All Panthers need is Love?· Page 4

Zero2Cool
Elite Member Topic Starter

2 years ago

So, we're talking JORDAN LOVE and the CAROLINA PANTHERS in this topic, huh? The more I read and hear, it sounds like the Packers really want to know what they have with Love before making any decision. That was from Ian Rapoport who apparently he has sources, so. 🤷‍♂️

There aren't even 32 worthy starting QB's in the league and the Packers basically have to figure out if Love can be one of them or not. It's probably best for the Packers to keep Love unless someone offers them a 1st round pick, which, there is no way any team is going to do that.

nerdmann
Premier Member

2 years ago

#32

No, Aaron is a much more gifted and talented QB than Tom Brady is. It's not close. The reason they don't call Aaron the "GOAT" is because Tom has 7 Super Bowl rings. That makes him the GOAT.

The end.

Originally Posted by: PackerNation

Starr, Unitas, Montana, Marino, Moon. Go from there.

“Winning is not a sometime thing, it is an all the time thing. You don't do things right once in a while…you do them right all the time.”

nerdmann
Premier Member

2 years ago

#33

I know better than giving this commenter attention. If this turns into trolling...then this will be the last reply this individual gets from me.

The thread is about Jordan Love. Jordan is a developing QB with a high ceiling. The present and future are set at QB in Green Bay. Thanks Brian!

Someone(nerdmann) was implying that Jordan Love should start for the Packers over Aaron Rodgers this season. That is a ridiculous imply.

Tom Brady is the most successful QB in playoff history. Of course he has had more success in the playoffs than Aaron Rodgers. Brady has had more success than every QB in history. That doesn't mean that Aaron is a great QB that turns into a bad one in the playoffs. Saying that just isn't factual. Aaron has the same number of playoff victories as Troy Aikman and Roger Staubach. Does anyone say those guys sucked in the playoffs? No, of course no one says that about them.

Yes, Aaron has not played up to his elite QB level in his last 2 playoff appearances. He readily admits that. He knows the Packers had Super Bowl winning rosters for the last 2 seasons. He takes as much of the blame upon himself for not getting it done as anyone has.

The J-Love era will start when it starts. That will not be in 2022. Aaron and the boys have unfinished business to take care of.

Originally Posted by: PackerNation

I was implying that? Could have sworn I was saying Aaron is inconsistent. And btw, I did not say Love is 80% as good as Rodgers. I was using thst as an example. Ehat I said was, "Love is not ready, yet."

“Winning is not a sometime thing, it is an all the time thing. You don't do things right once in a while…you do them right all the time.”

beast
Select Member

2 years ago

#34

Starr, Unitas, Montana, Marino, Moon. Go from there.

Originally Posted by: nerdmann

Why are you bringing up Starr, Unitas, Montana, Marino and Moon in a thread about Jordan Love and the Panthers? Did they play for the Panthers or something? 😋 (just being a playful sarcastic wise guy lol)

Zero2Cool
Elite Member Topic Starter

2 years ago

#35

Originally Posted by: beast

🤦‍♂️🤦‍♂️🤦‍♂️

nerdmann
Premier Member

2 years ago

#36

BRIAN FLORES WANTED JORDAN LOVE OVER TUA

Omar Kelly on with “The Big O” Orlando Alzugaray talks about what happened on Draft Day 2020 and Brian Flores not wanting Miami to select Tua. Flores was pushing for the Dolphins to select Jordan Love at #5 overall.

Interesting.

“Winning is not a sometime thing, it is an all the time thing. You don't do things right once in a while…you do them right all the time.”

wpr
Preferred Member

2 years ago

#37

BRIAN FLORES WANTED JORDAN LOVE OVER TUA

Interesting.

Originally Posted by: nerdmann

Yeah but Flores was fired so what does he know. 😁

Zero2Cool
Elite Member Topic Starter

2 years ago

#38

Yeah but Flores was fired so what does he know. 😁

Originally Posted by: wpr

Brian Flores was fired for not losing enough. So, I mean, Jordan Love > Tua. 🙂

Martha Careful
Member

2 years ago

#39

Brian Flores was fired for not losing enough. So, I mean, Jordan Love >; Tua.

Originally Posted by: Zero2Cool

For what its worth, I thought Flores teams always fought their asses off. I respect his opinion, and I think he was correct on this call.

Why trade Love? He is the perfect back-up at this point. Live reps are all he is lacking. Is he AR12? No. Could he be exceptionally strong....possibly!

And by the way, (although outside the thread topic) I would take AR12 over Brady in any playoff game any day, any venue.

Go Packers!!!!

wpr
Preferred Member

2 years ago

#40

Originally Posted by: Martha Careful

My comment on Flores was just to pick at nermann. He's use to it.

Important Information:

The PACKERSHOME uses cookies. By continuing to browse this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. More Details Close

Fan Shout

Zero2Cool (38m) : I see what you did there Mucky

Zero2Cool (39m) : dammit. 3:25pm

Zero2Cool (39m) : Packers Vikings flexed to 3:35pm

Mucky Tundra (46m) : Upon receiving the news about Luke Musgrave, I immediately fell to the ground

Mucky Tundra (47m) : Yeah baby!

Zero2Cool (1h) : LUKE MUSGRAVE PLAYING TONIGHT~!~~~~WOWHOAAOHAOAA yah

Zero2Cool (2h) : I wanna kill new QB's ... blitz the crap out of them.

beast (2h) : Barry seemed to get too conservative against new QBs, Hafley doesn't have that issue

Zero2Cool (3h) : However, we seem to struggle vs new QB's

Zero2Cool (3h) : Should be moot point, cuz Packers should win tonight.

packerfanoutwest (3h) : ok I stand corrected

Zero2Cool (3h) : Ok, yes, you are right. I see that now how they get 7th

Zero2Cool (3h) : 5th - Packers win out, Vikings lose out. Maybe?

beast (3h) : Saying no to the 6th lock.

beast (3h) : No, with the Commanders beating the Eagles, Packers could have a good chance of 6th or 7th unless the win out

Zero2Cool (3h) : I think if Packers win, they are locked 6th with chance for 5th.

beast (3h) : But it doesn't matter, as the Packers win surely win one of their remaining games

beast (3h) : This is not complex, just someone doesn't want to believe reality

beast (3h) : We already have told you... if Packers lose all their games (they won't, but if they did), and Buccaneers and Falcons win all theirs

Zero2Cool (3h) : I posted it in that Packers and 1 seed thread

Zero2Cool (3h) : I literally just said it.

packerfanoutwest (3h) : show us a scenario where Pack don't get in? bet you can't

Zero2Cool (3h) : Falcons, Buccaneers would need to win final two games.

Zero2Cool (3h) : Yes, if they win one of three, they are lock. If they lose out, they can be eliminated.

packerfanoutwest (3h) : as I just said,,gtheyh are in no matter what

Zero2Cool (4h) : Packers should get in. I just hope it's not 7th seed. Feels dirty.

packerfanoutwest (4h) : If packers lose out, no matter what, they are in

packerfanoutwest (4h) : both teams can not male the playoffs....falcon hold the tie breaker

packerfanoutwest (4h) : if bucs win out they win their division

beast (4h) : Fine, Buccaneers and Falcons can get ahead of us

packerfanoutwest (4h) : falcons are already ahead of us

beast (4h) : Packers will get in

beast (4h) : If Packers lose the rest of their games and Falcons win the rest of theirs, they could pass us... but not gonna happen

packerfanoutwest (4h) : they still are in the playoffs

packerfanoutwest (4h) : If Packers lose the remaining games,,,,at 10-7

Zero2Cool (6h) : We can say it. We don't play.

Mucky Tundra (7h) : But to say they are in is looking past the Saints

Mucky Tundra (7h) : That said, their odds are very favorable with a >99% chance of making the playoffs entering this week's games

Mucky Tundra (7h) : Packers are not in and have not clinched a playoff spot.

buckeyepackfan (8h) : Packers are in, they need to keep winning to improve their seed#.

Mucky Tundra (17h) : Getting help would have been nice, but helping ourselves should always be the plan

beast (17h) : Too bad Seahawks couldn't beat Vikings

bboystyle (17h) : We just need to win Monday night and were in

Mucky Tundra (20h) : Or ties, but let's be real here

Mucky Tundra (20h) : Other scenario was Falcons+Rams losses

Mucky Tundra (20h) : Needed a Falcons loss for a Seahawk loss to clinch

buckeyepackfan (21h) : Am I wring in saying if Tge Vikings beat The Seahawks, The Packers clinch?

Mucky Tundra (21-Dec) : Agreed; you stinks

Zero2Cool (21-Dec) : I'm not beating anyone. I stinks.

Mucky Tundra (21-Dec) : rough injury for tank dell. guy can't catch abreak

Please sign in to use Fan Shout

2024 Packers Schedule

Friday, Sep 6 @ 7:15 PM

Eagles

29 - 34

Sunday, Sep 15 @ 12:00 PM

COLTS

16 - 10

Sunday, Sep 22 @ 12:00 PM

Titans

30 - 14

Sunday, Sep 29 @ 12:00 PM

VIKINGS

29 - 31

Sunday, Oct 6 @ 3:25 PM

Rams

24 - 19

Sunday, Oct 13 @ 12:00 PM

CARDINALS

34 - 13

Sunday, Oct 20 @ 12:00 PM

TEXANS

24 - 22

Sunday, Oct 27 @ 12:00 PM

Jaguars

30 - 27

Sunday, Nov 3 @ 3:25 PM

LIONS

14 - 24

Sunday, Nov 17 @ 12:00 PM

Bears

20 - 19

Sunday, Nov 24 @ 3:25 PM

49ERS

38 - 10

Thursday, Nov 28 @ 7:20 PM

DOLPHINS

30 - 17

Thursday, Dec 5 @ 7:15 PM

Lions

31 - 34

Sunday, Dec 15 @ 7:20 PM

Seahawks

30 - 13

Monday, Dec 23 @ 7:15 PM

SAINTS

Sunday, Dec 29 @ 3:25 PM

Vikings

Saturday, Jan 4 @ 11:00 PM

BEARS