Aaron "doesn't want to be part of a rebuild."· Page 4

Zero2Cool
Elite Member

2 years ago

#31

Andrew Brandt is thinking multiple first round picks.

beast
Select Member

2 years ago

#32

We've seen one game where he ran the scheme based on Aaron's strengths and tendencies and one half where he ran an Aaron-based screen with scrubs.

Give him another off season. Matt made RG3 look like Joe Montana his rookie year. Let's see what he can do with Love.

Originally Posted by: nerdmann

That was a lot more than Matt... but Mike Shanahan, Kyle Shanahan, Sean McVay might also had some input and RG3 ran a lot and didn't have many good seasons.

Also interesting that you won't except factual information for Rodgers but you give Love all the excuses I'm the world.... biased much?

nerdmann
Premier Member Topic Starter

2 years ago

#33

Originally Posted by: beast

I give nothing but facts. RG3 looked like a future star his rookie year. FACT. Subsequently face planted. FACT. We haven't seen Love in a system playing to his strengths, protecting his weaknesses. FACT.

Does Love still need to work on his footwork? Yeah. Is it guaranteed that he will be The Man? Nope. But I trust Matt as a QB whisperer.

“Winning is not a sometime thing, it is an all the time thing. You don't do things right once in a while…you do them right all the time.”

Zero2Cool
Elite Member

2 years ago

#34

Two 1st round picks and one 3rd round pick for Matthew Stafford. I would think the Packers could get a little more for Aaron Rodgers.

beast
Select Member

2 years ago

#35

Two 1st round picks and one 3rd round pick for Matthew Stafford. I would think the Packers could get a little more for Aaron Rodgers.

Originally Posted by: Zero2Cool

Arguably they got a 1st round for taking the bad Goff contract off the Rams hands.

Though yes, I'd want more than two 1st, though I doubt three first would be likely. Though it also depends how high those first picks are...

Right now the Broncos have pick numbers 9, 40, 63, 75, 95 in the 2022 draft... that's basically equaled to more than picks number 30, 31 and 32. Heck according to a draft calculator it's more than 20, 21 and 22. So whole it's less than two 1st it might have more value.

beast
Select Member

2 years ago

#36

Originally Posted by: nerdmann

The lack of factual was towards your Rodgers comments, not to your Love comments. You just always see the green as greener on the other side, even if it's brown as dirt.

And no those aren't all facts, those are your opinions, stop mistaking your opinion as fact. Thanks.

Zero2Cool
Elite Member

2 years ago

#37

Originally Posted by: beast

The only opinions around here that are facts are my opinions! YA ALL BETTER RECONGIZE!!

But yeah, I wouldn't want to be part of a rebuild either. If it was a one year turn around, maybe, but are we one year away? What's salary cap gonna look like? What prospects in college? What free agents? So many crystal ball type questions.

dhazer
Veteran Member

2 years ago

#38

I think he is sent off to Denver for 2 1sts and a 2nd and a player or like baseball they take the dead cap money if that's possible. I like the tag and trade Adams also maybe for a 1st and Juedy.

As for Love I will be interested to see how Matt schemes his offense to fit Love's strengths. Will there be more RPO in the offense instead of straight-back passing?

Just Imagine this for the next 6-9 years. What a ride it will be 🙂 (PS, Zero should charge for this)

beast
Select Member

2 years ago

#39

If the Broncos want to trade for a QB, I'm guessing Gute has a QB that they'll just Love! 💕

Zero2Cool
Elite Member

2 years ago

#40

If the Broncos want to trade for a QB, I'm guessing Gute has a QB that they'll just Love! 💕

Originally Posted by: beast

You imagine the uproar if Broncos ship off their 9th overall and one of their 2nd round picks even up for Jordan Love? People would be praising the hell out of Brian G. Yes, I know this won't happen, but it's a hypothetical, go with it.

Important Information:

The PACKERSHOME uses cookies. By continuing to browse this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. More Details Close

Fan Shout

Zero2Cool (10m) : I would think it would hurt the home team because people would have to cancel last minute maybe? i dunno

beast (19m) : I agree that it's BS for fans planning on going to the game. But how does it bring in more money? I'm guessing indirectly?

packerfanoutwest (30m) : bs on flexing the game....they do it for the $$league$$, not the hometown fans

Zero2Cool (1h) : I see what you did there Mucky

Zero2Cool (1h) : dammit. 3:25pm

Zero2Cool (1h) : Packers Vikings flexed to 3:35pm

Mucky Tundra (1h) : Upon receiving the news about Luke Musgrave, I immediately fell to the ground

Mucky Tundra (1h) : Yeah baby!

Zero2Cool (1h) : LUKE MUSGRAVE PLAYING TONIGHT~!~~~~WOWHOAAOHAOAA yah

Zero2Cool (2h) : I wanna kill new QB's ... blitz the crap out of them.

beast (2h) : Barry seemed to get too conservative against new QBs, Hafley doesn't have that issue

Zero2Cool (3h) : However, we seem to struggle vs new QB's

Zero2Cool (3h) : Should be moot point, cuz Packers should win tonight.

packerfanoutwest (4h) : ok I stand corrected

Zero2Cool (4h) : Ok, yes, you are right. I see that now how they get 7th

Zero2Cool (4h) : 5th - Packers win out, Vikings lose out. Maybe?

beast (4h) : Saying no to the 6th lock.

beast (4h) : No, with the Commanders beating the Eagles, Packers could have a good chance of 6th or 7th unless the win out

Zero2Cool (4h) : I think if Packers win, they are locked 6th with chance for 5th.

beast (4h) : But it doesn't matter, as the Packers win surely win one of their remaining games

beast (4h) : This is not complex, just someone doesn't want to believe reality

beast (4h) : We already have told you... if Packers lose all their games (they won't, but if they did), and Buccaneers and Falcons win all theirs

Zero2Cool (4h) : I posted it in that Packers and 1 seed thread

Zero2Cool (4h) : I literally just said it.

packerfanoutwest (4h) : show us a scenario where Pack don't get in? bet you can't

Zero2Cool (4h) : Falcons, Buccaneers would need to win final two games.

Zero2Cool (4h) : Yes, if they win one of three, they are lock. If they lose out, they can be eliminated.

packerfanoutwest (4h) : as I just said,,gtheyh are in no matter what

Zero2Cool (4h) : Packers should get in. I just hope it's not 7th seed. Feels dirty.

packerfanoutwest (4h) : If packers lose out, no matter what, they are in

packerfanoutwest (4h) : both teams can not male the playoffs....falcon hold the tie breaker

packerfanoutwest (4h) : if bucs win out they win their division

beast (4h) : Fine, Buccaneers and Falcons can get ahead of us

packerfanoutwest (4h) : falcons are already ahead of us

beast (5h) : Packers will get in

beast (5h) : If Packers lose the rest of their games and Falcons win the rest of theirs, they could pass us... but not gonna happen

packerfanoutwest (5h) : they still are in the playoffs

packerfanoutwest (5h) : If Packers lose the remaining games,,,,at 10-7

Zero2Cool (6h) : We can say it. We don't play.

Mucky Tundra (8h) : But to say they are in is looking past the Saints

Mucky Tundra (8h) : That said, their odds are very favorable with a >99% chance of making the playoffs entering this week's games

Mucky Tundra (8h) : Packers are not in and have not clinched a playoff spot.

buckeyepackfan (8h) : Packers are in, they need to keep winning to improve their seed#.

Mucky Tundra (17h) : Getting help would have been nice, but helping ourselves should always be the plan

beast (18h) : Too bad Seahawks couldn't beat Vikings

bboystyle (18h) : We just need to win Monday night and were in

Mucky Tundra (21h) : Or ties, but let's be real here

Mucky Tundra (21h) : Other scenario was Falcons+Rams losses

Mucky Tundra (21h) : Needed a Falcons loss for a Seahawk loss to clinch

buckeyepackfan (21h) : Am I wring in saying if Tge Vikings beat The Seahawks, The Packers clinch?

Please sign in to use Fan Shout

2024 Packers Schedule

Friday, Sep 6 @ 7:15 PM

Eagles

29 - 34

Sunday, Sep 15 @ 12:00 PM

COLTS

16 - 10

Sunday, Sep 22 @ 12:00 PM

Titans

30 - 14

Sunday, Sep 29 @ 12:00 PM

VIKINGS

29 - 31

Sunday, Oct 6 @ 3:25 PM

Rams

24 - 19

Sunday, Oct 13 @ 12:00 PM

CARDINALS

34 - 13

Sunday, Oct 20 @ 12:00 PM

TEXANS

24 - 22

Sunday, Oct 27 @ 12:00 PM

Jaguars

30 - 27

Sunday, Nov 3 @ 3:25 PM

LIONS

14 - 24

Sunday, Nov 17 @ 12:00 PM

Bears

20 - 19

Sunday, Nov 24 @ 3:25 PM

49ERS

38 - 10

Thursday, Nov 28 @ 7:20 PM

DOLPHINS

30 - 17

Thursday, Dec 5 @ 7:15 PM

Lions

31 - 34

Sunday, Dec 15 @ 7:20 PM

Seahawks

30 - 13

Monday, Dec 23 @ 7:15 PM

SAINTS

Sunday, Dec 29 @ 3:25 PM

Vikings

Saturday, Jan 4 @ 11:00 PM

BEARS