Nonstopdrivel
14 years ago

He'll win more than he'll cost ya.

"Zero2Cool wrote:



I'm not convinced that will be the case this year.
UserPostedImage
Formo
14 years ago

Thus, eliminating the writers perspective that Favre is to blame for the loss.

"Zero2Cool" wrote:



How many points did the Vikings lose by and didn't Favre fumble the ball in the end zone that was recovered for a touchdown?

I didn't watch the game, I was watching professional football on CBS. Packers vs Bills.

"Formo" wrote:



Vikings - Dolphins box score on Google. 

"Zero2Cool" wrote:



I should have figured you wouldn't understand it.

Guess I have to explain this a little better for the 'young' crowd.

Vikings lost by 4.
The fumble gave the Dolphins 6 plus 1 on the extra point.
That is a 3 point difference.


The loss was not Brett's fault though. But the loss to the Cardinals in the playoffs last year was Rodgers fault. Right?



Brett cost the Vikings the game, period. He'll win more than he'll cost ya. Come to terms with it and move forward.

"Formo" wrote:



But by that logic, the loss should be pinned on Chilly. He was the one that opted to go for it on 4th and 2 within Longwell's range. That's a potential 10 point swing (because the Phins took the ball and scored on that possession).

I wouldn't put the Packers loss on Rodgers last years' playoff.. I mean, their defense got torched, right? I'd say that's the defenses fault.

EDIT: My original point, before you derail me, was that the loss yesterday can not soley be placed on Favre's shoulders. He deserves a lot of the flak he's getting, but not all of the blame lays on him. Just looking at the stat lines can be deceiving (like the writers perspective on Favre's 4 turnovers), as proven by Rodgers' fumble last year's playoff game, or Favre's INT that bounced off his WRs hands (happened at least once last year, and happened yesterday as well).
UserPostedImage
Thanks to TheViking88 for the sig!!
longtimefan
14 years ago
a loss or win really never should be based on just one guy

but when it comes to Rodgers haters a loss does..

You seen that here you know you have
Zero2Cool
14 years ago

But by that logic, the loss should be pinned on Chilly. He was the one that opted to go for it on 4th and 2 within Longwell's range. That's a potential 10 point swing (because the Phins took the ball and scored on that possession).

I wouldn't put the Packers loss on Rodgers last years' playoff.. I mean, their defense got torched, right? I'd say that's the defenses fault.

EDIT: My original point, before you derail me, was that the loss yesterday can not soley be placed on Favre's shoulders. He deserves a lot of the flak he's getting, but not all of the blame lays on him. Just looking at the stat lines can be deceiving (like the writers perspective on Favre's 4 turnovers), as proven by Rodgers' fumble last year's playoff game, or Favre's INT that bounced off his WRs hands (happened at least once last year, and happened yesterday as well).

"Formo" wrote:



Three interceptions.
One fumble loss that was directly 7 points.
Team lost by 4 points.

If your QB position didn't have four turnovers, YOU WIN THE GAME!


Holy shit you like to argue.
UserPostedImage
Dexter_Sinister
14 years ago
I don't think Favre is responsible for losing the game. He is responsible for playing atrociously. A 44 rating 3 ints and a fumble in the endzone for a TD.

All the Favre fans were saying that they will finally win it this year because Favre will play as well as he did last year. I said that it is more likely for him to have his worst season ever than it would be for him to have his 2 career best years back to back at age 40-41.

I wouldn't be surprised to see a 36+ turnover year with a rating below 70.

The most they should realistically expect is his average year. Mid 80s rating and mid 20s in turnovers.

With their run D failing, the secondary weak, the blocking on the O-line being inconsistent and no wide receiver threats, Favre will struggle to even be average. At his age and lack of mobility, worst ever seem more probable.

Add in the fact that they play something like 7 of the first 9 games against playoff teams from last year. And they already lost to 1 of the 2 that didn't make the playoffs.

A weak splat, softly in the distance, with no meaning or relevance. Out of contention and inconsequential. Favre's swan song will be crickets chirping as some one turns of the Dome lights.
I want to go out like my Grandpa did. Peacefully in his sleep.
Not screaming in terror like his passengers.
Zero2Cool
14 years ago

I don't think Favre is responsible for losing the game. He is responsible for playing atrociously. A 44 rating 3 ints and a fumble in the endzone for a TD.

"Dexter_Sinister" wrote:



Three interceptions.
One lost fumble that gave the opponent 7 points.
They lost by four points.


It's not as if Brett threw 3 TD's that kept them in the game. The Vikings were in the game in SPITE of the play at the QB position.



I don't understand why people continue to make excuses for the man. He's human, he had a bad game and it cost his team. It's not the end of the world. He's also a key reason they won a few of the games last year. First one comes to mind the 49ers game, they won the game because of Brett. Sure, Greg could have dropped the ball, but without Brett's superior pocket presence, that game never gets a W for the Vikings.

It's okay to say they lost because of the QB, just like its okay to say they won because of the QB. Obviously its a team game, but one position sure can make it hard to win the game. That's exactly what happened for the Vikings. The QB did them no favors.

Call it however you wish, but know that the QB position cost the Vikings the game. Stevie Wonder says that was obvious to the naked eye.
UserPostedImage
Formo
14 years ago

But by that logic, the loss should be pinned on Chilly. He was the one that opted to go for it on 4th and 2 within Longwell's range. That's a potential 10 point swing (because the Phins took the ball and scored on that possession).

I wouldn't put the Packers loss on Rodgers last years' playoff.. I mean, their defense got torched, right? I'd say that's the defenses fault.

EDIT: My original point, before you derail me, was that the loss yesterday can not soley be placed on Favre's shoulders. He deserves a lot of the flak he's getting, but not all of the blame lays on him. Just looking at the stat lines can be deceiving (like the writers perspective on Favre's 4 turnovers), as proven by Rodgers' fumble last year's playoff game, or Favre's INT that bounced off his WRs hands (happened at least once last year, and happened yesterday as well).

"Zero2Cool" wrote:



Three interceptions.
One fumble loss that was directly 7 points.
Team lost by 4 points.

If your QB position didn't have four turnovers, YOU WIN THE GAME!


Holy shit you like to argue.

"Formo" wrote:



Sooo..

You are saying that it was soley Rodger's fault the Packers lost last year in the playoffs?
UserPostedImage
Thanks to TheViking88 for the sig!!
Dexter_Sinister
14 years ago

But by that logic, the loss should be pinned on Chilly. He was the one that opted to go for it on 4th and 2 within Longwell's range. That's a potential 10 point swing (because the Phins took the ball and scored on that possession).

I wouldn't put the Packers loss on Rodgers last years' playoff.. I mean, their defense got torched, right? I'd say that's the defenses fault.

EDIT: My original point, before you derail me, was that the loss yesterday can not soley be placed on Favre's shoulders. He deserves a lot of the flak he's getting, but not all of the blame lays on him. Just looking at the stat lines can be deceiving (like the writers perspective on Favre's 4 turnovers), as proven by Rodgers' fumble last year's playoff game, or Favre's INT that bounced off his WRs hands (happened at least once last year, and happened yesterday as well).

"Formo" wrote:



Three interceptions.
One fumble loss that was directly 7 points.
Team lost by 4 points.

If your QB position didn't have four turnovers, YOU WIN THE GAME!


Holy shit you like to argue.

"Zero2Cool" wrote:



Sooo..

You are saying that it was soley Rodger's fault the Packers lost last year in the playoffs?

"Formo" wrote:



If you start with the what ifs and take away mistakes, you could also take away the gift fumbles by Williams and Brown. If the Vikings had not been given the ball on the 2, would they have scored? Take that away and the Vikings scored 3 on their own.
I want to go out like my Grandpa did. Peacefully in his sleep.
Not screaming in terror like his passengers.
Formo
14 years ago

But by that logic, the loss should be pinned on Chilly. He was the one that opted to go for it on 4th and 2 within Longwell's range. That's a potential 10 point swing (because the Phins took the ball and scored on that possession).

I wouldn't put the Packers loss on Rodgers last years' playoff.. I mean, their defense got torched, right? I'd say that's the defenses fault.

EDIT: My original point, before you derail me, was that the loss yesterday can not soley be placed on Favre's shoulders. He deserves a lot of the flak he's getting, but not all of the blame lays on him. Just looking at the stat lines can be deceiving (like the writers perspective on Favre's 4 turnovers), as proven by Rodgers' fumble last year's playoff game, or Favre's INT that bounced off his WRs hands (happened at least once last year, and happened yesterday as well).

"Dexter_Sinister" wrote:



Three interceptions.
One fumble loss that was directly 7 points.
Team lost by 4 points.

If your QB position didn't have four turnovers, YOU WIN THE GAME!


Holy shit you like to argue.

"Formo" wrote:



Sooo..

You are saying that it was soley Rodger's fault the Packers lost last year in the playoffs?

"Zero2Cool" wrote:



If you start with the what ifs and take away mistakes, you could also take away the gift fumbles by Williams and Brown. If the Vikings had not been given the ball on the 2, would they have scored? Take that away and the Vikings scored 3 on their own.

"Formo" wrote:



I'm not playing the 'what if' game. I'm just stating that the loss yesterday (two days ago, officially) can not be blamed soley on Favre.

This is all.
UserPostedImage
Thanks to TheViking88 for the sig!!
Dexter_Sinister
14 years ago

I don't think Favre is responsible for losing the game. He is responsible for playing atrociously. A 44 rating 3 ints and a fumble in the endzone for a TD.

"Zero2Cool" wrote:



Three interceptions.
One lost fumble that gave the opponent 7 points.
They lost by four points.


It's not as if Brett threw 3 TD's that kept them in the game. The Vikings were in the game in SPITE of the play at the QB position.



I don't understand why people continue to make excuses for the man. He's human, he had a bad game and it cost his team. It's not the end of the world. He's also a key reason they won a few of the games last year. First one comes to mind the 49ers game, they won the game because of Brett. Sure, Greg could have dropped the ball, but without Brett's superior pocket presence, that game never gets a W for the Vikings.

It's okay to say they lost because of the QB, just like its okay to say they won because of the QB. Obviously its a team game, but one position sure can make it hard to win the game. That's exactly what happened for the Vikings. The QB did them no favors.

Call it however you wish, but know that the QB position cost the Vikings the game. Stevie Wonder says that was obvious to the naked eye.

"Dexter_Sinister" wrote:



The what ifs don't mean anything. Favre played horribly. But he was not the only one. Peterson could have gotten one more yard. Tahi could have thrown one block. The line could have protected better. Harvin could have caught that pass that was intercepted. The list of IFs is endless.

Favre was not the only guy screwing up out there. He is only responsible for his own play. He is responsible for waving off the FG unit and blowing it on 4th down from comfortable field goal range. For missing camp and not having timing. For throwing into double coverage, late and behind receivers. For not getting rid of the ball in the endzone. But it took all 53 of them to lose. Plus all of the coaches.
I want to go out like my Grandpa did. Peacefully in his sleep.
Not screaming in terror like his passengers.
Fan Shout
beast (15m) : That way teams like Indiana and SMU don't make the conference championships by simply avoiding all the other good teams in their own confere
beast (16m) : Also, with these "Super Conferences" instead of a single conference champion, have 4 teams make a Conference playoffs.
beast (17m) : Also in college football, is a bye week a good or bad thing?
Martha Careful (4h) : The tournament format was fine. Seeding could use some work.
beast (4h) : You can't assume Ohio State would of won the Michigan game...
beast (4h) : Rankings were 1) Oregon 2) Georgia 3) Texas 4) Penn State 5) Notre Dame 6) Ohio State, none of the rest mattered
wpr (6h) : Texas, ND and OSU would have been fighting for the final 2 slots.
wpr (6h) : Oregon and Georgia were locks. Without the luxury of extra playoff berths, Ohios St would have been more focused on Michigan game.
wpr (6h) : Zero, no. If there were only 4 teams Ohio State would have been one of them. Boise St and ASU would not have been selected.
Zero2Cool (9h) : So that was 7 vs 8, that means in BCS they never would made it?
Martha Careful (10h) : A great game. Give ND credit for coming back, although I am please with the outcome.
Mucky Tundra (17h) : FG to make it academic
Mucky Tundra (17h) : and there's the dagger
Mucky Tundra (17h) : ooooo 8 point game with 4 minutes to go!
Mucky Tundra (18h) : ooooooooohhhhhh he missed!
Mucky Tundra (18h) : Ooooo that completion makes things VERY interesting
Mucky Tundra (18h) : Game not over yet
beast (19h) : Oh yeah, Georgia starting quarterback season ending elbow injury
beast (19h) : Sadly something happened to Georgia... they should be playing in this game against Ohio State
beast (19h) : I thought Ohio State and Texas were both better than Notre Dame & Penn State
Mucky Tundra (19h) : Notre Lame getting rolled
Martha Careful (20h) : Ohio State just got punched in the gut. Lets see how they respond
Mucky Tundra (20h) : Notre Lame vs the Luckeyes, bleh
Mucky Tundra (20h) : Oh snap!!!
Zero2Cool (20h) : Even Stevie Wonder can see that.
Zero2Cool (20h) : Nah, you see Lions OC leaving to be HC of Bears is directly related to Packers.
Mucky Tundra (21h) : ohhhhhhh Zero is in TROUBLE
packerfanoutwest (21h) : Zero, per your orders, check Bearshome, not packershome
Zero2Cool (23h) : Then he'll land with another team and flourish.
Zero2Cool (23h) : Ben going to Bears. He'll be out in 3 years.
Mucky Tundra (20-Jan) : what's so funny?
Zero2Cool (20-Jan) : BAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
Zero2Cool (20-Jan) : Bears are finalizing a deal to hire Ben Johnson as their head coach. (via @tompelissero )
Mucky Tundra (20-Jan) : Looks like Lions OC Ben Johnson is going to be the Bears coach
Mucky Tundra (20-Jan) : TD but another failed 2 pt conversion!
Mucky Tundra (20-Jan) : Ravens still alive, but barely
Mucky Tundra (19-Jan) : Or not...BUT THAT CATCH BY NACUA
Mucky Tundra (19-Jan) : WE MAY HAVE BEEN PREMATURE KANATA
TheKanataThrilla (19-Jan) : Time to make dinner
TheKanataThrilla (19-Jan) : Ouch!!!! Dagger for the Eagles
Mucky Tundra (19-Jan) : DAGGER
TheKanataThrilla (19-Jan) : pass plays
TheKanataThrilla (19-Jan) : Seems some of their passes are too deep. Reminds me of MLF as well.
Mucky Tundra (19-Jan) : Oren Burks with a clutch pass break up...I will now light myself on fire
Mucky Tundra (19-Jan) : a run on 2nd down and 17 from McVay? So that's where MLF gets it from!
Mucky Tundra (19-Jan) : Do or die time for the Rams
TheKanataThrilla (19-Jan) : Kicking field goals are impressive
Mucky Tundra (19-Jan) : Oh that might be a backbreaker
Mucky Tundra (19-Jan) : That's what I thought too, just wasn't sure
TheKanataThrilla (19-Jan) : Kicking doesn't make much sense
Please sign in to use Fan Shout
2024 Packers Schedule
Friday, Sep 6 @ 7:15 PM
Eagles
Sunday, Sep 15 @ 12:00 PM
COLTS
Sunday, Sep 22 @ 12:00 PM
Titans
Sunday, Sep 29 @ 12:00 PM
VIKINGS
Sunday, Oct 6 @ 3:25 PM
Rams
Sunday, Oct 13 @ 12:00 PM
CARDINALS
Sunday, Oct 20 @ 12:00 PM
TEXANS
Sunday, Oct 27 @ 12:00 PM
Jaguars
Sunday, Nov 3 @ 3:25 PM
LIONS
Sunday, Nov 17 @ 12:00 PM
Bears
Sunday, Nov 24 @ 3:25 PM
49ERS
Thursday, Nov 28 @ 7:20 PM
DOLPHINS
Thursday, Dec 5 @ 7:15 PM
Lions
Sunday, Dec 15 @ 7:20 PM
Seahawks
Monday, Dec 23 @ 7:15 PM
SAINTS
Sunday, Dec 29 @ 3:25 PM
Vikings
Sunday, Jan 5 @ 12:00 PM
BEARS
Sunday, Jan 12 @ 3:30 PM
Eagles
Recent Topics
1h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Mucky Tundra

1h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Mucky Tundra

7h / Green Bay Packers Talk / bboystyle

23h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Martha Careful

20-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / bboystyle

20-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

20-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

19-Jan / Random Babble / Martha Careful

18-Jan / Random Babble / packerfanoutwest

18-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

17-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / bboystyle

17-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

17-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / Martha Careful

16-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / Mucky Tundra

16-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

Copyright © 2006 - 2025 PackersHome.com™. All Rights Reserved.