Zero2Cool
2 years ago
Andrew Brandt is thinking multiple first round picks.

UserPostedImage
beast
2 years ago

We've seen one game where he ran the scheme based on Aaron's strengths and tendencies and one half where he ran an Aaron-based screen with scrubs.

Give him another off season. Matt made RG3 look like Joe Montana his rookie year. Let's see what he can do with Love.

Originally Posted by: nerdmann 


That was a lot more than Matt... but Mike Shanahan, Kyle Shanahan, Sean McVay might also had some input and RG3 ran a lot and didn't have many good seasons.

Also interesting that you won't except factual information for Rodgers but you give Love all the excuses I'm the world.... biased much?

UserPostedImage
nerdmann
2 years ago

That was a lot more than Matt... but Mike Shanahan, Kyle Shanahan, Sean McVay might also had some input and RG3 ran a lot and didn't have many good seasons.

Also interesting that you won't except factual information for Rodgers but you give Love all the excuses I'm the world.... biased much?

Originally Posted by: beast 



I give nothing but facts. RG3 looked like a future star his rookie year. FACT. Subsequently face planted. FACT. We haven't seen Love in a system playing to his strengths, protecting his weaknesses. FACT.

Does Love still need to work on his footwork? Yeah. Is it guaranteed that he will be The Man? Nope. But I trust Matt as a QB whisperer.
“Winning is not a sometime thing, it is an all the time thing. You don't do things right once in a while…you do them right all the time.”
Zero2Cool
2 years ago
Two 1st round picks and one 3rd round pick for Matthew Stafford. I would think the Packers could get a little more for Aaron Rodgers.
UserPostedImage
beast
2 years ago

Two 1st round picks and one 3rd round pick for Matthew Stafford. I would think the Packers could get a little more for Aaron Rodgers.

Originally Posted by: Zero2Cool 


Arguably they got a 1st round for taking the bad Goff contract off the Rams hands.

Though yes, I'd want more than two 1st, though I doubt three first would be likely. Though it also depends how high those first picks are...

Right now the Broncos have pick numbers 9, 40, 63, 75, 95 in the 2022 draft... that's basically equaled to more than picks number 30, 31 and 32. Heck according to a draft calculator it's more than 20, 21 and 22. So whole it's less than two 1st it might have more value.



UserPostedImage
beast
2 years ago

I give nothing but facts. RG3 looked like a future star his rookie year. FACT. Subsequently face planted. FACT. We haven't seen Love in a system playing to his strengths, protecting his weaknesses. FACT.

Does Love still need to work on his footwork? Yeah. Is it guaranteed that he will be The Man? Nope. But I trust Matt as a QB whisperer.

Originally Posted by: nerdmann 


The lack of factual was towards your Rodgers comments, not to your Love comments. You just always see the green as greener on the other side, even if it's brown as dirt.

And no those aren't all facts, those are your opinions, stop mistaking your opinion as fact. Thanks.

UserPostedImage
Zero2Cool
2 years ago

The lack of factual was towards your Rodgers comments, not to your Love comments. You just always see the green as greener on the other side, even if it's brown as dirt.

And no those aren't all facts, those are your opinions, stop mistaking your opinion as fact. Thanks.

Originally Posted by: beast 



The only opinions around here that are facts are my opinions! YA ALL BETTER RECONGIZE!!

But yeah, I wouldn't want to be part of a rebuild either. If it was a one year turn around, maybe, but are we one year away? What's salary cap gonna look like? What prospects in college? What free agents? So many crystal ball type questions.
UserPostedImage
dhazer
2 years ago
I think he is sent off to Denver for 2 1sts and a 2nd and a player or like baseball they take the dead cap money if that's possible. I like the tag and trade Adams also maybe for a 1st and Juedy.

As for Love I will be interested to see how Matt schemes his offense to fit Love's strengths. Will there be more RPO in the offense instead of straight-back passing?
Just Imagine this for the next 6-9 years. What a ride it will be 🙂 (PS, Zero should charge for this)
UserPostedImage
beast
2 years ago
If the Broncos want to trade for a QB, I'm guessing Gute has a QB that they'll just Love! 💕
UserPostedImage
Zero2Cool
2 years ago

If the Broncos want to trade for a QB, I'm guessing Gute has a QB that they'll just Love! 💕

Originally Posted by: beast 



You imagine the uproar if Broncos ship off their 9th overall and one of their 2nd round picks even up for Jordan Love? People would be praising the hell out of Brian G. Yes, I know this won't happen, but it's a hypothetical, go with it.
UserPostedImage
Users browsing this topic
Fan Shout
packerfanoutwest (9m) : bs on flexing the game....they do it for the $$league$$, not the hometown fans
Zero2Cool (55m) : I see what you did there Mucky
Zero2Cool (56m) : dammit. 3:25pm
Zero2Cool (56m) : Packers Vikings flexed to 3:35pm
Mucky Tundra (1h) : Upon receiving the news about Luke Musgrave, I immediately fell to the ground
Mucky Tundra (1h) : Yeah baby!
Zero2Cool (1h) : LUKE MUSGRAVE PLAYING TONIGHT~!~~~~WOWHOAAOHAOAA yah
Zero2Cool (2h) : I wanna kill new QB's ... blitz the crap out of them.
beast (2h) : Barry seemed to get too conservative against new QBs, Hafley doesn't have that issue
Zero2Cool (3h) : However, we seem to struggle vs new QB's
Zero2Cool (3h) : Should be moot point, cuz Packers should win tonight.
packerfanoutwest (3h) : ok I stand corrected
Zero2Cool (3h) : Ok, yes, you are right. I see that now how they get 7th
Zero2Cool (3h) : 5th - Packers win out, Vikings lose out. Maybe?
beast (3h) : Saying no to the 6th lock.
beast (3h) : No, with the Commanders beating the Eagles, Packers could have a good chance of 6th or 7th unless the win out
Zero2Cool (3h) : I think if Packers win, they are locked 6th with chance for 5th.
beast (3h) : But it doesn't matter, as the Packers win surely win one of their remaining games
beast (3h) : This is not complex, just someone doesn't want to believe reality
beast (3h) : We already have told you... if Packers lose all their games (they won't, but if they did), and Buccaneers and Falcons win all theirs
Zero2Cool (3h) : I posted it in that Packers and 1 seed thread
Zero2Cool (3h) : I literally just said it.
packerfanoutwest (4h) : show us a scenario where Pack don't get in? bet you can't
Zero2Cool (4h) : Falcons, Buccaneers would need to win final two games.
Zero2Cool (4h) : Yes, if they win one of three, they are lock. If they lose out, they can be eliminated.
packerfanoutwest (4h) : as I just said,,gtheyh are in no matter what
Zero2Cool (4h) : Packers should get in. I just hope it's not 7th seed. Feels dirty.
packerfanoutwest (4h) : If packers lose out, no matter what, they are in
packerfanoutwest (4h) : both teams can not male the playoffs....falcon hold the tie breaker
packerfanoutwest (4h) : if bucs win out they win their division
beast (4h) : Fine, Buccaneers and Falcons can get ahead of us
packerfanoutwest (4h) : falcons are already ahead of us
beast (4h) : Packers will get in
beast (4h) : If Packers lose the rest of their games and Falcons win the rest of theirs, they could pass us... but not gonna happen
packerfanoutwest (4h) : they still are in the playoffs
packerfanoutwest (4h) : If Packers lose the remaining games,,,,at 10-7
Zero2Cool (6h) : We can say it. We don't play.
Mucky Tundra (7h) : But to say they are in is looking past the Saints
Mucky Tundra (7h) : That said, their odds are very favorable with a >99% chance of making the playoffs entering this week's games
Mucky Tundra (7h) : Packers are not in and have not clinched a playoff spot.
buckeyepackfan (8h) : Packers are in, they need to keep winning to improve their seed#.
Mucky Tundra (17h) : Getting help would have been nice, but helping ourselves should always be the plan
beast (17h) : Too bad Seahawks couldn't beat Vikings
bboystyle (18h) : We just need to win Monday night and were in
Mucky Tundra (21h) : Or ties, but let's be real here
Mucky Tundra (21h) : Other scenario was Falcons+Rams losses
Mucky Tundra (21h) : Needed a Falcons loss for a Seahawk loss to clinch
buckeyepackfan (21h) : Am I wring in saying if Tge Vikings beat The Seahawks, The Packers clinch?
Mucky Tundra (21-Dec) : Agreed; you stinks
Zero2Cool (21-Dec) : I'm not beating anyone. I stinks.
Please sign in to use Fan Shout
2024 Packers Schedule
Friday, Sep 6 @ 7:15 PM
Eagles
Sunday, Sep 15 @ 12:00 PM
COLTS
Sunday, Sep 22 @ 12:00 PM
Titans
Sunday, Sep 29 @ 12:00 PM
VIKINGS
Sunday, Oct 6 @ 3:25 PM
Rams
Sunday, Oct 13 @ 12:00 PM
CARDINALS
Sunday, Oct 20 @ 12:00 PM
TEXANS
Sunday, Oct 27 @ 12:00 PM
Jaguars
Sunday, Nov 3 @ 3:25 PM
LIONS
Sunday, Nov 17 @ 12:00 PM
Bears
Sunday, Nov 24 @ 3:25 PM
49ERS
Thursday, Nov 28 @ 7:20 PM
DOLPHINS
Thursday, Dec 5 @ 7:15 PM
Lions
Sunday, Dec 15 @ 7:20 PM
Seahawks
Monday, Dec 23 @ 7:15 PM
SAINTS
Sunday, Dec 29 @ 3:25 PM
Vikings
Saturday, Jan 4 @ 11:00 PM
BEARS
Recent Topics
2h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

2h / Random Babble / Martha Careful

2h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Martha Careful

22-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / packerfanoutwest

19-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

19-Dec / Random Babble / Zero2Cool

18-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

17-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / wpr

17-Dec / Featured Content / Zero2Cool

16-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

16-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / Martha Careful

16-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

16-Dec / Feedback, Suggestions and Issues / Mucky Tundra

16-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

16-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

Headlines
Copyright © 2006 - 2024 PackersHome.com™. All Rights Reserved.