Zero2Cool
15 years ago
Source Link 


Ryan Grant lobbied the Green Bay Packers to sign veteran running back Ahman Green and applauded their decision to finally make the move last Wednesday.[img_r]http://media.jsonline.com/images/199*130/ahman102409.jpg[/img_r]

Should he have?

There are two ways to look at it if you're Grant.

On the one hand, bringing in Green relieves some of the pressure on Grant to produce like a guy who is worthy of the four-year, $18 million contract he received in August 2007. On the other hand, it implies that the Packers no longer think Grant is capable of being a franchise back and probably would be better suited for a job-sharing role.

If the Packers simply wanted to fill the position vacated when third-down back DeShawn Wynn was lost for the season with a knee injury, they would have signed veteran free agent Dominic Rhodes or elevated practice squad running back Kregg Lumpkin. Instead, they turned to Green, a former franchise back whose career took a detour because of injuries.

There are several reasons the Packers took a shot with Green, but simple logic will tell you he might be able to fill gaps that are missing in the team's mediocre running game.

Things like:

Better production on first down.
Better production on screen passes and check-downs.
Better production running to the left side.

Upon signing Green, no one on the Packers' coaching staff, including head man Mike McCarthy, characterized the move as having anything to do with Grant, even though the fourth-year back ranks 18th in the NFL in yards with 347, 31st in yards per carry at 3.8 and 28th in runs of 20 or more yards with one.

Still, McCarthy did say he thought the move upgraded the position and provided the Packers with someone who is a good fit for his zone running scheme.

"He still has excellent in-line quickness," McCarthy said after Green's first practice Wednesday "He really has the ability to drop his pads and run with forward lean and the things you always liked about his running style.

"I'd like to see more of him."

Could make debut vs. Vikings

Green, who has been out of football since November, won't play against the Cleveland Browns on Sunday at Cleveland Browns Stadium, but there's a chance he'll be available when the Minnesota Vikings come to Green Bay next Sunday. Common sense would tell you it's going to be awhile before he's effective - if he's effective at all at age 32.

At this point, the Packers' running game shouldn't really scare anyone. Green Bay ranks 19th mostly on the strength of some strong late-game finishes against St. Louis and Detroit, when the Packers were able to beat down a demoralized opponent.

When you're talking about production in key areas, such as on first down, the Packers are not a good running team. Obviously, the offensive line plays a part in that, but the right side of the line is solid, and backup center Scott Wells has done a fine job against some tough opponents.

McCarthy's reluctance to stick with the run is another factor. The Packers are running the ball just 39.6% of the time, and that's not enough to get a rhythm going. But still, he should be able to count on 4 yards on first down.

Through five games, the Packers are running the ball 44% of the time on first and 10. They rank 28th in yards on those downs. Grant averages 3.4 yards a carry on first and 10 and, while full rankings weren't available for that stat, San Diego's LaDainian Tomlinson ranks 20th in the league with an average of 4.3, so you can imagine how far down the list Grant is.

It's something the Packers acknowledge is a problem.

"If you're averaging 3.2 yards on first down, that's not good enough," offensive coordinator Joe Philbin said. "Obviously you want to mix some explosives (runs) in there. You're really looking at the consistency of winning the down.

"The thing that is more helpful is looking at your second and 8 call sheet and how many times you're filling that thing up. If you're up at 8, 10, 12, you know you have some issues."

Green likes to bang inside

To say Green can come in and immediately prop up those numbers is wishful thinking. Given his recent injury history, it's questionable whether he can help the Packers' running game at all. But the decision to take a chance on him is because he runs the ball the way the Packers would like to see Grant run it more often.

Green described his style this way:

"I love running in between the tackles. I love banging around in there. I like saying hello to the 'backers in the middle, let them know I'm going to be here and it's going to be for four quarters."

The Packers have to be hoping Green's style of keeping his head up, making decisive cuts and pumping his knees high so he can't be brought down with arm tackles will rub off on Grant. Running backs coach Edgar Bennett has made it clear in the past two weeks that he'd like all of his backs to get their knees up and start breaking more tackles.

Green envisions that he and Grant will complement each other.

"We're going to be battering up the linebacker crew and softening it up for each other," he said. "Whenever I do get in there, along with Brandon Jackson, it's like when it was myself and Dorsey (Levens) in the backfield. You give that defense something to think about."

It remains to be seen how many carries Green will take away from Grant, but if he has anything left in the tank he'll push the Packers' starter. One area where he might be most effective is on third downs.

Possible passing target

Since he left after the 2006 season, the Packers haven't had a back with more than 30 catches. Grant had 18 last season and has 12 in five games this year.

If you examine the Mike Holmgren and Mike Sherman years, the running backs made up for low per-carry averages with production in the passing game. From 1993-'95, Bennett ranked second on the team in catches each season.

The trend continued through the Sherman era when Green ranked first twice, second three times and third once during a seven-year stretch. This team has not used the screen pass or check-downs effectively.

"Every year is different," Bennett said. "I think lately we're getting back into that, as far as check-downs and things of that nature. We take pride in being complete backs, being a complete unit. When we are getting out we have to make the most of the opportunities. Catch the ball, look it in and make a play after."

Opportunity may be a big reason why the catches haven't come. Quarterback Aaron Rodgers has been stubborn about giving up on downfield throws and taking the check-down, and a lot will depend on him. It's possible Green's presence will make him feel more confident about doing it, given Grant and Wynn each have dropped two passes on check-downs.

Another area where Green can help is running to the left side, a problem for the Packers this season. According to the NFL's statistical database, the Packers average 2.67 yards when they run at the left guard, 3.18 at left tackle and 3.52 at left end. All of their runs to the right and middle average more than 4 yards.

Green is left-handed and it's more natural for him to turn that direction. During his record-breaking 2003 season, he averaged 8.78 yards running off left tackle and just over 4.0 at left end and left guard.

Adding Green is a desperation move for the Packers and uncharacteristic for general manager Ted Thompson, who prefers to bring up younger players when there is an opening.

But it shows their concern that they're not getting enough out of Grant.


UserPostedImage
LambeauEast
15 years ago
Maybe Green will rub off on Grant like the article pointed out that Bennett said. I'd like to see them break a few more tackles as well.
UserPostedImage
Dulak
15 years ago
What if grant knew that GB wanted a back; so grant thought well if we get a aged old back with many injuries - he will be least likely to take my job away and only be good on select plays anyways ...?

... just conjecture here
nerdmann
15 years ago
Just remember, they're also going to be playing Lang. That in and of itself should help the run game.
“Winning is not a sometime thing, it is an all the time thing. You don't do things right once in a while…you do them right all the time.”
gbguy20
15 years ago
Didn't read too much of the article but judging by the beginning of it is written like Green will receive a bunch of playing time, and not like he was signed as the #3 back, which automatically makes this a pile of trash.
BAD EMAIL because the address couldn ot be found, or is unable to receive mail.
Zero2Cool
15 years ago

Didn't read too much of the article but judging by the beginning of it is written like Green will receive a bunch of playing time, and not like he was signed as the #3 back, which automatically makes this a pile of trash.

"gbguy20" wrote:



If you're not going to read the entire article, don't comment on it's point if you don't know it.
UserPostedImage
15 years ago
I think Silverstein is a little off base this time. We would've signed Rhodes or brought up Lumpkin? Why Rhodes, if Green is the better option and we signed him for the veteran's minimum?
UserPostedImage
Brettizzle
15 years ago

I think Silverstein is a little off base this time. We would've signed Rhodes or brought up Lumpkin? Why Rhodes, if Green is the better option and we signed him for the veteran's minimum?

"MassPackersFan" wrote:




I agree, I read that and was a little confused. It doesn't make sense to bring Rhodes in instead of Green for any reason.
Jermichael Finley

We will be in Indianapolis

Greg C.
15 years ago
Like some others here, I found that the article pretty much lost me from the beginning. Silverstein is overanalyzing by saying that bringing in Green implies that Grant is not good enough. I'm assuming that they brought in Green because he was the best player available and the price was right. He's the replacement for their #3 RB, who was hurt.
blank
gbguy20
15 years ago

Didn't read too much of the article but judging by the beginning of it is written like Green will receive a bunch of playing time, and not like he was signed as the #3 back, which automatically makes this a pile of trash.

"Zero2Cool" wrote:



If you're not going to read the entire article, don't comment on it's point if you don't know it.

"gbguy20" wrote:



"If the Packers simply wanted to fill the position vacated when third-down back DeShawn Wynn was lost for the season with a knee injury, they would have signed veteran free agent Dominic Rhodes or elevated practice squad running back Kregg Lumpkin. Instead, they turned to Green, a former franchise back whose career took a detour because of injuries.

There are several reasons the Packers took a shot with Green, but simple logic will tell you he might be able to fill gaps that are missing in the team's mediocre running game.

Things like:

Better production on first down.
Better production on screen passes and check-downs.
Better production running to the left side."

This was enough for me to stop reading the article. That whole segment is written as if Green is going to be the main back, which we all know is wrong. Judging by everyone else's comments in this thread, it seems they all got the same feeling from it as I did.

But just for you I went back and read the whole thing. The rest of the article goes on to talk about Green's running style, etc. Not really saying much of anything.
BAD EMAIL because the address couldn ot be found, or is unable to receive mail.
Fan Shout
Mucky Tundra (51m) : Getting help would have been nice, but helping ourselves should always be the plan
beast (1h) : Too bad Seahawks couldn't beat Vikings
bboystyle (1h) : We just need to win Monday night and were in
Mucky Tundra (4h) : Or ties, but let's be real here
Mucky Tundra (4h) : Other scenario was Falcons+Rams losses
Mucky Tundra (4h) : Needed a Falcons loss for a Seahawk loss to clinch
buckeyepackfan (4h) : Am I wring in saying if Tge Vikings beat The Seahawks, The Packers clinch?
Mucky Tundra (21-Dec) : Agreed; you stinks
Zero2Cool (21-Dec) : I'm not beating anyone. I stinks.
Mucky Tundra (21-Dec) : rough injury for tank dell. guy can't catch abreak
beast (21-Dec) : So far the college playoffs have sucked... One team absolutely dominates the other
beast (21-Dec) : Well even if you weren't positive towards a guy, you wouldn't nessarily want to tell the media that (if they don't know about it)
Martha Careful (21-Dec) : I think MLF want Love to look past the end half issues, and feel good about his play. Our coaches generally keep a very positive tone.
beast (21-Dec) : I think a great running game will do that for most QBs
packerfanoutwest (21-Dec) : Coach Matt LaFleur has said quarterback Jordan Love is playing the best football of his career.
beast (21-Dec) : Oh, that's how you keep beating buckeye, with cheating
Zero2Cool (20-Dec) : There is a rule that if your name starts with 'b' you lose 15 points. Hey, I don't make the rules, I just enforce them!
wpr (20-Dec) : and then there is Beast. Running away with it all.
beast (20-Dec) : As of tonight, 3 way tie for 2nd in Pick'em, that battle is interesting!
beast (20-Dec) : Lions vs Vikings could be the main last game as it could determine division winners or #1 vs #2 seed
Mucky Tundra (20-Dec) : Or if KC needs to win for the #1 seed
Mucky Tundra (20-Dec) : Right now it looks like the only prime worthy games are Det-Minny and KC-Denver (if Denver can clinch a wild card spot)
Mucky Tundra (20-Dec) : The entirety of week 18 being listed as flex is weird
Zero2Cool (19-Dec) : Matt LaFleur today says unequivocally "Ted Thompson had nothing to do with the drafting of Jordan Love."
Zero2Cool (19-Dec) : Apparently, the editing is what pieces comments together. That Ted thing ... fake news.
Zero2Cool (19-Dec) : LaFleur "opportunity that Ted Thompson thought was too good to pass up"
Zero2Cool (19-Dec) : Jordan Love pick was Ted Thompson's idea.
Mucky Tundra (19-Dec) : Kyle Shanahan on signing De'Vondre Campbell as a FA last offseason: “We obviously made a mistake.”
packerfanoutwest (19-Dec) : Alexander’s last season with GB
Martha Careful (18-Dec) : if I were a professional athlete, I would probably look to see who the agent is for Kirk Cousins and then use him
beast (18-Dec) : $100 million fully guaranteed Kirk Cousins gets benched for rookie
Mucky Tundra (18-Dec) : a lower case b
Mucky Tundra (18-Dec) : The real lie is how beast capitalized his name in his message while it's normally spelled with
packerfanoutwest (18-Dec) : haha that's a lie
beast (17-Dec) : Despite what lies other might tell, Beast didn't hate the Winter Warnings, it felt refreshing to Beast for some reason.
Zero2Cool (17-Dec) : whiteout uniforms in general are pretty lame and weak. NFL greed at it's worst
Martha Careful (17-Dec) : The Viking uniforms, the whiteout uniforms specifically absolutely suck
beast (17-Dec) : Thanks Zero2Cool, looks a lot better now
beast (17-Dec) : Seems like someone has a crush on me, can't stop talking about me
Zero2Cool (17-Dec) : Should be gooder now. The forum default theme went to goofy land.
Zero2Cool (17-Dec) : What the hell
packerfanoutwest (17-Dec) : yeah beast hates the Winter Warning Unies
Mucky Tundra (16-Dec) : Okay I'm glad to know it's not just something happening to me lol
Mucky Tundra (16-Dec) : Zero, did you copy the Packers uniforms from last night and white out the board?
beast (16-Dec) : Oh crap, is the board going to the Winter Warning Uniforms too?!? It's all white on white right now!
Zero2Cool (16-Dec) : WR Odell Beckham Jr is officially a free agent after clearing waivers.
Zero2Cool (16-Dec) : Packers are 6th in sacks.
Zero2Cool (16-Dec) : RB David Montgomery will undergo season-ending knee surgery.
Mucky Tundra (16-Dec) : Dan Campbell on onside kick with 12 minutes left: In hindsight, wish I didn’t do that
Zero2Cool (16-Dec) : They have that whole 12th man thing so ...
Please sign in to use Fan Shout
2024 Packers Schedule
Friday, Sep 6 @ 7:15 PM
Eagles
Sunday, Sep 15 @ 12:00 PM
COLTS
Sunday, Sep 22 @ 12:00 PM
Titans
Sunday, Sep 29 @ 12:00 PM
VIKINGS
Sunday, Oct 6 @ 3:25 PM
Rams
Sunday, Oct 13 @ 12:00 PM
CARDINALS
Sunday, Oct 20 @ 12:00 PM
TEXANS
Sunday, Oct 27 @ 12:00 PM
Jaguars
Sunday, Nov 3 @ 3:25 PM
LIONS
Sunday, Nov 17 @ 12:00 PM
Bears
Sunday, Nov 24 @ 3:25 PM
49ERS
Thursday, Nov 28 @ 7:20 PM
DOLPHINS
Thursday, Dec 5 @ 7:15 PM
Lions
Sunday, Dec 15 @ 7:20 PM
Seahawks
Monday, Dec 23 @ 7:15 PM
SAINTS
Sunday, Dec 29 @ 12:00 PM
Vikings
Saturday, Jan 4 @ 11:00 PM
BEARS
Recent Topics
42m / Green Bay Packers Talk / Mucky Tundra

5h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

22-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / packerfanoutwest

19-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

19-Dec / Random Babble / Zero2Cool

18-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

17-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / wpr

17-Dec / Featured Content / Zero2Cool

16-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

16-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / Martha Careful

16-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

16-Dec / Feedback, Suggestions and Issues / Mucky Tundra

16-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

16-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

16-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

Headlines
Copyright © 2006 - 2024 PackersHome.com™. All Rights Reserved.