10

Announcement PH Beta → Check it out! Click Me! (you might be see "unsafe", but it is safe)

dhazer
Veteran Member

14 years ago

as we stand right now we are ranked the following on offense:

pts a game : 13th (22)

yds per game : 16th (335.9)

3rd down % : 26th (35%)

turnovers : 13th (+2)

offensive plays a game : 19th (29.55)

so ya I would say our offense is struggling.

i got my info from here stats

Just Imagine this for the next 6-9 years. What a ride it will be 🙂 (PS, Zero should charge for this)

go.pack.go.
Veteran Member

14 years ago

#92

"dhazer" wrote:

Honestly, I couldnt care less what we are ranked compared to everyone else. It means absolutely nothing. As long as we put in a winning performance, I couldnt care less.

Stevetarded
Registered

14 years ago

#93

listen..I'm just starting a discussion. I was wrong about Rodgers having turnovers against the jets, he did not. He was sacked in the red zone against the jets, he did throw a red zone pick against the Vikes, and another int that killed a drive in that game, he has missed a ton of open WR, we do suck on third down conversions.

The Jets win was a great win, and i think we will beat the cowboys and get healthier after the bye.

Our offense needs some work. Rodgers is off, and that is all I'm writing, not that he should be benched. He needs to improve his play if the Packers are going to make the playoffs.

Plenty of people agree with this, but for some reason, any other thought on the packers on this forum, other than, we are great and will win the Super Bowl, is never even discussed.

"dhpackr" wrote:

Where the hell have you been? I have not seen anyone say we aren't struggling offensively this year. You are full of shit. All I've seen in this thread are people happy about winning a HUGE game and not feeling like bitching about offensive stats.

Maybe take some more time to read things that people are actually writing or stick to the NFCN section where you can read and write about your precious Vikings.

Maybe it's a surprise to you but most fans are fans of the team and don't just attach themselves to the QB and follow him around and act like the success of the season is based off what kind of numbers he puts up. I guess they should apologize for being excited over shutting out one of the best teams in the NFL because the QB didn't get huge numbers.

I don't know about others but I couldn't give 2 shits if Rodgers throws 3 picks in the Superbowl and is replaced by Justin Harrell at halftime as long as they win the damn thing.

blank

musccy
Veteran Member

14 years ago

#94

I don't know about others but I couldn't give 2 shits if Rodgers throws 3 picks in the Superbowl and is replaced by Justin Harrell at halftime as long as they win the damn thing.

"Stevetarded" wrote:

I LOL'd, so +1.

Benching Aaron is a proposterous idea not even worth delving into, and I also don't think people should draw conclusions from the Jets' game. I have NO problem with him functioning as a game manager who didn't mess up in a defensive struggle where yards, opportunities, and points were at a premium.

HOWEVER, there's no denying that the 3rd down offense and passing game have been underwhelming this year and something that needs to improve in order for this team to go anywhere.

dhpackr
Registered

14 years ago

#95

Are you dumb? Where the he'll do you get 4 from. I knew somebody like you would complain about something like that when he is great in the red zone. Really, you need to stop hating everything about the Packers since Favre has joined our arch rivals. It's ok. You can admit that you've switched to the dark side as well.

"go.pack.go." wrote:

hating everything about the packers, yeah that' me. I hate everything about the packers.

"Stevetarded" wrote:

well "retarded"seeing as how this is a thread about how much the offense sucks this year, this would be the spot about bitching about offensive stats, and not a place to boast about shutting out the jets.

if you can not get first downs, and score in the red zone, the losses will start to pile up.

No, he's had 1 in his entire career.

"Nonstopdrivel" wrote:

ok totally wrong. there was two red zone picks against the Vikes

1. from the 23 yrd line rodgers threw into dbl coverage and was picked and then jarred Allen pick on the 12

link
http://www.nfl.com/gamecenter/2010102412/2010/REG7/vikings@packers#tab:watch

So if you meet me Have some courtesy, Have some sympathy, and some taste
Use all your well-learned politesse, Or I'll lay your soul to waste

dhpackr
Registered

14 years ago

#96

so, like I wrote, #12 had 2 red zone picks against the Vikes, not the Jets. So The number is two red zone picks this year not 4, and it was the Vikes not the Jets.

and i was called dumb, full of shit, & i hate the packers.

yeah, i was wrong about the number of red zone picks this year by two ints. and oh yeah, I posted how we are unable to score in the red zone, can not convert on third downs, rodgers looks lost on the field, his passes have been way off target, IN A THREAD about the offense stinking it up.

I should be banned and for ever wear Viking purple.

what A JOKE!

So if you meet me Have some courtesy, Have some sympathy, and some taste
Use all your well-learned politesse, Or I'll lay your soul to waste

Stevetarded
Registered

14 years ago

#97

"dhpackr" wrote:

hating everything about the packers, yeah that' me. I hate everything about the packers.

"go.pack.go." wrote:

No, he's had 1 in his entire career.

"Stevetarded" wrote:

"Nonstopdrivel" wrote:

Fair enough, all I'm saying is you can't expect people to rip on Rodgers as hard as you want them to after a HUGE win on the road.

and last time I checked the red zone was inside the 20 yard line BTW

blank

Stevetarded
Registered

14 years ago

#98

"dhpackr" wrote:

You said he was turning it over in the red zone at least once a game... what about that statement ISN'T full of shit?

blank

dhpackr
Registered

14 years ago

#99

for cripes sake...i do not want anybody to rip on #12.

the thread was about the offenses poor play, and i added a comment. My thoughts on the subject of the thread. the qb is playing poorly, and i posted examples. i was wrong about the number.

the pass play from the 23 yrd line, was a terrible play. he was on the run and threw into dbl coverage. do i want the guy benched?? not really, just hoping he can turn it around. the better rodgers plays, the better GB plays.

So if you meet me Have some courtesy, Have some sympathy, and some taste
Use all your well-learned politesse, Or I'll lay your soul to waste

Nonstopdrivel
Preferred Member

14 years ago

#100

But you are objectively wrong. A pass from the 23 is not a red-zone interception, even if the ball is intercepted in the red zone or the end zone. A red-zone interception must be thrown from inside the 20 yard line.

Important Information:

The PACKERSHOME uses cookies. By continuing to browse this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. More Details Close

Fan Shout

Mucky Tundra (28m) : Kanata, seek help! lol

beast (2h) : I was rooting for the Bears to win and hurt their draft pick status

Zero2Cool (2h) : Forgot there was even a game last night haha

TheKanataThrilla (2h) : That was terrible.

TheKanataThrilla (2h) : Watching that game in its entirety yesterday is proof positive that I am a football addict.

beast (3h) : And horrible time management multiple times... and not being able to score more than 3 points on a team with talent

beast (3h) : Realizing the Bears didn't fix it from the previous week and do the same thing, getting the game to overtime

beast (3h) : They probably are not tanking, but they've absolutely mismanagement some things, such as Vikings seeing the Packers blocked FG and realizing

Zero2Cool (4h) : Crazy of Bears to have that mindset that is

Zero2Cool (4h) : Hail Mary stop away from 5 - 2. Not sure how that flips to tanking. Crazy mindset if true

beast (5h) : I've quietly questioned if Bears are tanking on purpose... they suddenly got a lot worse with some simple concepts like 101 clock management

wpr (7h) : Watching bares fans melt down over how putrid their team is, so enjoyable. It's the gift that keeps on giving.

Mucky Tundra (14h) : The Seattle Seahawks defeat the Chicago Bears 6-3. Jason Myers had 6 RBIs for Seattle while Cairo Santos had 3 RBI for Chicago

beast (15h) : Not nessarily, he might of been injured either way. He's playing about 50% of the games the last 4 years

Zero2Cool (21h) : If they'd been more patient with him, he'd be back already. Putting him out there vs Bears caused him to tweak it and here we are.

packerfanoutwest (22h) : well this is his last season with the PAck, book it

beast (23h) : Sounds like no Alexander (again), I'm wondering if his time with the Packers is done

Zero2Cool (26-Dec) : Could ban beast and I still don't think anyone catches him.

Mucky Tundra (26-Dec) : Houston getting dog walked by Baltimore

packerfanoutwest (25-Dec) : Feliz Navidad!

Zero2Cool (25-Dec) : Merry Christmas!

beast (25-Dec) : Merry Christmas 🎄🎁

beast (24-Dec) : Sounds like no serious injuries from the Saints game and Jacobs and Watson should play in the Vikings game

packerfanoutwest (24-Dec) : both games Watson missed, Packers won

Martha Careful (24-Dec) : I hope all of you have a Merry Christmas!

Mucky Tundra (24-Dec) : Oh I know about Jacobs, I just couldn't pass up an opportunity to mimic Zero lol

buckeyepackfan (24-Dec) : Jacobs was just sat down, Watson re-injured that knee that kept him out 1 game earlier

buckeyepackfan (24-Dec) : I needed .14 that's. .14 points for the whole 4th quarter to win and go to the SB. Lol

Mucky Tundra (24-Dec) : Jacobs gonna be OK???

Zero2Cool (24-Dec) : Watson gonna be OK???

packerfanoutwest (24-Dec) : Inactives tonight for the Pack: Alexander- knee Bullard - ankle Williams - quad Walker -ankle Monk Heath

packerfanoutwest (24-Dec) : No Jaire, but hopefully the front 7 destroys the line of scrimmage & forces Rattler into a few passes to McKinney.

packerfanoutwest (24-Dec) : minny could be #1 seed and the Lions #5 seed

Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : We'd have same Division and Conference records. Strength of schedule we edge them

Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I just checked. What tie breaker?

bboystyle (23-Dec) : yes its possible but unlikely. If we do get the 5th, we face the NFCS winner

Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : Ahh, ok.

bboystyle (23-Dec) : yes due to tie breaker

Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I mean, unlikely, yes, but mathematically, 5th is possible by what I'm reading.

Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : If Vikings lose out, Packers win out, Packers get 5th, right?

bboystyle (23-Dec) : Minny isnt going to lose out so 5th seed is out of the equation. We are playing for the 6th or 7th seed which makes no difference

Mucky Tundra (23-Dec) : beast, the ad revenue goes to the broadcast company but they gotta pay to air the game on their channel/network

beast (23-Dec) : If we win tonight the game is still relative in terms of 5th, 6th or 7th seed... win and it's 5th or 6th, lose and it's 6th or 7th

beast (23-Dec) : Mucky, I thought the ad revenue went to the broadcasting companies or the NFL, at least not directly

Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I think the revenue share is moot, isn't it? That's the CBA an Salary Cap handling that.

bboystyle (23-Dec) : i mean game becomes irrelevant if we win tonight. Just a game where we are trying to play spoilers to Vikings chance at the #1 seed

Mucky Tundra (23-Dec) : beast, I would guess ad revenue from more eyes watching tv

Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I would think it would hurt the home team because people would have to cancel last minute maybe? i dunno

beast (23-Dec) : I agree that it's BS for fans planning on going to the game. But how does it bring in more money? I'm guessing indirectly?

packerfanoutwest (23-Dec) : bs on flexing the game....they do it for the $$league$$, not the hometown fans

Please sign in to use Fan Shout

2024 Packers Schedule

Friday, Sep 6 @ 7:15 PM

Eagles

29 - 34

Sunday, Sep 15 @ 12:00 PM

COLTS

16 - 10

Sunday, Sep 22 @ 12:00 PM

Titans

30 - 14

Sunday, Sep 29 @ 12:00 PM

VIKINGS

29 - 31

Sunday, Oct 6 @ 3:25 PM

Rams

24 - 19

Sunday, Oct 13 @ 12:00 PM

CARDINALS

34 - 13

Sunday, Oct 20 @ 12:00 PM

TEXANS

24 - 22

Sunday, Oct 27 @ 12:00 PM

Jaguars

30 - 27

Sunday, Nov 3 @ 3:25 PM

LIONS

14 - 24

Sunday, Nov 17 @ 12:00 PM

Bears

20 - 19

Sunday, Nov 24 @ 3:25 PM

49ERS

38 - 10

Thursday, Nov 28 @ 7:20 PM

DOLPHINS

30 - 17

Thursday, Dec 5 @ 7:15 PM

Lions

31 - 34

Sunday, Dec 15 @ 7:20 PM

Seahawks

30 - 13

Monday, Dec 23 @ 7:15 PM

SAINTS

34 - 0

Sunday, Dec 29 @ 3:25 PM

Vikings

Saturday, Jan 4 @ 11:00 PM

BEARS