Packers have had 34, 28, 30 and 30 points put on them over the last four games.

Passing Yards : Rushing Yards
372:95
307:92
320:119
250:96

1,249:402

1,651 yards giving up on passing and rushing. That's not good.

Are you concerned? I am

 image.png You have insufficient rights to see the content.

---

Over the first 10 games, Packers gave up 28 points or more only twice.

Over last four games, each team has racked up 28 or more points.

This isn't the time of season you want to be getting tallied up on.

---

I can accept the Rams, Vikings, and Ravens getting 28 but the Bears getting there is the one that worries me the most.

---

Wasn't too worried after the Vikings and Rams because of their talent+matchup opportunities, but I am starting to worry about the number of long plays they are giving up. They have had stretches where they've forced 3 and outs, gotten good pressure up front and had turnover opportunities, so it hasn't been all bad, but more inconsistent I believe.

---

I bares game was not on the defense. ST caused it. Besides the punt return for 7 they gave the bares outstanding field position all the time.
FG, started at GB 44 (39 yards)
TD, Chi 40 (60 yards)
Punt return TD (97 yards)
FG Chi 42 (32 yards)

20 points were directly or indirectly caused by poor ST play. Letting a team get a drive of 39 or 32 yards is not a big deal. If they began at their own 20 or 25, even 30 instead of scoring they would have punted. While the 60 yards drive wasn't great it's the NFL. It's not easy to keep the offense from scoring every single time.

Even if only the punt return was removed people wouldn't be as worried about the bares scoring 23 points. Remove the field goal where they started in GB territory basically almost in FG range and it's only 20 points.

From here through the playoffs the defense probably won't give up more than 25 points.

---

Want to clinch HFA early, so we can see Jordan Love in that last game. 🤘

---