(Rourke?)

"Zero2Cool" wrote:

Another loss this Sunday.. and the Viking may wish that they left the Favre experience at one season. ;)

Brett would rather end the streak on am sure on his own terms.. sitting may qualify as that.

But then that begs the next question.. if he knows he is wrong, going to sit because of his own agenda.. then say suspended for x games (I will believe it when I see it)... would the Vikings at that point have grounds to terminate his contract and recapture some of this seasons wage?

"pack93z" wrote:

So now Brett is saying he could end up sitting down a game or two because of the tendinitis in his elbow. He later says he can play in the game without practricing but get this ... says he needs the reps.

Where the hell was that thinking during training camp? He's sure quick to point out he has no rapport (Rourke?) with the receivers, but again, training camp?


I can't help but wonder, does Brett know he was wrong and is going to get suspended? I wonder that because does he want the record he admits means the most to him to be ended by a suspension? I think not.

Headlines?
Suspension ends Favre's ironman streak at 294.
Favre's ironman streak put to rest, along with his elbow.


Which flavor serves an ego better? Or rather, which headline is less humiliating? An injury is something of the norm, suspension not so much.

"Zero2Cool" wrote:

"pack93z" wrote:

Yep.. I also seen him missing guys and clutching his elbow late as well.. not saying he isn't play well or is...

If the Vikings continue to loss and fall out of the race.. this Brett photo nonsense comes to a suspension and he decides to sit ahead of the suspension to avoid his streak being broken by a suspension..

The Vikings are a team in the red.. last season they dipped hard into the supplemental revenue pool from the NFL to balance the books.. they are not in the position, in my opinion, of a team that can absorb 13 million for a guy the isn't playing, partially due to an off the field issue.

"pack93z" wrote: