Announcement PH Beta → Check it out! Click Me! (you might be see "unsafe", but it is safe)
dfosterf
15 years ago
I know how long he has been on the team. He is nowhere near on a trajectory to be an impact defensive lineman, and that is what I was referencing. This will be his third year, as all know, and he is effectively a rookie.

I want him to succeed as much as anyone, but I still reserve the right to bitch about it. I have been nice to him, I have been mean to him, I have been in-between with him. I understood drafting him at the time...Few seemed to.

I am going to estimate that I have made approximately 28 negative posts in the past two years as regards Justin. Coincidentally, that is how many tackles he has made in the last two years, coupled with no sacks, no forced fumbles and no fumble recoveries. He is being moved to DE, and he is ostensibly a run stuffer--he will be changing gears, here...

As far as the money goes, he generously agreed to no signing bonus when we signed him. He did receive a salary of 285k for 2007, along with a roster bonus of 962k.

He has a guarantee of 8.1 million, btw.

For 2008, he got an option bonus of 5.3 million dollars, a base of 370k, and a 162k roster bonus.

So, for a mere 7.079 million dollars, we have got 28 tackles, of which, 18 were solo, but I'm being nice here. That is $252,821.43 per tackle.

For 2009, he will make 460k base plus 186,625 in another roster bonus.

If we cut him at the end of training camp (for example). It will cost us 1.021 million, satisfying his guarantee. If he stays on the team, it will actually cost us a bit less at 646,625.00 for the year, with of course the differential in guarantee remaining, or put another way, about two tackles worth (sorry, can't help myself).

At these prices, Justin Harrell can endure my bitching about it on a forum.
dhpackr
15 years ago
that's the whole thing with harrell, can this guy stay healthy. i really did not understand drafting an injured player in the first round when there was such a glaring weakness on offense, and a solution to that weakness was available instead of harrell.

is the torn muscle in his arm healed, and is his back ready to go?? if yes, then this guy should be productive.
So if you meet me Have some courtesy, Have some sympathy, and some taste
Use all your well-learned politesse, Or I'll lay your soul to waste
Rockmolder
15 years ago

that's the whole thing with harrell, can this guy stay healthy. i really did not understand drafting an injured player in the first round when there was such a glaring weakness on offense, and a solution to that weakness was available instead of harrell.

is the torn muscle in his arm healed, and is his back ready to go?? if yes, then this guy should be productive.

"dhpackr" wrote:



On one side, I agree with you. He hasn't been healthy for ages and it was a very risky pick. We could've had a Michael Griffin, for instance. With our holes at safety, that would've been nice. (2007 was the season before Atari's break-out year)

On the other side, he did look like an amazing athlete for his size and position. Like Foster-Dave had been hammering on, he might be one of those once in a generation players, if only he could stay healthy. Maybe we should've traded back since, apart from Michael Griffin (Who's playing as a FS), there wheren't any guys on the board that we really needed at this point. Any O-lineman would've been a reach for instance.
dhpackr
15 years ago
what about greg olsen. he is a productive starter.
So if you meet me Have some courtesy, Have some sympathy, and some taste
Use all your well-learned politesse, Or I'll lay your soul to waste
Rockmolder
15 years ago

what about greg olsen. he is a productive starter.

"dhpackr" wrote:



He went at the 31st pick, though. I've mainly seen him go late first to early second in mock drafts. Would've been a nice pick in hindsight.

Joe Staley would've been a decent pick as well when you look at it now. He would've been great as a developmental player behind Tauscher and Clifton and last year would've been the perfect year to put him into the starting line-up, when Tauscher went down.
dhpackr
15 years ago
like its been posted several times, justin has the tools, he is healthy (supposedly) and he should be a solid player and contribute this season.
So if you meet me Have some courtesy, Have some sympathy, and some taste
Use all your well-learned politesse, Or I'll lay your soul to waste
dfosterf
15 years ago
Somebody get the Delorean out of the professor's garage.

We'll trade back.
dhpackr
15 years ago
how about just making the right decision in the first place.
steer clear of injured players in the first round. seems pretty simple to me!
So if you meet me Have some courtesy, Have some sympathy, and some taste
Use all your well-learned politesse, Or I'll lay your soul to waste
DakotaT
15 years ago

how about just making the right decision in the first place.
steer clear of injured players in the first round. seems pretty simple to me!

"dhpackr" wrote:




Were we very deep at DT when Harrell was picked? I'm not being a smartass like usual, I'm asking.

I think DT's are a premium in this league, whereas TE would be an easier position to fill in the later rounds. Some GM's stick to a draft strategy, which I think Ted Thompson does. I think weighing postions you'll find it to go QB, LT, Corner, Dline as most important positions to fill.

Greg Olson has done the work to be fine NFL tight. Kudos to the Bears.
UserPostedImage
Stevetarded
15 years ago
in the last 2 seasons

Donald Lee 87catches 878yards 11TD
Greg Olsen 93catches 965yards 7TD

Yeah, Olsen is pretty good but I don't get the people always acting like it is some huge mistake that we didn't get him.
blank
Fan Shout
Mucky Tundra (21m) : Kanata, seek help! lol
beast (2h) : I was rooting for the Bears to win and hurt their draft pick status
Zero2Cool (2h) : Forgot there was even a game last night haha
TheKanataThrilla (2h) : That was terrible.
TheKanataThrilla (2h) : Watching that game in its entirety yesterday is proof positive that I am a football addict.
beast (3h) : And horrible time management multiple times... and not being able to score more than 3 points on a team with talent
beast (3h) : Realizing the Bears didn't fix it from the previous week and do the same thing, getting the game to overtime
beast (3h) : They probably are not tanking, but they've absolutely mismanagement some things, such as Vikings seeing the Packers blocked FG and realizing
Zero2Cool (4h) : Crazy of Bears to have that mindset that is
Zero2Cool (4h) : Hail Mary stop away from 5 - 2. Not sure how that flips to tanking. Crazy mindset if true
beast (4h) : I've quietly questioned if Bears are tanking on purpose... they suddenly got a lot worse with some simple concepts like 101 clock management
wpr (7h) : Watching bares fans melt down over how putrid their team is, so enjoyable. It's the gift that keeps on giving.
Mucky Tundra (14h) : The Seattle Seahawks defeat the Chicago Bears 6-3. Jason Myers had 6 RBIs for Seattle while Cairo Santos had 3 RBI for Chicago
beast (15h) : Not nessarily, he might of been injured either way. He's playing about 50% of the games the last 4 years
Zero2Cool (21h) : If they'd been more patient with him, he'd be back already. Putting him out there vs Bears caused him to tweak it and here we are.
packerfanoutwest (21h) : well this is his last season with the PAck, book it
beast (23h) : Sounds like no Alexander (again), I'm wondering if his time with the Packers is done
Zero2Cool (26-Dec) : Could ban beast and I still don't think anyone catches him.
Mucky Tundra (26-Dec) : Houston getting dog walked by Baltimore
packerfanoutwest (25-Dec) : Feliz Navidad!
Zero2Cool (25-Dec) : Merry Christmas!
beast (25-Dec) : Merry Christmas 🎄🎁
beast (24-Dec) : Sounds like no serious injuries from the Saints game and Jacobs and Watson should play in the Vikings game
packerfanoutwest (24-Dec) : both games Watson missed, Packers won
Martha Careful (24-Dec) : I hope all of you have a Merry Christmas!
Mucky Tundra (24-Dec) : Oh I know about Jacobs, I just couldn't pass up an opportunity to mimic Zero lol
buckeyepackfan (24-Dec) : Jacobs was just sat down, Watson re-injured that knee that kept him out 1 game earlier
buckeyepackfan (24-Dec) : I needed .14 that's. .14 points for the whole 4th quarter to win and go to the SB. Lol
Mucky Tundra (24-Dec) : Jacobs gonna be OK???
Zero2Cool (24-Dec) : Watson gonna be OK???
packerfanoutwest (24-Dec) : Inactives tonight for the Pack: Alexander- knee Bullard - ankle Williams - quad Walker -ankle Monk Heath
packerfanoutwest (24-Dec) : No Jaire, but hopefully the front 7 destroys the line of scrimmage & forces Rattler into a few passes to McKinney.
packerfanoutwest (24-Dec) : minny could be #1 seed and the Lions #5 seed
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : We'd have same Division and Conference records. Strength of schedule we edge them
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I just checked. What tie breaker?
bboystyle (23-Dec) : yes its possible but unlikely. If we do get the 5th, we face the NFCS winner
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : Ahh, ok.
bboystyle (23-Dec) : yes due to tie breaker
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I mean, unlikely, yes, but mathematically, 5th is possible by what I'm reading.
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : If Vikings lose out, Packers win out, Packers get 5th, right?
bboystyle (23-Dec) : Minny isnt going to lose out so 5th seed is out of the equation. We are playing for the 6th or 7th seed which makes no difference
Mucky Tundra (23-Dec) : beast, the ad revenue goes to the broadcast company but they gotta pay to air the game on their channel/network
beast (23-Dec) : If we win tonight the game is still relative in terms of 5th, 6th or 7th seed... win and it's 5th or 6th, lose and it's 6th or 7th
beast (23-Dec) : Mucky, I thought the ad revenue went to the broadcasting companies or the NFL, at least not directly
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I think the revenue share is moot, isn't it? That's the CBA an Salary Cap handling that.
bboystyle (23-Dec) : i mean game becomes irrelevant if we win tonight. Just a game where we are trying to play spoilers to Vikings chance at the #1 seed
Mucky Tundra (23-Dec) : beast, I would guess ad revenue from more eyes watching tv
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I would think it would hurt the home team because people would have to cancel last minute maybe? i dunno
beast (23-Dec) : I agree that it's BS for fans planning on going to the game. But how does it bring in more money? I'm guessing indirectly?
packerfanoutwest (23-Dec) : bs on flexing the game....they do it for the $$league$$, not the hometown fans
Please sign in to use Fan Shout
2024 Packers Schedule
Friday, Sep 6 @ 7:15 PM
Eagles
Sunday, Sep 15 @ 12:00 PM
COLTS
Sunday, Sep 22 @ 12:00 PM
Titans
Sunday, Sep 29 @ 12:00 PM
VIKINGS
Sunday, Oct 6 @ 3:25 PM
Rams
Sunday, Oct 13 @ 12:00 PM
CARDINALS
Sunday, Oct 20 @ 12:00 PM
TEXANS
Sunday, Oct 27 @ 12:00 PM
Jaguars
Sunday, Nov 3 @ 3:25 PM
LIONS
Sunday, Nov 17 @ 12:00 PM
Bears
Sunday, Nov 24 @ 3:25 PM
49ERS
Thursday, Nov 28 @ 7:20 PM
DOLPHINS
Thursday, Dec 5 @ 7:15 PM
Lions
Sunday, Dec 15 @ 7:20 PM
Seahawks
Monday, Dec 23 @ 7:15 PM
SAINTS
Sunday, Dec 29 @ 3:25 PM
Vikings
Saturday, Jan 4 @ 11:00 PM
BEARS
Recent Topics
21m / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

39m / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

41m / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

1h / Random Babble / Martha Careful

1h / Around The NFL / Martha Careful

4h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

11h / Random Babble / Mucky Tundra

17h / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

25-Dec / Featured Content / Zero2Cool

25-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

25-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

25-Dec / GameDay Threads / bboystyle

24-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

24-Dec / Random Babble / beast

24-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

Headlines
Copyright © 2006 - 2024 PackersHome.com™. All Rights Reserved.