Cheesey, the trophies themselves aren't lame.. Just the fact that the argument (or discussion) always resorts back to the empty trophy case the Vikings have (I'm pretty sure they give out an NFC Champions trophy, actually).
It's, in our eyes as Viking fans, the lamest comment we get. It's too easy to use that as a discussion point. And, in my opinion, it should be the last resort comment Packer fans use when in a 'discussion'. lol
"Formo" wrote:
1. The trophies themselves are not lame, nor what they represent, which seems to be missing from your lame argument.
2. The argument is ever-so-slightly lame, but you have to be in a position to make the argument for authorization to credibly critique it. Come talk to us if you are ever in a position to do so from a winner's perspective.
3. The NFC Championship trophy is so lame...I think it's actually an ice-sculpture... We don't count those in Green Bay, (I heard we keep ours in a walk-in freezer at St. Norbert College-something about a brisk tourist trade from Minnesota or something) I can see why the Lamekings and their fans would get excited about 'em, however.
4. It is so incredibly easy (and noticeably convenient) for Viking fans to call the Packer fans comments lame than it is to absorb the lameness of the team they root for, hence Viking fans comments about the lameness of our comments is the very definition of lameness, only exceeded by the hyper-extreme lameness of their mutual agreement that our comments are lame.
Thought I'd clear that up for ya. btw--Vikings fans are so lame that they don't even know that when we start talking about those 3 Super Bowl trophies... we are just being nice. We can go all the way to 12 with our argument, my theory being that we refrain from doing so because it is a concept that would appear as something akin to star-travel to your typical queen fan, so I'm not going there, much like you ain't fillin' any case with any trophy.
:tongue3: