What if the Packers play better in the 4-3 than the 3-4?· Page 2

vegOmatic
Registered

15 years ago

#11

It doesn't matter if we play 3-4, 4-3, 6-1, 5-2.

It's all in the coaching.

blank

zombieslayer
Registered

15 years ago

#12

People talk about Arod not being able to lead us back late in games. The opposing teams did to him what we could not do to them. Get to the QB. They KNEW in all those games Arod would have to whing it if we were going to win and they brought the dogs on Arod.

I watched game after game that we lost where the opposing QB was left back there to do what he pleased with three minutes left and, yeah, given all day guys like Bishop or our safeties are going to get beat there.

Goes to show any QB can look like a hero if you give him enough time.

"warhawk" wrote:

These statements are so true. I watched game after game of AR having a full second less than the opposing QB. You can't do that and expect to get very far against top tier teams.

And yes, ANY QB will look good with enough seconds. It seemed to me we were giving 5-6 seconds or so. That's too much time.

My man Donald Driver

(thanks to Pack93z for the pic)
2010 will be seen as the beginning of the new Packers dynasty. 🇹🇹 🇲🇲 🇦🇷

obi1
Registered

15 years ago

#13

IF we play the 3-4 like we played the 4-3 LAST year, we are indeed in troouble.

blank

PackFanWithTwins
Veteran Member

15 years ago

#14

Both defenses can be run where the only basic difference is what the players are called. Since we have Matthews, look at the defense Pete Carroll runs. 4-3 under. It is a 4-3 with the defensive line shifted so one DT is linded up over center and called a NT.

Check this out.

http://www.arrowheadpride.com/2009/4/14/835982/a-look-into-the-4-3-under

The world needs ditch diggers too Danny!!!

Greg C.
Registered

15 years ago

#15

Yeah one exception with Carolina where Delhomme can just loft the ball down the field and Smith will 9 times out of 10 come down with it.

"DarkaneRules" wrote:

More like 1 out of 10, I would say. Delhomme threw up a prayer, it blew around in the wind, Woodson lost track of it, and Smith made a heck of a play. It was a drag, but sometimes those things happen.

As for 3-4 vs. 4-3, they will have different personnel in each defense, but if the 3-4 is not as effective as the 4-3, they will change the personnel rather than going to the 4-3 all the time. Maybe they will use a little more 4-3, but 3-4 is Capers' basic scheme, and I don't think he'll go away from it too much.

blank

blueleopard
Member

15 years ago

#16

The 34 only makes our defense more expansive and it plays to our strength because our players are football players, not just specialists.

The more expansive it is, the more confusing it is for opposing offenses.

This is what the Patriots do, and I won't mind being the NFC version of the Patriots with #12 as our QB.

Danreb Victorio A Believer of Greg Jennings

Zero2Cool
Elite Member

15 years ago

#17

Yeah one exception with Carolina where Delhomme can just loft the ball down the field and Smith will 9 times out of 10 come down with it.

"Greg C." wrote:

"DarkaneRules" wrote:

True, but still frustrating!!! LoL

Important Information:

The PACKERSHOME uses cookies. By continuing to browse this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. More Details Close

Fan Shout

packerfanoutwest (6h) : don't care

Zero2Cool (11h) : Lions shopping Jameson Williams?

packerfanoutwest (19h) : Packers General Manager Brian Gutekunst says Green Bay’s roster can win, even without adding anyone in the draft.

Zero2Cool (19h) : It's a poor design. New site has SignalR like our gameday chat

wpr (19h) : Ah today's Shout was very quick to post.

wpr (19h) : now 3

Zero2Cool (20h) : Who? What?

beast (22-Apr) : What is he supposed to say? He doesn't want players currently on the team?

Martha Careful (21-Apr) : meh

Zero2Cool (21-Apr) : Sounds like Walker and Wyatt will be with Packers for beyond 2026

Zero2Cool (21-Apr) : It's so awesome.

Zero2Cool (21-Apr) : new site fan shout post fast

wpr (21-Apr) : Slow posting in Fan shout.

wpr (21-Apr) : Only 4

Zero2Cool (21-Apr) : If only we had a topic to read about and discuss it. That's something new website must have!!!

dfosterf (21-Apr) : Justice Musqueda over at Acme Packing put up an excellent synopsis of the Packers 1st round options this am

wpr (19-Apr) : 5 days

beast (18-Apr) : 6 days

wpr (17-Apr) : 7 days

Zero2Cool (16-Apr) : sounds like Packers don't get good compensation, Jaire staying

dfosterf (16-Apr) : Nobody coming up with a keep, but at x amount

dfosterf (16-Apr) : Trade, cut or keep

dfosterf (16-Apr) : that from Jaire

dfosterf (16-Apr) : My guess is the Packers floated the concept of a reworked contract via his agent and agent got a f'

Zero2Cool (16-Apr) : Yes, and that is why I think Rob worded it how he did. Rather than say "agent"

dfosterf (16-Apr) : Same laws apply. Agent must present such an offer to Jaire. Cannot accept or reject without presenting it

Zero2Cool (16-Apr) : I'm thinking that is why Rob worded it how he did.

dfosterf (16-Apr) : The Packers can certainly still make the offer to the agent

dfosterf (16-Apr) : Laws of agency and definition of fiduciary responsibility

dfosterf (16-Apr) : Jaire is open to a reduced contract without Jaire's permission

dfosterf (16-Apr) : The agent would arguably violate the law if he were to tell the Packers

Zero2Cool (16-Apr) : That someone ... likely the agent.

Zero2Cool (16-Apr) : So, Jaire has not been offered nor rejected a pay reduction, but someone says he'd decline.

Zero2Cool (16-Apr) : Demovksy says t was direct communication with someone familiar with Jaire’s line of thinking at that moment.

Zero2Cool (16-Apr) : Demovsky just replied to me a bit ago. Jaire hasn't said it.

dfosterf (16-Apr) : Of course, that depends on the definition of "we"

dfosterf (16-Apr) : We have been told that they haven't because he wouldn't accept it. I submit we don't know that

dfosterf (16-Apr) : What is the downside in making a calculated reduced offer to Jaire?

Zero2Cool (15-Apr) : Packers are receiving interest in Jaire Alexander but a trade is not imminent

Zero2Cool (15-Apr) : Jalen Ramsey wants to be traded. He's never happy is he?

Zero2Cool (15-Apr) : two 1sts in 2022 and two 2nd's in 2023 and 2024

Zero2Cool (15-Apr) : Packers had fortunate last three drafts.

dfosterf (15-Apr) : I may have to move

dfosterf (15-Apr) : My wife just told the ancient Japanese sushi dude not enough rice under his fish

Zero2Cool (14-Apr) : I think a dozen is what I need

dfosterf (14-Apr) : Go fund me for this purpose just might work. A dozen nurses show up at 1265 to provide mental health assistance.

dfosterf (14-Apr) : Maybe send a crew of Angels to the Packers draft room on draft day.

Zero2Cool (14-Apr) : I am the Angel that gets visited.

dfosterf (14-Apr) : Visiting Angels has a pretty good reputation

Please sign in to use Fan Shout

2024 Packers Schedule

Friday, Sep 6 @ 7:15 PM

Eagles

29 - 34

Sunday, Sep 15 @ 12:00 PM

COLTS

16 - 10

Sunday, Sep 22 @ 12:00 PM

Titans

30 - 14

Sunday, Sep 29 @ 12:00 PM

VIKINGS

29 - 31

Sunday, Oct 6 @ 3:25 PM

Rams

24 - 19

Sunday, Oct 13 @ 12:00 PM

CARDINALS

34 - 13

Sunday, Oct 20 @ 12:00 PM

TEXANS

24 - 22

Sunday, Oct 27 @ 12:00 PM

Jaguars

30 - 27

Sunday, Nov 3 @ 3:25 PM

LIONS

14 - 24

Sunday, Nov 17 @ 12:00 PM

Bears

20 - 19

Sunday, Nov 24 @ 3:25 PM

49ERS

38 - 10

Thursday, Nov 28 @ 7:20 PM

DOLPHINS

30 - 17

Thursday, Dec 5 @ 7:15 PM

Lions

31 - 34

Sunday, Dec 15 @ 7:20 PM

Seahawks

30 - 13

Monday, Dec 23 @ 7:15 PM

SAINTS

34 - 0

Sunday, Dec 29 @ 3:25 PM

Vikings

25 - 27

Sunday, Jan 5 @ 12:00 PM

BEARS

22 - 24