dfosterf
15 years ago
Link 

Perhaps this article should go in the NFL section, but it is so intertwined with the Pack I decided to put it here.

Spending & winning are not the same
Heres proof that you cant always buy a title. Andrew Brandt
July 03, 2009

In the vast majority of cases, the answer to the question anyone is asking is, Follow the money. The bottom line is almost always the bottom line. My favorite line from press conferences where athletes sign big contracts is, It isnt about the money. Translation: Its all about the money.

However, there appears to be one metric in sports, especially in the NFL, where the answer may not be to follow the money. That statistic and its the most important one in sports is winning. Money can buy a lot of things, but it will not necessarily buy a championship or even a winning record in professional sports.

My colleague Michael Lombardi aptly described the importance of prudent and targeted spending Thursday in his column about the Buccaneers.

According to a report from Jason La Canfora of NFL Network showing all the cash commitments in the NFL from 2004-2008, the range of spending goes from the Cowboys at $567 million to the Bucs at $449 million, a range of $118M, or approximately $30M per season in disparity between the highest- and lowest-spending clubs.

Although I have numbers that are slightly different, the point is the same: Spending big and winning big do not correlate. Indeed, having managed player costs at the Packers during that time frame, we were third lowest in the league at $457M about $114M average per season -- and were an overtime away from the Super Bowl in a year (2007) in which we were the second lowest-spending team in the league.

Cash not cap -- numbers are the key numbers to focus on with teams and spending. Cap spending is something that teams manage in different ways; it does not reflect how much money teams are actually paying players. One of the biggest misperceptions that fans have about teams willingness to spend is that if they have a lot of cap room, they are not spending. That can be very far from the truth. A well-managed cap with plenty of room can coincide with having spent liberally to improve. I know that firsthand.

The lack of correlation between winning and spending is not a novel concept and one that has been proven for years. The proper way to build success in the NFL is to assemble and develop young talent that proves worthy of core contract extensions, ensuring continuity of key players at key positions on the roster. Selective and targeted acquisition of free agents is necessary to complement the existing talent base. However, continued spending on free agents, driving up player costs and pushing out players who have been coached and developed, is not a sound way to put together a team.

A large amount of spending league-wide is done in early March during the opening days of free agency. Thats when teams make a splash, when owners acquiesce or even encourage finding that missing link that will put the team over the top. Its a time when contract research is thrown away, as bidding by multiple suitors creates unprecedented levels of pay for top-echelon position players. This year alone, Albert Haynesworth, Bart Scott and Jason Brown set new benchmarks for their respective positions at defensive tackle, linebacker and center.

Free agency can work if theres a plan and a clear vision for the player.

The problem with free agency in football compared to baseball (where players hit, pitch and catch) and basketball (where players athleticism creates competitive advantages) is that football requires schemes and interdependency among 11 players on every play. Its not that easy to put a new piece into the mix as it is with other sports. Thats one reason why results from free agency are sketchy. Usually, teams that make noise in March do not make noise in January.

Free agency is also the price paid for not drafting well. In Green Bay, I remember having to chase and sign Hardy Nickerson because our draft choice slated for middle linebacker, Torrance Marshall, was not working out. I chased and signed Charles Woodson because our two high picks from two previous years, Ahmad Carroll and Joey Thomas, did not pan out.

Look at any big free-agent signing and chances are hes replacing someone the team had high hopes for at some point in the recent past.

As mentioned above, the four-year spread between the highest-spending team, the Cowboys, and the lowest-spending team, the Bucs, is less than $30M a year. In contrast, the New York Yankees are spending more than $200M on their 25 players this season, while the Florida Marlins playing in the same professional sports league are spending $36M. Thats a spread of $164M between the highest- and lowest-spending teams in baseball! And, as we all know, money hasnt bought much for the free-spending Yankees in recent years (although that fact doesnt seem to stop them).

The baseball situation above is what can happen without a salary cap. While there are year-to-year differences in spending between NFL teams, there is a self-regulating effect of the NFL salary cap that will not allow teams to have top-of-league spending every year (the Redskins have been big spenders in 2005, 2007 and 2009 but have had normal spending in the other years).

Bud Selig a member of the board of directors of the Packers -- would shake his head when he listened to my cap and cash presentations, knowing that there was no regulatory mechanism like a cap in baseball. Baseball teams have their own caps budgets but the inequality in spending was and is a problem in baseball. Selig loved the fact that the Tampa Bay Rays were in the World Series last year with a $44M payroll, proving the theme again that sound management rather than money buys championships.

The disparity in spending in baseball can be a cautionary tale for owners and players in football. Without a cap, there is neither a ceiling nor a floor on spending. There could be teams playing the role of the Yankees and Red Sox and teams playing the role of the Marlins and Rays. Time will tell, and that time may be coming.

Cash is king, and the cash numbers are out. What they show are two things: One, for the overriding goal of winning, sometimes you cant just follow the money. And two, the disparity in spending is a fraction of that of baseball, a potentially ominous statistic as we stare down the barrel of a year without a salary cap in 2010.

Enjoy the holiday. Happy birthday, America!

blueleopard
15 years ago
I remember all the flack we got when signing Woodson. I knew he would pan out. At that point in time, any veteran was better than keeping Ahmad Carroll around.
Danreb Victorio A Believer of Greg Jennings
bozz_2006
15 years ago
I was mad that we signed Woodson instead of Lavar Arrington. :thumbleft:
UserPostedImage
Bigbyfan
15 years ago

I was mad that we signed Woodson instead of Lavar Arrington. :thumbleft:

"bozz_2006" wrote:



Ouch 😉
blank
dhazer
15 years ago

Although I have numbers that are slightly different, the point is the same: Spending big and winning big do not correlate. Indeed, having managed player costs at the Packers during that time frame, we were third lowest in the league at $457M about $114M average per season -- and were an overtime away from the Super Bowl in a year (2007) in which we were the second lowest-spending team in the league.



That part bothers me he is bragging about being an ot away from the Super Bowl but yet doesn't bother to mention we ended up with 2 top 10 draft picks and made the playoff one year. I think your good teams are usually right in the middle, but then again i saw the other day that the cowboys had the longest streak of being in the playoffs. Also to talk about the draft we are coming up to what i predicted and that was we would be losing players because we have so many players contracts expiring at the same time.
Just Imagine this for the next 6-9 years. What a ride it will be 🙂 (PS, Zero should charge for this)
UserPostedImage
15 years ago
I do not blame Tampa Bay this off season as there was not much on the free agent market. The only thing the Bucaneers should have done was bring back Garcia.
blank
beast
15 years ago

i saw the other day that the cowboys had the longest streak of being in the playoffs.

"dhazer" wrote:



I'm not sure it's true but the other day I saw something about the Playoffs too. It said,

There are two teams that haven't won a playoff game since 2000.

The Lions and..... the Cowboys.



Not sure if true but anyways it's not about being in the playoffs... but winning in them.
UserPostedImage
Bigbyfan
15 years ago
The Cowboys haven't won a playoff game in 12 years.
blank
dfosterf
15 years ago
Dhazer gets his streaks confused.

I suggest bleach and use the hot water setting.
IronMan
15 years ago

but then again i saw the other day that the cowboys had the longest streak of being in the playoffs.

"dhazer" wrote:


The Cowboys have made the playoffs 3 times in the last 9 years.
Fan Shout
Martha Careful (2h) : 1 round 7 min, with one extra minute if there is a trade. 2nd round 4 minutes, 3rd -3, 2 thereafter IMO
Martha Careful (3h) : Agree
dfosterf (3h) : Great idea imo
dfosterf (3h) : 1st round to 7 minutes with one extension
dfosterf (3h) : NFL comissioner wants to shorten the 2st
Mucky Tundra (8h) : @jalenreagors They’re discussing if Sheduer can go back to college on NFL Network LMFAOOOOO
beast (10h) : Great point Martha
beast (10h) : Buddy Ryan used to say if a candy bar goes missing, there are two to blame, Rex and Rob 🤪 jk 😁
Martha Careful (12h) : Bum Phillips used to say there are two ways to get better. Get better players or get players to play better. We have a new DL coach
Zero2Cool (13h) : Yes. Look at the losses last year. They can win.
beast (13h) : Can Packers win with their current DL?
bboystyle (15h) : waiting for a pass rusher.
dfosterf (17h) : 5 minutes between picks in the 3rd
dfosterf (17h) : 3rd. Hate this phone
dfosterf (17h) : 4rd
dfosterf (17h) : 5 minutes in the 4
dfosterf (17h) : 7 minutes between picks in the 2nd round
Martha Careful (17h) : Sorry to bitch, but the headline writers in that section absolutely mislead, or don't know how to read. It is maddening
Martha Careful (17h) : No thanks. Not a dependable guy to be in the right place and run the right route. Dumb as a box of rocks.
Zero2Cool (18h) : Losing 2nd round pick for a one year rental, not ideal. Especially a headcase.
TheKanataThrilla (19h) : Pickens for Jaire may be interesting. Definitely not sure we want Pickens long term.
dfosterf (19h) : No.Absolutely not
Zero2Cool (19h) : NO NO NO NO NO NO!!1 🤬🤬🤬🤬🤬
dhazer (19h) : scenario: Our main prospects are off the board when our pick comes around, do we just throw a 2nd round pick at Pittsburgh for Pickens
TheKanataThrilla (19h) : Hopefully she had some comfort that her son will be live his dream when she passed away. Sad news.
Mucky Tundra (20h) : Damn that sucks
Zero2Cool (20h) : News about Derrick Harmon mom, saddening.
Zero2Cool (22h) : Mark Murphy: "I predict we will trade up once and down twice."
beast (23h) : Rip the Packers and getting the fans yelling and booing him
beast (23h) : Super competitive Bears fan and WWE "superstar" wrestler, Seth Rollins is supposed to announce a Bears pick and absolutely rip Packers
packerfanoutwest (25-Apr) : Golden
beast (25-Apr) : I want DT Derrick Harmon, Oregon
Mucky Tundra (25-Apr) : And I can't be looking at my phone
Mucky Tundra (25-Apr) : Hey I'm at work lol
Zero2Cool (24-Apr) : btw, new site chat won't delete auto like
Zero2Cool (24-Apr) : because everyone left like wimps
TheKanataThrilla (24-Apr) : I am wondering if there is some type of autoclear when there isn't activity after a certain amount of time.
Mucky Tundra (24-Apr) : What happened in the chat? Me and Zero posted a few things earlier and they're all gone
dfosterf (24-Apr) : 10-15 min bs plus flyover
dfosterf (24-Apr) : Yes
Zero2Cool (24-Apr) : 7pm is when this kicks off????
buckeyepackfan (24-Apr) : I told him. IT'S VONTE MACK , no matter what!
buckeyepackfan (24-Apr) : He asked me who I thought The Browns were taking.
buckeyepackfan (24-Apr) : 2. Would of had to wear Browns gear all week. NOPE I'll watch from my living room.
buckeyepackfan (24-Apr) : He wanted to know if I would go. 2 things, would have had to fly from Detroit to Green Bay. Nope
buckeyepackfan (24-Apr) : All expense paid trip to the draft. He will be in the Browns section. I told him to say hi to J-10VE for me 😃😃i
buckeyepackfan (24-Apr) : For a call from my nephew, he won an sllexp
TheKanataThrilla (24-Apr) : Hope to see everyone in the Chat tonight!!! Go Pack Go!!!
TheKanataThrilla (24-Apr) : Jeanty would be a great pick-up for the Bears. I see Warren mocked to them as well who I think would be a great selection.
Zero2Cool (24-Apr) : GameDay Chat is open. Posting bits an tids in there.
Please sign in to use Fan Shout
2024 Packers Schedule
Friday, Sep 6 @ 7:15 PM
Eagles
Sunday, Sep 15 @ 12:00 PM
COLTS
Sunday, Sep 22 @ 12:00 PM
Titans
Sunday, Sep 29 @ 12:00 PM
VIKINGS
Sunday, Oct 6 @ 3:25 PM
Rams
Sunday, Oct 13 @ 12:00 PM
CARDINALS
Sunday, Oct 20 @ 12:00 PM
TEXANS
Sunday, Oct 27 @ 12:00 PM
Jaguars
Sunday, Nov 3 @ 3:25 PM
LIONS
Sunday, Nov 17 @ 12:00 PM
Bears
Sunday, Nov 24 @ 3:25 PM
49ERS
Thursday, Nov 28 @ 7:20 PM
DOLPHINS
Thursday, Dec 5 @ 7:15 PM
Lions
Sunday, Dec 15 @ 7:20 PM
Seahawks
Monday, Dec 23 @ 7:15 PM
SAINTS
Sunday, Dec 29 @ 3:25 PM
Vikings
Sunday, Jan 5 @ 12:00 PM
BEARS
Recent Topics
6m / Green Bay Packers Talk / bboystyle

30m / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

45m / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

56m / Green Bay Packers Talk / earthquake

1h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

2h / Green Bay Packers Talk / dfosterf

10h / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

14h / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

19h / Green Bay Packers Talk / bboystyle

20h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Mucky Tundra

21h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Martha Careful

25-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

24-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / TheKanataThrilla

24-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

24-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / wpr

Headlines
Copyright © 2006 - 2025 PackersHome.com™. All Rights Reserved.