Zero2Cool
15 years ago
Source Link 

Rodgers focused on job at hand

Green Bay - In his first season as starting quarterback of the Green Bay Packers, Aaron Rodgers was merely asked to replace a legend.

No pressure.

For an encore this year, Rodgers likely will have to stare down the resuscitated gunslinger, Brett Favre, in the flesh and in the house he helped build. Oh, and Jay Cutler, who bears a striking resemblance to a young Favre in talent and mentality, has taken up residence in the NFC North with the Chicago Bears.

Talk about seeing ghosts. With Cutler and potentially Favre on teams making up a quarter of the schedule, Rodgers will bump into them if he's not looking straight ahead.

If Rodgers is going to have any jitters - which he exhibited on the practice field as the Favre situation came to a head last year in training camp - they aren't showing up yet. The adversity may be mounting, but Rodgers heads into Year 2 with his California cool still intact.

"You know what, I really don't get into that whole thing, I really don't," Rodgers said. "I'm so focused on what I'm doing, what our team is doing. I know we play the Bears twice a year, the Vikings twice a year and the Lions twice a year, but all that other stuff to me is stuff that sells papers, but I don't really get a rise out of it."

Of course, that won't stop the fans from chewing on it. And that will have ramifications if things don't go well for Rodgers and the Packers.

Last year, they did not.

After the Packers ultimately chose Rodgers over Favre, they went from 13-3 in 2007 to 6-10. In eight of those losses, the Packers either led or trailed in the fourth quarter by no more than a score.

Rodgers surely was not to blame. A completion percentage of 63.6, 4,038 passing yards and 28 touchdowns against 13 interceptions are impressive statistics, to be sure. But victories and losses are what matter most. And the Packers failed in that respect.

But where others see reason for worry, the Packers find optimism. Of course, they have no other choice, and that will not halt the chorus of doubters.

"There are always going to be distractions, we just have to manage them," Rodgers said. "We have so much talent in this room; the only thing that can stop us is ourselves. And we stopped ourselves way too many times last year. If we can limit the distractions, I think we're going to be in a position to make a big run."

Off the field, in the meeting rooms, that's exactly what coach Mike McCarthy and Rodgers are working toward together. McCarthy's confidence in Rodgers has grown after last season's performance. Rodgers now has much more input into game plans and the types of plays McCarthy will call.

More freedom
[ul]While Rodgers did have the ability to audible last season, he often was limited to what options he had. McCarthy has indicated to this point that Rodgers will have more options at his disposal.

"I just think that the way he calls plays, he'll give me more responsibility at the line of scrimmage this year," Rodgers said. "I think it's him trusting that he can call more plays where there's more of a chance that I might change it at the line of scrimmage depending on what I see.

"And that respect level has grown through the type of preparation I have put in. I think he saw the way I prepared every week and knew, 'OK, he's studied the film, he's studied the game plan, he knows what to expect, so I can call the play in so if he doesn't like it or he sees something different, he knows what the correct checks are going to be,' instead of calling a play where you're kind of locked into this with no other options."[/ul]

His own self
[ul]Perhaps having more input at the line will allow Rodgers to play less managed. At times last season, Rodgers played like a system quarterback, doing exactly what he had been told the previous three seasons. It was as if Rodgers had programmed himself to be the anti-Favre: limit mistakes, let the others do the heavy lifting.

At times it worked. There were other times when even Rodgers' teammates told him to let loose a little bit.

"There were a few occasions where you could see he totally wasn't himself," receiver Greg Jennings said. "It was kind of like you could see he was trying to be what (the coaches) wanted him to be. Not saying that's what Mike and everybody wanted him to be. But it wasn't Aaron. It was like, 'Man, you have to be you.'

"I remember sharing that with him down in New Orleans when we were going through that shootout. That was one of the games where I really noticed it, that wasn't Aaron Rodgers playing. That was Aaron the coached-up player playing."

That was a season-on-the-line, got-to-have-it game. The Packers were embarrassed on national television, 51-29, as Rodgers threw three interceptions and posted his second-worst passer rating (59.8).

Maybe McCarthy thought the same as Jennings, because McCarthy has made it clear Rodgers needs to be his own man - warts and all - on the field. Not the man the coaches envision him being.
[/ul]

Coach agrees
[ul]"I think it's important, No. 1, for Aaron Rodgers to be himself," McCarthy said. "Do I think he's an extension of myself? Yes, I agree. But it's important for him to do that within his own personality, and you can see this football team is definitely starting to have his name on it."

Will that match with the names of Cutler and, likely, Favre? The Packers bet six years and $65 million - the contract they handed Rodgers after seven starts (4-3) last year - it would.

"You obviously want them to feel like they made the right decision," Rodgers said. "Definitely."

Rodgers, Year 2, starts now.

No pressure.[/ul]



This is a great article. I found Jennings comments very interesting and I am intrigued to see how he plays, he meaning Rodgers. With him having more freedom perhaps he'll let loose a bit more and take some chances that give our WR's a chance to help win those close games down the stretch for us.
UserPostedImage
buckeyepackfan
15 years ago
Several posters last year were screaming every week to let Aaron Rodgers turn it loose(including me), good to hear Mike McCarthy is going to give him more freedom and more options.

I watched the latest video on Packers.com with AR, was impressed with his confidence and just the overall leadership that came across while he was being interviewed.

Time to turn the page on 2008 and look foward to 2009.

I look for a 4500-5000 yd , 30-35 td's, 15-20 ints. year for AR. I said it all last year and I will continue to say it, the strength of this Packer team is their WR's, put them all on the field and let Aaron Rodgers do his thing.

I have and always will be a huge Brett Favre fan, if he does play this year, it is going to be tough, but I will have to be rooting against him at least twice this year. :icon_smile: :icon_smile: :icon_smile:

Go Pack bring back The North Ghampionship in 2009!!!!
I was addicted to The Hokey Pokey, but I turned myself around!
Fan Shout
beast (2h) : Merry Christmas 🎄🎁
beast (10h) : Sounds like no serious injuries from the Saints game and Jacobs and Watson should play in the Vikings game
packerfanoutwest (14h) : both games Watson missed, Packers won
Martha Careful (16h) : I hope all of you have a Merry Christmas!
Mucky Tundra (24-Dec) : Oh I know about Jacobs, I just couldn't pass up an opportunity to mimic Zero lol
buckeyepackfan (24-Dec) : Jacobs was just sat down, Watson re-injured that knee that kept him out 1 game earlier
buckeyepackfan (24-Dec) : I needed .14 that's. .14 points for the whole 4th quarter to win and go to the SB. Lol
Mucky Tundra (24-Dec) : Jacobs gonna be OK???
Zero2Cool (24-Dec) : Watson gonna be OK???
packerfanoutwest (24-Dec) : Inactives tonight for the Pack: Alexander- knee Bullard - ankle Williams - quad Walker -ankle Monk Heath
packerfanoutwest (24-Dec) : No Jaire, but hopefully the front 7 destroys the line of scrimmage & forces Rattler into a few passes to McKinney.
packerfanoutwest (24-Dec) : minny could be #1 seed and the Lions #5 seed
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : We'd have same Division and Conference records. Strength of schedule we edge them
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I just checked. What tie breaker?
bboystyle (23-Dec) : yes its possible but unlikely. If we do get the 5th, we face the NFCS winner
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : Ahh, ok.
bboystyle (23-Dec) : yes due to tie breaker
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I mean, unlikely, yes, but mathematically, 5th is possible by what I'm reading.
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : If Vikings lose out, Packers win out, Packers get 5th, right?
bboystyle (23-Dec) : Minny isnt going to lose out so 5th seed is out of the equation. We are playing for the 6th or 7th seed which makes no difference
Mucky Tundra (23-Dec) : beast, the ad revenue goes to the broadcast company but they gotta pay to air the game on their channel/network
beast (23-Dec) : If we win tonight the game is still relative in terms of 5th, 6th or 7th seed... win and it's 5th or 6th, lose and it's 6th or 7th
beast (23-Dec) : Mucky, I thought the ad revenue went to the broadcasting companies or the NFL, at least not directly
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I think the revenue share is moot, isn't it? That's the CBA an Salary Cap handling that.
bboystyle (23-Dec) : i mean game becomes irrelevant if we win tonight. Just a game where we are trying to play spoilers to Vikings chance at the #1 seed
Mucky Tundra (23-Dec) : beast, I would guess ad revenue from more eyes watching tv
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I would think it would hurt the home team because people would have to cancel last minute maybe? i dunno
beast (23-Dec) : I agree that it's BS for fans planning on going to the game. But how does it bring in more money? I'm guessing indirectly?
packerfanoutwest (23-Dec) : bs on flexing the game....they do it for the $$league$$, not the hometown fans
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I see what you did there Mucky
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : dammit. 3:25pm
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : Packers Vikings flexed to 3:35pm
Mucky Tundra (23-Dec) : Upon receiving the news about Luke Musgrave, I immediately fell to the ground
Mucky Tundra (23-Dec) : Yeah baby!
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : LUKE MUSGRAVE PLAYING TONIGHT~!~~~~WOWHOAAOHAOAA yah
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I wanna kill new QB's ... blitz the crap out of them.
beast (23-Dec) : Barry seemed to get too conservative against new QBs, Hafley doesn't have that issue
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : However, we seem to struggle vs new QB's
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : Should be moot point, cuz Packers should win tonight.
packerfanoutwest (23-Dec) : ok I stand corrected
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : Ok, yes, you are right. I see that now how they get 7th
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : 5th - Packers win out, Vikings lose out. Maybe?
beast (23-Dec) : Saying no to the 6th lock.
beast (23-Dec) : No, with the Commanders beating the Eagles, Packers could have a good chance of 6th or 7th unless the win out
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I think if Packers win, they are locked 6th with chance for 5th.
beast (23-Dec) : But it doesn't matter, as the Packers win surely win one of their remaining games
beast (23-Dec) : This is not complex, just someone doesn't want to believe reality
beast (23-Dec) : We already have told you... if Packers lose all their games (they won't, but if they did), and Buccaneers and Falcons win all theirs
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I posted it in that Packers and 1 seed thread
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I literally just said it.
Please sign in to use Fan Shout
2024 Packers Schedule
Friday, Sep 6 @ 7:15 PM
Eagles
Sunday, Sep 15 @ 12:00 PM
COLTS
Sunday, Sep 22 @ 12:00 PM
Titans
Sunday, Sep 29 @ 12:00 PM
VIKINGS
Sunday, Oct 6 @ 3:25 PM
Rams
Sunday, Oct 13 @ 12:00 PM
CARDINALS
Sunday, Oct 20 @ 12:00 PM
TEXANS
Sunday, Oct 27 @ 12:00 PM
Jaguars
Sunday, Nov 3 @ 3:25 PM
LIONS
Sunday, Nov 17 @ 12:00 PM
Bears
Sunday, Nov 24 @ 3:25 PM
49ERS
Thursday, Nov 28 @ 7:20 PM
DOLPHINS
Thursday, Dec 5 @ 7:15 PM
Lions
Sunday, Dec 15 @ 7:20 PM
Seahawks
Monday, Dec 23 @ 7:15 PM
SAINTS
Sunday, Dec 29 @ 3:25 PM
Vikings
Saturday, Jan 4 @ 11:00 PM
BEARS
Recent Topics
2h / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

2h / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

5h / GameDay Threads / bboystyle

11h / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

12h / Random Babble / beast

17h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

23-Dec / Random Babble / Martha Careful

22-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / packerfanoutwest

19-Dec / Random Babble / Zero2Cool

18-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

17-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / wpr

17-Dec / Featured Content / Zero2Cool

16-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

16-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / Martha Careful

16-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

Headlines
Copyright © 2006 - 2024 PackersHome.com™. All Rights Reserved.