go.pack.go.
3 years ago

Looks like most of Tennessee is getting the game on Fox Cable TV (just saying).

Packers @ Bears in Red
UserPostedImage
Red: Green Bay @ ChicagoJoe Davis, Greg Olsen

Blue: LA Rams @ NY GiantsAdam Amin, Mark Schlereth

Yellow: Minnesota @ CarolinaKenny Albert, Jonathan Vilma

Tan: Cincinnati @ DetroitChris Myers, Daryl Johnston

Green: Arizona @ Cleveland (LATE)Kevin Kugler, Mark

Originally Posted by: beast 



My wife would shoot me if I told her I wasn’t going out between 1 & 4 on our last day of vacation. I was hoping we wouldn’t get it just so I wouldn’t feel bad about being out of our room. Damn
UserPostedImage
beast
3 years ago

1. Beast, thanks for the 506 (TV availability) post. I am lucking out on the TV coverage here in Naples, FL.

2. Any update on Akeem Hicks availability....last I saw he was questionable, and along with Mack was not practicing. IMO Hicks is the most important player to their defense. (I would LOVE to see him in GB.) If we get Myers and Jenkins back and Hicks is not playing, I will be very warm and fuzzy.

Originally Posted by: KRK 


Chicago has a ton of star players listed as "Questionable" (too many for my to go through them all), which usually means they're playing.


Please Note: The Bears OL is reportedly grading out better than I expected them to... and one of the reasons for this is because they're one of three teams whom have run the ball more than pass the ball.

1 New Orleans 54.74%
2 Cleveland 52.55%
3 Chicago 51.56%
9 San Francisco 45.14%
11 Cincinnati 44.21%
18 Green Bay 41.04%
19 Minnesota 40.00%
26 Detroit 36.06%

So the Packers should expect a heavy dosage of running, and maybe they should still run blitz. Bottom Line, put as much pressure on that backfield as possible, as a young rookie backfield might not know how to handle it.

My wife would shoot me if I told her I wasn’t going out between 1 & 4 on our last day of vacation. I was hoping we wouldn’t get it just so I wouldn’t feel bad about being out of our room. Damn

Originally Posted by: go.pack.go. 



Opps, sorry to give the bad news, I was hoping it would be good new lol 😂 Well if you just happened to get back by 3:30 maybe you could watch the ending, if not you have it recorded at home lol

UserPostedImage
KRK
  • KRK
  • Veteran Member
3 years ago
gopackgo mentioned:

My wife would shoot me if I told her I wasn’t going out between 1 & 4 on our last day of vacation. I was hoping we wouldn’t get it just so I wouldn’t feel bad about being out of our room. Damn

If you own a small caliber gun, you will likely survive

Beast commented:

The Bears OL is reportedly grading out better than I expected them to... and one of the reasons for this is because they're one of three teams whom have run the ball more than pass the ball.

I think Nagy wants to protect Fields and keep him primarily in plausible play-action and RPO. Despite some of the articles referenced, i am not convinced play action works unless a team is effective running the ball OR run with a much higher frequency, which the Bares appear to be doing.

In Luce tua Videmus Lucem KRK
beast
3 years ago
KRK wisely noted:

i am not convinced play action works unless a team is effective running the ball OR run with a much higher frequency, which the Bares appear to be doing.

Originally Posted by: KRK 



I completely agree, especially when they respect your QB (as is the case with the Packers).

Averaging what 4 yards per carry is good, but even if a running game is averaging 5, over three plays that's still only 15 yards. One error against an elite QB can easily be 20 yards or more. So to get a defensive more concerned with a running game over an elite QB, you either have to average more than 6 yards per run, or you have to keep on running to actually make the defense think you will.

And I think this was a large problem of the Packers offense in the first six quarters of this year's (Saints game and Lions 1st half).

In that they refused to establish the running game first, and tried to get the defense to bite on play fake runs anyways (why would they bite on fake runs when you haven't established it and they know the Aaron Rodgers threat?)...

Also for whatever reason (I'm not sure why), the Packers long ball game really hasn't connected as well as it normally does, with exception to Adams. But the long ball opportunities have been there, with tight windows just something hasn't connected too often.


I forget whom (maybe Tony Dungy?) but one of the talking heads was complaining that defenses (I assume he means 49ers and Bengals) keep saying, this is what we do and keep to their normal scheme (I assume aggressive man coverage) and according to the talking head, you can't do that against Rodgers and Adams and expect to stop them.


I am wondering, how would/will Rodgers and LaFleur respond to a team that plays conservative coverage all game long... because that's where Rodgers has struggled, mainly because they (Rodgers/LaFleur) seem to get impatient and tries to go more aggressive instead of just taking the check down 5 yards stuff given and keep getting first down after first down, go for a deep coverage beater and again, for whatever reason, those just haven't connected against more conservative coverage's for whatever reason other than to Adams this year.

But you can bet Mike Zimmer and the Vikings will try testing their patients... and I'm sure the Bears coaches have shown the Bears defense how they got embearrassed last year and that defense wants an improved showing.

UserPostedImage
beast
3 years ago
I saw where someone brought up a great point, the Bears hired former defensive coordinator Pettine.

He might have a better understanding of the Packers weaknesses or preference more than any other person in the NFL considering he was in the building with Rodgers for three years. And coached with LaFleur for two? Plus knows defensive players strengths and weaknesses very well.

But the Bears defense sucked last year against the Packers, they MIGHT look a lot better this time. Of course having Hicks health alone might do that, especially if the OL isn't healthy.


Also that's another thing we haven't talked about, if the entire OL is healthy, then who lm starts and where?

RT: Turner
C: Myers
You put Jenkins at LT or LG?
Runyan has played better than the other interior OGs (though he looked horrible in preseason, in season has looked great).

I'm debating between there two
1) Nijman, Jenkins, Myers, Runyan, Turner
2) Jenkins, Runyan, Myers, Patrick, Turner

I think #1 gets the best 5 on the field, but #2 moves the OGs around less and puts the best pass blockers at the OTs and I think it's more likely.

Though, they might stay with Newman over Patrick, both are struggling in the running game, I think Patrick is the better pass blocker... and we got Rodgers, we're going to be a pass first team.
UserPostedImage
wpr
  • wpr
  • Preferred Member
3 years ago
Real prediction
GB 35 Bares 18
UserPostedImage
KRK
  • KRK
  • Veteran Member
3 years ago
Beast posited:

I'm debating between there two
1) Nijman, Jenkins, Myers, Runyan, Turner
2) Jenkins, Runyan, Myers, Patrick, Turner

If it weren't Smith and Mack on the bookends, I think you would see 1, but I think 2 is more likely. I would like to see Jenkins, Runyan, Myers, Newman, Turner
In Luce tua Videmus Lucem KRK
Zero2Cool
3 years ago
Week 6 #Packers inactives vs Bears:

• CB Kevin King
• S Vernon Scott
• LB Isaiah McDuffie
• OL Dennis Kelly
• DL Jack Heflin

**OL Elgton Jenkins, LB Jaylon Smith, & CB Rasul Douglas are ACTIVE**

UserPostedImage
beast
3 years ago

Week 6 #Packers inactives vs Bears:

• CB Kevin King
• S Vernon Scott
• LB Isaiah McDuffie
• OL Dennis Kelly
• DL Jack Heflin

**OL Elgton Jenkins, LB Jaylon Smith, & CB Rasul Douglas are ACTIVE**

Originally Posted by: Zero2Cool 


I'm surprised the Packers keep going short handed at DBs, considering in dime package you might have 6 on the field at once and Packers only have 8 on game day roster.

Of course, you might expect to use dime less against the Bears with them running the ball more often right now, and having, in theory, two better coverage ILBers than we're used to.

But still who's backup for whom and where might get interesting should they have a need for backups.

And they actives a WR from the PS instead of a DB.

UserPostedImage
wpr
  • wpr
  • Preferred Member
3 years ago



I'm debating between there two
1) Nijman, Jenkins, Myers, Runyan, Turner
2) Jenkins, Runyan, Myers, Patrick, Turner

I think #1 gets the best 5 on the field, but #2 moves the OGs around less and puts the best pass blockers at the OTs and I think it's more likely.

Though, they might stay with Newman over Patrick, both are struggling in the running game, I think Patrick is the better pass blocker... and we got Rodgers, we're going to be a pass first team.

Originally Posted by: beast 



I thought they would go back to what they did the first few games.
LT Elgton Jenkins, LG Jon Runyan, C Josh Myers, RG Royce Newman, RT Billy Turner.

UserPostedImage
Fan Shout
dfosterf (43m) : Great idea imo
dfosterf (43m) : 1st round to 7 minutes with one extension
dfosterf (44m) : NFL comissioner wants to shorten the 2st
Mucky Tundra (5h) : @jalenreagors They’re discussing if Sheduer can go back to college on NFL Network LMFAOOOOO
beast (7h) : Great point Martha
beast (7h) : Buddy Ryan used to say if a candy bar goes missing, there are two to blame, Rex and Rob 🤪 jk 😁
Martha Careful (9h) : Bum Phillips used to say there are two ways to get better. Get better players or get players to play better. We have a new DL coach
Zero2Cool (10h) : Yes. Look at the losses last year. They can win.
beast (10h) : Can Packers win with their current DL?
bboystyle (11h) : waiting for a pass rusher.
dfosterf (14h) : 5 minutes between picks in the 3rd
dfosterf (14h) : 3rd. Hate this phone
dfosterf (14h) : 4rd
dfosterf (14h) : 5 minutes in the 4
dfosterf (14h) : 7 minutes between picks in the 2nd round
Martha Careful (14h) : Sorry to bitch, but the headline writers in that section absolutely mislead, or don't know how to read. It is maddening
Martha Careful (14h) : No thanks. Not a dependable guy to be in the right place and run the right route. Dumb as a box of rocks.
Zero2Cool (15h) : Losing 2nd round pick for a one year rental, not ideal. Especially a headcase.
TheKanataThrilla (15h) : Pickens for Jaire may be interesting. Definitely not sure we want Pickens long term.
dfosterf (16h) : No.Absolutely not
Zero2Cool (16h) : NO NO NO NO NO NO!!1 🤬🤬🤬🤬🤬
dhazer (16h) : scenario: Our main prospects are off the board when our pick comes around, do we just throw a 2nd round pick at Pittsburgh for Pickens
TheKanataThrilla (16h) : Hopefully she had some comfort that her son will be live his dream when she passed away. Sad news.
Mucky Tundra (17h) : Damn that sucks
Zero2Cool (17h) : News about Derrick Harmon mom, saddening.
Zero2Cool (18h) : Mark Murphy: "I predict we will trade up once and down twice."
beast (20h) : Rip the Packers and getting the fans yelling and booing him
beast (20h) : Super competitive Bears fan and WWE "superstar" wrestler, Seth Rollins is supposed to announce a Bears pick and absolutely rip Packers
packerfanoutwest (25-Apr) : Golden
beast (25-Apr) : I want DT Derrick Harmon, Oregon
Mucky Tundra (25-Apr) : And I can't be looking at my phone
Mucky Tundra (25-Apr) : Hey I'm at work lol
Zero2Cool (24-Apr) : btw, new site chat won't delete auto like
Zero2Cool (24-Apr) : because everyone left like wimps
TheKanataThrilla (24-Apr) : I am wondering if there is some type of autoclear when there isn't activity after a certain amount of time.
Mucky Tundra (24-Apr) : What happened in the chat? Me and Zero posted a few things earlier and they're all gone
dfosterf (24-Apr) : 10-15 min bs plus flyover
dfosterf (24-Apr) : Yes
Zero2Cool (24-Apr) : 7pm is when this kicks off????
buckeyepackfan (24-Apr) : I told him. IT'S VONTE MACK , no matter what!
buckeyepackfan (24-Apr) : He asked me who I thought The Browns were taking.
buckeyepackfan (24-Apr) : 2. Would of had to wear Browns gear all week. NOPE I'll watch from my living room.
buckeyepackfan (24-Apr) : He wanted to know if I would go. 2 things, would have had to fly from Detroit to Green Bay. Nope
buckeyepackfan (24-Apr) : All expense paid trip to the draft. He will be in the Browns section. I told him to say hi to J-10VE for me 😃😃i
buckeyepackfan (24-Apr) : For a call from my nephew, he won an sllexp
TheKanataThrilla (24-Apr) : Hope to see everyone in the Chat tonight!!! Go Pack Go!!!
TheKanataThrilla (24-Apr) : Jeanty would be a great pick-up for the Bears. I see Warren mocked to them as well who I think would be a great selection.
Zero2Cool (24-Apr) : GameDay Chat is open. Posting bits an tids in there.
Zero2Cool (24-Apr) : Excellent Source: The Bears have a deal in place to move up to 5 if Jeanty is there.
Zero2Cool (24-Apr) : Probably not until 10pm will be making pick
Please sign in to use Fan Shout
2024 Packers Schedule
Friday, Sep 6 @ 7:15 PM
Eagles
Sunday, Sep 15 @ 12:00 PM
COLTS
Sunday, Sep 22 @ 12:00 PM
Titans
Sunday, Sep 29 @ 12:00 PM
VIKINGS
Sunday, Oct 6 @ 3:25 PM
Rams
Sunday, Oct 13 @ 12:00 PM
CARDINALS
Sunday, Oct 20 @ 12:00 PM
TEXANS
Sunday, Oct 27 @ 12:00 PM
Jaguars
Sunday, Nov 3 @ 3:25 PM
LIONS
Sunday, Nov 17 @ 12:00 PM
Bears
Sunday, Nov 24 @ 3:25 PM
49ERS
Thursday, Nov 28 @ 7:20 PM
DOLPHINS
Thursday, Dec 5 @ 7:15 PM
Lions
Sunday, Dec 15 @ 7:20 PM
Seahawks
Monday, Dec 23 @ 7:15 PM
SAINTS
Sunday, Dec 29 @ 3:25 PM
Vikings
Sunday, Jan 5 @ 12:00 PM
BEARS
Recent Topics
53m / Green Bay Packers Talk / Martha Careful

58m / Green Bay Packers Talk / Martha Careful

2h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Mucky Tundra

3h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Mucky Tundra

7h / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

11h / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

16h / Green Bay Packers Talk / bboystyle

17h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Mucky Tundra

17h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Martha Careful

21h / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

24-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / TheKanataThrilla

24-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

24-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / wpr

24-Apr / Packers Draft Threads / wpr

22-Apr / Random Babble / Martha Careful

Headlines
Copyright © 2006 - 2025 PackersHome.com™. All Rights Reserved.