MintBaconDrivel
7 months ago
[quote=MintBaconDrivel;466102]Enter the GameDay Chat  to discuss the game via the instant chat feature.
Click HERE  to watch the game!


UserPostedImage
Green Bay Packers ( 2 - 1 )
    Total Offense = 5th
    Rushing Offense = 1st
    Passing Offense = 22nd

    Total Defense = 20th
    Rushing Defense = 10th
    Passing Defense = 22nd

    Points For = 25.0 (7th)
    Points Against = 19.2 (12th)



UserPostedImage
Minnesota Vikings ( 3 - 0 )
    Total Offense = 12th
    Rushing Offense = 13th
    Passing Offense = 16th

    Total Defense = 13th
    Rushing Defense = 2nd
    Passing Defense = 26th

    Points For = 28.3 (3rd)
    Points Against = 10.0 (2nd)



Delivering the latest and most important updates on the Green Bay Packers for your convenience.
UserPostedImage
Cheesey
7 months ago
I'd start Willis, even if Love is cleared to play. For a couple of reasons. First, Willis is playing really good, and is a real threat to take off running. While Love has not played in almost a month, and with his injury, doesn't have the ability to run away from the defenders. And with our Oline problems, could get him killed.
Then, if Willis isn't doing well, you can bring in Love to see if he can do any better.
Those are my thoughts, for what they are worth.
UserPostedImage
7 months ago

I'd start Willis, even if Love is cleared to play. For a couple of reasons. First, Willis is playing really good, and is a real threat to take off running. While Love has not played in almost a month, and with his injury, doesn't have the ability to run away from the defenders. And with our Oline problems, could get him killed.
Then, if Willis isn't doing well, you can bring in Love to see if he can do any better.
Those are my thoughts, for what they are worth.

Originally Posted by: Cheesey 

Unless, Love is more than 90% healed, I totally agree. Its a long season, and given Willis' performance, and his healthy legs, let' not rush it.

The last two wins give us some room to be patient. This is NOT a must win game.

Go Packers!!!!
Zero2Cool
7 months ago

I'd start Willis, even if Love is cleared to play. For a couple of reasons. First, Willis is playing really good, and is a real threat to take off running. While Love has not played in almost a month, and with his injury, doesn't have the ability to run away from the defenders. And with our Oline problems, could get him killed.
Then, if Willis isn't doing well, you can bring in Love to see if he can do any better.
Those are my thoughts, for what they are worth.

Originally Posted by: Cheesey 



It's funny how I've flopped around on this. I thought he would have handled the Colts game plan and it'd be OK. I didn't want to fall to 0 - 2. Then when it was 1 - 1 I thought going with all three and then having Jordan Love go a few series just to keep him less "rusty". And now seeing how Malik Willis and the offense has done the last two weeks I'm kind of like meh maybe let the QB who hasn't played much in the last 9 months rest another week, lol.

So, over/under sitting at 43.5 and Packers favored by 2.5? I'm thinking Vikings get the better of Packers this week. That Brian Flores defense seems to be a nightmare for the Shanahan tree offenses.
 image.png You have insufficient rights to see the content.
 image.png You have insufficient rights to see the content.
UserPostedImage
bboystyle
7 months ago

It's funny how I've flopped around on this. I thought he would have handled the Colts game plan and it'd be OK. I didn't want to fall to 0 - 2. Then when it was 1 - 1 I thought going with all three and then having Jordan Love go a few series just to keep him less "rusty". And now seeing how Malik Willis and the offense has done the last two weeks I'm kind of like meh maybe let the QB who hasn't played much in the last 9 months rest another week, lol.

So, over/under sitting at 43.5 and Packers favored by 2.5? I'm thinking Vikings get the better of Packers this week. That Brian Flores defense seems to be a nightmare for the Shanahan tree offenses.
 image.png You have insufficient rights to see the content.
 image.png You have insufficient rights to see the content.

Originally Posted by: Zero2Cool 



I agree. we lose in a defensive battle game. 21-13
Zero2Cool
6 months ago
Vikings lead NFL after 3 weeks in sacks with 16. That's not ideal for a QB with a bum wheel.
UserPostedImage
civic
6 months ago
It depends does Darnold keep showing why he was picked in the first round or does he see ghosts again. Not just the Packers qb with performance issues.
blank
bboystyle
6 months ago

Vikings lead NFL after 3 weeks in sacks with 16. That's not ideal for a QB with a bum wheel.

Originally Posted by: Zero2Cool 


Agreed. Malik is a great counter to an agressive pass rush. Let Love sit another week
wpr
  • wpr
  • Preferred Member
6 months ago
I've put this off all week.
Is Love going to play? Is he still only at about 60-70%? If so will they bite the bullet and start Willis?
Minnisoda's run defense is pretty good. Will they shut both Jacobs and Willis down. If so advantage vickies.
Is JJ going to torch JA? If so advantage Minnisoda.
Will the Packers overload protection to JJ, if so another receiver including Jones might be running free. Advantage Minnisoda.
Will the Packers D stand up and get 3 turnovers this week? If so advantage Packers.
Will the Packers systematically pick apart the vickie LB and DBs? If so advantage Good Guys.
Will Jacobs bust out another big game? Will Jones take his revenge on the team that dumped him? If so neither may matter at all. Also it could decide the game.
Can the Packers pressure Darnold into having a bad game? If so advantage Packers? Maybe. I've seen way too many times a QB get flushed out of the pocket and throw to a wide open receiver for a huge play.

*SIGH*
Gotta go with the Packers pulling this one off. Too many maybes in play to say they will lose so I choose them.

GB 48
mini 12

Actually GB 24
mn 21
OT
UserPostedImage
Zero2Cool
6 months ago

I've put this off all week.
Is Love going to play? Is he still only at about 60-70%? If so will they bite the bullet and start Willis?
Minnisoda's run defense is pretty good. Will they shut both Jacobs and Willis down. If so advantage vickies.
Is JJ going to torch JA? If so advantage Minnisoda.
Will the Packers overload protection to JJ, if so another receiver including Jones might be running free. Advantage Minnisoda.
Will the Packers D stand up and get 3 turnovers this week? If so advantage Packers.
Will the Packers systematically pick apart the vickie LB and DBs? If so advantage Good Guys.
Will Jacobs bust out another big game? Will Jones take his revenge on the team that dumped him? If so neither may matter at all. Also it could decide the game.
Can the Packers pressure Darnold into having a bad game? If so advantage Packers? Maybe. I've seen way too many times a QB get flushed out of the pocket and throw to a wide open receiver for a huge play.

*SIGH*
Gotta go with the Packers pulling this one off. Too many maybes in play to say they will lose so I choose them.

GB 48
mini 12

Actually GB 24
mn 21
OT

Originally Posted by: wpr 


I'm assuming JA is Jaire Alexander. He didn't practice today. 😬 Neither did Carrington Valentine. 😬😬
UserPostedImage
Fan Shout
dfosterf (50m) : PFOW Out of our division would be a good thing imo
Zero2Cool (2h) : Jameson Williams is done at 24 years old? What? He's a WR, not QB. I'm missing something here haha
wpr (2h) : Tomorrow is almost here.
packerfanoutwest (2h) : would you want him if Pack needed a back up qb?
packerfanoutwest (3h) : JW is done......stick a fork in him
Zero2Cool (4h) : You should. He goes to AFC that helps Packers.
packerfanoutwest (15h) : don't care
Zero2Cool (20h) : Lions shopping Jameson Williams?
packerfanoutwest (22-Apr) : Packers General Manager Brian Gutekunst says Green Bay’s roster can win, even without adding anyone in the draft.
Zero2Cool (22-Apr) : It's a poor design. New site has SignalR like our gameday chat
wpr (22-Apr) : Ah today's Shout was very quick to post.
wpr (22-Apr) : now 3
Zero2Cool (22-Apr) : Who? What?
beast (22-Apr) : What is he supposed to say? He doesn't want players currently on the team?
Martha Careful (21-Apr) : meh
Zero2Cool (21-Apr) : Sounds like Walker and Wyatt will be with Packers for beyond 2026
Zero2Cool (21-Apr) : It's so awesome.
Zero2Cool (21-Apr) : new site fan shout post fast
wpr (21-Apr) : Slow posting in Fan shout.
wpr (21-Apr) : Only 4
wpr (21-Apr) : Only 4
Zero2Cool (21-Apr) : If only we had a topic to read about and discuss it. That's something new website must have!!!
dfosterf (21-Apr) : Justice Musqueda over at Acme Packing put up an excellent synopsis of the Packers 1st round options this am
wpr (19-Apr) : 5 days
beast (18-Apr) : 6 days
wpr (17-Apr) : 7 days
Zero2Cool (16-Apr) : sounds like Packers don't get good compensation, Jaire staying
dfosterf (16-Apr) : Nobody coming up with a keep, but at x amount
dfosterf (16-Apr) : Trade, cut or keep
dfosterf (16-Apr) : that from Jaire
dfosterf (16-Apr) : My guess is the Packers floated the concept of a reworked contract via his agent and agent got a f'
Zero2Cool (16-Apr) : Yes, and that is why I think Rob worded it how he did. Rather than say "agent"
dfosterf (16-Apr) : Same laws apply. Agent must present such an offer to Jaire. Cannot accept or reject without presenting it
Zero2Cool (16-Apr) : I'm thinking that is why Rob worded it how he did.
dfosterf (16-Apr) : The Packers can certainly still make the offer to the agent
dfosterf (16-Apr) : Laws of agency and definition of fiduciary responsibility
dfosterf (16-Apr) : Jaire is open to a reduced contract without Jaire's permission
dfosterf (16-Apr) : The agent would arguably violate the law if he were to tell the Packers
Zero2Cool (16-Apr) : That someone ... likely the agent.
Zero2Cool (16-Apr) : So, Jaire has not been offered nor rejected a pay reduction, but someone says he'd decline.
Zero2Cool (16-Apr) : Demovksy says t was direct communication with someone familiar with Jaire’s line of thinking at that moment.
Zero2Cool (16-Apr) : Demovsky just replied to me a bit ago. Jaire hasn't said it.
dfosterf (16-Apr) : Of course, that depends on the definition of "we"
dfosterf (16-Apr) : We have been told that they haven't because he wouldn't accept it. I submit we don't know that
dfosterf (16-Apr) : What is the downside in making a calculated reduced offer to Jaire?
Zero2Cool (15-Apr) : Packers are receiving interest in Jaire Alexander but a trade is not imminent
Zero2Cool (15-Apr) : Jalen Ramsey wants to be traded. He's never happy is he?
Zero2Cool (15-Apr) : two 1sts in 2022 and two 2nd's in 2023 and 2024
Zero2Cool (15-Apr) : Packers had fortunate last three drafts.
dfosterf (15-Apr) : I may have to move
Please sign in to use Fan Shout
2024 Packers Schedule
Friday, Sep 6 @ 7:15 PM
Eagles
Sunday, Sep 15 @ 12:00 PM
COLTS
Sunday, Sep 22 @ 12:00 PM
Titans
Sunday, Sep 29 @ 12:00 PM
VIKINGS
Sunday, Oct 6 @ 3:25 PM
Rams
Sunday, Oct 13 @ 12:00 PM
CARDINALS
Sunday, Oct 20 @ 12:00 PM
TEXANS
Sunday, Oct 27 @ 12:00 PM
Jaguars
Sunday, Nov 3 @ 3:25 PM
LIONS
Sunday, Nov 17 @ 12:00 PM
Bears
Sunday, Nov 24 @ 3:25 PM
49ERS
Thursday, Nov 28 @ 7:20 PM
DOLPHINS
Thursday, Dec 5 @ 7:15 PM
Lions
Sunday, Dec 15 @ 7:20 PM
Seahawks
Monday, Dec 23 @ 7:15 PM
SAINTS
Sunday, Dec 29 @ 3:25 PM
Vikings
Sunday, Jan 5 @ 12:00 PM
BEARS
Recent Topics
1h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

4h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

20h / Packers Draft Threads / Zero2Cool

22h / Random Babble / Martha Careful

22-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

22-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / dfosterf

17-Apr / Random Babble / wpr

13-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / Martha Careful

12-Apr / Feedback, Suggestions and Issues / Zero2Cool

11-Apr / Feedback, Suggestions and Issues / Rockmolder

2-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

2-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / bboystyle

1-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / Mucky Tundra

1-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / wpr

31-Mar / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

Headlines
Copyright © 2006 - 2025 PackersHome.com™. All Rights Reserved.