Zero2Cool's Rd 2 Draft Cheat Sheet Mock 1.ONLY

Zero2Cool
Elite Member Topic Starter

a year ago

You know you love it.
Pick 42 Darnell Washington TE Georgia
Pick 45 Jalin Hyatt WR Tennessee

image.png You have insufficient rights to see the content. image.png You have insufficient rights to see the content.

Wanna join the discussion?! Login to your PACKERSHOME forum account or Register a new forum account

TheKanataThrilla
Veteran Member

a year ago

Very interested in what positions we take with our two second round picks. Branch still available and our need at Safety could Gute trade up? I would prefer we keep our picks, but I could see the desire to secure the best Safety in the draft.

wpr
Preferred Member

a year ago

I'm working off my phone. It's difficult to type. At a glance I am thinking TE, WR and S are the greatest needs. I have no idea which of these players are really worthwhile. I'm going off of 2 consensus big boards.
TE
Mayer
Washington
Musgrave
Kraft
LaPorta

WR
Hyatt
Downs
Tillman
Rice
Mims
Dell

S
Branch
Johnson
Battle
Brown

Picking at 13 & 15 someone will be there. Depending on how the Packers value them they might select another player.

earthquake
Member

a year ago

I like Kevin's picks. I'm thinking there may be a run on WRs and TEs before the Packers pick because everyone knows they need both. So maybe they end up with S and/or OL here in the second round.

blank

Zero2Cool
Elite Member Topic Starter

a year ago

I like Kevin's picks. I'm thinking there may be a run on WRs and TEs before the Packers pick because everyone knows they need both. So maybe they end up with S and/or OL here in the second round.

Originally Posted by: earthquake

I'm spitting this out there because I want feedback. I think the Packers tend to take physical projects in Round One, but seem to take more polished players in Rounds 2 and 3. Do you (anyone) think this is accurate? I pose this question because the more I think about my TE selection, I think he might be too athletic/project-y for the Packers in round two.

beast
Select Member

a year ago

Originally Posted by: Zero2Cool

I saw someone break the Packers patterns down sort of like this...

Round 1: Extremely high potential developmental athlete. (Alexander, Gary, Savage, Love, Walker, Wyatt)

Round 2: Where's the beef? (Jenkins, Dillon, Myers)...

Round 3: Some tweener player whom can't play either position in the pros (Burks, Sternberger, Digara, Amari, Rhyan)

===================

I thought that was a great breakdown, though I think for Round 2 it should be assuming we don't re-sign anyone, what's are biggest need next year's draft.

As that's gets you Jackson, Jenkins, Dillon, Myers and Watson.

Which, this year it would be TE and S

wpr
Preferred Member

a year ago

Originally Posted by: beast

Round 3 tweeners explains why they have been so bad with the 3rd in recent years.
I think the experiment is over.

Round 2 is going to be a TE and WR. 3, an OL to be named later.

beast
Select Member

a year ago

Round 3 tweeners explains why they have been so bad with the 3rd in recent years.
I think the experiment is over.

Round 2 is going to be a TE and WR. 3, an OL to be named later.

Originally Posted by: wpr

Yeah they're tweeners

Burks was a Safety moved to LB to be a coverage LB

Sternberger was used like a WR in college (but had the TE label) and got moved to TE. Also, he never seemed like the smarter to start with, then concussions surely did not help. Also, Rodgers wanting players to know a ton of audibles that never get written down sure did not help either.

Dugara, well, not so much of a tweener, as an H-back (which H-back is a TE/FB tweener by definition), so I guess tweener after all.

Amari, WR but listen to the Packers post draft keep talking about using him at RB... which honestly that's on the Packers. To fit that roll well, you need speed, quickness or explosion, which Amari clearly didn't have... not sure why they thought that was a good idea.

Rhyan, played as a LT for a long time, but clearly didn't have the correct body type for it, and would surely be moving to OG in the pros. Also, his style is clearly going to have to change, as he was overcompensating to stay at LT and keep up with that speed and length, which if he does that at OG in the pros he'll get bowled right over will bull rush after bull rush, focus on power as he has enough quickness for an OG and doesn't need to overcompensate for it. Though, I still clearly had him behind Tom.

buckeyepackfan
Veteran Member

a year ago

Originally Posted by: Zero2Cool

42.
If Gute is looking for a Marcedes Lewis type, Washington is the pick.

Road Grader who wasn't used in the passing game a whole lot, but made the plays when called upon. Sound familiar.

45.
Cedric Tillman would be my pick for wr.
6' 3" - 220 Gute has almost always preferred the tall lanky guys. No 6-4 or 6-5 in this draft that I know of .

78.
J.L Skinner S Boise State
Just like his size and ability.

I still wonder if Gute is going to try and trade Savage?
He traded HA Ha
Savage has that 8mil guaranteed cap hit, sure would be nice to free up that money for cap space.

I was addicted to The Hokey Pokey, but I turned myself around!

Zero2Cool
Elite Member Topic Starter

a year ago

#10

Well, so far, exactly as I umm ... predicted.

Important Information:

The PACKERSHOME uses cookies. By continuing to browse this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. More Details Close

Fan Shout

beast (3h) : Merry Christmas 🎄🎁

beast (11h) : Sounds like no serious injuries from the Saints game and Jacobs and Watson should play in the Vikings game

packerfanoutwest (16h) : both games Watson missed, Packers won

Martha Careful (17h) : I hope all of you have a Merry Christmas!

Mucky Tundra (24-Dec) : Oh I know about Jacobs, I just couldn't pass up an opportunity to mimic Zero lol

buckeyepackfan (24-Dec) : Jacobs was just sat down, Watson re-injured that knee that kept him out 1 game earlier

buckeyepackfan (24-Dec) : I needed .14 that's. .14 points for the whole 4th quarter to win and go to the SB. Lol

Mucky Tundra (24-Dec) : Jacobs gonna be OK???

Zero2Cool (24-Dec) : Watson gonna be OK???

packerfanoutwest (24-Dec) : Inactives tonight for the Pack: Alexander- knee Bullard - ankle Williams - quad Walker -ankle Monk Heath

packerfanoutwest (24-Dec) : No Jaire, but hopefully the front 7 destroys the line of scrimmage & forces Rattler into a few passes to McKinney.

packerfanoutwest (24-Dec) : minny could be #1 seed and the Lions #5 seed

Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : We'd have same Division and Conference records. Strength of schedule we edge them

Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I just checked. What tie breaker?

bboystyle (23-Dec) : yes its possible but unlikely. If we do get the 5th, we face the NFCS winner

Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : Ahh, ok.

bboystyle (23-Dec) : yes due to tie breaker

Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I mean, unlikely, yes, but mathematically, 5th is possible by what I'm reading.

Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : If Vikings lose out, Packers win out, Packers get 5th, right?

bboystyle (23-Dec) : Minny isnt going to lose out so 5th seed is out of the equation. We are playing for the 6th or 7th seed which makes no difference

Mucky Tundra (23-Dec) : beast, the ad revenue goes to the broadcast company but they gotta pay to air the game on their channel/network

beast (23-Dec) : If we win tonight the game is still relative in terms of 5th, 6th or 7th seed... win and it's 5th or 6th, lose and it's 6th or 7th

beast (23-Dec) : Mucky, I thought the ad revenue went to the broadcasting companies or the NFL, at least not directly

Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I think the revenue share is moot, isn't it? That's the CBA an Salary Cap handling that.

bboystyle (23-Dec) : i mean game becomes irrelevant if we win tonight. Just a game where we are trying to play spoilers to Vikings chance at the #1 seed

Mucky Tundra (23-Dec) : beast, I would guess ad revenue from more eyes watching tv

Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I would think it would hurt the home team because people would have to cancel last minute maybe? i dunno

beast (23-Dec) : I agree that it's BS for fans planning on going to the game. But how does it bring in more money? I'm guessing indirectly?

packerfanoutwest (23-Dec) : bs on flexing the game....they do it for the $$league$$, not the hometown fans

Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I see what you did there Mucky

Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : dammit. 3:25pm

Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : Packers Vikings flexed to 3:35pm

Mucky Tundra (23-Dec) : Upon receiving the news about Luke Musgrave, I immediately fell to the ground

Mucky Tundra (23-Dec) : Yeah baby!

Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : LUKE MUSGRAVE PLAYING TONIGHT~!~~~~WOWHOAAOHAOAA yah

Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I wanna kill new QB's ... blitz the crap out of them.

beast (23-Dec) : Barry seemed to get too conservative against new QBs, Hafley doesn't have that issue

Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : However, we seem to struggle vs new QB's

Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : Should be moot point, cuz Packers should win tonight.

packerfanoutwest (23-Dec) : ok I stand corrected

Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : Ok, yes, you are right. I see that now how they get 7th

Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : 5th - Packers win out, Vikings lose out. Maybe?

beast (23-Dec) : Saying no to the 6th lock.

beast (23-Dec) : No, with the Commanders beating the Eagles, Packers could have a good chance of 6th or 7th unless the win out

Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I think if Packers win, they are locked 6th with chance for 5th.

beast (23-Dec) : But it doesn't matter, as the Packers win surely win one of their remaining games

beast (23-Dec) : This is not complex, just someone doesn't want to believe reality

beast (23-Dec) : We already have told you... if Packers lose all their games (they won't, but if they did), and Buccaneers and Falcons win all theirs

Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I posted it in that Packers and 1 seed thread

Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I literally just said it.

Please sign in to use Fan Shout

2024 Packers Schedule

Friday, Sep 6 @ 7:15 PM

Eagles

29 - 34

Sunday, Sep 15 @ 12:00 PM

COLTS

16 - 10

Sunday, Sep 22 @ 12:00 PM

Titans

30 - 14

Sunday, Sep 29 @ 12:00 PM

VIKINGS

29 - 31

Sunday, Oct 6 @ 3:25 PM

Rams

24 - 19

Sunday, Oct 13 @ 12:00 PM

CARDINALS

34 - 13

Sunday, Oct 20 @ 12:00 PM

TEXANS

24 - 22

Sunday, Oct 27 @ 12:00 PM

Jaguars

30 - 27

Sunday, Nov 3 @ 3:25 PM

LIONS

14 - 24

Sunday, Nov 17 @ 12:00 PM

Bears

20 - 19

Sunday, Nov 24 @ 3:25 PM

49ERS

38 - 10

Thursday, Nov 28 @ 7:20 PM

DOLPHINS

30 - 17

Thursday, Dec 5 @ 7:15 PM

Lions

31 - 34

Sunday, Dec 15 @ 7:20 PM

Seahawks

30 - 13

Monday, Dec 23 @ 7:15 PM

SAINTS

34 - 0

Sunday, Dec 29 @ 3:25 PM

Vikings

Saturday, Jan 4 @ 11:00 PM

BEARS