Zero2Cool
5 years ago
Yesterday, there was a chat around the Packers/Lions game. The talk about Aaron Rodgers got so belligerent, I had to leave. It truly amazes me how some people are fans of the same team, but can be complete utter assholes to one another.

I want to make something abundantly clear before I jump into this. I believe Aaron Rodgers is a top ten quarterback in the NFL. I do not want him released, traded, benched or whatever else. The fact of the matter is Rodgers is not the ole Rodgers we were spoiled with. That's a fact. That is not something that can be disputed. Aaron Rodgers is HUMAN and father time is doing it's thing. It happens to all of us.

Let's dive into the two different groups I've observed regarding Aaron Rodgers.

The Rodgers Apologists - these fans feel Rodgers does nothing wrong and it's everyone else's fault -- the favorite to blame -- the WR's. I'm going to speculate these fans endured the 70's and/or 80's piss poor teams and appreciate the hell out of what Rodgers has done.

The Rodgers Antagonists - these fans feel Rodgers is to blame for everything, even their late rent payment. I speculate some of these fans began following the Packers in the late 80's or early 90's if not later and don't really know what shitty quarterbacks look like sporting Green and Gold.

So, what the hell is going on?

Are the WR getting open?
According to NextGen Stats, the Packers WR's get the most separation in the NFL.

 image.png You have insufficient rights to see the content.


Are the players dropping passes?
Packers had 15 dropped passes which was 21st in the league. Meaning 20 teams had more dropped passes. - Source 

I needed a 2nd source on the subject because that didn't feel right. I went with PFF who has Rodgers tied with 5th in drops (DRP: Drops - on-target passes dropped by the receiver.) with 30.

 image.png You have insufficient rights to see the content.

Our WR group is Davante Adams and guys who are basically what you want at WR3 and WR4. Allen Lazard looks most promising to elevate himself to a legit WR2.

Our QB is not as accurate as we are used to seeing. He's not throwing guys open. He's not hitting guys in stride. He's over throwing guys (16 overthrows vs Lions most by any QB in like 15 years). He's under throwing guys (which led to his lone interception yesterday). The part that scares me is his quote below. My hope is he's aware of what the deal was and is going to correct it.



That said, Rodgers is still capable of throwing amazing throws. Look at that screen pass at the end of the Lions game. How the hell did he fit that ball in there? Freaking amazing!

I was wondering if the collarbone could be the issue so I threw together his numbers of similar games before and after the injury. You decide.

 image.png You have insufficient rights to see the content.

UserPostedImage
Zero2Cool
5 years ago
Check out the Charts for Aaron Rodgers
https://nextgenstats.nfl.com/charts/player/aaron-rodgers/ROD339293 

 image.png You have insufficient rights to see the content.
UserPostedImage
Cheesey
5 years ago
Thanks Kevin. I also was getting upset at the back and forth attack by a few posters. There’s nothing wrong with having different opinions, but that’s what they are, your opinion.

Anyone that thinks Rodgers hasn’t lost something.....I don’t know how they can watch the games and not see it.
Yesterday he was overthrowing guys left and right, and throwing behind guys. Had he lead them, we would have had more scores.
Ad to that the dropped passes that SHOULD have been caught.

My opinion is: Rodgers needs to take what the defense gives. Hit more quick passes on short crossing routes.
Rodgers wasn’t getting huge pressure yesterday, and was just missing guys. Then, when he had a guy right on top of him on the last drive, he hits Jones with a arrow.
It seems he’s better under pressure. Like , maybe he doesn’t have time to THINK about the throw, and just does it.
That’s my 2 cents.
UserPostedImage
Mucky Tundra
5 years ago


Real question is will Rodgers accept this or go down swin...er, throwing?
Under Construction!
Cheesey
5 years ago
And the thing is, there is no guarantee that they will ever get to this point again.
If Rodgers doesn’t look at his play honestly, and make the changes, (taking the short quick passes instead of seemingly always looking for the long pass) the season will end with disappointment.
Yes, I know they have overachieved. But they have a shot at a super bowl. Rodgers is on the downside of his career. They may never get this chance again.
Pull out all stops, put it all out on the field. Don’t waste this opportunity.
UserPostedImage
dyeah_gb
5 years ago
I am in both camps. The one thing I said during chat is that Rodgers is really not fun to watch most of the time. Seeing him waste downs and make the same mistakes over and over again is frustrating. The mistakes by the WR corps are also frustrating and, to be honest, I don't know where Rodger's faults end and the WR problems begin. Maybe those overthrows were because MVS was not where he was supposed to be on those deep throws given his expected speed.

MLF and AR won't solve everything in two weeks. Given the luxury of a good defense though, maybe they only need to figure out enough to get by. How amazing would it be for the Pack to get 3 more ugly wins??? Unlike the performance against the 3-win Lions, I am trying to set my expectations low for the next game. It is amazing for the Pack to be where they are at and I am thankful for it. . . What I am trying to say is this team is a walking paradox.
The first principle is that you must not fool yourself, and you are the easiest person to fool - R. Feynman
go.pack.go.
5 years ago
Rodgers has definitely declined. But my thing is that it’s not entirely his fault. How many of those over throws were due to miscommunications? Was the potential miscommunication his fault, or the receiver’s fault? That’s what none of us will ever know because we aren’t in practice. We don’t know anything about the design of the play other than what we see on the broadcast.

I do know that it seemed like yesterday Rodgers was throwing to receivers that he’s never practiced with. That’s not a good thing, especially in week 17. Who’s at fault? Who knows. I’d say it’s on both Rodgers AND the receivers. And I wasn’t a fan of the play calling either. Just seemed like there wasn’t much up-tempo calls. That was frustrating because up-tempo seems to be where we are at our best. Why get away from it?

Moral of the story in my opinion is that it is not 100% on Rodgers. But he’s certainly not playing at the top of his game either. I do think it is extremely important to address the WR position in the offseason. Should’ve been done this past offseason, but instead we made the situation worse by not re-signing Cobb. Frustrating.
UserPostedImage
Cheesey
5 years ago

. What I am trying to say is this team is a walking paradox.

Originally Posted by: dyeah_gb 



Is that when two doctors are walking down the street???😋🤪
UserPostedImage
beast
5 years ago
As the "The Rodgers Antagonist" that I'm being called... i certainly don't blame Rodgers for everything (and I've only ever had one late payment in my life, and it wasn't rent)... that throw to Jimmy Graham early was certainly a drop, and the blocking flag on Adams certainly hurt a hell of a lot.

The Packers just pissed me off in the 1st half against the Vikings when the small ball of running and short passes were working perfectly, and after they got into Vikings territory, kept going for the long bomb, which wasn't working at all, as the Vikings are set-up to stop the long bombs. I bitched about that, because the Packers were killing themselves, if they just kept doing was working they would of scored a lot more, and they FINALLY adjusted and did just that in the second half.

The Lions were trying to stop the short stuff and daring them to throw long, and they attempted it then, where it was the correct call to try some bombs. As already mentioned, Graham dropped a ball, Adams got flagged for blocking early, and Rodgers missed one throw... one person was non-stop pissing on about the Adams flag and the fact that I said Rodgers missed one throw...

I don't believe my claim that Rodgers missing one throw was a big deal... and I don't think I was antagonizing Rodgers. I tried to drop it and move for forward in the game, but that one person kept pissing on, and finally I decided to give them some of their own medicine (then they got all pissy).

Sorry we upset you Zero. But Rodgers was off yesterday, and he absolutely admitted it, and the stats agree. I didn't think it was a big deal that a WR dropped a tough pass that was too off target, just stating that it happened in my opinion.
UserPostedImage
Zero2Cool
5 years ago

Rodgers has definitely declined. But my thing is that it’s not entirely his fault. How many of those over throws were due to miscommunications? Was the potential miscommunication his fault, or the receiver’s fault? That’s what none of us will ever know because we aren’t in practice. We don’t know anything about the design of the play other than what we see on the broadcast.

Originally Posted by: go.pack.go. 



[list]
  • When you over throw the RB that's behind the line of scrimmage, that's on the QB.
  • When you over throw the WR that's running a five yard slant, that's on the QB.
  • When you over throw the RB on a wheel route, that's on the QB.
  • When you throw behind the WR on a 20 yard slant and the ball hits the WR in the hands and he drops it, that's on the WR and should be left in Detroit to rot away.
  • When you throw a dart down the middle to open the game and the TE drops it, that's on the TE who should be cut immediately. [/list]

  • What has me concerned is when I see our MVP missing routine throws I see other QB's making. I know our WR's aren't Lynn Swann and John Stalworth, but I see lesser QB's doing more with less. I'm a spoiled fan who wants his MVP to stop aging and keep dominating.

    https://gamepass.nfl.com/  subscribe. You will not watch football the same again after watching a few All-22's. You'll thank me.


    I do know that it seemed like yesterday Rodgers was throwing to receivers that he’s never practiced with. That’s not a good thing, especially in week 17. Who’s at fault? Who knows. I’d say it’s on both Rodgers AND the receivers. And I wasn’t a fan of the play calling either. Just seemed like there wasn’t much up-tempo calls. That was frustrating because up-tempo seems to be where we are at our best. Why get away from it?

    Originally Posted by: go.pack.go. 



    Rodgers has said he knows what he's doing with what he says in his press conferences. Knowing that, I think some of his comments could mean we will see more Lazard and Kumerow than Allison and Valdes-Scantling in the post-season. Just a hunch.

    Moral of the story in my opinion is that it is not 100% on Rodgers. But he’s certainly not playing at the top of his game either. I do think it is extremely important to address the WR position in the offseason. Should’ve been done this past offseason, but instead we made the situation worse by not re-signing Cobb. Frustrating.

    Originally Posted by: go.pack.go. 


    I'm pleased with the off-season. We had a lot of holes and depth to fill and I think the staff did a damn good job. Sure, I would have loved a WR, but I'm a realist.

    Randall Cobb? You have to be shitting me. The guy who only 3 players (includes WR,TE, HB) had more drops this season? Yeah, you're right. We should have inked him to a one year $5 million contract. Cobb was the 4th most targeted player on his team.
     image.png You have insufficient rights to see the content.


    I think we see eye to eye on Rodgers for the most part. I will say this, the WR position NEEDS to be addressed this off-season. Our QB cannot turn Jarrett Boykin's into Jordy Nelson's anymore. We need to get him some talent! I want a Free Agent and 2nd or 3rd round pick talent brought up in here! Let's go back to back Super Bowl Victories!

    UserPostedImage
    Fan Shout
    dfosterf (2m) : The 40th is Titletown Tech itself. This is a pet project of both Ed Policy and Mark Murphy
    Zero2Cool (3m) : New site coming along nicely. The editor is better than what we have here. Oh yeah!
    dfosterf (4m) : No profit that I know of. 0 for 40
    dfosterf (7m) : The woke reference has to do with the makeup and oftentimes objectives of the companies they invested in
    packerfanoutwest (8m) : beer and brats woke? say whom?
    beast (13m) : I don't want to get into politics, but how is, beers and brats considered to be "woke"? Food is food...
    beast (14m) : That being said, I'm not saying all 100% should be that way, but not surprised if majority are Wisconsin based
    beast (15m) : And if everyone has heard of them, then it it probably has less growth potential and less community based
    beast (15m) : Well isn't the investing person supposed to invest the money?
    dfosterf (48m) : I swear if I were to discover that one of them has invented a virtue signalling transmitter I will not be surprised, lol
    dfosterf (52m) : 39 companies so far that I bet no one has ever heard of.
    dfosterf (54m) : -Not saying woke, but should- borderline philanthopist venture capital excercise
    dfosterf (56m) : Well for one, they are pouring resources into Title Town Tech. Investing beer, brat, hot dog, ticket money into what is pretty much...
    beast (7h) : Wow, 95% drop in investment revenue? Would be interesting to hear the details of why...
    dfosterf (25-Jul) : It's my one day deal complaint dept. on shareholder meeting day
    dfosterf (25-Jul) : Probably a homer access credential intimidation kinda thing
    dfosterf (25-Jul) : Meathead "journalists" skip this, concentrating on operational revenue when convenient. They switch when net revenue is more favorable.
    dfosterf (25-Jul) : Resulting in an actual drop of net revenue of 12.5%. She is from Minnesota. Just sayin'
    dfosterf (25-Jul) : Any plans to hold Maureen Smith (CFO) accountable for a 95% drop in investment revenue?
    Mucky Tundra (25-Jul) : In your face, HBO!
    Mucky Tundra (25-Jul) : @ByRyanWood Mark Murphy: “A great source of pride of mine is that we were never on Hard Knocks.”
    Mucky Tundra (25-Jul) : *years
    Mucky Tundra (25-Jul) : @mattschneidman Mark Murphy says he anticipates “many Packers games” being played in Germany, Ireland and/or the U.K. over the next 5-10 yea
    dfosterf (25-Jul) : *cafeteria* I have hit my head also, so I sympathize
    dfosterf (25-Jul) : Possibly hit his head leaning into the glass protecting the food in the cafateria
    dfosterf (25-Jul) : Maybe a low flying drone
    dfosterf (25-Jul) : Did Savion Williams run into a goalpost or something?
    Mucky Tundra (25-Jul) : also, no bueno when a guy starts getting concussions right off the bat in his career
    Zero2Cool (25-Jul) : Concussion is worse. Banks probably vet off day via back booboo claim
    Mucky Tundra (25-Jul) : @AndyHermanNFL Jordy Nelson out at camp today. No word if he’s in play for one of the two open roster spots ; )
    dfosterf (25-Jul) : Is that better or worse than Banks bad back?
    Zero2Cool (25-Jul) : Savion concussion ... not good.
    packerfanoutwest (24-Jul) : Aaron Rodgers’s first pass of first team period was picked off
    Mucky Tundra (24-Jul) : tbh I didn't hear of his passing
    Zero2Cool (24-Jul) : Cosby Show. Malcom Jamal Warner I think is real name
    Mucky Tundra (24-Jul) : I was thinking of Ozzy and Hulk
    Mucky Tundra (24-Jul) : Who's Theo?
    Zero2Cool (24-Jul) : How is Theo alliteration?
    Mucky Tundra (24-Jul) : Bad week for people whose names are alliterations
    Zero2Cool (24-Jul) : Hulk Hogan gone too.
    Zero2Cool (24-Jul) : Oh, it's toe injury
    Zero2Cool (24-Jul) : Hope it's not serious. that would stink
    dfosterf (24-Jul) : Sounds like an ankle not a knee for Fields
    dfosterf (24-Jul) : Ya Flaccp on Browns
    Zero2Cool (24-Jul) : Maybe Tyrod Taylor instead
    Zero2Cool (24-Jul) : He's on Browns, right?
    dfosterf (24-Jul) : They would probably go with Flacco is my guess if Fields out
    dfosterf (24-Jul) : Fleece 'em again!
    Zero2Cool (24-Jul) : Malik Willis might be someone Jets come after
    packerfanoutwest (24-Jul) : Packers introduce 1923-inspired classic uniform, leather-look helmet
    Please sign in to use Fan Shout
    2025 Packers Schedule
    Sunday, Sep 7 @ 3:25 PM
    LIONS
    Thursday, Sep 11 @ 7:15 PM
    COMMANDERS
    Sunday, Sep 21 @ 12:00 PM
    Browns
    Sunday, Sep 28 @ 7:20 PM
    Cowboys
    Sunday, Oct 12 @ 3:25 PM
    BENGALS
    Sunday, Oct 19 @ 3:25 PM
    Cardinals
    Sunday, Oct 26 @ 7:20 PM
    Steelers
    Sunday, Nov 2 @ 12:00 PM
    PANTHERS
    Monday, Nov 10 @ 7:15 PM
    EAGLES
    Sunday, Nov 16 @ 12:00 PM
    Giants
    Sunday, Nov 23 @ 12:00 PM
    VIKINGS
    Thursday, Nov 27 @ 12:00 PM
    Lions
    Sunday, Dec 7 @ 12:00 PM
    BEARS
    Sunday, Dec 14 @ 3:25 PM
    Broncos
    Friday, Dec 19 @ 11:00 PM
    Bears
    Friday, Dec 26 @ 11:00 PM
    RAVENS
    Saturday, Jan 3 @ 11:00 PM
    Vikings
    Recent Topics
    8m / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

    7h / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

    25-Jul / Around The NFL / Mucky Tundra

    25-Jul / Green Bay Packers Talk / Mucky Tundra

    25-Jul / Green Bay Packers Talk / TheKanataThrilla

    25-Jul / Green Bay Packers Talk / dfosterf

    25-Jul / Around The NFL / beast

    24-Jul / Green Bay Packers Talk / Martha Careful

    24-Jul / Around The NFL / beast

    24-Jul / Green Bay Packers Talk / Mucky Tundra

    23-Jul / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

    23-Jul / Green Bay Packers Talk / wpr

    22-Jul / Random Babble / Zero2Cool

    22-Jul / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

    22-Jul / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

    Headlines
    Copyright © 2006 - 2025 PackersHome.com™. All Rights Reserved.