evad04
15 years ago

I didn't get to see the first Vikings game, but I can say that the entire first half of last night's game, I was having flashbacks to the 2007 Cowboys game in which Favre inexplicably came out throwing long bombs that were promptly intercepted. Time after time, McCarthy's gameplanning seems to break down in the really big games. It's like he out-thinks and intimidates himself. A little less trickery and a lot more playing to our personnel's strengths would be a welcome change.

"buckeyepackfan" wrote:

t

Outclassed and outcoached, the story of Mike McCarthy in big games!!

"Nonstopdrivel" wrote:


Didn't A-Rod come in and direct the offense with relative success in that Cowboys game? So ... when Favre failed (looked like a nutcase in that came) it's McCarthy's poor gameplan. Then Rodgers comes in and ...

Just wondering. Who gets the credit? I say follow the trend on these boards. When Rodgers came in against the Cowboys two years ago, it wasn't McCarthy's playcalling at ALL -- it was Rodgers playing well.

Now, Rodgers leads the NFL in QB rating (not the be-all-end-all statistic, and yes, he's been sacked 31 times and that's the big problem) but none of the credit goes to the head coach.

I've been accused now formally by buckeye as being a McCarthy apologist/defender (see the shot box). I really don't think that's what I'm doing. I do however think that threads that call for his firing are premature and unwarranted. I just think we need to see the positives along with the negatives.

If Rodgers is -- sans the ridiculous volume of sacks -- having a very good year, are we to assume it's happening in a vacuum? Sure, Rodgers is the absolute shit (which I'd agree with) but the playcalling is crap and our head coach sucks. This is such a logical disconnect it makes me sick to my stomach. Rodgers is the quarterback he is in at least moderate respect to the coach with whom he's built a strong relationship with: McCarthy.

Rodgers can't be playing great without McCarthy's impact, but NO ONE is making that argument. One of the reasons why is the seemingly horny obsession with blaming just about everything on our head coach.
William Henderson didn't have to run people over. His preferred method was levitation.
"I'm a reasonable man, get off my case."
Rockmolder
15 years ago

20 Jay Cutler CHI



Only in Chicago can you trade for a somewhat proven QB and screw him up totally. That town has some sort of anti-QB-force-field over it.
Nonstopdrivel
15 years ago
evad04, if you were a little more open minded and less quick to judge, you might understand what I'm trying to say. I have been giving Mike McCarthy credit for a great deal of Aaron Rodgers' exceptional performance. I have stated explicitly and repeatedly that he does have the intelligence and ability to create good gameplans, and when he does, our team excels. In the third quarter, we came out with the kind of strategy we should have been employing from the first play of the first quarter -- and it worked brilliantly. In the 2007 Cowboys game, when Rodgers took over in relief, he played a short-pass, quick-strike game that also worked very well -- and was precisely what everyone expected the Packers to play coming into the game. It was the early attempts at subterfuge that put us two scores down. The moment Favre reared back to uncork those bombs, I was on my feet screaming -- well before they fell into the hands of the waiting defenders. It was a strategy that made no sense.

I readily acknowledge McCarthy is able to draft an excellent gameplan when he doesn't overthink himself. That doesn't mean I won't call him to task when he screws up. In fact, it's because I know he can do it that I judge him so harshly. It's not his talent I question -- it's his stubborness I despise.
UserPostedImage
dfosterf
15 years ago
I didn't drink a drop yesterday, but had laid in a case of Blue Moon.

The temperature in the garage is dropping rapidly.

That's all I got right now. It's a good one, though. :icon_smile:

Oh, and my quarterback is incredibly friggin' awesome when I consider the lack of help he gets from his line and/or running backs...

At least I know for sure he is trying to make a play. People seem to bitch about some sacks that are "on him"... He ought to wear those as badges of honor...He is a gamer.
Nonstopdrivel
15 years ago
Substitute some Franziskaner for the Blue Moon, old buddy. It'll do you good. 😉
UserPostedImage
evad04
15 years ago

evad04, if you were a little more open minded and less quick to judge, you might understand what I'm trying to say. I have been giving Mike McCarthy credit for a great deal of Aaron Rodgers' exceptional performance. I have stated explicitly and repeatedly that he does have the intelligence and ability to create good gameplans, and when he does, our team excels. In the third quarter, we came out with the kind of strategy we should have been employing from the first play of the first quarter -- and it worked brilliantly. In the 2007 Cowboys game, when Rodgers took over in relief, he played a short-pass, quick-strike game that also worked very well -- and was precisely what everyone expected the Packers to play coming into the game. It was the early attempts at subterfuge that put us two scores down. The moment Favre reared back to uncork those bombs, I was on my feet screaming -- well before they fell into the hands of the waiting defenders. It was a strategy that made no sense.

I readily acknowledge McCarthy is able to draft an excellent gameplan when he doesn't overthink himself. That doesn't mean I won't call him to task when he screws up. In fact, it's because I know he can do it that I judge him so harshly. It's not his talent I question -- it's his stubborness I despise.

"Nonstopdrivel" wrote:


It's not a lack of open-mindedness. Let's be real here: if Rodgers was playing any better (which would probably mean better gameplans, eh?) he'd be playing better than any QB, ever. Our problems are well documented, and they almost exclusively start and end with our offensive line troubles.

No need to be defensive. I'm still waiting for a sound explanation of all these downfield passes in the first half. That isn't what I saw. Help me understand it (which is hard to do, I understand -- it's not like I have any "film" on the game). I don't remember a half of football overloaded with trickery (something that, by the way is lauded when it works -- like when McCarthy calls a flea flicker from our inverted wishbone set). I didn't think it was overtly "finesse" either. I think the two halves of football aren't so completely different in production BECAUSE of playcalling. If that is how you feel -- and it's evident to anyone who reads you that you're an obviously intelligent person -- then let me understand it with concrete examples.

I want to know how McCarthy's playcalling was the neutralizing factor in the first half. I want someone to address the fact that pressure was constant and rarely at the hands of more than four defensive rushers (leaving, of coruse, seven men in coverage). I want someone to explain how the short quick passing game is a panacea against a defensive front that can apply pressure quickly while the other seven defenders have a numbers advantage over the receiving targets AND have the advantage of staring at the QBs eyes -- which have to be moving a mile a minute because he's being pressured incessantly. I would like MORE THAN ANYTHING for someone to ground their criticism of McCarthy's playcalling with concrete examples and I want someone to adequately assess how it was different from the first half.

To me it wasn't an entirely different approach in the second half. It was much the same.

This is certainly a big issue. It warrants an indepth and complicated-but-hopefully-worthwhile conclusion.

I'm just not sold on McCarthy's supposedly uninspired first half playcalling being the reason.
William Henderson didn't have to run people over. His preferred method was levitation.
"I'm a reasonable man, get off my case."
dfosterf
15 years ago

Substitute some Franziskaner for the Blue Moon, old buddy. It'll do you good. ;)

"Nonstopdrivel" wrote:



19 bucks more a case.

Full moon road-dog theory precluded the purchase.

I only go Franziskaner on festive occasions.

Blue Moon is for mourning.

and 19 bucks cheaper, lol
evad04
15 years ago

Substitute some Franziskaner for the Blue Moon, old buddy. It'll do you good. ;)

"Nonstopdrivel" wrote:


Are you going the Dunkel-Weisse route? I hope so. One of my favorites.
William Henderson didn't have to run people over. His preferred method was levitation.
"I'm a reasonable man, get off my case."
all_about_da_packers
15 years ago

Rodgers played a poor game in the first half yesterday but played an exceptional game in the second half.. that speaks well to him overall.

I care less about the QB rating.. I seen what I need to see in the second half yesterday.

The first half, he was clearly pushing too hard and very frustrated.

He went into the locker room at half, and got his composure back for the second half. That means the world to me over his overall QB rating.

"pack93z" wrote:




Totally agree!

I get a little peeved with articles saying Aaron needs to be more aggressive to become a better a play maker.

I saw a QB yesterday that did what the elite QBs do - bring his team back into a game they had no reason to be in. People forget that the Offense was 28 yards away from taking the lead. That's surreal considering how poorly we played in the first half.

It's also similar to what Aaron did against Carolina last year. He came out in the second half and brought his team back into a game they had no business being in. Heck against the Panthers, he got his team into the lead with a unreal completion % around 80% in the second half.

The dude has shown he is a franchise QB.
The NFL: Where Greg Jennings Happens.
El3ment12
15 years ago
Ugh, I'm so sick of Rodgers doing amazing but we still lose. Why does that always happen??
Users browsing this topic
    Fan Shout
    Zero2Cool (8h) : Both LB Quay Walker and Rookie DB Micah Robinson have passed their physicals
    Zero2Cool (8h) : Happy to see site feels more snappy snappy
    Zero2Cool (8h) : No sir. I did not.
    dfosterf (8h) : You didn't get free childcare when you were at work?
    wpr (9h) : These guys make hundreds of thousands of dollars a year. Pay for their own childcare.
    dfosterf (10h) : 2nd issue. Number 1 issue was no gameday childcare. 1 of 3 teams not providing it
    Zero2Cool (10h) : Suppose if locker room is main issue, we sitting pretty
    wpr (10h) : I thought so Mucky. In those useless player polls GB always rates high overall. Locker is a part of it.
    Mucky Tundra (11h) : Wasn't the locker room just updated like 6 or 7 years ago?
    Zero2Cool (12h) : I have forum updated on different site. We'll see how this one goes before going to that
    Zero2Cool (12h) : Elgton Jenkins has a back injury, is expect to end contract dispute
    wpr (14h) : It's funny the PA complained about the locker room. It wasn't that long ago it was top shelf. Things change in a hurry.
    wpr (14h) : The site is much more better.
    Zero2Cool (15h) : NFLPA report said Packers lockerroom needed upgrade. Whining bout where you change?
    Zero2Cool (15h) : I saw that and thought it was kind of lame.
    dfosterf (15h) : Packers new locker room is pretty awesome. Great for morale, imo
    Zero2Cool (15h) : Shuffled things on the web server. Hope it makes it faster.
    Zero2Cool (16h) : Other times, it's turtle ass
    Zero2Cool (16h) : Sometimes it's snappy, like now.
    beast (17h) : I feel like it's loading at the top of the next minute, or something like that.
    beast (17h) : Also the thanks/heart takes FOREVER to load, and posting in the shout box takes three times FOREVER!
    beast (17h) : Thanks for saying something, I thought it was slow, but assumed it was on my end
    beast (17h) : Thanks for saying something, I thought it was slow, but assumed it was on my end
    Zero2Cool (17h) : Yeah, I noticed that too. Is it slow for PackerPeople.com too?
    wpr (17h) : I don't know what you IT guys call it but the page loading is very slow for me today.
    Zero2Cool (17h) : SSL might be settled now.
    Zero2Cool (23-Jul) : Still working through SSL cert issues
    wpr (23-Jul) : Glad to be back
    Zero2Cool (23-Jul) : I think PH original finally working.
    dfosterf (22-Jul) : Can tell you are having a fun day Kev
    Zero2Cool (22-Jul) : Yep, I had to manually move them. It'll fix itself after more posts.
    Mucky Tundra (22-Jul) : Same deal with the songs/videos thread, says you replied last but when I go there it's what I posted earlier is last
    Zero2Cool (22-Jul) : I had to manually move three posts.
    Mucky Tundra (22-Jul) : But when I go it, Martha's is the last reply
    Mucky Tundra (22-Jul) : Still a little screwy; it shows on the main forum that you were the last person to reply to the Jenkins trade thread
    Zero2Cool (22-Jul) : Host issues, been crazy day
    Mucky Tundra (22-Jul) : Connect 4?
    Zero2Cool (22-Jul) : Connecting to new database
    Zero2Cool (22-Jul) : What the hell
    beast (22-Jul) : Packershome going to the Whiteout unis again
    Zero2Cool (21-Jul) : Oh wait, they got Cam Ward. 1st overall right? haha oops
    Zero2Cool (21-Jul) : They could send Packers a 1st for a QB they are familiar with
    Zero2Cool (21-Jul) : Titans QB Will Levis to have season-ending shoulder surgery
    Zero2Cool (19-Jul) : Their season did kind of start there, so 🤷
    dfosterf (19-Jul) : Eagles put an engraved Brazil flag on their super bowl rings
    Zero2Cool (18-Jul) : Benton unsigned no more
    Zero2Cool (17-Jul) : That's good analysis, yes you are getting old. It'd a blessing!
    dfosterf (14-Jul) : *analysis* gettin' old
    dfosterf (14-Jul) : One of the best analyisis I"ve ever watched at this time of an offseason
    dfosterf (14-Jul) : Andy Herman interviewed Warren Sharp on his Pack a day podcast
    Please sign in to use Fan Shout
    2025 Packers Schedule
    Sunday, Sep 7 @ 3:25 PM
    LIONS
    Thursday, Sep 11 @ 7:15 PM
    COMMANDERS
    Sunday, Sep 21 @ 12:00 PM
    Browns
    Sunday, Sep 28 @ 7:20 PM
    Cowboys
    Sunday, Oct 12 @ 3:25 PM
    BENGALS
    Sunday, Oct 19 @ 3:25 PM
    Cardinals
    Sunday, Oct 26 @ 7:20 PM
    Steelers
    Sunday, Nov 2 @ 12:00 PM
    PANTHERS
    Monday, Nov 10 @ 7:15 PM
    EAGLES
    Sunday, Nov 16 @ 12:00 PM
    Giants
    Sunday, Nov 23 @ 12:00 PM
    VIKINGS
    Thursday, Nov 27 @ 12:00 PM
    Lions
    Sunday, Dec 7 @ 12:00 PM
    BEARS
    Sunday, Dec 14 @ 3:25 PM
    Broncos
    Friday, Dec 19 @ 11:00 PM
    Bears
    Friday, Dec 26 @ 11:00 PM
    RAVENS
    Saturday, Jan 3 @ 11:00 PM
    Vikings
    Recent Topics
    56m / Green Bay Packers Talk / Mucky Tundra

    1h / Around The NFL / Mucky Tundra

    2h / Around The NFL / Mucky Tundra

    6h / Green Bay Packers Talk / bboystyle

    6h / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

    7h / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

    17h / Green Bay Packers Talk / wpr

    23-Jul / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

    22-Jul / Random Babble / Zero2Cool

    22-Jul / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

    22-Jul / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

    20-Jul / Green Bay Packers Talk / Mucky Tundra

    20-Jul / Green Bay Packers Talk / Mucky Tundra

    18-Jul / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

    15-Jul / Green Bay Packers Talk / Mucky Tundra

    Headlines
    Copyright © 2006 - 2025 PackersHome.com™. All Rights Reserved.