Zero2Cool
15 years ago
Source Link 

TAMPA, Fla. The question was posed, and Aaron Rodgers responded with footballs conversational equivalent of I dont want to talk about it.



I dont know, the Green Bay Packers quarterback replied. Were going to have to watch the film.



The topic, of course, was sacks as usual. During Sundays 38-28 loss to the Tampa Bay Buccaneers at Raymond James Stadium, Rodgers was sacked six more times by a team that had a not-so-grand total of 11 through its first seven games to run the Packers NFL-high season total to 37. Theyre now on pace for 74 this season, which would break the 1990 teams record of 52 and means Rodgers will break Don Majkowskis single-quarterback record of 47, set in 1989, within the next few weeks.



Assuming Rodgers is still upright at that point.



We should be worried about him. Because weve got a lot of games left, and no player particularly your quarterback should be taking the punishment that he is, running back Ryan Grant said. Im surprised he gets up sometimes. Thats on all of us. Everybody. We need to get it right.



And that includes Rodgers, who is starting to show more signs that the constant beat-downs are getting to him. For the first time, coach Mike McCarthy publicly pinned a significant portion of the blame not on the offensive line, but on the quarterback himself. McCarthy intimated that Rodgers may have receivers open but is holding onto the ball too long or being indecisive with it.



I thought he had plenty of time to throw. I'm real curious to see the film because either they're doing a hell of a job covering us, (or) ..., McCarthy said, his voice trailing off. I mean, there was time and time again that our receivers on crossing routes versus that coverage ... I mean, it'll be curious to see what the film looks like."

As for the sheer number of sacks three more than Rodgers absorbed all of last season McCarthy said, It has to stop. You can't sit here and keep taking sacks. I'm sure you're tired of asking the question and I'm tired of talking about it. That's a reflection of coaching and playing. It's something that's been coached, it's something that's been trained, and it keeps showing up on Sundays. It has to end. We cannot continue to have the numbers that we have in the sacks.


Of course, the sacks werent Rodgers only problem Sunday. He came into the game as the NFLs top-rated passer, having thrown 14 touchdowns versus just two interceptions, and he left having thrown three picks to finish with his lowest single-game passer rating (57.6) since last years loss to the Buccaneers here (a career-low 55.9).

Two of Rodgers interceptions came on passes thrown late down the middle of the field. The first, picked off by lurking cornerback Elbert Mack on a deep ball to an apparently open Donald Driver, set up the Buccaneers first touchdown. The second, on a deep ball to Greg Jennings with four players around him, might have been a 42-yard touchdown anyway but it caromed to cornerback Aqib Talib at the goal line. And the last one, on a high throw to Driver on fourth-and-12 with 1:35 to go, deflected off Drivers hands to safety Tanard Jackson, who returned it for a touchdown.



"The first one, he clearly didn't see the corner. I think the other two I would consider them contested, McCarthy said. If you want to classify them he had the one minus decision."



Rodgers confessed he didnt see Mack on the first pick, then said he felt good about the second ball and said the third was desperation.



But desperation also describes the Packers protection situation. The final interception was actually set up two plays earlier, when on second-and-10 from the Packers 13-yard line, defensive end Stylez G. White beat left guard Daryn Colledge on a stunt, bull-rushing Colledge back into Rodgers for a 9-yard sack loss, leading to third-and-19 and ultimately the fourth-and-12 misfire.



Colledge said he initially blocked defensive tackle Chris Hovan, and when he recognized the game Hovan and White were playing, it was too late.



By the time I realized what happened, he was already in my lap. You just cant do that, said Colledge, who had a costly holding penalty on the previous series, too. "(White) already had leverage. I shouldve been ready.



While Rodgers is absorbing more criticism for the sacks, Colledge said the fault ultimately lies with the line.



Theres a lot of factors in why its happened so much, but the fact of the matter is weve got to block better, Colledge said. Weve got to block as long as he needs to hold the ball. Were not going to put the blame on him. The offensive line will take that blame and well find a way to do it better and longer.



Rodgers said his foot problems a sprained right foot and a sprained big toe on his left foot, which kept him out of practice Wednesday and Thursday did not factor into his play. He seemed as mobile as ever, making several throws on the run and carrying the ball three times for 26 yards, including a 12-yard touchdown.



They hurt, definitely, but I dont think it really slowed me too much, Rodgers said. I got hit in the hip, which kind of took some pain out of my feet. They werent an issue.


UserPostedImage
Felipe7777777
15 years ago
Im surprised Grant gets up and is not too embarassed after he gets arm tackled by a 5'8" corner......................<insert disgusted smiley>
blank
Porforis
15 years ago

It has to stop. You can't sit here and keep taking sacks. I'm sure you're tired of asking the question and I'm tired of talking about it. That's a reflection of coaching and playing. It's something that's been coached, it's something that's been trained, and it keeps showing up on Sundays. It has to end. We cannot continue to have the numbers that we have in the sacks.

"Zero2Cool" wrote:



Talk talk talk. You're not taking partial responsibility if you're not bringing results. How about telling us what you're going to do to fix the problems, and whose head is going to roll if the problems don't get fixed and Rodgers gets a serious injury or his mechanics get screwed up beyond repair?

That's right, your head is going to roll. Shut up and fix it.
Felipe7777777
15 years ago
^^^i agree im tired of all the talk already, i'd rather him just say im not gonna talk about it anymore and i think i would be more satisfied with silence then the same answers every week......
blank
Scottish_Packer
15 years ago
It seems like when players are honest (see Cullen Jenkins this past week) they're marched into the coaches office, told whats what, and it's back to the, "we need to clean that up" nonsense... sounds like brainwashing to me (LOL)
UserPostedImage
sunflower100
15 years ago
At least nobody can say Rodgers is any injury prone anymore. At least that's a plus.
blank
Porforis
15 years ago

At least nobody can say Rodgers is any injury prone anymore. At least that's a plus.

"sunflower100" wrote:



...Please don't jinx us.
Rockmolder
15 years ago

At least nobody can say Rodgers is any injury prone anymore. At least that's a plus.

"sunflower100" wrote:



He might not be injury prone, but he'll be out of the league or completely immobile in a year or 4 if things keep going like this.
TengoJuego
15 years ago

Im surprised Grant gets up and is not too embarassed after he gets arm tackled by a 5'8" corner......................<insert disgusted smiley>

"Felipe7777777" wrote:



Two best DB's in the league are about that height. (Polamalu and Bob Sanders)
zombieslayer
15 years ago

We should be worried about him. Because weve got a lot of games left, and no player particularly your quarterback should be taking the punishment that he is, running back Ryan Grant said. Im surprised he gets up sometimes. Thats on all of us. Everybody. We need to get it right.



Yes. He is taking a lot of punishment.

As said in the article, it's also Aaron's fault for holding the ball too long. But let's just say it's 50/50 - half Aaron's fault, half the OL's fault. Still, that would put Rodgers at 18.5 sacks, which means there are only 6 QBs who have been sacked more. Completely unacceptable.
My man Donald Driver
UserPostedImage
(thanks to Pack93z for the pic)
2010 will be seen as the beginning of the new Packers dynasty. 🇹🇹 🇲🇲 🇦🇷
Fan Shout
packerfanoutwest (2m) : Inactives tonight for the Pack: Alexander- knee Bullard - ankle Williams - quad Walker -ankle Monk Heath
packerfanoutwest (4m) : No Jaire, but hopefully the front 7 destroys the line of scrimmage & forces Rattler into a few passes to McKinney.
packerfanoutwest (15m) : minny could be #1 seed and the Lions #5 seed
Zero2Cool (2h) : We'd have same Division and Conference records. Strength of schedule we edge them
Zero2Cool (2h) : I just checked. What tie breaker?
bboystyle (2h) : yes its possible but unlikely. If we do get the 5th, we face the NFCS winner
Zero2Cool (2h) : Ahh, ok.
bboystyle (2h) : yes due to tie breaker
Zero2Cool (2h) : I mean, unlikely, yes, but mathematically, 5th is possible by what I'm reading.
Zero2Cool (2h) : If Vikings lose out, Packers win out, Packers get 5th, right?
bboystyle (2h) : Minny isnt going to lose out so 5th seed is out of the equation. We are playing for the 6th or 7th seed which makes no difference
Mucky Tundra (3h) : beast, the ad revenue goes to the broadcast company but they gotta pay to air the game on their channel/network
beast (4h) : If we win tonight the game is still relative in terms of 5th, 6th or 7th seed... win and it's 5th or 6th, lose and it's 6th or 7th
beast (4h) : Mucky, I thought the ad revenue went to the broadcasting companies or the NFL, at least not directly
Zero2Cool (4h) : I think the revenue share is moot, isn't it? That's the CBA an Salary Cap handling that.
bboystyle (4h) : i mean game becomes irrelevant if we win tonight. Just a game where we are trying to play spoilers to Vikings chance at the #1 seed
Mucky Tundra (4h) : beast, I would guess ad revenue from more eyes watching tv
Zero2Cool (5h) : I would think it would hurt the home team because people would have to cancel last minute maybe? i dunno
beast (5h) : I agree that it's BS for fans planning on going to the game. But how does it bring in more money? I'm guessing indirectly?
packerfanoutwest (5h) : bs on flexing the game....they do it for the $$league$$, not the hometown fans
Zero2Cool (6h) : I see what you did there Mucky
Zero2Cool (6h) : dammit. 3:25pm
Zero2Cool (6h) : Packers Vikings flexed to 3:35pm
Mucky Tundra (6h) : Upon receiving the news about Luke Musgrave, I immediately fell to the ground
Mucky Tundra (6h) : Yeah baby!
Zero2Cool (6h) : LUKE MUSGRAVE PLAYING TONIGHT~!~~~~WOWHOAAOHAOAA yah
Zero2Cool (8h) : I wanna kill new QB's ... blitz the crap out of them.
beast (8h) : Barry seemed to get too conservative against new QBs, Hafley doesn't have that issue
Zero2Cool (8h) : However, we seem to struggle vs new QB's
Zero2Cool (8h) : Should be moot point, cuz Packers should win tonight.
packerfanoutwest (9h) : ok I stand corrected
Zero2Cool (9h) : Ok, yes, you are right. I see that now how they get 7th
Zero2Cool (9h) : 5th - Packers win out, Vikings lose out. Maybe?
beast (9h) : Saying no to the 6th lock.
beast (9h) : No, with the Commanders beating the Eagles, Packers could have a good chance of 6th or 7th unless the win out
Zero2Cool (9h) : I think if Packers win, they are locked 6th with chance for 5th.
beast (9h) : But it doesn't matter, as the Packers win surely win one of their remaining games
beast (9h) : This is not complex, just someone doesn't want to believe reality
beast (9h) : We already have told you... if Packers lose all their games (they won't, but if they did), and Buccaneers and Falcons win all theirs
Zero2Cool (9h) : I posted it in that Packers and 1 seed thread
Zero2Cool (9h) : I literally just said it.
packerfanoutwest (9h) : show us a scenario where Pack don't get in? bet you can't
Zero2Cool (9h) : Falcons, Buccaneers would need to win final two games.
Zero2Cool (9h) : Yes, if they win one of three, they are lock. If they lose out, they can be eliminated.
packerfanoutwest (9h) : as I just said,,gtheyh are in no matter what
Zero2Cool (9h) : Packers should get in. I just hope it's not 7th seed. Feels dirty.
packerfanoutwest (9h) : If packers lose out, no matter what, they are in
packerfanoutwest (9h) : both teams can not male the playoffs....falcon hold the tie breaker
packerfanoutwest (9h) : if bucs win out they win their division
beast (9h) : Fine, Buccaneers and Falcons can get ahead of us
Please sign in to use Fan Shout
2024 Packers Schedule
Friday, Sep 6 @ 7:15 PM
Eagles
Sunday, Sep 15 @ 12:00 PM
COLTS
Sunday, Sep 22 @ 12:00 PM
Titans
Sunday, Sep 29 @ 12:00 PM
VIKINGS
Sunday, Oct 6 @ 3:25 PM
Rams
Sunday, Oct 13 @ 12:00 PM
CARDINALS
Sunday, Oct 20 @ 12:00 PM
TEXANS
Sunday, Oct 27 @ 12:00 PM
Jaguars
Sunday, Nov 3 @ 3:25 PM
LIONS
Sunday, Nov 17 @ 12:00 PM
Bears
Sunday, Nov 24 @ 3:25 PM
49ERS
Thursday, Nov 28 @ 7:20 PM
DOLPHINS
Thursday, Dec 5 @ 7:15 PM
Lions
Sunday, Dec 15 @ 7:20 PM
Seahawks
Monday, Dec 23 @ 7:15 PM
SAINTS
Sunday, Dec 29 @ 3:25 PM
Vikings
Saturday, Jan 4 @ 11:00 PM
BEARS
Recent Topics
2h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

2h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

8h / Random Babble / Martha Careful

22-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / packerfanoutwest

19-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

19-Dec / Random Babble / Zero2Cool

18-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

17-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / wpr

17-Dec / Featured Content / Zero2Cool

16-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

16-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / Martha Careful

16-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

16-Dec / Feedback, Suggestions and Issues / Mucky Tundra

16-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

16-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

Headlines
Copyright © 2006 - 2024 PackersHome.com™. All Rights Reserved.