-Starting to worry about Sternberger. Is he still in the concussion protocol? 37 was active on ST.

Originally Posted by: nerdmann 

Has EQ usurped MVS?

Originally Posted by: nerdmann 

Why, because he caught one pass?

MVS has the 5th most snaps on offense this year. Only Rodgers, Jenkins, Patrick, Turner have more snaps on offense... St. Brown needs to do.more before he's considered a starter...

Originally Posted by: beast 

Has EQ usurped MVS?

Originally Posted by: nerdmann 

MVS 41 62

I'm gonna join in on the Debbie Downer stuff. That 59 yard run by Aaron Jones. It's a good thing he didn't score a TD. What is wrong with you, Kevin?!?! How can you say that? Really easily because if it was a score, it would have been reviewed and they would have noticed he stepped out around 45 yard line.

It's a good thing Aaron Jones isn't a speedy guy!

Originally Posted by: Zero2Cool 

I said that to my wife when we saw the replay. The lack of a challenge was completely the fault of Vrabel. Any time you see a team sprint down the field, especially those big chunky boys, you should know they are trying get the next play off before it's challenged. All the more so when the play was on the Packer sideline. Having a challenge not go your way is not the end of the world. He should have showed a little guts and made the decision without the guys in the booth whispering in his ear.

Originally Posted by: wpr 

I said that to my wife when we saw the replay. The lack of a challenge was completely the fault of Vrabel. Any time you see a team sprint down the field, especially those big chunky boys, you should know they are trying get the next play off before it's challenged. All the more so when the play was on the Packer sideline. Having a challenge not go your way is not the end of the world. He should have showed a little guts and made the decision without the guys in the booth whispering in his ear.

Originally Posted by: wpr 

I came away unimpressed with Vrabel after this game. Between punting from Green Bay's 30 and not challenging here he did the Titans no favors. Not challenging the run was egregious as the Titans managed to finally get some momentum and clawed back to make the game 19-14. Their D was struggling to stop the Packers O, the big boys were running to get into position and Vrabel does nothing.

Originally Posted by: Mucky Tundra 

I've seen people jumping on the Titans for not challenging. I think that's wrong. We fans had the benefit of actually watching it. I credit the Packers for getting down the field, lined up and snapping the ball before Titans could review the play. I know that's not the en vogue or culture thing to do ... you know ... give a team credit when we can bash another team, but that's how I viewed it. I had a few rounds with some folks on Twitter about it too. They were saying it was dumb to not challenge it. They assumed that Vrabel SAW the RB step out of bounds and elected not to challenge it. There was absolutely no reason for Vrabel to throw the challenge flag. The play was on the opposite sideline. They didn't show it on the jumbotron.

The lack of challenging the play was more so good on the Packers hustling than it was a failure on Titans.


Edit, I just found this.

Originally Posted by: Zero2Cool