I still stand by my feelings and that is Rodgers isn't that great its been 2 games, who's to say if Flynn was at qb he wouldn't have put up stats like that. I took offense to his comments in SI a nobody should open their mouth like that, telling us fans what to do. What annoys me the most is the Rodgers lovers giving him a nickname that belongs to a baseball player so everytime i see it i have to ask why are we talking about the Yankees, also the biggest thing that pisses me off is people comparing Rodgers and Brett there is none. Rodgers played 2 games and Brett has played 16 years, when Rodgers has played for the same team for 7 years then we can compare but i'll make an early prediction and that is Rodgers will bail the packers when hes a FA.
Thats the things that annoy me
"dhazer" wrote:
Hint: If you are on a Packer forum, and in the "Packers disscussion" area and you see "A-rod" mentioned, there's PROBABLY a 99.9% chance they mean Aaron Rodgers.
Oh....and i doubt Flynn would have put up those numbers. AR has made good plays and decisions on the field. I doubt a rookie would do that well. After all, look at the Vikings. Jackson has been a QB a few years now, and still sucks. AR doesn't suck, and hasn't had a major bonehead play yet, has he?
And......if people want to compare BF and AR, who cares? Let them have fun with it. You don't have to agree, but why get upset over it? The media has been doing it since BF went to the Jets.
BF has won ONE more Super Bowl then AR so far. JUST one. Maybe AR will win as many, more, or none. But to be fair to him, he should also be given as many years as it took BF to get one, right? At least 5 years, right?
So yeah......he hasn't had the time behind center for ME at least to compare him to BF. But thats just me. Hopefully in just a few seasons Packer fans will have at least ONE more Lombardi trophy in it's trophy case. Thats what it's all about, right?