The_Green_Ninja
15 years ago

I don't like the new rule, if its a bad trade veto it, also do like alot of the leagues i get into have a vote on if it should go thru. With your new rule you will actually take away from alot of trading thus not much is done now but what team in contention is going to want to trade to help someone else in contention? But i have bitched about this league from day 1 with to many players drafted with this many teams.

"dhazer" wrote:



A lot? Out of contention means there is NO possible way to get to the playoffs. Right now that means only 1 and 2 teams are out right now, so my suggestions, any trade you want to do with some other team, do it now. And if you think having teams help others teams by giving their good players seems "fair" to you, I'd love to know your other thoughts.
UserPostedImage
The_Green_Ninja
15 years ago

I don't like the new rule, if its a bad trade veto it, also do like alot of the leagues i get into have a vote on if it should go thru. With your new rule you will actually take away from alot of trading thus not much is done now but what team in contention is going to want to trade to help someone else in contention? But i have bitched about this league from day 1 with to many players drafted with this many teams.

"Formo" wrote:



I haven't hear someone whine so much in the position you are in, ever!

Shut up dude, you are beating the shit out of everything. You lose your right to complain.

And Zero.. You missed the train on this one.. That's on you, dawg. Now wipe away your tears and move along, little doegy..

"dhazer" wrote:



Lol the only thing I agree with Formo with, ever.
UserPostedImage
djcubez
15 years ago

I don't like the new rule, if its a bad trade veto it, also do like alot of the leagues i get into have a vote on if it should go thru. With your new rule you will actually take away from alot of trading thus not much is done now but what team in contention is going to want to trade to help someone else in contention? But i have bitched about this league from day 1 with to many players drafted with this many teams.

"The_Green_Ninja" wrote:



A lot? Out of contention means there is NO possible way to get to the playoffs. Right now that means only 1 and 2 teams are out right now, so my suggestions, any trade you want to do with some other team, do it now. And if you think having teams help others teams by giving their good players seems "fair" to you, I'd love to know your other thoughts.

"dhazer" wrote:


If it's obviously a bad trade all of us owners can veto it. At least that's how most fantasy leagues I've been in work. I was in fantasy baseball over the summer and this guy was trying to trade Pujols for Russel Branyan. Obviously this guy was just selling off his roster so we all vetoed it. Unfair or bad trades will get vetoed, the status of the teams should have nothing to do with it.
The_Green_Ninja
15 years ago

I don't like the new rule, if its a bad trade veto it, also do like alot of the leagues i get into have a vote on if it should go thru. With your new rule you will actually take away from alot of trading thus not much is done now but what team in contention is going to want to trade to help someone else in contention? But i have bitched about this league from day 1 with to many players drafted with this many teams.

"djcubez" wrote:



A lot? Out of contention means there is NO possible way to get to the playoffs. Right now that means only 1 and 2 teams are out right now, so my suggestions, any trade you want to do with some other team, do it now. And if you think having teams help others teams by giving their good players seems "fair" to you, I'd love to know your other thoughts.

"The_Green_Ninja" wrote:


If it's obviously a bad trade all of us owners can veto it. At least that's how most fantasy leagues I've been in work. I was in fantasy baseball over the summer and this guy was trying to trade Pujols for Russel Branyan. Obviously this guy was just selling off his roster so we all vetoed it. Unfair or bad trades will get vetoed, the status of the teams should have nothing to do with it.

"dhazer" wrote:



Exactly... because even if I had not made an announcement I would have vetoed a trade between a team in contention and a team not in contention. So I thought "Hell, might as well tell them unless they were planning something with a team out of contention..." Yet, people will find any way to get in a argument...lol.
UserPostedImage
Zero2Cool
15 years ago
Pretty damn lame that you operate like that and using PackersHome. That's shady and wrong.

What a crock of shit.
UserPostedImage
The_Green_Ninja
15 years ago

Pretty damn lame that you operate like that and using PackersHome. That's shady and wrong.

What a crock of shit.

"Zero2Cool" wrote:



Yeah, fairness and balance doesn't follow the PackersHome way, right?
UserPostedImage
Nonstopdrivel
15 years ago
What the fuck is the problem with a trade between a team in contention and one not in contention? I don't follow that logic any more than I follow those dumb no-trade lists.
UserPostedImage
Rockmolder
15 years ago

What the fuck is the problem with a trade between a team in contention and one not in contention? I don't follow that logic any more than I follow those dumb no-trade lists.

"Nonstopdrivel" wrote:



Because it's a concrete way to outlaw ridiculous 'friend' trades. I mean, what's in it for the team that isn't in contention?

And if anyone wanted an only Packers team, he could've started doing that about 8 weeks ago.

Yes, you can veto trades as well, but who will decide what an unfair trade is? Formo traded Andre Johnson away for Larry Johnson in the beginning of the season. I surely would've veto'd that, if I could, later on. In Formo's opinion, though, it was just a good trade for a RB-desperate team.

Why on earth would a team that's out of contention trade or release its entire roster, besides helping someone else to victory?
Nonstopdrivel
15 years ago
Again, I ask, so what? Sounds like sour grapes to me.

Buncha whiners, the lot o' ya. šŸ˜›
UserPostedImage
Rockmolder
15 years ago

Again, I ask, so what? Sounds like sour grapes to me.

Buncha whiners, the lot o' ya. :P

"Nonstopdrivel" wrote:



Competitive Nature.
Similar Topics
Users browsing this topic
    Fan Shout
    dfosterf (6m) : Hopefully the color scheme remains the same
    dfosterf (12m) : *Friday*
    dfosterf (15m) : 100 million would be 539 million as of Fridsy
    dfosterf (16m) : Heck, they could have taken a hundred milliion and invested in DAVE inc. last year (semi random, humor, but real)
    dfosterf (28m) : Beer brat and ticket is where the money comes from
    dfosterf (34m) : The 40th is Titletown Tech itself. This is a pet project of both Ed Policy and Mark Murphy
    Zero2Cool (35m) : New site coming along nicely. The editor is better than what we have here. Oh yeah!
    dfosterf (37m) : No profit that I know of. 0 for 40
    dfosterf (39m) : The woke reference has to do with the makeup and oftentimes objectives of the companies they invested in
    packerfanoutwest (40m) : beer and brats woke? say whom?
    beast (45m) : I don't want to get into politics, but how is, beers and brats considered to be "woke"? Food is food...
    beast (46m) : That being said, I'm not saying all 100% should be that way, but not surprised if majority are Wisconsin based
    beast (47m) : And if everyone has heard of them, then it it probably has less growth potential and less community based
    beast (48m) : Well isn't the investing person supposed to invest the money?
    dfosterf (1h) : I swear if I were to discover that one of them has invented a virtue signalling transmitter I will not be surprised, lol
    dfosterf (1h) : 39 companies so far that I bet no one has ever heard of.
    dfosterf (1h) : -Not saying woke, but should- borderline philanthopist venture capital excercise
    dfosterf (1h) : Well for one, they are pouring resources into Title Town Tech. Investing beer, brat, hot dog, ticket money into what is pretty much...
    beast (7h) : Wow, 95% drop in investment revenue? Would be interesting to hear the details of why...
    dfosterf (25-Jul) : It's my one day deal complaint dept. on shareholder meeting day
    dfosterf (25-Jul) : Probably a homer access credential intimidation kinda thing
    dfosterf (25-Jul) : Meathead "journalists" skip this, concentrating on operational revenue when convenient. They switch when net revenue is more favorable.
    dfosterf (25-Jul) : Resulting in an actual drop of net revenue of 12.5%. She is from Minnesota. Just sayin'
    dfosterf (25-Jul) : Any plans to hold Maureen Smith (CFO) accountable for a 95% drop in investment revenue?
    Mucky Tundra (25-Jul) : In your face, HBO!
    Mucky Tundra (25-Jul) : @ByRyanWood Mark Murphy: ā€œA great source of pride of mine is that we were never on Hard Knocks.ā€
    Mucky Tundra (25-Jul) : *years
    Mucky Tundra (25-Jul) : @mattschneidman Mark Murphy says he anticipates ā€œmany Packers gamesā€ being played in Germany, Ireland and/or the U.K. over the next 5-10 yea
    dfosterf (25-Jul) : *cafeteria* I have hit my head also, so I sympathize
    dfosterf (25-Jul) : Possibly hit his head leaning into the glass protecting the food in the cafateria
    dfosterf (25-Jul) : Maybe a low flying drone
    dfosterf (25-Jul) : Did Savion Williams run into a goalpost or something?
    Mucky Tundra (25-Jul) : also, no bueno when a guy starts getting concussions right off the bat in his career
    Zero2Cool (25-Jul) : Concussion is worse. Banks probably vet off day via back booboo claim
    Mucky Tundra (25-Jul) : @AndyHermanNFL Jordy Nelson out at camp today. No word if heā€™s in play for one of the two open roster spots ; )
    dfosterf (25-Jul) : Is that better or worse than Banks bad back?
    Zero2Cool (25-Jul) : Savion concussion ... not good.
    packerfanoutwest (24-Jul) : Aaron Rodgersā€™s first pass of first team period was picked off
    Mucky Tundra (24-Jul) : tbh I didn't hear of his passing
    Zero2Cool (24-Jul) : Cosby Show. Malcom Jamal Warner I think is real name
    Mucky Tundra (24-Jul) : I was thinking of Ozzy and Hulk
    Mucky Tundra (24-Jul) : Who's Theo?
    Zero2Cool (24-Jul) : How is Theo alliteration?
    Mucky Tundra (24-Jul) : Bad week for people whose names are alliterations
    Zero2Cool (24-Jul) : Hulk Hogan gone too.
    Zero2Cool (24-Jul) : Oh, it's toe injury
    Zero2Cool (24-Jul) : Hope it's not serious. that would stink
    dfosterf (24-Jul) : Sounds like an ankle not a knee for Fields
    dfosterf (24-Jul) : Ya Flaccp on Browns
    Zero2Cool (24-Jul) : Maybe Tyrod Taylor instead
    Please sign in to use Fan Shout
    2025 Packers Schedule
    Sunday, Sep 7 @ 3:25 PM
    LIONS
    Thursday, Sep 11 @ 7:15 PM
    COMMANDERS
    Sunday, Sep 21 @ 12:00 PM
    Browns
    Sunday, Sep 28 @ 7:20 PM
    Cowboys
    Sunday, Oct 12 @ 3:25 PM
    BENGALS
    Sunday, Oct 19 @ 3:25 PM
    Cardinals
    Sunday, Oct 26 @ 7:20 PM
    Steelers
    Sunday, Nov 2 @ 12:00 PM
    PANTHERS
    Monday, Nov 10 @ 7:15 PM
    EAGLES
    Sunday, Nov 16 @ 12:00 PM
    Giants
    Sunday, Nov 23 @ 12:00 PM
    VIKINGS
    Thursday, Nov 27 @ 12:00 PM
    Lions
    Sunday, Dec 7 @ 12:00 PM
    BEARS
    Sunday, Dec 14 @ 3:25 PM
    Broncos
    Friday, Dec 19 @ 11:00 PM
    Bears
    Friday, Dec 26 @ 11:00 PM
    RAVENS
    Saturday, Jan 3 @ 11:00 PM
    Vikings
    Recent Topics
    41m / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

    7h / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

    25-Jul / Around The NFL / Mucky Tundra

    25-Jul / Green Bay Packers Talk / Mucky Tundra

    25-Jul / Green Bay Packers Talk / TheKanataThrilla

    25-Jul / Green Bay Packers Talk / dfosterf

    25-Jul / Around The NFL / beast

    24-Jul / Green Bay Packers Talk / Martha Careful

    24-Jul / Around The NFL / beast

    24-Jul / Green Bay Packers Talk / Mucky Tundra

    23-Jul / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

    23-Jul / Green Bay Packers Talk / wpr

    22-Jul / Random Babble / Zero2Cool

    22-Jul / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

    22-Jul / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

    Headlines
    Copyright Ā© 2006 - 2025 PackersHome.comā„¢. All Rights Reserved.