OFFICIAL [Match-Up] Dallas at Green Bay· Page 7

zombieslayer
Registered

15 years ago

#61

Damn. I was really hoping we'd get our 2nd shutout against the Cows.

My man Donald Driver

(thanks to Pack93z for the pic)
2010 will be seen as the beginning of the new Packers dynasty. 🇹🇹 🇲🇲 🇦🇷

Cheesey
Preferred Member

15 years ago

#62

Me too.....but a junk TD doesn't bother me. We didn't give up ANY big plays. Not on D, or special teams.
I'm proud of how they gave it 110% today!
If they can keep that attitude, we have a realistic shot at the wild card.

Zero2Cool
Elite Member Topic Starter

15 years ago

#63

By the way, this is the first time I've picked against the Packers all year. That says a lot.

"Zero2Cool" wrote:

Yeah, it says you care more about being right than being a fan. 🙂

I pick the Packers, every week. I even picked them during the bye week. That's how I roll. I'm a fan, through good and bad. Always rooting for them, always picking them to win. :downtown:

"Nonstopdrivel" wrote:

tonyagnese
Registered

15 years ago

#64

What a great, great win. Helluva game by Woodson, though you expect nothing less from the top CB in the NFL.

blank

IronMan
Veteran Member

15 years ago

#65

Post game press conference:

http://www.packers.com/multimedia/packers_on_air_schedule/

Nonstopdrivel
Preferred Member

15 years ago

#66

I need to pick against the Packers more often. My prediction wasn't even in the correct galaxy, much less the right star system.

By the way, anyone else have the thought that Aaron Kampmann's ticket out of Green Bay might have been signed and dated today?

Rockmolder
Honored Member

15 years ago

#67

Absolutely the most enjoyable game that I've ever seen.

This was one of the best defensive efforts from the Packers in quite a while. I really, really hope to see this more often. 5 sacks, some crazy blitzes, constant pressure... it's like a fricken' dream come true.

Rockmolder
Honored Member

15 years ago

#68

"Nonstopdrivel" wrote:

What I noticed is this.

We went with a lot more exotic blitzes. I think to cover up for Kampman not being in there and not having that designated DE/OLB. I don't think that Dallas was expecting that.

This was the 'playfull' defense that we saw in pre-season. A lot of unorthodox blitzing, people coming up from the secondary.

I don't think that Kampman is a real liability, I just think that Capers overrates him. Left without a choice, we brought multiple people. I just hope that we keep this going once Kampman does get back.

Okay, rehashed that from another thread, but it fit so nicely.

I think that Kampman's ticket out of Green Bay was stamped quite a while ago. I really do think that he'll be gone in the off-season and that we'll just draft another DE/OLB prospect. It's a shame, but he's just not fitting in that well. The defense performing so well without him just magnifies it.

Like I said, though, he's not a liability, but he's not that good either in this system.

Nonstopdrivel
Preferred Member

15 years ago

#69

Packers beat Cowboys 17-7 to snap win streak

Provided by PA Sports

Written on November 15, 2009

GREEN BAY, Wis.(AP) Charles Woodson helped Green Bays defense
finally play up to its potential against a big-time opponent,
forcing two fumbles and picking off a pass by Tony Romo on the
goal line in a 17-7 victory over the Dallas Cowboys on Sunday.

It wasnt a pretty win for the Packers (5-4), but it might have
saved their season after back-to-back demoralizing losses.

The Packers sacked Romo five times and held him to 251 yards
passing in a momentum- killer for the Cowboys (6-3), who had won
four straight. Dallas also lost starting right tackle Marc
Colombo to a broken left leg.

Aaron Rodgers scored on a quarterback sneak and threw a
touchdown pass to tight end Spencer Havner.

For this article to already be in Google, BleacherReport.com must be a much more prominent website than I realized. Google gives priority to news-oriented sites when it spiders the web, but I always considered BR to be mostly a fan-run site.

Nonstopdrivel
Preferred Member

15 years ago

#70

One thing that did concern me about this game was how skinny Rodgers looked. He came into the season looking like he'd gained a significant amount of weight over the previous year, but as the weeks have gone on, he seems to be losing it. Compared to, say, Romo, he looks about as big as a college quarterback. Obviously he isn't, but his lithe appearance makes him seem fragile compared to some of the guys out there.

Maybe it isn't possible in the rigors of a full NFL season, but I'd like to see him bulk up a little over the next few weeks. I don't like cringing every time I see him go down.

Important Information:

The PACKERSHOME uses cookies. By continuing to browse this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. More Details Close

Fan Shout

bboystyle (2m) : i mean game becomes irrelevant if we win tonight. Just a game where we are trying to play spoilers to Vikings chance at the #1 seed

Mucky Tundra (11m) : beast, I would guess ad revenue from more eyes watching tv

Zero2Cool (32m) : I would think it would hurt the home team because people would have to cancel last minute maybe? i dunno

beast (40m) : I agree that it's BS for fans planning on going to the game. But how does it bring in more money? I'm guessing indirectly?

packerfanoutwest (52m) : bs on flexing the game....they do it for the $$league$$, not the hometown fans

Zero2Cool (1h) : I see what you did there Mucky

Zero2Cool (1h) : dammit. 3:25pm

Zero2Cool (1h) : Packers Vikings flexed to 3:35pm

Mucky Tundra (1h) : Upon receiving the news about Luke Musgrave, I immediately fell to the ground

Mucky Tundra (1h) : Yeah baby!

Zero2Cool (2h) : LUKE MUSGRAVE PLAYING TONIGHT~!~~~~WOWHOAAOHAOAA yah

Zero2Cool (3h) : I wanna kill new QB's ... blitz the crap out of them.

beast (3h) : Barry seemed to get too conservative against new QBs, Hafley doesn't have that issue

Zero2Cool (4h) : However, we seem to struggle vs new QB's

Zero2Cool (4h) : Should be moot point, cuz Packers should win tonight.

packerfanoutwest (4h) : ok I stand corrected

Zero2Cool (4h) : Ok, yes, you are right. I see that now how they get 7th

Zero2Cool (4h) : 5th - Packers win out, Vikings lose out. Maybe?

beast (4h) : Saying no to the 6th lock.

beast (4h) : No, with the Commanders beating the Eagles, Packers could have a good chance of 6th or 7th unless the win out

Zero2Cool (4h) : I think if Packers win, they are locked 6th with chance for 5th.

beast (4h) : But it doesn't matter, as the Packers win surely win one of their remaining games

beast (4h) : This is not complex, just someone doesn't want to believe reality

beast (4h) : We already have told you... if Packers lose all their games (they won't, but if they did), and Buccaneers and Falcons win all theirs

Zero2Cool (4h) : I posted it in that Packers and 1 seed thread

Zero2Cool (4h) : I literally just said it.

packerfanoutwest (4h) : show us a scenario where Pack don't get in? bet you can't

Zero2Cool (4h) : Falcons, Buccaneers would need to win final two games.

Zero2Cool (4h) : Yes, if they win one of three, they are lock. If they lose out, they can be eliminated.

packerfanoutwest (4h) : as I just said,,gtheyh are in no matter what

Zero2Cool (5h) : Packers should get in. I just hope it's not 7th seed. Feels dirty.

packerfanoutwest (5h) : If packers lose out, no matter what, they are in

packerfanoutwest (5h) : both teams can not male the playoffs....falcon hold the tie breaker

packerfanoutwest (5h) : if bucs win out they win their division

beast (5h) : Fine, Buccaneers and Falcons can get ahead of us

packerfanoutwest (5h) : falcons are already ahead of us

beast (5h) : Packers will get in

beast (5h) : If Packers lose the rest of their games and Falcons win the rest of theirs, they could pass us... but not gonna happen

packerfanoutwest (5h) : they still are in the playoffs

packerfanoutwest (5h) : If Packers lose the remaining games,,,,at 10-7

Zero2Cool (7h) : We can say it. We don't play.

Mucky Tundra (8h) : But to say they are in is looking past the Saints

Mucky Tundra (8h) : That said, their odds are very favorable with a >99% chance of making the playoffs entering this week's games

Mucky Tundra (8h) : Packers are not in and have not clinched a playoff spot.

buckeyepackfan (9h) : Packers are in, they need to keep winning to improve their seed#.

Mucky Tundra (18h) : Getting help would have been nice, but helping ourselves should always be the plan

beast (18h) : Too bad Seahawks couldn't beat Vikings

bboystyle (18h) : We just need to win Monday night and were in

Mucky Tundra (21h) : Or ties, but let's be real here

Mucky Tundra (21h) : Other scenario was Falcons+Rams losses

Please sign in to use Fan Shout

2024 Packers Schedule

Friday, Sep 6 @ 7:15 PM

Eagles

29 - 34

Sunday, Sep 15 @ 12:00 PM

COLTS

16 - 10

Sunday, Sep 22 @ 12:00 PM

Titans

30 - 14

Sunday, Sep 29 @ 12:00 PM

VIKINGS

29 - 31

Sunday, Oct 6 @ 3:25 PM

Rams

24 - 19

Sunday, Oct 13 @ 12:00 PM

CARDINALS

34 - 13

Sunday, Oct 20 @ 12:00 PM

TEXANS

24 - 22

Sunday, Oct 27 @ 12:00 PM

Jaguars

30 - 27

Sunday, Nov 3 @ 3:25 PM

LIONS

14 - 24

Sunday, Nov 17 @ 12:00 PM

Bears

20 - 19

Sunday, Nov 24 @ 3:25 PM

49ERS

38 - 10

Thursday, Nov 28 @ 7:20 PM

DOLPHINS

30 - 17

Thursday, Dec 5 @ 7:15 PM

Lions

31 - 34

Sunday, Dec 15 @ 7:20 PM

Seahawks

30 - 13

Monday, Dec 23 @ 7:15 PM

SAINTS

Sunday, Dec 29 @ 3:25 PM

Vikings

Saturday, Jan 4 @ 11:00 PM

BEARS