Zero2Cool
a year ago

Aaron Rodgers, the Packers and the long succession: ‘Just tell the truth, you wanted to move on’

May 31, 2023

A little more than three years ago, Aaron Rodgers was preparing to make his second appearance of the night on “The Pat McAfee Show,” the streaming sensation on which Rodgers is a regular guest, when he got a text from his longtime agent, Dave Dunn.

“QB,” it said, a reference to the Packers’ surprise selection of Utah State quarterback Jordan Love with the No. 26 pick of the 2020 NFL Draft.

Green Bay was fresh off an NFC Championship Game debacle, a 37-20 loss to the 49ers in which the team allowed 285 rushing yards — the most ever in an NFC title game. Conventional wisdom indicated the team should select a run-stopper, or maybe a wide receiver to complement star Davante Adams.

Instead, Packers general manager Brian Gutekunst traded up four spots in the first round to draft the 21-year-old Love even with four years remaining on the contract of arguably the best player in franchise history.

Rodgers skipped his scheduled appearance on McAfee’s show.

“That’s when I went and poured myself a little glass of Añejo and waited for somebody to call me,” he told The Athletic last week.

The Packers knew Rodgers wouldn’t be happy about the selection, and to protect the relationship between him and head coach Matt LaFleur, they told him the decision to draft Love was strictly the GM’s.

“I had friends who said, ‘Hey, Matt looked super excited when they made the draft pick,'” Rodgers said. “And I said, ‘I don’t care, honestly.’ Like, they made the pick. They all signed off on it.”

The drafting of Love proved to be the tipping point in the tumultuous, highly successful and nearly two-decade-long marriage between Rodgers and the Packers, even if took years before the final separation. Last month, three years after Green Bay selected Love — and one year after Rodgers signed a record-breaking contract extension after back-to-back MVP seasons — the Packers shipped Rodgers to the New York Jets, like fellow Packers icon Brett Favre before him, for a small bounty of draft picks.

As recently as last offseason, Gutekunst said he intended for Rodgers to play at least the 2022 and ’23 seasons in Green Bay. As recently as last July, Rodgers said he wanted to retire with the only team for which he had ever played. But the drafting of Love contributed to a simmering resentment and caused a legendary franchise and a franchise legend to conclude a divorce was coming.

The 39-year-old Rodgers is perhaps the most skilled passer in NFL history but also a bit of an enigma and/or diva, depending on your rooting interest. He’s no stranger to using slights as motivation, as he did for years after his boyhood team, the San Francisco 49ers, took quarterback Alex Smith No. 1 overall in 2005 instead of him.

“Did I wanna, years down the line, go, ‘Well, what if we had just taken somebody who could impact our team because we had just gone to the NFC Championship?’ Yeah, of course,” Rodgers said of the Packers’ decision to draft Love. “I don’t think any other competitor would say anything different.”

In 2020, Rodgers completed a career-high 70.7 percent of his passes for 4,299 yards and a career-best 48 touchdowns against only five interceptions. He was named the league’s MVP for the first time since 2014, but the Packers narrowly lost to the Buccaneers, 31-26, in the NFC Championship Game at Lambeau Field, leaving Green Bay one game short of the Super Bowl for the second consecutive season.

Rodgers’ comments in his Zoom press conference after that loss were ominous.

“A lot of guys’ futures, they’re uncertain,” he said then. “Myself included.”

Rodgers says now that after the Packers drafted Love, he thought he’d have one or two years left in Green Bay.

“We didn’t win the Super Bowl,” Rodgers said. “They had their guy in waiting. Unless things changed, I felt like — that’s why I said what I said — there was a possibility they were gonna move on.

“I knew that (Love) was always a possibility, that they would wanna go, ‘You know what? We tried hard. We tried to win a championship. We had a good team, but now it might be time to go with Jordan, move some contract stuff around and do that.'”

Rodgers had been on the other end of this, almost note for note.

At 21, he was a surprise No. 24 selection out of Cal in the 2005 draft but sat behind Favre for three seasons. In 2008, with Rodgers impressing behind the scenes and the Packers growing tired of Favre’s annual flirtations with retirement, Green Bay traded the 38-year-old to the Jets.

The major difference: Two of Favre’s campaigns with Rodgers on the bench were subpar, while Rodgers won MVPs with Love looking on in two of the last three seasons.

According to a source associated with the team who was granted anonymity to candidly discuss the sensitive dynamics between the front office and the star quarterback, early in the 2021 offseason, Dunn, Rodgers’ agent, called Packers president Mark Murphy with a request: Fire Gutekunst or trade Rodgers. Murphy did neither. Months later, news broke that Rodgers wanted out of Green Bay, but the Packers held firm.

When asked about the demand last week, Rodgers deferred to Dunn, who did not reply to The Athletic’s request for comment.

Rodgers stayed away from the team until days before training camp in late July — and after, among other things, Gutekunst extended an olive branch by trading for wide receiver Randall Cobb, Rodgers’ best friend and former longtime teammate.

“I was under contract, for one, so definitely wasn’t gonna hold out and let them fine me,” Rodgers said. “There were a lot of things that I was hoping were gonna change, and they made some promises about things they were gonna try and do better. But I just felt like coming back, have a good season, move forward and just not focus on some of those things that I really felt strongly about but that may or may not actually ever get done.”

After the first practice of camp, Rodgers aired his grievances, saying he wanted to see changes to the organization’s communication and culture. According to Rodgers, the communication between him and Gutekunst improved somewhat. (“It still wasn’t anywhere near what I’ve already enjoyed here with the Jets in just a few short weeks,” Rodgers added.)

The Packers believed privately that both parties had moved past the conflict, but Rodgers felt like executive VP and director of football operations Russ Ball, who manages the team’s salary cap, was the only member of the front office who took the message to heart.

“I mean, Russ definitely made an effort to be more seen, to be a better communicator, to be around more, to interact with the guys more, and I really appreciated his effort to grow and to listen to some of the things I was saying and try and make the culture and the place a better environment,” Rodgers said. “I thought Russ, more than anybody, really showed that he cared and showed a lot of personal growth, and I give him credit for that.”

In the 2021 regular season, Rodgers was exemplary again. He won his second consecutive MVP award and led the Packers to the No. 1 seed in the NFC, but the Packers fell to the 49ers in the divisional round at Lambeau Field. In postgame comments, Rodgers was once again noncommittal about his future.

The succession plan was going to be complicated.

Months later, there seemed to be clarity.

In March 2022, Rodgers signed a three-year, $150 million extension to keep him in Green Bay. Would Rodgers outlast his successor? Three years would seemingly allow Rodgers to retire as a Packer and would force the team to make a tough decision on Love and his lapsing rookie contract, but closer examination revealed Rodgers’ deal to be a glorified one-year contract with two additional years tacked on.

Days later, the Packers traded Davante Adams, who had paired with Rodgers for eight prolific seasons, to the Raiders. Rodgers knew Adams wasn’t thrilled in Green Bay, but the quarterback thought his star receiver would stay.

Adams wanted to be the highest-paid receiver in league history, exceeding DeAndre Hopkins’ $27.25 million per year, and the Packers were willing to oblige — eventually. Rodgers believes now that the way negotiations were handled helped drive Adams away.

On a recent appearance on the “I Am Athlete” podcast, Adams said the initial offer from Green Bay, which the Packers made before the 2021 season, was less than $20 million annually.

“They offered him less money than Christian Kirk ($18 million per year) and (Adams) is going, ‘Are you serious right now? I’m the best receiver in the league, and you’re gonna offer me less than Christian Kirk?” Rodgers said. “With all due respect, he’s not on Davante’s level.

“I’m sure that the team will say that’s just the business of negotiation — it’s like, yeah, but you’re also sending a message to that guy, and a lot of times it can stick with guys and make them a little sour on things. … That goes back to the first offer that they made, and I don’t think (the Packers) had the foresight — obviously didn’t have the foresight.”

While shutting down negotiations during the 2021 season, Adams, like Rodgers, posted a second consecutive All-Pro campaign. “By the time he got to the end of it, I think he kind of made up his mind he was gonna go somewhere else,” Rodgers said.

Adams was shipped to the Raiders for a first-round pick and a second-rounder the Packers used to trade up for North Dakota State receiver Christian Watson in the 2022 draft. Suddenly, the All-Pro teammate Rodgers thought he’d have when he inked his name on his new deal was gone, replaced by an untested rookie.

Rodgers didn’t show up to voluntary OTAs after the team drafted Watson and fellow receivers Romeo Doubs and Samori Toure, among others. The quarterback didn’t feel like his presence was as important as the team did, saying any progress made during voluntary OTAs is “very nominal.”

According to the source associated with the team, the Packers weren’t satisfied with Rodgers’ commitment and effort, not only during voluntary OTAs but on a day-to-day basis afterward. Rodgers takes exception to the thought that the team wanted more from him in the months after giving him the richest contract in NFL history.

“When I’m in, I’m all-in, and you wanna ride with offseason workouts?” Rodgers said. “I won MVP without doing offseason workouts. Like, was my commitment any less then? I’d say not at all. The way that I come back to work, not just physically in good shape but mentally refreshed, is the best thing for me to have the season I wanted to have during those in Green Bay.

“I think that’s just a cop-out written to try and find something to disparage me about that, honestly, when you know what offseason workouts are really about, it’s completely ridiculous.”

On the first day of training camp last year, Rodgers told reporters he was “definitely” retiring a Packer. “Unless they trade me,” he said through a wide smile.

The 2022 season was an unpleasant one for the Packers, and not only because of any private displeasure they had with their quarterback. Rodgers played through a broken thumb suffered in Week 5, a young receiving corps made predictable mental errors and the defense underachieved. Ultimately, the campaign ended when the Packers lost at home to the Lions in Week 18, preventing a five-game win streak and what would have been a miraculous playoff berth.

“I showed up to work, I brought the same commitment, the same type of energy, and obviously there were some trying times and frustration as we went through that losing streak,” Rodgers said. “But we put on a strong run to finish the season and came up short.

“I feel good about the way I showed up for my guys every single week, and it’s convenient now to look at that, but it wasn’t a conversation when Russ and Matt and Brian and Mark would thank me for my speeches after games or the way I fought, played and different things. You can rewrite history all you want, but like I said, I still got the receipts.”

Rodgers said that a week after the season ended the Packers told him to take as much time as he wanted to make a decision about his future. “We want you to retire a Packer,” Rodgers said they told him. “We’ll figure everything else out, but we want you to be here.”

Gutekunst and Rodgers agreed to meet in person in Southern California, where Rodgers lives in the offseason and where Gutekunst was traveling in late January for the NFLPA Collegiate Bowl, but they never connected while Gutekunst was out west.

“Life happens,” Rodgers says now. “When I hit him back, he was already out of town, but it wasn’t like I hit him back like five days later. He hit me up, like, in the morning of one day. I hit him up either the night or the next morning or the next day and then he was gone.

“It wasn’t like there was a date we were for sure meeting at this time and this place. It was like, ‘Hey, I’m coming out west. I’m driving, whatever, you wanna get together?’ I said ‘Yeah, I got a busy schedule. I’m working out, I got things going on, I got appearances, but I’d like to make it work, too.'”

A few weeks later, Rodgers went on his much-discussed darkness retreat to contemplate his future.

In March, at the NFL’s annual league meetings in Phoenix, Gutekunst told reporters he tried to contact Rodgers “many times” during the offseason to discuss how the quarterback fit into the team’s future, but that Rodgers proved too elusive to reach.

Asked about the two sides’ differing stories, Rodgers credited the disconnect to the Packers not using FaceTime to call him.

“I have zero or one bar at the house, so you call me — sometimes it goes through, most of the time it drops and doesn’t go through,” Rodgers said. “Everybody who knows me, when I’m out west, they know that’s how to get a hold of me. So you can say whatever you want about that, but that’s the f—— truth.

“Before I went in the darkness, I hit ’em up and said, ‘Hey, there’s some stuff swirling around here. We should get together, you, me and Matt.'”

Rodgers said he entered the darkness retreat thinking he would retire but emerged feeling good about either retiring or continuing to play. He contacted Dunn, who told Rodgers the Packers had been shopping him. Rodgers then told Dunn to tell Gutekunst he wanted to be traded to the Jets. He didn’t have much else to say to the GM.

“Did Brian text me more than I texted him? Yeah, but did I ghost him? No,” Rodgers said. “I texted him back. There was back-and-forths that we had and so this is the story you wanna go with? You’re gonna stand on this hill of austerity and say that arguably in the conversation of the best player in your franchise history, you’re gonna say I couldn’t get a hold of him and that’s why we had to move on?

“Like, c’mon man. Just tell the truth, you wanted to move on. You didn’t like the fact that we didn’t communicate all the time. Like, listen, I talk to the people that I like.”

The only aspect of this seismic transition that seems certain is this: It was time for the Packers and Rodgers to move on. Yes, this offseason served as a breaking point in their relationship, but the Packers also need to see what they have in the 24-year-old Love, who’s finally about to get his chance.

Thrust into the spotlight in Kansas City after Rodgers tested positive for COVID-19 in Week 9 of the 2021 season, Love completed 19 of 34 passes for 190 yards, one touchdown and an interception in his first start, a 13-7 loss.

But that afternoon is one of the reasons Gutekunst is encouraged about Love taking over. Why? Start with the 16 quarterback pressures the Packers allowed.

“We didn’t have a great plan for him there,” Gutekunst told The Athletic. “I thought the way he responded to that, the way he handled himself in the midst of that chaos in a tough time … I think it gave us confidence that he could stay poised in those moments.”

Love’s only meaningful regular-season snaps since then came in Week 12 last season, when Rodgers suffered a rib injury against the Eagles on “Sunday Night Football.” Love played the entire fourth quarter and, with the Eagles playing to protect their lead, completed 6 of 9 passes for 113 yards and a touchdown.

The Packers will remain patient with new QB Jordan Love, so onlookers should too.

Gutekunst said he has seen improvement from Love over the past couple of offseasons when Rodgers wasn’t around and when Love took starter’s reps and ran practice last season with Rodgers nursing injuries.

But the Packers haven’t committed to him yet. Instead of exercising or declining Love’s fifth-year option, Green Bay signed him to a one-year extension that essentially gives Love a two-year trial run as the full-time starter on financial terms that benefit both parties.

“Until you get into that fire and you go through a bunch of different games and you see a bunch of different looks and you fail and then have a bunch of those scars and overcome them, you’re never really gonna know,” Gutekunst said. “But I think we all took a lot of confidence just with how he grew the last year and a half.”

Rodgers and Favre had a famously complicated relationship, with the elder quarterback chafing at the idea that he was obligated to mentor his potential successor. But according to Love, Rodgers has been a model teammate.

“I like Jordan a lot,” Rodgers says now. “Jordan’s a good dude. It’s tough to be a backup behind a future Hall of Famer. You’ve got to kinda find that sweet spot. I thought he did a great job with that, but he’s a good-hearted kid. It’s undetermined, his future, but from the physical standpoint, I thought he improved his fundamentals this last year.”

Rodgers, meanwhile, seems energized on the rebound with the Jets. And as he prepares to start with his new franchise, he can’t help but think back to his start in Green Bay, when after three seasons he took Favre’s job and never looked back.

“(Love) gets a chance to blaze his own trails, be his own man and lead in the way he best sees fit,” Rodgers said. “Take the good things he learned from me; things he would do differently, do ’em differently. That’s what I did when I took over.

“Obviously the team felt good with moving forward with him as the starter, and that’s how the team felt in 2008 with me after I showed in ’07 that I could get the job done. And history just repeated itself in that sense.”

https://theathletic.com/4564360/2023/05/31/aaron-rodgers-packers-succession-trade/ 

Matt Schneidman wrote:


UserPostedImage
Zero2Cool
a year ago
Freaking incredible read here. Interesting how Rodgers has no problems talking Gutekunst down, but when it comes to the ultimatum made by David Dunn to Mark Murphy "fire Gutekunst or trade Rodgers", Rodgers then just says talk to the agent.

Gutekunst really comes out looking like a true professional for everything he had to deal with. Granted, if he doesn't make that QB Jordan Love pick, we're probably sitting differently.
UserPostedImage
a year ago
I think taking a QB at that time in the draft was a mistake when we had other needs...(and please,I am not saying Love won't be great) but I can see how he would have been irritated.   Regardless, he seems to have been a good teammate to Love (unlike Farve).

I still wish nothing but the best for Rodgers in all non-Packer games....however two things especially bother me from the article:

From the story in the Athletic:
Item 1 

Rodgers didn’t show up to voluntary OTAs after the team drafted Watson and fellow receivers Romeo Doubs and Samori Toure, among others. The quarterback didn’t feel like his presence was as important as the team did, saying any progress made during voluntary OTAs is “very nominal.”

Baloney.  Showing up show leadership.  Further, any incremental chemistry and development would have been helpful.  This was a bad decision and poor leadership.

Item 2 

“I have zero or one bar at the house, so you call me — sometimes it goes through, most of the time it drops and doesn’t go through,” Rodgers said. “Everybody who knows me, when I’m out west, they know that’s how to get a hold of me. So you can say whatever you want about that, but that’s the f—— truth.

“Before I went in the darkness, I hit ’em up and said, ‘Hey, there’s some stuff swirling around here. We should get together, you, me and Matt.'”
...
“Did Brian text me more than I texted him? Yeah, but did I ghost him? No,” Rodgers said. “I texted him back. There was back-and-forths that we had and so this is the story you wanna go with? You’re gonna stand on this hill of austerity and say that arguably in the conversation of the best player in your franchise history, you’re gonna say I couldn’t get a hold of him and that’s why we had to move on?

I am sorry, but I am just not buying this.   As you may all suspect, I am not a technology guru, but the man has to have cable and wifi throughout his house.  If he wanted to communicate on a call or a facetime or a zoom, that could easily have been accomplished.

He should have kept his thoughts to himself and simply have moved on.  

Also I could not agree with Zero2Cool more on this comment:

Gutekunst really comes out looking like a true professional for everything he had to deal with. Granted, if he doesn't make that QB Jordan Love pick, we're probably sitting differently.


Go Packers!!!!
Zero2Cool
a year ago
I'm listening to Jason Wilde and Mark Tauscher and losing my brain cells. Mark is such a clueless dolt -- at times. They're both saying Brian Gutekunst threw Matt LaFleur under the bus by saying "we didn't have good game plan vs Chiefs" when Jordan Love started. The thing here is, Brian is REPEATING what LaFleur said post game! How is this their freaking job and they do not know these simple obvious things?

Mark also says Packers had full week with Jordan Love, wrong. Rodgers tested positive Wednesday. And Mark damn well knows the game plan gets drawn up the prior two days and gets implemented Wednesdays. 


Bah, maybe I'm just being too pedantic. 
 image.png You have insufficient rights to see the content.
 
UserPostedImage
Cheesey
a year ago
I don't know. To me, it seems like Rodgers turned into some kind of mental case the last several years.
Some of the things he has said and done doesn't seem to be things that would come from someone that's mentally all there .....or us so full of himself that he can't think that he could possibly be wrong.
Again, JUST my opinion.
UserPostedImage
Zero2Cool
a year ago

I don't know. To me, it seems like Rodgers turned into some kind of mental case the last several years.
Some of the things he has said and done doesn't seem to be things that would come from someone that's mentally all there .....or us so full of himself that he can't think that he could possibly be wrong.
Again, JUST my opinion.

Originally Posted by: Cheesey 



Aaron Rodgers wanted to play for one franchise. That really meant a lot to him. When Jordan Love was drafted, it opened Rodgers eyes that the decision for him to play with one franchise, isn't necessarily his as he presumed it MIGHT be. This isn't me conjecture here, this is what Rodgers told Pat McAfee. I believe things spiraled from there. Well, they actually did based on everything. I mean, when your agent (on your behalf) tells the CEO/Owner/President to fire the GM or trade the QB1, that's pretty detrimental.  Yet, Gutekunst didn't throw Rodgers under the bus, he took the high road.

Rodgers, as we all know and LOVE, always finds a chip to put on his shoulder. The SELECTION of Jordan Love was that chip. It was nothing against Jordan, but the selection of the future QB is what triggered all this and there just wasn't any turning back. 

Before anyone (this isn't to you Alan) wants to say QB was a bad pick, stop, just stop.  That collarbone in 2017 -- a lot of rumblings he was done, couldn't recover to his MVP form. Then 2018 was not a good year. 2019 Rodgers HIMSELF said he heard the rumblings that he was done, and guess what, he said "so did I", so is it really a shock the Packers drafted a QB in 2020? NO! Especially since Gutekunst (month or two before) said if a QB they liked was available in round one, they'd take one. Why was that question even asked? BECAUSE AARON RODGERS WAS NOT PLAYING WELL. 
 
UserPostedImage
nerdmann
a year ago
Aaron was being a real douche to Matt, that's the prime reason that drafted Love. That's the prime reason they were even scouting QBs.
“Winning is not a sometime thing, it is an all the time thing. You don't do things right once in a while…you do them right all the time.”
Cheesey
a year ago
I never thought the pick of Jordan Love was a bad pick.  I know the Packers have to be prepared for the future.
At the time, the only problem I had with it was that there were so many needs at the time.
But there's a reason I'm not a GM.  I don't know crap!😁
UserPostedImage
wpr
  • wpr
  • Preferred Member
a year ago
Martha, Kevin and others have already pointed out the flaws to AR12's story. His narrative simply isn't believable. It would have been better to say nothing than to unload his load of BS. I am certain Gute's narrative isn't the whole story either but he isn't trying to act he's helpless. 
No phone service. Please. He has a bizillion dollars. He can be one of the very few people that can afford to install a landline and then never use it. Just to be sure. No signal means no missed calls. No signal means no one can leave a voice message. 

Gute's in town but I have no time to meet up with him. I am just so busy with all my other commitments I can't find 30 minutes in my schedule at any time of the day. Nothing.

He never mentioned that he actually showed up at training camp out of shape. Granted his out of shape is something I would love to have. That doesn't mean he is in NFL professional football playing shape. As was said, HE won an MVP but HE never crossed the street to help the young WRs develop a rhythm with him. Football is a team sport. It would have been nice for the team leader to show a little leadership instead of trying to find his chi or whatever he was doing.

As far as drafting Love, I didn't have a problem with it. The same way I didn't have a problem with drafting and developing Rodgers a few years before he was needed. While the Packers did trade up in the draft. I think they had a couple of players in mind. One of them was Brandon Aiyuk. I think he was their first choice. The Vikings already snagged Jefferson so they were not going to take another WR. It was SF who jumped ahead of the Packers to take him. Perhaps GB should have selected Tee Higgins. His stats over 3 seasons are slightly better than Aiyuk's.  Right or wrong, I don't think Higgins was on the Packers wish list for Round 1. GB needed another QB even if Rodgers didn't think so. You can't go on forever without a real QB2 sitting on the bench. And whether he wants to admit it or not, Rodger's performances for the previous couple of seasons wasn't what we all have come to expect from him. How did anyone know he would actually make an effort over the next two years? Naturally many will question if he would have been THAT succeesful if GB didn't take Love when they did.

What Aaron should really say is, to tell you the truth HE wanted to move on.







 
UserPostedImage
earthquake
a year ago
This whole story, and the fact that Rodgers went on the record with it, seems incredibly petty and vindictive. Which is to say, completely on brand.

The one positive I take from it is that he didn't talk trash about Jordan Love on the way out.
blank
Fan Shout
Zero2Cool (1m) : I think if Packers win, they are locked 6th with chance for 5th.
beast (2m) : But it doesn't matter, as the Packers win surely win one of their remaining games
beast (2m) : This is not complex, just someone doesn't want to believe reality
beast (2m) : We already have told you... if Packers lose all their games (they won't, but if they did), and Buccaneers and Falcons win all theirs
Zero2Cool (4m) : I posted it in that Packers and 1 seed thread
Zero2Cool (7m) : I literally just said it.
packerfanoutwest (10m) : show us a scenario where Pack don't get in? bet you can't
Zero2Cool (12m) : Falcons, Buccaneers would need to win final two games.
Zero2Cool (13m) : Yes, if they win one of three, they are lock. If they lose out, they can be eliminated.
packerfanoutwest (22m) : as I just said,,gtheyh are in no matter what
Zero2Cool (28m) : Packers should get in. I just hope it's not 7th seed. Feels dirty.
packerfanoutwest (30m) : If packers lose out, no matter what, they are in
packerfanoutwest (30m) : both teams can not male the playoffs....falcon hold the tie breaker
packerfanoutwest (32m) : if bucs win out they win their division
beast (42m) : Fine, Buccaneers and Falcons can get ahead of us
packerfanoutwest (47m) : falcons are already ahead of us
beast (51m) : Packers will get in
beast (51m) : If Packers lose the rest of their games and Falcons win the rest of theirs, they could pass us... but not gonna happen
packerfanoutwest (57m) : they still are in the playoffs
packerfanoutwest (57m) : If Packers lose the remaining games,,,,at 10-7
Zero2Cool (2h) : We can say it. We don't play.
Mucky Tundra (3h) : But to say they are in is looking past the Saints
Mucky Tundra (3h) : That said, their odds are very favorable with a >99% chance of making the playoffs entering this week's games
Mucky Tundra (3h) : Packers are not in and have not clinched a playoff spot.
buckeyepackfan (4h) : Packers are in, they need to keep winning to improve their seed#.
Mucky Tundra (13h) : Getting help would have been nice, but helping ourselves should always be the plan
beast (13h) : Too bad Seahawks couldn't beat Vikings
bboystyle (14h) : We just need to win Monday night and were in
Mucky Tundra (17h) : Or ties, but let's be real here
Mucky Tundra (17h) : Other scenario was Falcons+Rams losses
Mucky Tundra (17h) : Needed a Falcons loss for a Seahawk loss to clinch
buckeyepackfan (17h) : Am I wring in saying if Tge Vikings beat The Seahawks, The Packers clinch?
Mucky Tundra (21-Dec) : Agreed; you stinks
Zero2Cool (21-Dec) : I'm not beating anyone. I stinks.
Mucky Tundra (21-Dec) : rough injury for tank dell. guy can't catch abreak
beast (21-Dec) : So far the college playoffs have sucked... One team absolutely dominates the other
beast (21-Dec) : Well even if you weren't positive towards a guy, you wouldn't nessarily want to tell the media that (if they don't know about it)
Martha Careful (21-Dec) : I think MLF want Love to look past the end half issues, and feel good about his play. Our coaches generally keep a very positive tone.
beast (21-Dec) : I think a great running game will do that for most QBs
packerfanoutwest (21-Dec) : Coach Matt LaFleur has said quarterback Jordan Love is playing the best football of his career.
beast (21-Dec) : Oh, that's how you keep beating buckeye, with cheating
Zero2Cool (20-Dec) : There is a rule that if your name starts with 'b' you lose 15 points. Hey, I don't make the rules, I just enforce them!
wpr (20-Dec) : and then there is Beast. Running away with it all.
beast (20-Dec) : As of tonight, 3 way tie for 2nd in Pick'em, that battle is interesting!
beast (20-Dec) : Lions vs Vikings could be the main last game as it could determine division winners or #1 vs #2 seed
Mucky Tundra (20-Dec) : Or if KC needs to win for the #1 seed
Mucky Tundra (20-Dec) : Right now it looks like the only prime worthy games are Det-Minny and KC-Denver (if Denver can clinch a wild card spot)
Mucky Tundra (20-Dec) : The entirety of week 18 being listed as flex is weird
Zero2Cool (19-Dec) : Matt LaFleur today says unequivocally "Ted Thompson had nothing to do with the drafting of Jordan Love."
Zero2Cool (19-Dec) : Apparently, the editing is what pieces comments together. That Ted thing ... fake news.
Please sign in to use Fan Shout
2024 Packers Schedule
Friday, Sep 6 @ 7:15 PM
Eagles
Sunday, Sep 15 @ 12:00 PM
COLTS
Sunday, Sep 22 @ 12:00 PM
Titans
Sunday, Sep 29 @ 12:00 PM
VIKINGS
Sunday, Oct 6 @ 3:25 PM
Rams
Sunday, Oct 13 @ 12:00 PM
CARDINALS
Sunday, Oct 20 @ 12:00 PM
TEXANS
Sunday, Oct 27 @ 12:00 PM
Jaguars
Sunday, Nov 3 @ 3:25 PM
LIONS
Sunday, Nov 17 @ 12:00 PM
Bears
Sunday, Nov 24 @ 3:25 PM
49ERS
Thursday, Nov 28 @ 7:20 PM
DOLPHINS
Thursday, Dec 5 @ 7:15 PM
Lions
Sunday, Dec 15 @ 7:20 PM
Seahawks
Monday, Dec 23 @ 7:15 PM
SAINTS
Sunday, Dec 29 @ 12:00 PM
Vikings
Saturday, Jan 4 @ 11:00 PM
BEARS
Recent Topics
4m / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

13h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Mucky Tundra

22-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / packerfanoutwest

19-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

19-Dec / Random Babble / Zero2Cool

18-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

17-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / wpr

17-Dec / Featured Content / Zero2Cool

16-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

16-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / Martha Careful

16-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

16-Dec / Feedback, Suggestions and Issues / Mucky Tundra

16-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

16-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

16-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

Headlines
Copyright © 2006 - 2024 PackersHome.com™. All Rights Reserved.