Zero2Cool
4 years ago

I think the Packers trade their 30th overall pick with the Dolphins 39th overall and also get pick #70 out of it.

Packers get 39th and 70th.
Dolphins get 30th.

Originally Posted by: Zero2Cool 




UserPostedImage
Zero2Cool
4 years ago
We're all right that the four teams in front of us wouldn't have likely drafted Jordan Love. However, as some of us said they might trade the pick to someone else would may have selected him. Sounds like Colts were such a team.

UserPostedImage
Nonstopdrivel
4 years ago
This reply to that tweet made me gag a little:

UserPostedImage
Zero2Cool
4 years ago
True.

UserPostedImage
wpr
  • wpr
  • Preferred Member Topic Starter
4 years ago

True.

Originally Posted by: Zero2Cool 



That is such a crock. You can't compare Love to Rodgers.
Love is no where near Rodgers' ability coming out of college.
Teddy didn't move up to grab Rodgers.
Aaron was considered the #1 QB and the #1 overall player heading into the 2005 draft by a lot of people. Some didn't even consider Love to be worthy of a 1st round selection. At best he's the 3rd or 4th best QB this year.

Granted some of the fan reactions are wrong. In general you are going to see some of the fans complain about every player picked after the top 2 or 3 selections. Years ago there was a hilarious video of some dude losing his mind over the Justin Harrell selection. He was over the top in his reaction but in the end, he was right. It was a wasted pick.
UserPostedImage
Nonstopdrivel
4 years ago

Some didn't even consider Love to be worthy of a 1st round selection. At best he's the 3rd or 4th best QB this year.

Originally Posted by: wpr 


I don't know why, but that reminded me of this:


UserPostedImage
beast
4 years ago

That is such a crock. You can't compare Love to Rodgers.
Love is no where near Rodgers' ability coming out of college.
Teddy didn't move up to grab Rodgers.
Aaron was considered the #1 QB and the #1 overall player heading into the 2005 draft by a lot of people. Some didn't even consider Love to be worthy of a 1st round selection. At best he's the 3rd or 4th best QB this year.

Granted some of the fan reactions are wrong. In general you are going to see some of the fans complain about every player picked after the top 2 or 3 selections. Years ago there was a hilarious video of some dude losing his mind over the Justin Harrell selection. He was over the top in his reaction but in the end, he was right. It was a wasted pick.

Originally Posted by: wpr 



Actually you can compare their physical potentially quite easily. And Rodgers was no where near Rodgers prime ability coming out of college either. Aaron was considered a possibility at #1 in a weak QB year, if you put out of college Rodgers in this draft class, then he's would of clearly been behind Joe Burrow and Tua Tagovailoa.

And yes Love regressed and Rodgers didn't their last year in college, but Rodgers also didn't have 9 of the other 10 offensive starters leave (graduate or early NFL draft) on him and leave him with a brand new coaches and teammates to work with, as pervious coaches got hired to go coach at a new program. Just Love and an OT returned to that offense, and the blocking was worse. Love went Brett Favre on them, being behind, tried to do extra, take a chance to keep them into ball games and like Favre, he'd throw INTS at times doing so.

Do I think Love will develop like Rodgers? NO! Though I didn't think Rodgers would develop like Rodgers, I didn't think there was a QB worth a top 16 pick in 2005. And a majority of those teams agreed that Rodgers wasn't worth their 1st round draft choice that year, as Aaron Rodgers had a lot of uncertainty how he would develop just like Love does now.
UserPostedImage
Fan Shout
Mucky Tundra (9h) : Oh I know about Jacobs, I just couldn't pass up an opportunity to mimic Zero lol
buckeyepackfan (9h) : Jacobs was just sat down, Watson re-injured that knee that kept him out 1 game earlier
buckeyepackfan (9h) : I needed .14 that's. .14 points for the whole 4th quarter to win and go to the SB. Lol
Mucky Tundra (9h) : Jacobs gonna be OK???
Zero2Cool (10h) : Watson gonna be OK???
packerfanoutwest (13h) : Inactives tonight for the Pack: Alexander- knee Bullard - ankle Williams - quad Walker -ankle Monk Heath
packerfanoutwest (13h) : No Jaire, but hopefully the front 7 destroys the line of scrimmage & forces Rattler into a few passes to McKinney.
packerfanoutwest (13h) : minny could be #1 seed and the Lions #5 seed
Zero2Cool (16h) : We'd have same Division and Conference records. Strength of schedule we edge them
Zero2Cool (16h) : I just checked. What tie breaker?
bboystyle (16h) : yes its possible but unlikely. If we do get the 5th, we face the NFCS winner
Zero2Cool (16h) : Ahh, ok.
bboystyle (16h) : yes due to tie breaker
Zero2Cool (16h) : I mean, unlikely, yes, but mathematically, 5th is possible by what I'm reading.
Zero2Cool (16h) : If Vikings lose out, Packers win out, Packers get 5th, right?
bboystyle (16h) : Minny isnt going to lose out so 5th seed is out of the equation. We are playing for the 6th or 7th seed which makes no difference
Mucky Tundra (17h) : beast, the ad revenue goes to the broadcast company but they gotta pay to air the game on their channel/network
beast (17h) : If we win tonight the game is still relative in terms of 5th, 6th or 7th seed... win and it's 5th or 6th, lose and it's 6th or 7th
beast (17h) : Mucky, I thought the ad revenue went to the broadcasting companies or the NFL, at least not directly
Zero2Cool (18h) : I think the revenue share is moot, isn't it? That's the CBA an Salary Cap handling that.
bboystyle (18h) : i mean game becomes irrelevant if we win tonight. Just a game where we are trying to play spoilers to Vikings chance at the #1 seed
Mucky Tundra (18h) : beast, I would guess ad revenue from more eyes watching tv
Zero2Cool (18h) : I would think it would hurt the home team because people would have to cancel last minute maybe? i dunno
beast (18h) : I agree that it's BS for fans planning on going to the game. But how does it bring in more money? I'm guessing indirectly?
packerfanoutwest (19h) : bs on flexing the game....they do it for the $$league$$, not the hometown fans
Zero2Cool (19h) : I see what you did there Mucky
Zero2Cool (19h) : dammit. 3:25pm
Zero2Cool (19h) : Packers Vikings flexed to 3:35pm
Mucky Tundra (20h) : Upon receiving the news about Luke Musgrave, I immediately fell to the ground
Mucky Tundra (20h) : Yeah baby!
Zero2Cool (20h) : LUKE MUSGRAVE PLAYING TONIGHT~!~~~~WOWHOAAOHAOAA yah
Zero2Cool (21h) : I wanna kill new QB's ... blitz the crap out of them.
beast (21h) : Barry seemed to get too conservative against new QBs, Hafley doesn't have that issue
Zero2Cool (22h) : However, we seem to struggle vs new QB's
Zero2Cool (22h) : Should be moot point, cuz Packers should win tonight.
packerfanoutwest (22h) : ok I stand corrected
Zero2Cool (22h) : Ok, yes, you are right. I see that now how they get 7th
Zero2Cool (22h) : 5th - Packers win out, Vikings lose out. Maybe?
beast (22h) : Saying no to the 6th lock.
beast (22h) : No, with the Commanders beating the Eagles, Packers could have a good chance of 6th or 7th unless the win out
Zero2Cool (22h) : I think if Packers win, they are locked 6th with chance for 5th.
beast (22h) : But it doesn't matter, as the Packers win surely win one of their remaining games
beast (22h) : This is not complex, just someone doesn't want to believe reality
beast (22h) : We already have told you... if Packers lose all their games (they won't, but if they did), and Buccaneers and Falcons win all theirs
Zero2Cool (22h) : I posted it in that Packers and 1 seed thread
Zero2Cool (22h) : I literally just said it.
packerfanoutwest (23h) : show us a scenario where Pack don't get in? bet you can't
Zero2Cool (23h) : Falcons, Buccaneers would need to win final two games.
Zero2Cool (23h) : Yes, if they win one of three, they are lock. If they lose out, they can be eliminated.
packerfanoutwest (23h) : as I just said,,gtheyh are in no matter what
Please sign in to use Fan Shout
2024 Packers Schedule
Friday, Sep 6 @ 7:15 PM
Eagles
Sunday, Sep 15 @ 12:00 PM
COLTS
Sunday, Sep 22 @ 12:00 PM
Titans
Sunday, Sep 29 @ 12:00 PM
VIKINGS
Sunday, Oct 6 @ 3:25 PM
Rams
Sunday, Oct 13 @ 12:00 PM
CARDINALS
Sunday, Oct 20 @ 12:00 PM
TEXANS
Sunday, Oct 27 @ 12:00 PM
Jaguars
Sunday, Nov 3 @ 3:25 PM
LIONS
Sunday, Nov 17 @ 12:00 PM
Bears
Sunday, Nov 24 @ 3:25 PM
49ERS
Thursday, Nov 28 @ 7:20 PM
DOLPHINS
Thursday, Dec 5 @ 7:15 PM
Lions
Sunday, Dec 15 @ 7:20 PM
Seahawks
Monday, Dec 23 @ 7:15 PM
SAINTS
Sunday, Dec 29 @ 3:25 PM
Vikings
Saturday, Jan 4 @ 11:00 PM
BEARS
Recent Topics
21m / Green Bay Packers Talk / MintBaconDrivel

58m / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

5h / GameDay Threads / Mucky Tundra

9h / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

21h / Random Babble / Martha Careful

22-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / packerfanoutwest

19-Dec / Random Babble / Zero2Cool

18-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

17-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / wpr

17-Dec / Featured Content / Zero2Cool

16-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

16-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / Martha Careful

16-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

16-Dec / Feedback, Suggestions and Issues / Mucky Tundra

16-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

Headlines
Copyright © 2006 - 2024 PackersHome.com™. All Rights Reserved.