Nonstopdrivel
14 years ago

He'll win more than he'll cost ya.

"Zero2Cool wrote:



I'm not convinced that will be the case this year.
UserPostedImage
Formo
14 years ago

Thus, eliminating the writers perspective that Favre is to blame for the loss.

"Zero2Cool" wrote:



How many points did the Vikings lose by and didn't Favre fumble the ball in the end zone that was recovered for a touchdown?

I didn't watch the game, I was watching professional football on CBS. Packers vs Bills.

"Formo" wrote:



Vikings - Dolphins box score on Google. 

"Zero2Cool" wrote:



I should have figured you wouldn't understand it.

Guess I have to explain this a little better for the 'young' crowd.

Vikings lost by 4.
The fumble gave the Dolphins 6 plus 1 on the extra point.
That is a 3 point difference.


The loss was not Brett's fault though. But the loss to the Cardinals in the playoffs last year was Rodgers fault. Right?



Brett cost the Vikings the game, period. He'll win more than he'll cost ya. Come to terms with it and move forward.

"Formo" wrote:



But by that logic, the loss should be pinned on Chilly. He was the one that opted to go for it on 4th and 2 within Longwell's range. That's a potential 10 point swing (because the Phins took the ball and scored on that possession).

I wouldn't put the Packers loss on Rodgers last years' playoff.. I mean, their defense got torched, right? I'd say that's the defenses fault.

EDIT: My original point, before you derail me, was that the loss yesterday can not soley be placed on Favre's shoulders. He deserves a lot of the flak he's getting, but not all of the blame lays on him. Just looking at the stat lines can be deceiving (like the writers perspective on Favre's 4 turnovers), as proven by Rodgers' fumble last year's playoff game, or Favre's INT that bounced off his WRs hands (happened at least once last year, and happened yesterday as well).
UserPostedImage
Thanks to TheViking88 for the sig!!
longtimefan
14 years ago
a loss or win really never should be based on just one guy

but when it comes to Rodgers haters a loss does..

You seen that here you know you have
Zero2Cool
14 years ago

But by that logic, the loss should be pinned on Chilly. He was the one that opted to go for it on 4th and 2 within Longwell's range. That's a potential 10 point swing (because the Phins took the ball and scored on that possession).

I wouldn't put the Packers loss on Rodgers last years' playoff.. I mean, their defense got torched, right? I'd say that's the defenses fault.

EDIT: My original point, before you derail me, was that the loss yesterday can not soley be placed on Favre's shoulders. He deserves a lot of the flak he's getting, but not all of the blame lays on him. Just looking at the stat lines can be deceiving (like the writers perspective on Favre's 4 turnovers), as proven by Rodgers' fumble last year's playoff game, or Favre's INT that bounced off his WRs hands (happened at least once last year, and happened yesterday as well).

"Formo" wrote:



Three interceptions.
One fumble loss that was directly 7 points.
Team lost by 4 points.

If your QB position didn't have four turnovers, YOU WIN THE GAME!


Holy shit you like to argue.
UserPostedImage
Dexter_Sinister
14 years ago
I don't think Favre is responsible for losing the game. He is responsible for playing atrociously. A 44 rating 3 ints and a fumble in the endzone for a TD.

All the Favre fans were saying that they will finally win it this year because Favre will play as well as he did last year. I said that it is more likely for him to have his worst season ever than it would be for him to have his 2 career best years back to back at age 40-41.

I wouldn't be surprised to see a 36+ turnover year with a rating below 70.

The most they should realistically expect is his average year. Mid 80s rating and mid 20s in turnovers.

With their run D failing, the secondary weak, the blocking on the O-line being inconsistent and no wide receiver threats, Favre will struggle to even be average. At his age and lack of mobility, worst ever seem more probable.

Add in the fact that they play something like 7 of the first 9 games against playoff teams from last year. And they already lost to 1 of the 2 that didn't make the playoffs.

A weak splat, softly in the distance, with no meaning or relevance. Out of contention and inconsequential. Favre's swan song will be crickets chirping as some one turns of the Dome lights.
I want to go out like my Grandpa did. Peacefully in his sleep.
Not screaming in terror like his passengers.
Zero2Cool
14 years ago

I don't think Favre is responsible for losing the game. He is responsible for playing atrociously. A 44 rating 3 ints and a fumble in the endzone for a TD.

"Dexter_Sinister" wrote:



Three interceptions.
One lost fumble that gave the opponent 7 points.
They lost by four points.


It's not as if Brett threw 3 TD's that kept them in the game. The Vikings were in the game in SPITE of the play at the QB position.



I don't understand why people continue to make excuses for the man. He's human, he had a bad game and it cost his team. It's not the end of the world. He's also a key reason they won a few of the games last year. First one comes to mind the 49ers game, they won the game because of Brett. Sure, Greg could have dropped the ball, but without Brett's superior pocket presence, that game never gets a W for the Vikings.

It's okay to say they lost because of the QB, just like its okay to say they won because of the QB. Obviously its a team game, but one position sure can make it hard to win the game. That's exactly what happened for the Vikings. The QB did them no favors.

Call it however you wish, but know that the QB position cost the Vikings the game. Stevie Wonder says that was obvious to the naked eye.
UserPostedImage
Formo
14 years ago

But by that logic, the loss should be pinned on Chilly. He was the one that opted to go for it on 4th and 2 within Longwell's range. That's a potential 10 point swing (because the Phins took the ball and scored on that possession).

I wouldn't put the Packers loss on Rodgers last years' playoff.. I mean, their defense got torched, right? I'd say that's the defenses fault.

EDIT: My original point, before you derail me, was that the loss yesterday can not soley be placed on Favre's shoulders. He deserves a lot of the flak he's getting, but not all of the blame lays on him. Just looking at the stat lines can be deceiving (like the writers perspective on Favre's 4 turnovers), as proven by Rodgers' fumble last year's playoff game, or Favre's INT that bounced off his WRs hands (happened at least once last year, and happened yesterday as well).

"Zero2Cool" wrote:



Three interceptions.
One fumble loss that was directly 7 points.
Team lost by 4 points.

If your QB position didn't have four turnovers, YOU WIN THE GAME!


Holy shit you like to argue.

"Formo" wrote:



Sooo..

You are saying that it was soley Rodger's fault the Packers lost last year in the playoffs?
UserPostedImage
Thanks to TheViking88 for the sig!!
Dexter_Sinister
14 years ago

But by that logic, the loss should be pinned on Chilly. He was the one that opted to go for it on 4th and 2 within Longwell's range. That's a potential 10 point swing (because the Phins took the ball and scored on that possession).

I wouldn't put the Packers loss on Rodgers last years' playoff.. I mean, their defense got torched, right? I'd say that's the defenses fault.

EDIT: My original point, before you derail me, was that the loss yesterday can not soley be placed on Favre's shoulders. He deserves a lot of the flak he's getting, but not all of the blame lays on him. Just looking at the stat lines can be deceiving (like the writers perspective on Favre's 4 turnovers), as proven by Rodgers' fumble last year's playoff game, or Favre's INT that bounced off his WRs hands (happened at least once last year, and happened yesterday as well).

"Formo" wrote:



Three interceptions.
One fumble loss that was directly 7 points.
Team lost by 4 points.

If your QB position didn't have four turnovers, YOU WIN THE GAME!


Holy shit you like to argue.

"Zero2Cool" wrote:



Sooo..

You are saying that it was soley Rodger's fault the Packers lost last year in the playoffs?

"Formo" wrote:



If you start with the what ifs and take away mistakes, you could also take away the gift fumbles by Williams and Brown. If the Vikings had not been given the ball on the 2, would they have scored? Take that away and the Vikings scored 3 on their own.
I want to go out like my Grandpa did. Peacefully in his sleep.
Not screaming in terror like his passengers.
Formo
14 years ago

But by that logic, the loss should be pinned on Chilly. He was the one that opted to go for it on 4th and 2 within Longwell's range. That's a potential 10 point swing (because the Phins took the ball and scored on that possession).

I wouldn't put the Packers loss on Rodgers last years' playoff.. I mean, their defense got torched, right? I'd say that's the defenses fault.

EDIT: My original point, before you derail me, was that the loss yesterday can not soley be placed on Favre's shoulders. He deserves a lot of the flak he's getting, but not all of the blame lays on him. Just looking at the stat lines can be deceiving (like the writers perspective on Favre's 4 turnovers), as proven by Rodgers' fumble last year's playoff game, or Favre's INT that bounced off his WRs hands (happened at least once last year, and happened yesterday as well).

"Dexter_Sinister" wrote:



Three interceptions.
One fumble loss that was directly 7 points.
Team lost by 4 points.

If your QB position didn't have four turnovers, YOU WIN THE GAME!


Holy shit you like to argue.

"Formo" wrote:



Sooo..

You are saying that it was soley Rodger's fault the Packers lost last year in the playoffs?

"Zero2Cool" wrote:



If you start with the what ifs and take away mistakes, you could also take away the gift fumbles by Williams and Brown. If the Vikings had not been given the ball on the 2, would they have scored? Take that away and the Vikings scored 3 on their own.

"Formo" wrote:



I'm not playing the 'what if' game. I'm just stating that the loss yesterday (two days ago, officially) can not be blamed soley on Favre.

This is all.
UserPostedImage
Thanks to TheViking88 for the sig!!
Dexter_Sinister
14 years ago

I don't think Favre is responsible for losing the game. He is responsible for playing atrociously. A 44 rating 3 ints and a fumble in the endzone for a TD.

"Zero2Cool" wrote:



Three interceptions.
One lost fumble that gave the opponent 7 points.
They lost by four points.


It's not as if Brett threw 3 TD's that kept them in the game. The Vikings were in the game in SPITE of the play at the QB position.



I don't understand why people continue to make excuses for the man. He's human, he had a bad game and it cost his team. It's not the end of the world. He's also a key reason they won a few of the games last year. First one comes to mind the 49ers game, they won the game because of Brett. Sure, Greg could have dropped the ball, but without Brett's superior pocket presence, that game never gets a W for the Vikings.

It's okay to say they lost because of the QB, just like its okay to say they won because of the QB. Obviously its a team game, but one position sure can make it hard to win the game. That's exactly what happened for the Vikings. The QB did them no favors.

Call it however you wish, but know that the QB position cost the Vikings the game. Stevie Wonder says that was obvious to the naked eye.

"Dexter_Sinister" wrote:



The what ifs don't mean anything. Favre played horribly. But he was not the only one. Peterson could have gotten one more yard. Tahi could have thrown one block. The line could have protected better. Harvin could have caught that pass that was intercepted. The list of IFs is endless.

Favre was not the only guy screwing up out there. He is only responsible for his own play. He is responsible for waving off the FG unit and blowing it on 4th down from comfortable field goal range. For missing camp and not having timing. For throwing into double coverage, late and behind receivers. For not getting rid of the ball in the endzone. But it took all 53 of them to lose. Plus all of the coaches.
I want to go out like my Grandpa did. Peacefully in his sleep.
Not screaming in terror like his passengers.
Fan Shout
Mucky Tundra (2h) : Will there be a tracker on the ball or something?
Zero2Cool (5h) : uh oh
Martha Careful (5h) : Too bad camera's can't spot the ball as well.
Mucky Tundra (7h) : So will the chain gang be gone completely or will they still be around as a backup or whatever?
Zero2Cool (8h) : The method for measuring first downs in the NFL will switch from chain gangs to camera-based technology in 2025, the league announced.
Martha Careful (11h) : A big step in the right direction. Just put in the college system is very very good.
Zero2Cool (13h) : NFL has passed a rule that allows both teams to possess the ball in OT during the regular season
Zero2Cool (13h) : Touchbacks on kickoffs will now bring the ball to the 35-yard line.
beast (31-Mar) : It might of gotten more popular recently, but braiding hair (even men) in certain cultures goes back for centuries.
Martha Careful (30-Mar) : Is men braiding their hair a new style thing? Watching the NCAA men's tournament many players have done
Zero2Cool (29-Mar) : Ha. Well, it'd be nice for folks to reset their own password. Via validated email 😏
beast (29-Mar) : Monopoly was supposed to be an educational game, that show how evil capitalism was and how we should avoid it
beast (29-Mar) : Lol, I was thinking username would be better, as then I wouldn't have to keep an email up to date lol 😂
beast (29-Mar) : Zero2Cool (25-Mar) : I was thinking email because I think it'll make folks keep it up todate lol
wpr (29-Mar) : sure is
Zero2Cool (29-Mar) : Monopoly is a rip off of The Landlord's Game
wpr (27-Mar) : 28 days until the draft
earthquake (27-Mar) : Which seemed strange to my 9 year old self, that you could be a fan for a team other than the one you play for
earthquake (27-Mar) : Nothing eventful happened, other than it being clear that he was a bengals fan
earthquake (27-Mar) : And we went and hung out with him one afternoon, I must have been 9 or so
earthquake (27-Mar) : That’s wild, when I was a kid my friend lived in the same apartment complex in De Pere
Mucky Tundra (27-Mar) : Only career highspot was a 200 yard rushing game while playing for the Cardinals
Mucky Tundra (27-Mar) : He is a former Packer. Drafted out of Northern Illinois. Didn't do much in GB.
dfosterf (26-Mar) : Despicable
Zero2Cool (26-Mar) : Former NFL. I think Packers too
Zero2Cool (26-Mar) : NFL RB Leshon Johnson has been charged in a massive dog fighting operation, with the FBI seizing over 190 Pit Bulls
Mucky Tundra (26-Mar) : Some real irony of a QB as short as Wilson playing for the Giants
Mucky Tundra (26-Mar) : Giants country, let's be the tall beings of lore!
Mucky Tundra (26-Mar) : Russell Wilson signs with the Giants.
Zero2Cool (25-Mar) : I was thinking email because I think it'll make folks keep it up todate lol
wpr (25-Mar) : I don't think there is a significant difference. I use a user name for many. Others email.
Martha Careful (25-Mar) : email
Zero2Cool (25-Mar) : would it be better to use EMAIL or USERNAME to log into a site?
wpr (25-Mar) : Thanks Zero
Zero2Cool (24-Mar) : New forum has the ability to Thank a post now.
beast (24-Mar) : And the only time they have won the Championship in an even year, was the first time they did, in 2006.
beast (24-Mar) : Since 2007, there have been 10 odd numbered years, Wisconsin Women have won the Championship in 7 of those 10 odd numbered years.
buckeyepackfan (24-Mar) : Congratulations Lady Badger Hockey Team. NATIONAL CHAMPIONS!!
Zero2Cool (23-Mar) : I don't think it's completed yet. it was just announced last month, right?
dhazer (23-Mar) : did netflix ever release the Packers documentary
Zero2Cool (21-Mar) : And it is glorious!
beast (21-Mar) : Unsigned FA QB Rodgers is supposedly in the Steelers building
Martha Careful (19-Mar) : But I don't own a car! So can I still use it in my apartment?
Zero2Cool (19-Mar) : btw, new site auto updates
Zero2Cool (19-Mar) : Woohoo!
TheKanataThrilla (19-Mar) : Oops I guess I should have updated the site before posting
TheKanataThrilla (19-Mar) : Jeremy Fowler @JFowlerESPN · Follow Source: Free agent WR/return specialist Mecole Hardman is signing with the #Packers on a one-year deal.
Zero2Cool (18-Mar) : Former Packers wide receiver Bob Long, who stayed in Wisconsin after playing days, dies at age 83
Martha Careful (17-Mar) : PFOW, Pati O'Furniture
wpr (17-Mar) : Thanks dfosterf. Been a while since I heard the song.
Please sign in to use Fan Shout
2024 Packers Schedule
Friday, Sep 6 @ 7:15 PM
Eagles
Sunday, Sep 15 @ 12:00 PM
COLTS
Sunday, Sep 22 @ 12:00 PM
Titans
Sunday, Sep 29 @ 12:00 PM
VIKINGS
Sunday, Oct 6 @ 3:25 PM
Rams
Sunday, Oct 13 @ 12:00 PM
CARDINALS
Sunday, Oct 20 @ 12:00 PM
TEXANS
Sunday, Oct 27 @ 12:00 PM
Jaguars
Sunday, Nov 3 @ 3:25 PM
LIONS
Sunday, Nov 17 @ 12:00 PM
Bears
Sunday, Nov 24 @ 3:25 PM
49ERS
Thursday, Nov 28 @ 7:20 PM
DOLPHINS
Thursday, Dec 5 @ 7:15 PM
Lions
Sunday, Dec 15 @ 7:20 PM
Seahawks
Monday, Dec 23 @ 7:15 PM
SAINTS
Sunday, Dec 29 @ 3:25 PM
Vikings
Sunday, Jan 5 @ 12:00 PM
BEARS
Sunday, Jan 12 @ 3:30 PM
Eagles
Recent Topics
7h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Mucky Tundra

9h / Green Bay Packers Talk / wpr

31-Mar / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

30-Mar / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

29-Mar / Random Babble / wpr

28-Mar / Feedback, Suggestions and Issues / dfosterf

28-Mar / Random Babble / Martha Careful

26-Mar / Random Babble / Mucky Tundra

25-Mar / Random Babble / Martha Careful

24-Mar / Random Babble / packerfanoutwest

24-Mar / Random Babble / Zero2Cool

21-Mar / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

19-Mar / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

19-Mar / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

18-Mar / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

Headlines
Copyright © 2006 - 2025 PackersHome.com™. All Rights Reserved.