The_Green_Ninja
15 years ago

ANNOUNCEMENT:

If a team is out of contention for the playoffs, then they can not trade with a team who is in contention .

"Zero2Cool" wrote:



Disable trading.

"The_Green_Ninja" wrote:



I want trading to continue, just with in these limits. But any trade where it is between a team in contention and out of contention, I'm just going to veto it. I'd rather give the announcement so that if someone was thinking of it didn't wonder why I randomly vetoed it.
UserPostedImage
Zero2Cool
15 years ago

ANNOUNCEMENT:

If a team is out of contention for the playoffs, then they can not trade with a team who is in contention .

"The_Green_Ninja" wrote:



Disable trading.

"Zero2Cool" wrote:



I want trading to continue, just with in these limits. But any trade where it is between a team in contention and out of contention, I'm just going to veto it. I'd rather give the announcement so that if someone was thinking of it didn't wonder why I randomly vetoed it.

"The_Green_Ninja" wrote:




Was this rule mentioned before the league's season started?

Personally, I think you're out of line. You're playing a cruel game of 'this counts, this one doesn't.'


If I was in that league, I'd be pretty pissed off, unless this rule was disclosed in the very beginning.
UserPostedImage
Rockmolder
15 years ago

ANNOUNCEMENT:

If a team is out of contention for the playoffs, then they can not trade with a team who is in contention .

"Zero2Cool" wrote:



Disable trading.

"The_Green_Ninja" wrote:



I want trading to continue, just with in these limits. But any trade where it is between a team in contention and out of contention, I'm just going to veto it. I'd rather give the announcement so that if someone was thinking of it didn't wonder why I randomly vetoed it.

"Zero2Cool" wrote:




Was this rule mentioned before the league's season started?

Personally, I think you're out of line. You're playing a cruel game of 'this counts, this one doesn't.'


If I was in that league, I'd be pretty pissed off, unless this rule was disclosed in the very beginning.

"The_Green_Ninja" wrote:



It wasn't, but it sounds like a very fair rule to me.

I mean, what's the use of trading for teams that aren't in contention, anyway? All that they can do is give away big name players for way too little because they don't care anymore.
djcubez
15 years ago

another week another win lol

"dhazer" wrote:



Have you lost a game yet? You have the ultimate all star team in the Yahoo! league. You got that one wrapped up like four weeks ago! lol

"Zero2Cool" wrote:




I lost the 1st week in espn league, lost by 2 points fricken mendenhal wasn't starting. Between the 2 leagues i will be 17-1 :P

I guess lucky leprechauns deserves the trophy because he beat me


what i'm trying to figure out is im tied for 1st and beat that team but in playoff seeding they have me as a wildcard wtf kind of setup is that

"dhazer" wrote:



Yup I beat you in week 1 ;)

I also just squeaked out a win over Porky too this week. That's why they call me Lucky Lloyd 😃
Zero2Cool
15 years ago
What if someone is out and they want to put together a team of their personal favorites? So now because they are out of contention to win, they can't find some fun in the league?

It's what I did in my league. I know I won't be able to beat dhazer so I traded my team away to make a Packers roster. In this league, if I lasted farther, I wouldn't have been able to do that.
UserPostedImage
The_Green_Ninja
15 years ago

ANNOUNCEMENT:

If a team is out of contention for the playoffs, then they can not trade with a team who is in contention .

"Rockmolder" wrote:



Disable trading.

"Zero2Cool" wrote:



I want trading to continue, just with in these limits. But any trade where it is between a team in contention and out of contention, I'm just going to veto it. I'd rather give the announcement so that if someone was thinking of it didn't wonder why I randomly vetoed it.

"The_Green_Ninja" wrote:




Was this rule mentioned before the league's season started?

Personally, I think you're out of line. You're playing a cruel game of 'this counts, this one doesn't.'


If I was in that league, I'd be pretty pissed off, unless this rule was disclosed in the very beginning.

"Zero2Cool" wrote:



It wasn't, but it sounds like a very fair rule to me.

I mean, what's the use of trading for teams that aren't in contention, anyway? All that they can do is give away big name players for way too little because they don't care anymore.

"The_Green_Ninja" wrote:



It's kind of an obvious rule Z2C, but just so Jarod can have his justice on a league he isn't even is a part of 😛, I'll put a poll up on the main page of the ESPN PHFFL discussing it. I have a feeling though that it's going to go in favor of the ruling.
UserPostedImage
The_Green_Ninja
15 years ago

What if someone is out and they want to put together a team of their personal favorites? So now because they are out of contention to win, they can't find some fun in the league?

It's what I did in my league. I know I won't be able to beat dhazer so I traded my team away to make a Packers roster. In this league, if I lasted farther, I wouldn't have been able to do that.

"Zero2Cool" wrote:



Well, just because your league is a total fun and laugh, this one will be considered fair for the others trying to actually compete with dhazer (argue, freakin dhazer).
UserPostedImage
Zero2Cool
15 years ago
Fair? Are you reading what you're proposing and doing? Fair?


and it's fantasy football, its all meant to be FUN

you're potentially removing fun from someone. But hey that's fair.
UserPostedImage
djcubez
15 years ago
Eh, the rule kind of makes sense even though I disagree with it. I don't really care though, this league has kind of handcuffed me from the start:

I only have one QB Matt Cassel and he was out for the first game so I had to start Pat White who has 0 fantasy points this season. I also had to start him my bye week. Now my only TE, by far my best player Owen Daniels is gone for the season and the highest points for TE's in FA is 5 for the whole season. 5 frickin points. So why can't I trade with a team that's out of contention to fill the void I have at TE?
The_Green_Ninja
15 years ago

Eh, the rule kind of makes sense even though I disagree with it. I don't really care though, this league has kind of handcuffed me from the start:

I only have one QB Matt Cassel and he was out for the first game so I had to start Pat White who has 0 fantasy points this season. I also had to start him my bye week. Now my only TE, by far my best player Owen Daniels is gone for the season and the highest points for TE's in FA is 5 for the whole season. 5 frickin points. So why can't I trade with a team that's out of contention to fill the void I have at TE?

"djcubez" wrote:



That's TE. Once a TE gets injured, you might be screwed in any league. It's luck of the draw. But who says you can't trade for a TE with a team in contention? I believe, really, every team still is. Or atleast 18/20.

Oh and, there have been a lot of QBs who took over starting that were originally a FA.
UserPostedImage
Similar Topics
Users browsing this topic
    Fan Shout
    Zero2Cool (27m) : I wanna kill new QB's ... blitz the crap out of them.
    beast (28m) : Barry seemed to get too conservative against new QBs, Hafley doesn't have that issue
    Zero2Cool (1h) : However, we seem to struggle vs new QB's
    Zero2Cool (1h) : Should be moot point, cuz Packers should win tonight.
    packerfanoutwest (1h) : ok I stand corrected
    Zero2Cool (1h) : Ok, yes, you are right. I see that now how they get 7th
    Zero2Cool (1h) : 5th - Packers win out, Vikings lose out. Maybe?
    beast (1h) : Saying no to the 6th lock.
    beast (1h) : No, with the Commanders beating the Eagles, Packers could have a good chance of 6th or 7th unless the win out
    Zero2Cool (1h) : I think if Packers win, they are locked 6th with chance for 5th.
    beast (1h) : But it doesn't matter, as the Packers win surely win one of their remaining games
    beast (1h) : This is not complex, just someone doesn't want to believe reality
    beast (1h) : We already have told you... if Packers lose all their games (they won't, but if they did), and Buccaneers and Falcons win all theirs
    Zero2Cool (1h) : I posted it in that Packers and 1 seed thread
    Zero2Cool (1h) : I literally just said it.
    packerfanoutwest (1h) : show us a scenario where Pack don't get in? bet you can't
    Zero2Cool (1h) : Falcons, Buccaneers would need to win final two games.
    Zero2Cool (1h) : Yes, if they win one of three, they are lock. If they lose out, they can be eliminated.
    packerfanoutwest (2h) : as I just said,,gtheyh are in no matter what
    Zero2Cool (2h) : Packers should get in. I just hope it's not 7th seed. Feels dirty.
    packerfanoutwest (2h) : If packers lose out, no matter what, they are in
    packerfanoutwest (2h) : both teams can not male the playoffs....falcon hold the tie breaker
    packerfanoutwest (2h) : if bucs win out they win their division
    beast (2h) : Fine, Buccaneers and Falcons can get ahead of us
    packerfanoutwest (2h) : falcons are already ahead of us
    beast (2h) : Packers will get in
    beast (2h) : If Packers lose the rest of their games and Falcons win the rest of theirs, they could pass us... but not gonna happen
    packerfanoutwest (2h) : they still are in the playoffs
    packerfanoutwest (2h) : If Packers lose the remaining games,,,,at 10-7
    Zero2Cool (4h) : We can say it. We don't play.
    Mucky Tundra (5h) : But to say they are in is looking past the Saints
    Mucky Tundra (5h) : That said, their odds are very favorable with a >99% chance of making the playoffs entering this week's games
    Mucky Tundra (5h) : Packers are not in and have not clinched a playoff spot.
    buckeyepackfan (6h) : Packers are in, they need to keep winning to improve their seed#.
    Mucky Tundra (15h) : Getting help would have been nice, but helping ourselves should always be the plan
    beast (15h) : Too bad Seahawks couldn't beat Vikings
    bboystyle (15h) : We just need to win Monday night and were in
    Mucky Tundra (19h) : Or ties, but let's be real here
    Mucky Tundra (19h) : Other scenario was Falcons+Rams losses
    Mucky Tundra (19h) : Needed a Falcons loss for a Seahawk loss to clinch
    buckeyepackfan (19h) : Am I wring in saying if Tge Vikings beat The Seahawks, The Packers clinch?
    Mucky Tundra (21-Dec) : Agreed; you stinks
    Zero2Cool (21-Dec) : I'm not beating anyone. I stinks.
    Mucky Tundra (21-Dec) : rough injury for tank dell. guy can't catch abreak
    beast (21-Dec) : So far the college playoffs have sucked... One team absolutely dominates the other
    beast (21-Dec) : Well even if you weren't positive towards a guy, you wouldn't nessarily want to tell the media that (if they don't know about it)
    Martha Careful (21-Dec) : I think MLF want Love to look past the end half issues, and feel good about his play. Our coaches generally keep a very positive tone.
    beast (21-Dec) : I think a great running game will do that for most QBs
    packerfanoutwest (21-Dec) : Coach Matt LaFleur has said quarterback Jordan Love is playing the best football of his career.
    beast (21-Dec) : Oh, that's how you keep beating buckeye, with cheating
    Please sign in to use Fan Shout
    2024 Packers Schedule
    Friday, Sep 6 @ 7:15 PM
    Eagles
    29 - 34
    Sunday, Sep 15 @ 12:00 PM
    COLTS
    16 - 10
    Sunday, Sep 22 @ 12:00 PM
    Titans
    30 - 14
    Sunday, Sep 29 @ 12:00 PM
    VIKINGS
    29 - 31
    Sunday, Oct 6 @ 3:25 PM
    Rams
    24 - 19
    Sunday, Oct 13 @ 12:00 PM
    CARDINALS
    34 - 13
    Sunday, Oct 20 @ 12:00 PM
    TEXANS
    24 - 22
    Sunday, Oct 27 @ 12:00 PM
    Jaguars
    30 - 27
    Sunday, Nov 3 @ 3:25 PM
    LIONS
    14 - 24
    Sunday, Nov 17 @ 12:00 PM
    Bears
    20 - 19
    Sunday, Nov 24 @ 3:25 PM
    49ERS
    38 - 10
    Thursday, Nov 28 @ 7:20 PM
    DOLPHINS
    30 - 17
    Thursday, Dec 5 @ 7:15 PM
    Lions
    31 - 34
    Sunday, Dec 15 @ 7:20 PM
    Seahawks
    30 - 13
    Monday, Dec 23 @ 7:15 PM
    SAINTS
    Sunday, Dec 29 @ 12:00 PM
    Vikings
    Saturday, Jan 4 @ 11:00 PM
    BEARS
    Recent Topics
    8m / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

    33m / Random Babble / Martha Careful

    47m / Green Bay Packers Talk / Martha Careful

    22-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / packerfanoutwest

    19-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

    19-Dec / Random Babble / Zero2Cool

    18-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

    17-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / wpr

    17-Dec / Featured Content / Zero2Cool

    16-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

    16-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / Martha Careful

    16-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

    16-Dec / Feedback, Suggestions and Issues / Mucky Tundra

    16-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

    16-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

    Headlines
    Copyright © 2006 - 2024 PackersHome.com™. All Rights Reserved.