Seriously though, I'm not concerned about it. The idea of introducing the 3-4 is to diversify the defensive playbook so that offenses can't predict what we are doing. I'm starting to think the reason so many teams were able to drive in clutch situations against us last year was because they "figured us out" defensively and used the plays they knew would work in key moments of the game.
"zombieslayer" wrote:
+1.
"MassPackersFan" wrote:
What teams "figured out" late in games is that we couldn't get to the passer. In the Titans game were hanging right in there until the end and one of the best rushing teams in football moves the ball down the field by... passing it and beats us.
We gave Chicago the game simply by allowing Orton time to pass the ball late in that game. You put a rush on him and he's toast.
We lose the Carolina game on two long bombs dead down the middle and you can't let a QB sit back there and let him deliver the ball right on the money 45 yards downfield.
People talk about Arod not being able to lead us back late in games. The opposing teams did to him what we could not do to them. Get to the QB. They KNEW in all those games Arod would have to whing it if we were going to win and they brought the dogs on Arod.
Many of those late game INT's he threw coincidently occured while he was on a dead run. That's what YOUR SUPPOSED TO DO TO TEAMS late in games when there's little time left.
I watched game after game that we lost where the opposing QB was left back there to do what he pleased with three minutes left and, yeah, given all day guys like Bishop or our safeties are going to get beat there.
Goes to show any QB can look like a hero if you give him enough time.
"The train is leaving the station."