Rodgers talks about facing Favre· Page 5

shield4life
Veteran Member

15 years ago

#41

Hazer, AR is going to shut you up real good this year 🙂.

Glad To Be A Packers Fan.

MassPackersFan
Member

15 years ago

#42

The only way Rodgers could shut dhazer up is by riding a flying unicycle through his fantasy land, ricocheting footballs off of his dome. He sure can't shut him up by playing well.

go.pack.go.
Veteran Member

15 years ago

#43

There really is no reason for hazer to hate Aaron Rodgers like that. It's obvious that it's only because Ted Thompson brought him here.

So hazer, would you rather have a 22 TD and 22 INT QB or a 28 TD and a 13 INT QB?

Don't give me that bullshit like "well Brett Favre only did bad because of his bad shoulder." BULLSHIT!!

Brett is always the one saying "I won't go out and play if I don't think I can contribute to my team." So obviously he thought he could contribute.

dhazer
Veteran Member

15 years ago

#44

"go.pack.go." wrote:

To be honest i could careless if my qb threw for 50 ints aslong as we were winning the games. In the end that's all i want is wins. The only stat that matters is the Wins stat plain and simple.

And once again here is my story. I hate TT, do i think Ted Thompson wanted Brett gone? Hell Ya. Do i hate Ted Thompson just because of last year? Nope i hated his conservative style from day 1. Do i hate Rodgers? Nope but i refuse to praise a guy for one good year when the team lost games. Like they say every dog has its day. If he can do it for another 2 years then i will start giving him the praise like most of you people do. So for you people calling me a Favre fister is way off.

Just Imagine this for the next 6-9 years. What a ride it will be 🙂 (PS, Zero should charge for this)

DakotaT
Select Member

15 years ago

#45

I hate Ted Thompson, do i think Ted Thompson wanted Brett gone? Hell Ya. Do i hate Ted Thompson just because of last year? Nope i hated his conservative style from day 1.

"dhazer" wrote:

You know I do agree with you on Thompson wanting him gone, but you'll never see an adminission of this in the press. I don't think McCarthey wanted him anymore truthfully, and the reason would be his recklessness and Brett's whole aura of being the face of the Packers. I think Brett became uncoachable during his Sherman tenure. Brett became above the Packers and we as fans are as resposible as well as the local and national media.

So I guess we've established, I'll be calling you Tator (yes Cheesey, we will leave it with an or not an er). :icon_smile:

buckeyepackfan
Veteran Member

15 years ago

#46

Is it September yet? IMHO both sides of this argument are somewhat correct.
AR did have a good year, the defense did stink it up, my thinking is MM needs to let AR loose and see if he is the QB everyone wants him to be.

Instead of sitting on a 3 point lead or just settling for 3 when 7 was very possible, MM needs to let AR do what he does best, put points on the board. Then if the D falters, maybe the Pack will have a 14 or 17 point lead.

Good point whoever posted last year is last year. Of course some on this forum can't leave anything go, {damn if we only would have drafted Barry Sanders) :icon_smile: :icon_smile: :icon_smile:

I see that the "labelers are still around".
The big srory this year(if it happens)is going to be Brett coming back to play against The Packers, live with it, deal with it, it probably will happen.

I am a huge BF fan, does that mean I don't care about The Packers anymore?

No what it means is I will be enjoying being able to watch #4 at least one more year, but when it come the day he is playing against The Pack, I will treat him like any other qb.

I was addicted to The Hokey Pokey, but I turned myself around!

Zero2Cool
Elite Member

15 years ago

#47

"go.pack.go." wrote:

I'd have to ask, when did those 22 and 28 TD's happen as well as when did those 22 INT's and 13 INT's happen in each game and what were the results of said TD's/INT's?

I'd rather have a QB throw 16 game winning TD scores with 32 INT's than lose 12 games with a QB throwing 38 TD's and 10 INT's.

MassPackersFan
Member

15 years ago

#48

A QB who doesn't throw 32 INTs wouldn't have to throw 16 game winning TDs. Plus the rest of the supporting cast would be amazing to go 16-0 with a QB throwing 16 TDs and 32 INTs.

Blank402
Registered

15 years ago

#49

Have a better passer rating of 46.6 in the last 5 minutes of a game and be able to substain a drive so the defense don't have to be on the field :p

"dhazer" wrote:

While we're on the subject of stats in the last five minutes of games, I ran across an interesting one the other day. Teams down by one score driving against our defense with five minutes or less on the clock had a 76% success rate. :p

And you know what helps sustain drives? A good running game, which we didn't have last year, especially at the end of games.

As a whole, I think it's safe to say our team in general was very unclutch last year, but if you want to go on blaming Aaron Rodgers for that I'm not going to stop you.

blank

Zero2Cool
Elite Member

15 years ago

#50

A QB who doesn't throw 32 INTs wouldn't have to throw 16 game winning TDs. Plus the rest of the supporting cast would be amazing to go 16-0 with a QB throwing 16 TDs and 32 INTs.

"MassPackersFan" wrote:

Wow, c'mon. You GET the point I'm making here, geez.

Important Information:

The PACKERSHOME uses cookies. By continuing to browse this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. More Details Close

Fan Shout

beast (8h) : What is he supposed to say? He doesn't want players currently on the team?

Martha Careful (12h) : meh

Zero2Cool (17h) : Sounds like Walker and Wyatt will be with Packers for beyond 2026

Zero2Cool (17h) : It's so awesome.

Zero2Cool (17h) : new site fan shout post fast

wpr (20h) : Slow posting in Fan shout.

wpr (20h) : Only 4

Zero2Cool (22h) : If only we had a topic to read about and discuss it. That's something new website must have!!!

dfosterf (23h) : Justice Musqueda over at Acme Packing put up an excellent synopsis of the Packers 1st round options this am

wpr (19-Apr) : 5 days

beast (18-Apr) : 6 days

wpr (17-Apr) : 7 days

Zero2Cool (16-Apr) : sounds like Packers don't get good compensation, Jaire staying

dfosterf (16-Apr) : Nobody coming up with a keep, but at x amount

dfosterf (16-Apr) : Trade, cut or keep

dfosterf (16-Apr) : that from Jaire

dfosterf (16-Apr) : My guess is the Packers floated the concept of a reworked contract via his agent and agent got a f'

Zero2Cool (16-Apr) : Yes, and that is why I think Rob worded it how he did. Rather than say "agent"

dfosterf (16-Apr) : Same laws apply. Agent must present such an offer to Jaire. Cannot accept or reject without presenting it

Zero2Cool (16-Apr) : I'm thinking that is why Rob worded it how he did.

dfosterf (16-Apr) : The Packers can certainly still make the offer to the agent

dfosterf (16-Apr) : Laws of agency and definition of fiduciary responsibility

dfosterf (16-Apr) : Jaire is open to a reduced contract without Jaire's permission

dfosterf (16-Apr) : The agent would arguably violate the law if he were to tell the Packers

Zero2Cool (16-Apr) : That someone ... likely the agent.

Zero2Cool (16-Apr) : So, Jaire has not been offered nor rejected a pay reduction, but someone says he'd decline.

Zero2Cool (16-Apr) : Demovksy says t was direct communication with someone familiar with Jaire’s line of thinking at that moment.

Zero2Cool (16-Apr) : Demovsky just replied to me a bit ago. Jaire hasn't said it.

dfosterf (16-Apr) : Of course, that depends on the definition of "we"

dfosterf (16-Apr) : We have been told that they haven't because he wouldn't accept it. I submit we don't know that

dfosterf (16-Apr) : What is the downside in making a calculated reduced offer to Jaire?

Zero2Cool (15-Apr) : Packers are receiving interest in Jaire Alexander but a trade is not imminent

Zero2Cool (15-Apr) : Jalen Ramsey wants to be traded. He's never happy is he?

Zero2Cool (15-Apr) : two 1sts in 2022 and two 2nd's in 2023 and 2024

Zero2Cool (15-Apr) : Packers had fortunate last three drafts.

dfosterf (15-Apr) : I may have to move

dfosterf (15-Apr) : My wife just told the ancient Japanese sushi dude not enough rice under his fish

Zero2Cool (14-Apr) : I think a dozen is what I need

dfosterf (14-Apr) : Go fund me for this purpose just might work. A dozen nurses show up at 1265 to provide mental health assistance.

dfosterf (14-Apr) : Maybe send a crew of Angels to the Packers draft room on draft day.

Zero2Cool (14-Apr) : I am the Angel that gets visited.

dfosterf (14-Apr) : Visiting Angels has a pretty good reputation

Zero2Cool (14-Apr) : what

Martha Careful (14-Apr) : WINNING IT, not someone else losing it. The best victory though was re-uniting with his wife

Martha Careful (14-Apr) : The manner in which he won it was just amazing and wonderful. First blowing the lead then getting back, then blowing it. But ultimately

Zero2Cool (12-Apr) : I'm guessing since the thumb was broken, he wasn't feeling it.

dfosterf (10-Apr) : Looking for guidance. Not feeling the thumb.

Mucky Tundra (10-Apr) : If they knew about it or not

Mucky Tundra (10-Apr) : I don't recall that he did which is why I asked.

Please sign in to use Fan Shout

2024 Packers Schedule

Friday, Sep 6 @ 7:15 PM

Eagles

29 - 34

Sunday, Sep 15 @ 12:00 PM

COLTS

16 - 10

Sunday, Sep 22 @ 12:00 PM

Titans

30 - 14

Sunday, Sep 29 @ 12:00 PM

VIKINGS

29 - 31

Sunday, Oct 6 @ 3:25 PM

Rams

24 - 19

Sunday, Oct 13 @ 12:00 PM

CARDINALS

34 - 13

Sunday, Oct 20 @ 12:00 PM

TEXANS

24 - 22

Sunday, Oct 27 @ 12:00 PM

Jaguars

30 - 27

Sunday, Nov 3 @ 3:25 PM

LIONS

14 - 24

Sunday, Nov 17 @ 12:00 PM

Bears

20 - 19

Sunday, Nov 24 @ 3:25 PM

49ERS

38 - 10

Thursday, Nov 28 @ 7:20 PM

DOLPHINS

30 - 17

Thursday, Dec 5 @ 7:15 PM

Lions

31 - 34

Sunday, Dec 15 @ 7:20 PM

Seahawks

30 - 13

Monday, Dec 23 @ 7:15 PM

SAINTS

34 - 0

Sunday, Dec 29 @ 3:25 PM

Vikings

25 - 27

Sunday, Jan 5 @ 12:00 PM

BEARS

22 - 24