Rodgers stats vs ??????

Zero2Cool
Elite Member Topic Starter

15 years ago

I read this somewhere and had to research it to see it myself.

	?????	Rodgers
G	16	16
GS	16	16
Comp	371	341
Att	555	536
Pct	66.8	63.6
Yds	4002	4038
Avg	7.2	7.5
TD	27	28
Int	12	13
Sck	14	34
SckY	86	231
Rate	95	93.8
		 
Att	20	56
Yds	21	207
Avg	1.1	3.7
TD	1	4
Fum	1	10
Lost	0	3

Sacked 20 more times and NINE more fumbles! That's the difference between a MVP season and missing the playoffs ... 😞

Wanna join the discussion?! Login to your PACKERSHOME forum account or Register a new forum account

Rockmolder
Honored Member

15 years ago

I agree. I doubt that Rodgers will ever have the vision ????? has, though. Don't get me wrong, a lot of this is because of the O-line as well (Everyone knows how bad ours sucked last year), but he gets that ball out there and makes nearly no mistakes in his reads and what not.

shield4life
Veteran Member

15 years ago

"Rockmolder" wrote:

Yes our O-line did suck but if it was ??? it would still be less sacks due to the experience factor and reading the plays. Rodgers had 20 more sacks because the lack of experience. Next year stats of his sacks will be reduced.

No offense I love Aaron Rodgers but the o-line last year should of been much better then the previous year due to there experience but they weren't that good. Don't forget you had ???? the year previous which helped a lot Grant - O-line look much better due to the reason that the teams we're scared of his game.

Glad To Be A Packers Fan.

Rockmolder
Honored Member

15 years ago

I have to admit that I'm loosing you here. You do know that we're not talking about Favre, right?

Like I said and you pointed out again, as well, ????'s experience, smarts and ability to read the play got him out of a lot of these situations. In all honesty, the first half of the season, his O-line sucked just as much as ours did. These things come while playing, but I doubt that Rodgers will ever be on his level. Still, a good o-line is a necessity for both players.

LordFootball
Registered

15 years ago

I had to look it up. ??? = Peyton Manning. Not sure what the 10 fumbles are from. Maybe I'm reading something wrong but NFL.com has Rodgers listed as 4 fumbles

===edit, all fumbles count even the ones he got back :thumbright:

blank

Zero2Cool
Elite Member Topic Starter

15 years ago

"LordFootball" wrote:

Those stats in the first post are from NFL.com

Rodgers fumbled it 10 times, 3 were lost.
Peyton fumbled it 1 time, 0 were lost.

LordFootball
Registered

15 years ago

"Zero2Cool" wrote:

Those stats in the first post are from NFL.com

Rodgers fumbled it 10 times, 3 were lost.
Peyton fumbled it 1 time, 0 were lost.

"LordFootball" wrote:

I'm amazed by the 10 drops vs Mannings 1. I never even realized that Rodgers put it on the ground that much. I suppose when he only lost only 4 (or 3, depending on which nfl.com site your talking to :profileright: ) fumbles through out the season it becomes less noticable.

blank

MassPackersFan
Member

15 years ago

Rodgers showed better awareness and scrambling ability than I expected out of him last year. Our O-line was just THAT bad.

Zero2Cool
Elite Member Topic Starter

15 years ago

"LordFootball" wrote:

Source Link

Click the source to see the 3 fumbles lost 😉

I think it should be mentioned that if it's a bad snap, it falls onto the QB's stat sheet, not the centers. I could be mistaken on that, but I believe that's how it works. Someone more smarterest than me can confirm that 🙂

MassPackersFan
Member

15 years ago

#10

If Spitz is the starting center this year, they have to clean that shit up.

Important Information:

The PACKERSHOME uses cookies. By continuing to browse this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. More Details Close

Fan Shout

Martha Careful (22h) : thank you Mucky for sticking up for me

Martha Careful (22h) : some of those people are smarter than you zero. However Pete Carroll is not

Mucky Tundra (24-Jan) : Rude!

beast (24-Jan) : Martha? 😋

Zero2Cool (24-Jan) : Raiders hired someone from the elderly home.

dfosterf (24-Jan) : I'm going with a combination of the two.

beast (24-Jan) : Either the Cowboys have no idea what they're doing, or they're targeting their former OC, currently the Eagles OC

Zero2Cool (23-Jan) : Fake news. Cowboys say no

Zero2Cool (23-Jan) : Mystery candidate in the Cowboys head coaching search believed to be Packers ST Coordinator Rich Bisaccia.

beast (23-Jan) : Also why do both NYC teams have absolutely horrible OL for over a decade?

beast (23-Jan) : I wonder why the Jets always hire defensive coaches to be head coach

Zero2Cool (22-Jan) : Still HC positions available out there. I wonder if Hafley pops up for one

Zero2Cool (22-Jan) : Trent Baalke is out as the Jaguars GM.

dfosterf (22-Jan) : Jeff Hafley would have been a better choice, fortunately they don't know that. Someone will figure that out next off season

Zero2Cool (22-Jan) : Aaron Glenn Planning To Take Jets HC Job

dfosterf (22-Jan) : Martha- C'est mon boulot! 😁

Zero2Cool (22-Jan) : Thank you

wpr (22-Jan) : Z, glad you are feeling better.

wpr (22-Jan) : My son and D-I-L work for UM. It's a way to pick on them.

Zero2Cool (22-Jan) : Thank you. I rarely get sick, and even more rarely sick to the point I can't work.

wpr (22-Jan) : Beast- back to yesterday, I CAN say OSU your have been Michigan IF the odds of making the playoffs were more urgent.

dfosterf (22-Jan) : Glad to hear you are feeling a bit better.

Zero2Cool (22-Jan) : I've been near death ill last several days, finally feel less dead and site issues.

Zero2Cool (22-Jan) : It is a big deal. This host is having issues. It's frustrating.

Martha Careful (22-Jan) : just kidding...it was down

Martha Careful (22-Jan) : you were blocked yesterday, due to a a recalcitrant demeanor yesterday in the penalty box for a recalcitrant demeanor

dfosterf (22-Jan) : Was that site shutdown on your end or mine? No big deal, just curious

beast (21-Jan) : That way teams like Indiana and SMU don't make the conference championships by simply avoiding all the other good teams in their own confere

beast (21-Jan) : Also, with these "Super Conferences" instead of a single conference champion, have 4 teams make a Conference playoffs.

beast (21-Jan) : Also in college football, is a bye week a good or bad thing?

Martha Careful (21-Jan) : The tournament format was fine. Seeding could use some work.

beast (21-Jan) : You can't assume Ohio State would of won the Michigan game...

beast (21-Jan) : Rankings were 1) Oregon 2) Georgia 3) Texas 4) Penn State 5) Notre Dame 6) Ohio State, none of the rest mattered

wpr (21-Jan) : Texas, ND and OSU would have been fighting for the final 2 slots.

wpr (21-Jan) : Oregon and Georgia were locks. Without the luxury of extra playoff berths, Ohios St would have been more focused on Michigan game.

wpr (21-Jan) : Zero, no. If there were only 4 teams Ohio State would have been one of them. Boise St and ASU would not have been selected.

Zero2Cool (21-Jan) : So that was 7 vs 8, that means in BCS they never would made it?

Martha Careful (21-Jan) : A great game. Give ND credit for coming back, although I am please with the outcome.

Mucky Tundra (21-Jan) : FG to make it academic

Mucky Tundra (21-Jan) : and there's the dagger

Mucky Tundra (21-Jan) : ooooo 8 point game with 4 minutes to go!

Mucky Tundra (21-Jan) : ooooooooohhhhhh he missed!

Mucky Tundra (21-Jan) : Ooooo that completion makes things VERY interesting

Mucky Tundra (21-Jan) : Game not over yet

beast (21-Jan) : Oh yeah, Georgia starting quarterback season ending elbow injury

beast (21-Jan) : Sadly something happened to Georgia... they should be playing in this game against Ohio State

beast (21-Jan) : I thought Ohio State and Texas were both better than Notre Dame & Penn State

Mucky Tundra (21-Jan) : Notre Lame getting rolled

Martha Careful (21-Jan) : Ohio State just got punched in the gut. Lets see how they respond

Mucky Tundra (21-Jan) : Notre Lame vs the Luckeyes, bleh

Please sign in to use Fan Shout

2024 Packers Schedule

Friday, Sep 6 @ 7:15 PM

Eagles

29 - 34

Sunday, Sep 15 @ 12:00 PM

COLTS

16 - 10

Sunday, Sep 22 @ 12:00 PM

Titans

30 - 14

Sunday, Sep 29 @ 12:00 PM

VIKINGS

29 - 31

Sunday, Oct 6 @ 3:25 PM

Rams

24 - 19

Sunday, Oct 13 @ 12:00 PM

CARDINALS

34 - 13

Sunday, Oct 20 @ 12:00 PM

TEXANS

24 - 22

Sunday, Oct 27 @ 12:00 PM

Jaguars

30 - 27

Sunday, Nov 3 @ 3:25 PM

LIONS

14 - 24

Sunday, Nov 17 @ 12:00 PM

Bears

20 - 19

Sunday, Nov 24 @ 3:25 PM

49ERS

38 - 10

Thursday, Nov 28 @ 7:20 PM

DOLPHINS

30 - 17

Thursday, Dec 5 @ 7:15 PM

Lions

31 - 34

Sunday, Dec 15 @ 7:20 PM

Seahawks

30 - 13

Monday, Dec 23 @ 7:15 PM

SAINTS

34 - 0

Sunday, Dec 29 @ 3:25 PM

Vikings

25 - 27

Sunday, Jan 5 @ 12:00 PM

BEARS

22 - 24

Sunday, Jan 12 @ 3:30 PM

Eagles

10 - 22