yooperfan
15 years ago
Kudos to the scouting staff for doing their due diligence regarding the 2009 draft.
doddpower
15 years ago
Most draft picks are gambles. Not sure what you're getting at there. Percy Harvin was a definite gamble, as well as Adrian Peterson. Look at how many players never pan out at all. Our how about Donald Driver? Clifton? I could keep going on. Fact of the matter is, most players are a gamble, and you hope they pan out. Thompson is NOT the only one that "gambles," in your words.

Now, I will give you the Harrell pick (thank you NonStop for finally correcting that spelling). I didn't like it at the time and still don't. However, one bust of that manner is acceptable with as many hits as he has. I can definitely live with it. I think Thompson has learned from it as well, and that's all you can really ask.
go.pack.go.
15 years ago
Finally a positive thread about Ted Thompson.....

I have always thought good about TT. Finally others are starting to realize it. Now, just to convince dhazer and Gravedigga.
UserPostedImage
yooperfan
15 years ago
Nobody will ever convice me that there is anything positive about Ted Thompson, even up to my last dying breath.
And lest you think about my feelings being all about letting any QB we ever let go; sorry I was way ahead of him on that one.
Kudos to Ted Thompson for that.
Nonstopdrivel
15 years ago
It must really suck to stubbornly root against the general manager who has this team poised on the brink of its second playoff run in three seasons. I wonder how many other teams have been so fortunate in the past three years.

Then again, I'm not a big fan of our head coach, so what do I know.
UserPostedImage
Zero2Cool
15 years ago

It must really suck to stubbornly root against the general manager who has this team poised on the brink of its second playoff run in three seasons. I wonder how many other teams have been so fortunate in the past three years.

Then again, I'm not a big fan of our head coach, so what do I know.

"Nonstopdrivel" wrote:

I think hatred is easier to deal with than rooting for something and having to deal with the pain of failure. So, why not just hate to avoid the hardship? Maybe ...
UserPostedImage
zombieslayer
15 years ago

Finally a positive thread about Ted Thompson.....

I have always thought good about Ted Thompson. Finally others are starting to realize it. Now, just to convince dhazer and Gravedigga.

"go.pack.go." wrote:



I try to look at things objectively. He has had bad years, and I'll rightfully criticize him when he does.

2009 was an A year. If he keeps doing years like '09, I'll like him.
My man Donald Driver
UserPostedImage
(thanks to Pack93z for the pic)
2010 will be seen as the beginning of the new Packers dynasty. 🇹🇹 🇲🇲 🇦🇷
LambeauEast
15 years ago
You can't hit on everything, but I feel we are in good hands with Ted, minus a few clunkers here and there!
UserPostedImage
Fan Shout
Zero2Cool (26m) : I see what you did there Mucky
Zero2Cool (26m) : dammit. 3:25pm
Zero2Cool (26m) : Packers Vikings flexed to 3:35pm
Mucky Tundra (34m) : Upon receiving the news about Luke Musgrave, I immediately fell to the ground
Mucky Tundra (34m) : Yeah baby!
Zero2Cool (55m) : LUKE MUSGRAVE PLAYING TONIGHT~!~~~~WOWHOAAOHAOAA yah
Zero2Cool (2h) : I wanna kill new QB's ... blitz the crap out of them.
beast (2h) : Barry seemed to get too conservative against new QBs, Hafley doesn't have that issue
Zero2Cool (3h) : However, we seem to struggle vs new QB's
Zero2Cool (3h) : Should be moot point, cuz Packers should win tonight.
packerfanoutwest (3h) : ok I stand corrected
Zero2Cool (3h) : Ok, yes, you are right. I see that now how they get 7th
Zero2Cool (3h) : 5th - Packers win out, Vikings lose out. Maybe?
beast (3h) : Saying no to the 6th lock.
beast (3h) : No, with the Commanders beating the Eagles, Packers could have a good chance of 6th or 7th unless the win out
Zero2Cool (3h) : I think if Packers win, they are locked 6th with chance for 5th.
beast (3h) : But it doesn't matter, as the Packers win surely win one of their remaining games
beast (3h) : This is not complex, just someone doesn't want to believe reality
beast (3h) : We already have told you... if Packers lose all their games (they won't, but if they did), and Buccaneers and Falcons win all theirs
Zero2Cool (3h) : I posted it in that Packers and 1 seed thread
Zero2Cool (3h) : I literally just said it.
packerfanoutwest (3h) : show us a scenario where Pack don't get in? bet you can't
Zero2Cool (3h) : Falcons, Buccaneers would need to win final two games.
Zero2Cool (3h) : Yes, if they win one of three, they are lock. If they lose out, they can be eliminated.
packerfanoutwest (3h) : as I just said,,gtheyh are in no matter what
Zero2Cool (3h) : Packers should get in. I just hope it's not 7th seed. Feels dirty.
packerfanoutwest (3h) : If packers lose out, no matter what, they are in
packerfanoutwest (3h) : both teams can not male the playoffs....falcon hold the tie breaker
packerfanoutwest (3h) : if bucs win out they win their division
beast (4h) : Fine, Buccaneers and Falcons can get ahead of us
packerfanoutwest (4h) : falcons are already ahead of us
beast (4h) : Packers will get in
beast (4h) : If Packers lose the rest of their games and Falcons win the rest of theirs, they could pass us... but not gonna happen
packerfanoutwest (4h) : they still are in the playoffs
packerfanoutwest (4h) : If Packers lose the remaining games,,,,at 10-7
Zero2Cool (5h) : We can say it. We don't play.
Mucky Tundra (7h) : But to say they are in is looking past the Saints
Mucky Tundra (7h) : That said, their odds are very favorable with a >99% chance of making the playoffs entering this week's games
Mucky Tundra (7h) : Packers are not in and have not clinched a playoff spot.
buckeyepackfan (8h) : Packers are in, they need to keep winning to improve their seed#.
Mucky Tundra (16h) : Getting help would have been nice, but helping ourselves should always be the plan
beast (17h) : Too bad Seahawks couldn't beat Vikings
bboystyle (17h) : We just need to win Monday night and were in
Mucky Tundra (20h) : Or ties, but let's be real here
Mucky Tundra (20h) : Other scenario was Falcons+Rams losses
Mucky Tundra (20h) : Needed a Falcons loss for a Seahawk loss to clinch
buckeyepackfan (21h) : Am I wring in saying if Tge Vikings beat The Seahawks, The Packers clinch?
Mucky Tundra (21-Dec) : Agreed; you stinks
Zero2Cool (21-Dec) : I'm not beating anyone. I stinks.
Mucky Tundra (21-Dec) : rough injury for tank dell. guy can't catch abreak
Please sign in to use Fan Shout
2024 Packers Schedule
Friday, Sep 6 @ 7:15 PM
Eagles
Sunday, Sep 15 @ 12:00 PM
COLTS
Sunday, Sep 22 @ 12:00 PM
Titans
Sunday, Sep 29 @ 12:00 PM
VIKINGS
Sunday, Oct 6 @ 3:25 PM
Rams
Sunday, Oct 13 @ 12:00 PM
CARDINALS
Sunday, Oct 20 @ 12:00 PM
TEXANS
Sunday, Oct 27 @ 12:00 PM
Jaguars
Sunday, Nov 3 @ 3:25 PM
LIONS
Sunday, Nov 17 @ 12:00 PM
Bears
Sunday, Nov 24 @ 3:25 PM
49ERS
Thursday, Nov 28 @ 7:20 PM
DOLPHINS
Thursday, Dec 5 @ 7:15 PM
Lions
Sunday, Dec 15 @ 7:20 PM
Seahawks
Monday, Dec 23 @ 7:15 PM
SAINTS
Sunday, Dec 29 @ 3:25 PM
Vikings
Saturday, Jan 4 @ 11:00 PM
BEARS
Recent Topics
1h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

2h / Random Babble / Martha Careful

2h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Martha Careful

22-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / packerfanoutwest

19-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

19-Dec / Random Babble / Zero2Cool

18-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

17-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / wpr

17-Dec / Featured Content / Zero2Cool

16-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

16-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / Martha Careful

16-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

16-Dec / Feedback, Suggestions and Issues / Mucky Tundra

16-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

16-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

Headlines
Copyright © 2006 - 2024 PackersHome.com™. All Rights Reserved.