earthquake
2 years ago
I think the time to bring in a FA was before the draft. After taking 3 guys in the draft I think they have to roll with who they've got now, barring a couple of season-ending injuries or something like that. I think bringing in someone like Julio Jones or Beckham might make sense mid-to-late season if depth gets thin. But not now.
blank
Cheesey
2 years ago

Has had a degenerative ankle condition since 2012. Would be out of the league if not for Aaron.

Stepped ahead of Amari last year. We need veterans who know how to get it done this year. Let's see what he's got left.

Originally Posted by: nerdmann 



Yes....and yet he still makes plays.
You are probably right. If not for Rodgers, he probably would be out of football. But last year he showed that he could still make plays when called on.
I guess we will see how he is this season. Me, I'm not counting him out
UserPostedImage
Zero2Cool
2 years ago

I don't understand why so few are expecting much from Cobb. He might not be "great", but when called on he comes through. He made some great plays when needed.
And with Adams gone, he will be called on even more.

Originally Posted by: Cheesey 



Because they are haters of the hating kind of hatred.

I think Randall Cobb contributions come on need to move chain downs. And his leadership, mentorship to the youngsters. Those are big things, but since SportsCenter isn't going to be touting his TD's and Yardage some haters just spit that hate.


BTW, the "hate" stuff is me being facetious.
UserPostedImage
dyeah_gb
2 years ago

I don't understand why so few are expecting much from Cobb. He might not be "great", but when called on he comes through. He made some great plays when needed.
And with Adams gone, he will be called on even more.

Originally Posted by: Cheesey 



Cobb can be schemed open and can probably execute better than most of the young guys. I doubt he can be relied upon to beat anyone off the line or create separation on his own. It is good to have veteran leadership but that needs to be balanced with developing the future.
The first principle is that you must not fool yourself, and you are the easiest person to fool - R. Feynman
nerdmann
2 years ago

Cobb can be schemed open and can probably execute better than most of the young guys. I doubt he can be relied upon to beat anyone off the line or create separation on his own. It is good to have veteran leadership but that needs to be balanced with developing the future.

Originally Posted by: dyeah_gb 



Watson is gonna go deep, clearing out safeties so Cobb and Lazard can get open underneath, like that last play in the playoffs.
ā€œWinning is not a sometime thing, it is an all the time thing. You don't do things right once in a while…you do them right all the time.ā€
earthquake
2 years ago
As far as Cobb goes, I would count on him to be a solid #3 and miss around 5 games, but to play reasonably well when he's healthy. Since his career-best season in 2014 (when Jordy Nelson missed the year and he was the #1), he's only topped 800 yards twice. He also hasn't played a full 16-game season since 2014, missing 19 games in the last 4 seasons combined. If Cobb can stay healthy all season maybe he can get 700 yards with 5-6 TDs but going into his 10th season I wouldn't count on him to step in and be Devante Adams light.

I also wouldn't be shocked if the Packers don't end up with a single guy who tops 1000 yards, but still have a top 5 offense with Rodgers having another MVP type year.
blank
Cheesey
2 years ago

Because they are haters of the hating kind of hatred.

I think Randall Cobb contributions come on need to move chain downs. And his leadership, mentorship to the youngsters. Those are big things, but since SportsCenter isn't going to be touting his TD's and Yardage some haters just spit that hate.


BTW, the "hate" stuff is me being facetious.

Originally Posted by: Zero2Cool 



I HATE the haters that love to hate! Hating is something that should be hated!
😁😜
UserPostedImage
beast
2 years ago
Well that did add veteran WR Watkins.

As far as adding another, I think it would help this season, especially in the first half, but overall it would hurt in the long run taking development space away from the youngsters.

And I think that's been a huge part of Gute's philosophy, if there is a guy there that they believe might develop and step up, then clear the room to give them space to just that...

Now, that hurts when you miss (releasing Nelson), but it's helped more guys develop and have somewhere to step up into, giving opportunities to guys to try to step up, like the OL stepped up last year. And CBs stepped up too.

Of course some places it hasn't worked out, TE Graham and Sternberger, but if Gute thinks they have potential, he seems to try to give them a chance to proof it one way or the other.
UserPostedImage
bboystyle
2 years ago
Im trying to be optimistic here but i just cant. Adding a WR would be a good thing not for the team, but for the QB. Rodgers has never utilized a rookie WR regardless of their status. If they drop a pass, he will ignore them the rest of the game and possibly longer. This whole earning his trust crap is what stops the development of our young WRs. Hell even a vet like Lewis got that treatment during the SF game.
beast
2 years ago

Im trying to be optimistic here but i just cant. Adding a WR would be a good thing not for the team, but for the QB. Rodgers has never utilized a rookie WR regardless of their status. If they drop a pass, he will ignore them the rest of the game and possibly longer. This whole earning his trust crap is what stops the development of our young WRs. Hell even a vet like Lewis got that treatment during the SF game.

Originally Posted by: bboystyle 


That's an extremely unfair to pin on Rodgers, the rookie WRs inability to be a developed WR, especially when you look at the WR depth and rookie WRs he's had to work with...

2008: Nelson, he wasn't ready until like 3.5 years when he truely broke out.

2011: Cobb, they had a deep WR depth keeping Cobb in the bench and Cobb and Rodgers chemistry was great, and Rodgers won NFL MVP!

2014: Adams: had less than 60% catch rate and was #3 behind Nelson and Cobb whom dominated and once again Rodgers won NFL MVP.

2015: Ty Montgomery: I don't this he's developed into a starter with any QB yet.

2018: Moore, MVS, St. Brown... I think you can easily say Moore and St. Brown haven't developed into starters yet... MVS: I can argue that Rodgers should of had better chemistry with MVS, but for whatever reason, they always seemed a bit off the same page, but that was for four years, not just a rookie.

2021: Rodgers: he didn't seem to get on the field much...


Unless your specifically talking about MVS, I just don't see another case where Rodgers was in the position with a rookie WR that was ready to do that much more than they did as a rookie, as either the talented WR depth has held the rookie WR back (like with Cobb and Adams), or the WR just wasn't that good as a rookie (Monty, Moore, Rodgers).


So Rodgers is either 0/0 or 0/1 either way, it's an extremely small sample to make a judgement on how Rodgers is with ready to go rookie WRs, which by the way, most aren't ready to go as rookies like Greg Jennings was.

UserPostedImage
Fan Shout
dfosterf (29m) : PFOW Out of our division would be a good thing imo
Zero2Cool (1h) : Jameson Williams is done at 24 years old? What? He's a WR, not QB. I'm missing something here haha
wpr (2h) : Tomorrow is almost here.
packerfanoutwest (2h) : would you want him if Pack needed a back up qb?
packerfanoutwest (2h) : JW is done......stick a fork in him
Zero2Cool (4h) : You should. He goes to AFC that helps Packers.
packerfanoutwest (15h) : don't care
Zero2Cool (20h) : Lions shopping Jameson Williams?
packerfanoutwest (22-Apr) : Packers General Manager Brian Gutekunst says Green Bay’s roster can win, even without adding anyone in the draft.
Zero2Cool (22-Apr) : It's a poor design. New site has SignalR like our gameday chat
wpr (22-Apr) : Ah today's Shout was very quick to post.
wpr (22-Apr) : now 3
Zero2Cool (22-Apr) : Who? What?
beast (22-Apr) : What is he supposed to say? He doesn't want players currently on the team?
Martha Careful (21-Apr) : meh
Zero2Cool (21-Apr) : Sounds like Walker and Wyatt will be with Packers for beyond 2026
Zero2Cool (21-Apr) : It's so awesome.
Zero2Cool (21-Apr) : new site fan shout post fast
wpr (21-Apr) : Slow posting in Fan shout.
wpr (21-Apr) : Only 4
wpr (21-Apr) : Only 4
Zero2Cool (21-Apr) : If only we had a topic to read about and discuss it. That's something new website must have!!!
dfosterf (21-Apr) : Justice Musqueda over at Acme Packing put up an excellent synopsis of the Packers 1st round options this am
wpr (19-Apr) : 5 days
beast (18-Apr) : 6 days
wpr (17-Apr) : 7 days
Zero2Cool (16-Apr) : sounds like Packers don't get good compensation, Jaire staying
dfosterf (16-Apr) : Nobody coming up with a keep, but at x amount
dfosterf (16-Apr) : Trade, cut or keep
dfosterf (16-Apr) : that from Jaire
dfosterf (16-Apr) : My guess is the Packers floated the concept of a reworked contract via his agent and agent got a f'
Zero2Cool (16-Apr) : Yes, and that is why I think Rob worded it how he did. Rather than say "agent"
dfosterf (16-Apr) : Same laws apply. Agent must present such an offer to Jaire. Cannot accept or reject without presenting it
Zero2Cool (16-Apr) : I'm thinking that is why Rob worded it how he did.
dfosterf (16-Apr) : The Packers can certainly still make the offer to the agent
dfosterf (16-Apr) : Laws of agency and definition of fiduciary responsibility
dfosterf (16-Apr) : Jaire is open to a reduced contract without Jaire's permission
dfosterf (16-Apr) : The agent would arguably violate the law if he were to tell the Packers
Zero2Cool (16-Apr) : That someone ... likely the agent.
Zero2Cool (16-Apr) : So, Jaire has not been offered nor rejected a pay reduction, but someone says he'd decline.
Zero2Cool (16-Apr) : Demovksy says t was direct communication with someone familiar with Jaire’s line of thinking at that moment.
Zero2Cool (16-Apr) : Demovsky just replied to me a bit ago. Jaire hasn't said it.
dfosterf (16-Apr) : Of course, that depends on the definition of "we"
dfosterf (16-Apr) : We have been told that they haven't because he wouldn't accept it. I submit we don't know that
dfosterf (16-Apr) : What is the downside in making a calculated reduced offer to Jaire?
Zero2Cool (15-Apr) : Packers are receiving interest in Jaire Alexander but a trade is not imminent
Zero2Cool (15-Apr) : Jalen Ramsey wants to be traded. He's never happy is he?
Zero2Cool (15-Apr) : two 1sts in 2022 and two 2nd's in 2023 and 2024
Zero2Cool (15-Apr) : Packers had fortunate last three drafts.
dfosterf (15-Apr) : I may have to move
Please sign in to use Fan Shout
2024 Packers Schedule
Friday, Sep 6 @ 7:15 PM
Eagles
Sunday, Sep 15 @ 12:00 PM
COLTS
Sunday, Sep 22 @ 12:00 PM
Titans
Sunday, Sep 29 @ 12:00 PM
VIKINGS
Sunday, Oct 6 @ 3:25 PM
Rams
Sunday, Oct 13 @ 12:00 PM
CARDINALS
Sunday, Oct 20 @ 12:00 PM
TEXANS
Sunday, Oct 27 @ 12:00 PM
Jaguars
Sunday, Nov 3 @ 3:25 PM
LIONS
Sunday, Nov 17 @ 12:00 PM
Bears
Sunday, Nov 24 @ 3:25 PM
49ERS
Thursday, Nov 28 @ 7:20 PM
DOLPHINS
Thursday, Dec 5 @ 7:15 PM
Lions
Sunday, Dec 15 @ 7:20 PM
Seahawks
Monday, Dec 23 @ 7:15 PM
SAINTS
Sunday, Dec 29 @ 3:25 PM
Vikings
Sunday, Jan 5 @ 12:00 PM
BEARS
Recent Topics
59m / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

3h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

20h / Packers Draft Threads / Zero2Cool

22h / Random Babble / Martha Careful

22-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

22-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / dfosterf

17-Apr / Random Babble / wpr

13-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / Martha Careful

12-Apr / Feedback, Suggestions and Issues / Zero2Cool

11-Apr / Feedback, Suggestions and Issues / Rockmolder

2-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

2-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / bboystyle

1-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / Mucky Tundra

1-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / wpr

31-Mar / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

Headlines
Copyright Ā© 2006 - 2025 PackersHome.comā„¢. All Rights Reserved.