It's halftime in KC...Rodgers is a dumbass dumbass dumbass...times a gazillion...let's see it he's better in 2nd half...LOL
This is one big ole' strawman!
First off, my main 4 year running argument about Rodgers' suck is not statistical at all. I evaluate Rodgers' play against what he's supposed to do. Here's your problem: I describe a dickhead that is passing up 2nd read to Kumerow for a wide open easy first on 3rd and 5 and all you see [truly awesome pass to Lizard] is 1 for 1 for 35 and a TD. And you run from the evaluation. This is how he has been playing for 4 years. Those great passes along with his passer rating stat whoring mask how truly bad he has been. To say Rodgers is not elite is WRONG...He's pedestrian or worse for most of the last 4 years. The performance in Oakland proves its all between the ears/attitude/intentional. What kind of asshole ups his game because of a Baldwin article? And the prick admits it. He is effed in the head!
AND THIS IS CRITICAL: his gun-slinging glory hero highlight bitch stuff creates highs AND lows. He is inconsistent. This was Cutler's worst trait. Did you follow the Cubs hitting? 10 runs, 0 runs, 8 runs, 2 runs... That's a 5 run average each batter a statistical stud; but they sucked. GB cant win in playoffs unless Rodgers plays precisely and he cant! Eff the stats what's the point of great stats and a QB that's not focused on WINNING.
Why QBR? QB goes 10-10-125-2-0 w/ 3 lost fumbles, and takes 12 sacks for -125. The QB has a perfect passer rating. But, a QBR well under 50, which is bad, because the QB was BAD.
Rodgers is playing for passer rating, not wins. Those short passes hurt his PR, Rushing TDs hurt his PR. Not being careful with the ball as he's playing stat whore highlight boy, dont hurt his PR. Running around looking for a big play and taking a 15 yard sack doesn't affect his PR. INTs KILL your PR, so he wont throw a tight throw when he needs to. 3rd an 8 sometimes you gotta throw into tight coverage, Rodgers wont. That hurts the team Why doesn't he throw the ball away instead of taking so many sacks? Answer: INC hurt the PR, so the prick takes the sack. Rodgers is a passer rating stat whore.
Stats are for losers. YOU NEED TO EVALUATE PLAY! What I find special about Baldwin's article? It motivated the prick to a 158.3 PR. LOL. Otherwise it was interesting because it statistically EXACTLY confirms what I've been demonstrating to ya'll by showing you how terrible he at playing in the offense since the bye in 2015.
Again I've NEVER compared Rodgers to Cutler, except as it pertains to Rodgers' last 4 years. Rodgers was GOAT like up to that time, THEN SOMETHING CHANGED. It statistically dishonest to compare 4 years of Rodgers' prime to Cutler's career that included some horrific years early and late. It is statistically dishonest to weasel in Rodgers' stats prior to 2014, when I said he sucked after 2014.
Originally Posted by: Barfarn