obi1
16 years ago

yahoo sports' michael silver has us ranked 1st hah

"all_about_da_packers" wrote:



gimme a link please.

"Greg C." wrote:



Here's the link (scroll to the bottom of the page for rankings):
http://sports.yahoo.com/nfl/news?slug=ms-32questions091608&prov=yhoo&type=lgns 

And here's his comment:
1. Green Bay Packers: If they beat the Cowboys next week, will people stop sending emails questioning my sanity (and sobriety) for ranking them No. 1?

"Jacob" wrote:



Shocker.

With all due respect to the Packers, I can't imagine anyone actually having them ahead of the Cowboys. The Cowboys are loaded with talent that is proven.

The Packers may have talent, but it is not as proven, and I'd argue not as deep. The Cowboys are a scary team, if one of their players go down, they've got a back-up who'd be a starter on most other teams.

Actually, the only position I think the Packers clearly edge out Dallas is at WR. Even then, I'd question having the Pack as #1.

If the Packers play up to their potential (and get in a rhythm early and often) this will be one heck of a game.

"dannychau22" wrote:



Actually, Packers ARE proven. This is the same exact team that made the NFC championship game. W/O Brett Favre and right now, his replacement is not too far behind.

If they are #1 right now and the team has not hit its peak yet, it is scary what they will be like when they do...
blank
Packnic
16 years ago

yahoo sports' michael silver has us ranked 1st hah

"all_about_da_packers" wrote:



gimme a link please.

"Greg C." wrote:



Here's the link (scroll to the bottom of the page for rankings):
http://sports.yahoo.com/nfl/news?slug=ms-32questions091608&prov=yhoo&type=lgns 

And here's his comment:
1. Green Bay Packers: If they beat the Cowboys next week, will people stop sending emails questioning my sanity (and sobriety) for ranking them No. 1?

"Jacob" wrote:



Shocker.

With all due respect to the Packers, I can't imagine anyone actually having them ahead of the Cowboys. The Cowboys are loaded with talent that is proven.

The Packers may have talent, but it is not as proven, and I'd argue not as deep. The Cowboys are a scary team, if one of their players go down, they've got a back-up who'd be a starter on most other teams.

Actually, the only position I think the Packers clearly edge out Dallas is at WR. Even then, I'd question having the Pack as #1.

If the Packers play up to their potential (and get in a rhythm early and often) this will be one heck of a game.

"dannychau22" wrote:




I disagree a lot. I don't think the Cowboys are that deep, and we are hands down better than them at WR. They have a good Oline which is a huge factor. But that Philly game was smoke and mirrors i think. The big play can be contained and if so what are they gonna do then.

I also think we are more experienced than the Cowboys. We stayed in the post season longer last year and made very few changes.

and never forget the potential meltdown to come when all those ridiculous headline grabbing superstars can't handle their first loss.
blank
Zero2Cool
16 years ago
I don't think we contained the big play last time we played against them. I don't recall specifically.
UserPostedImage
walleye
16 years ago

I don't think we contained the big play last time we played against them. I don't recall specifically.

"Zero2Cool" wrote:



No we did not Harris let big mouth TO get in his head, and we where missing key players.
:whipitgood:
UserPostedImage
Here Fishy Fishy
Packnic
16 years ago

I don't think we contained the big play last time we played against them. I don't recall specifically.

"Zero2Cool" wrote:



we also weren't getting the pressure last time, that I've seen from the Packers so far. Its all about pressure. we pressure, we win.

I am not saying its a cake walk. I just happen to think we are a good football team and until Dallas wins a playoff game... we are better.
blank
gbpfan
16 years ago
romo does not do well under pressure he showed that against the eagles the only reason eagles lost is that badpass to westbrook if mcnabb would have just handed the ball like he usally does they could have had that game,but the fumble came and the cowboys took advantage of it,and i feel our d-line will be able to put lots of pressure on romo i know he can scramble but it is more backward than forward get them in long situstions can make a mess of a game plus if our o-line stays on the field longer and wear down their d-line can be a factor that was going for the eagles to
Fan Shout
beast (6h) : What is he supposed to say? He doesn't want players currently on the team?
Martha Careful (10h) : meh
Zero2Cool (15h) : Sounds like Walker and Wyatt will be with Packers for beyond 2026
Zero2Cool (15h) : It's so awesome.
Zero2Cool (15h) : new site fan shout post fast
wpr (18h) : Slow posting in Fan shout.
wpr (18h) : Only 4
wpr (18h) : Only 4
Zero2Cool (21h) : If only we had a topic to read about and discuss it. That's something new website must have!!!
dfosterf (21h) : Justice Musqueda over at Acme Packing put up an excellent synopsis of the Packers 1st round options this am
wpr (19-Apr) : 5 days
beast (18-Apr) : 6 days
wpr (17-Apr) : 7 days
Zero2Cool (16-Apr) : sounds like Packers don't get good compensation, Jaire staying
dfosterf (16-Apr) : Nobody coming up with a keep, but at x amount
dfosterf (16-Apr) : Trade, cut or keep
dfosterf (16-Apr) : that from Jaire
dfosterf (16-Apr) : My guess is the Packers floated the concept of a reworked contract via his agent and agent got a f'
Zero2Cool (16-Apr) : Yes, and that is why I think Rob worded it how he did. Rather than say "agent"
dfosterf (16-Apr) : Same laws apply. Agent must present such an offer to Jaire. Cannot accept or reject without presenting it
Zero2Cool (16-Apr) : I'm thinking that is why Rob worded it how he did.
dfosterf (16-Apr) : The Packers can certainly still make the offer to the agent
dfosterf (16-Apr) : Laws of agency and definition of fiduciary responsibility
dfosterf (16-Apr) : Jaire is open to a reduced contract without Jaire's permission
dfosterf (16-Apr) : The agent would arguably violate the law if he were to tell the Packers
Zero2Cool (16-Apr) : That someone ... likely the agent.
Zero2Cool (16-Apr) : So, Jaire has not been offered nor rejected a pay reduction, but someone says he'd decline.
Zero2Cool (16-Apr) : Demovksy says t was direct communication with someone familiar with Jaire’s line of thinking at that moment.
Zero2Cool (16-Apr) : Demovsky just replied to me a bit ago. Jaire hasn't said it.
dfosterf (16-Apr) : Of course, that depends on the definition of "we"
dfosterf (16-Apr) : We have been told that they haven't because he wouldn't accept it. I submit we don't know that
dfosterf (16-Apr) : What is the downside in making a calculated reduced offer to Jaire?
Zero2Cool (15-Apr) : Packers are receiving interest in Jaire Alexander but a trade is not imminent
Zero2Cool (15-Apr) : Jalen Ramsey wants to be traded. He's never happy is he?
Zero2Cool (15-Apr) : two 1sts in 2022 and two 2nd's in 2023 and 2024
Zero2Cool (15-Apr) : Packers had fortunate last three drafts.
dfosterf (15-Apr) : I may have to move
dfosterf (15-Apr) : My wife just told the ancient Japanese sushi dude not enough rice under his fish
Zero2Cool (14-Apr) : I think a dozen is what I need
dfosterf (14-Apr) : Go fund me for this purpose just might work. A dozen nurses show up at 1265 to provide mental health assistance.
dfosterf (14-Apr) : Maybe send a crew of Angels to the Packers draft room on draft day.
Zero2Cool (14-Apr) : I am the Angel that gets visited.
dfosterf (14-Apr) : Visiting Angels has a pretty good reputation
Zero2Cool (14-Apr) : what
Martha Careful (14-Apr) : WINNING IT, not someone else losing it. The best victory though was re-uniting with his wife
Martha Careful (14-Apr) : The manner in which he won it was just amazing and wonderful. First blowing the lead then getting back, then blowing it. But ultimately
Zero2Cool (12-Apr) : I'm guessing since the thumb was broken, he wasn't feeling it.
dfosterf (10-Apr) : Looking for guidance. Not feeling the thumb.
Mucky Tundra (10-Apr) : If they knew about it or not
Mucky Tundra (10-Apr) : I don't recall that he did which is why I asked.
Please sign in to use Fan Shout
2024 Packers Schedule
Friday, Sep 6 @ 7:15 PM
Eagles
Sunday, Sep 15 @ 12:00 PM
COLTS
Sunday, Sep 22 @ 12:00 PM
Titans
Sunday, Sep 29 @ 12:00 PM
VIKINGS
Sunday, Oct 6 @ 3:25 PM
Rams
Sunday, Oct 13 @ 12:00 PM
CARDINALS
Sunday, Oct 20 @ 12:00 PM
TEXANS
Sunday, Oct 27 @ 12:00 PM
Jaguars
Sunday, Nov 3 @ 3:25 PM
LIONS
Sunday, Nov 17 @ 12:00 PM
Bears
Sunday, Nov 24 @ 3:25 PM
49ERS
Thursday, Nov 28 @ 7:20 PM
DOLPHINS
Thursday, Dec 5 @ 7:15 PM
Lions
Sunday, Dec 15 @ 7:20 PM
Seahawks
Monday, Dec 23 @ 7:15 PM
SAINTS
Sunday, Dec 29 @ 3:25 PM
Vikings
Sunday, Jan 5 @ 12:00 PM
BEARS
Recent Topics
8h / Green Bay Packers Talk / dfosterf

17-Apr / Random Babble / wpr

16-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

13-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / Martha Careful

12-Apr / Feedback, Suggestions and Issues / Zero2Cool

11-Apr / Feedback, Suggestions and Issues / Rockmolder

2-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

2-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / bboystyle

1-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / Mucky Tundra

1-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / wpr

31-Mar / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

30-Mar / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

29-Mar / Random Babble / wpr

28-Mar / Random Babble / Martha Careful

26-Mar / Random Babble / Mucky Tundra

Headlines
Copyright © 2006 - 2025 PackersHome.com™. All Rights Reserved.