wpr
  • wpr
  • Preferred Member Topic Starter
5 years ago



Aaron Rodgers is having an outstanding season at the quarterback position. But before Rodgers asserted himself with authority into the MVP conversation this past week, one could have easily made the argument that the Packers’ best offensive player so far this season was not Aaron Rodgers, or even David Bakhtiari or Aaron Jones.
It was Bryan Bulaga, in his 10th year in the NFL.
Yes, Bulaga has quietly been having an outstanding year along the line so far. Yet if it were up to many Twitter pundits this offseason, he never would have been given the opportunity.
One of the oddest phenomena to me over the last offseason was the sheer number of people (both analysts and fans alike) on Twitter who advocated for the release of Bulaga this offseason, due to his combination of age and contract value. Go back and search tweets from throughout the spring and summer, and you'll find plenty of examples.
Bulaga is 30 years old, but has a lot of wear and tear on his body after 10 years in the league. He has a cap hit of $8,350,000 this season versus a dead cap penalty of just $1,850,000 that the team would have incurred with his release. And this is the final season of his contract.
Despite his recent injury history, Bulaga has still been a reliable player when he’s been on the field. It would have made very little sense to let Bulaga go before his contract expired, especially given the question marks at the tackle position coming into this season.
It would have been much easier to persuade me that Bulaga should have been allowed to walk after this season, if the Packers took a possible replacement in the draft. But now, Bulaga has become one of a couple players the Packers need to begin serious contract extension discussions with, as he is having a career year.

A career year
There aren’t as many statistics to consider when talking about offensive linemen as there are with other positions, which can make comparing across seasons a bit difficult. But the concrete data that is available shows just how well Bulaga is playing this season.
Through seven games, Bulaga has yet to allow a single sack or quarterback hit. He’s only allowed nine total hurries, for a total of nine pressures (a combination of sacks, hits and hurries). Pro Football Focus gives him a pass blocking grade of 79.9, which would rate among the finest seasons of his career.
It is the run blocking where Bulaga has been noticeably better this season, better than most years in his career. And credit has to be given to the Matt LaFleur offense here, which has significantly revamped the running game. PFF rates Bulaga at a 74.1 rating, which is better than every year of his career except his 2011 season, and a big step up from the last three or four seasons in particular.
While Bakhtiari grades out slightly better than Bulaga in the passing game, Bulaga significantly outgrades Bakhtiari in the running game, which makes sense—a keen watcher will discern Bulaga has been clearly the best offensive lineman on the team this season, and that’s on a line that has been playing quite well overall.
Across the league, Bulaga grades out in the top 10 tackles in the league for run blocking and just outside the top 10 in pass blocking. That’s out of 108 players who have taken snaps at the tackle position this season in the NFL. And the only right tackle consistently grading around Bulaga’s level is Tyler Morton of the Carolina Panthers. There’s a very strong argument yet again that Bulaga Is the league’s best right tackle.

Earning a new deal
There will still undoubtedly be those naysayers who point to Bulaga’s age and injury history as reasons to let him walk, but Bulaga’s level of play this season is irreplaceable.
Bulaga may have logged 10 years in the league and plenty of battle wounds, but he’s still just 30 years old. There are plenty of other linemen in the league still going strong into their mid to late 30s.
Take 37-year-old, 15-year vet Jason Peters of the Philadelphia Eagles, who continues to grade out among the top tackles in the league. Peters signed a one-year deal with the Eagles this year worth nearly $8.7 million, more than what Bulaga is making this season.
There’s also 35-year-old Joe Staley in his 13th year with the San Francisco 49ers, also consistently grading out among the best tackles in the league still at this stage of his career. The 49ers signed him to a new two-year extension worth $28 million, and he’s getting $14.7 million this year in the final year of his existing contract.  
Both of these guys are playing left tackle, so they’re going to command more money on the market than Bulaga likely would. Both are further along in their careers than Bulaga, but their teams have rewarded them for continuing to play at high levels.
The Packers will have the capacity to bring back Bulaga if they want for another year. The team will also have to make space to sign defensive tackle Kenny Clark, and likely interior linebacker Blake Martinez. Getting all three back may be tough with the current cap space, but offloading the contracts of Lane Taylor and Jimmy Graham (both of whom would be likely cap casualties in 2020, in my estimation) would give them more than enough room to make it work.
If I’m Brian Gutekunst and Russ Ball, I’m starting to have serious discussions now about extending Bulaga before he can hit the free agent market in March. He’s simply playing at too high a level to let him hit the street.

Continue Reading @ CheeseheadTV 

CheeseheadTV wrote:



Before the season began I was content to let Brian finish out his contract, thank him for his service and move on down the road.
But now:
He's played at nearly an elite level all season long.
I haven't seen anyone step up to be his replacement.
They may get him to sign a 3 year deal. Front load it with the signing bonus and then reevaluate the situation after next season. Perhaps they will find his replacement in next year's draft and give the rookie a year to learn the system.
UserPostedImage
gbguy20
5 years ago
I was also happy to see bulaga go this offseason. Tough to do it without a replacement in line though. didn't have it this year.
BAD EMAIL because the address couldn ot be found, or is unable to receive mail.
Dulak
5 years ago
Not really about Bulaga but did you watch the raiders game? ... Our defense didnt do jack to Carr. Their Oline owned us the Whole game. And even if Carr was an average QB if you give a guy protection like that he is going to make throws.

Really quite interesting to watch that game with the Oline at work.
go.pack.go.
5 years ago
We better lock him up. We have scrubs as back ups. Probably do need to consider taking a RT in the next couple of drafts though. Let him be groomed behind Bulaga for a year or two, or as long as Bulaga can play at a high level.
UserPostedImage
beast
5 years ago
OT needs to be a priority in the draft, even if we get Bulaga back, we need a young good back-up at such an important position, and as an OT, they might be able to backup OG too.


Also I always found it odd that fans wanted to move Bulaga (and Bak) because of their size numbers ... and put in Sherrod, or Spriggs, or someone 6'5"... let the best player keep their spot until someone can match them on field talent wise.

I remember an old article that talked about how Bulaga is just a great athlete in terms of adjusting... he adjusted to different schemes faster, when Sitton/Lang flipped sides, he adjusted to playing with Lang's more aggressive style faster next to him, in golf he adjusts faster... so I don't think we should be totally surprised in a new running scheme, he adjusted faster and quicker, he's pretty darn good at adjusting to his surroundings.


Unless the contract demand is too much, got to try to keep him around longer! Maybe with heavy gameday roster bonuses in case he's injured.
UserPostedImage
stevegb
5 years ago
Its nice to see him finally achieve his full potential and I'm all for giving him a new contract when he's playing this well but my issue isn't his ability its how often he can stay healthy.
blank
Fan Shout
beast (3h) : 6 days
wpr (17-Apr) : 7 days
Zero2Cool (16-Apr) : sounds like Packers don't get good compensation, Jaire staying
dfosterf (16-Apr) : Nobody coming up with a keep, but at x amount
dfosterf (16-Apr) : Trade, cut or keep
dfosterf (16-Apr) : that from Jaire
dfosterf (16-Apr) : My guess is the Packers floated the concept of a reworked contract via his agent and agent got a f'
Zero2Cool (16-Apr) : Yes, and that is why I think Rob worded it how he did. Rather than say "agent"
dfosterf (16-Apr) : Same laws apply. Agent must present such an offer to Jaire. Cannot accept or reject without presenting it
Zero2Cool (16-Apr) : I'm thinking that is why Rob worded it how he did.
dfosterf (16-Apr) : The Packers can certainly still make the offer to the agent
dfosterf (16-Apr) : Laws of agency and definition of fiduciary responsibility
dfosterf (16-Apr) : Jaire is open to a reduced contract without Jaire's permission
dfosterf (16-Apr) : The agent would arguably violate the law if he were to tell the Packers
Zero2Cool (16-Apr) : That someone ... likely the agent.
Zero2Cool (16-Apr) : So, Jaire has not been offered nor rejected a pay reduction, but someone says he'd decline.
Zero2Cool (16-Apr) : Demovksy says t was direct communication with someone familiar with Jaire’s line of thinking at that moment.
Zero2Cool (16-Apr) : Demovsky just replied to me a bit ago. Jaire hasn't said it.
dfosterf (16-Apr) : Of course, that depends on the definition of "we"
dfosterf (16-Apr) : We have been told that they haven't because he wouldn't accept it. I submit we don't know that
dfosterf (16-Apr) : What is the downside in making a calculated reduced offer to Jaire?
Zero2Cool (15-Apr) : Packers are receiving interest in Jaire Alexander but a trade is not imminent
Zero2Cool (15-Apr) : Jalen Ramsey wants to be traded. He's never happy is he?
Zero2Cool (15-Apr) : two 1sts in 2022 and two 2nd's in 2023 and 2024
Zero2Cool (15-Apr) : Packers had fortunate last three drafts.
dfosterf (15-Apr) : I may have to move
dfosterf (15-Apr) : My wife just told the ancient Japanese sushi dude not enough rice under his fish
Zero2Cool (14-Apr) : I think a dozen is what I need
dfosterf (14-Apr) : Go fund me for this purpose just might work. A dozen nurses show up at 1265 to provide mental health assistance.
dfosterf (14-Apr) : Maybe send a crew of Angels to the Packers draft room on draft day.
Zero2Cool (14-Apr) : I am the Angel that gets visited.
dfosterf (14-Apr) : Visiting Angels has a pretty good reputation
Zero2Cool (14-Apr) : what
Martha Careful (14-Apr) : WINNING IT, not someone else losing it. The best victory though was re-uniting with his wife
Martha Careful (14-Apr) : The manner in which he won it was just amazing and wonderful. First blowing the lead then getting back, then blowing it. But ultimately
Zero2Cool (12-Apr) : I'm guessing since the thumb was broken, he wasn't feeling it.
dfosterf (10-Apr) : Looking for guidance. Not feeling the thumb.
Mucky Tundra (10-Apr) : If they knew about it or not
Mucky Tundra (10-Apr) : I don't recall that he did which is why I asked.
Zero2Cool (10-Apr) : Guessing they probably knew. Did he have cast or something on?
Mucky Tundra (10-Apr) : Did they know that at the time or was that something the realized afterwards?
Zero2Cool (9-Apr) : Van Ness played most of season with broken thumb
wpr (9-Apr) : yay
Zero2Cool (9-Apr) : Mark Murphy says Steelers likely to protect Packers game. Meaning, no Ireland
Zero2Cool (8-Apr) : Struggling to figure out what text editor options are needed and which are 'nice to have'
Mucky Tundra (8-Apr) : *CHOMP CHOMP CHOMP*
Zero2Cool (2-Apr) : WR who said he'd break Xavier Worthy 40 time...and ran slower than you
Mucky Tundra (2-Apr) : Who?
Zero2Cool (2-Apr) : Texas’ WR Isaiah Bond is scheduled to visit the Bills, Browns, Chiefs, Falcons, Packers and Titans starting next week.
Zero2Cool (2-Apr) : Spotting ball isn't changing, only measuring distance is, Which wasn't the issue.
Please sign in to use Fan Shout
2024 Packers Schedule
Friday, Sep 6 @ 7:15 PM
Eagles
Sunday, Sep 15 @ 12:00 PM
COLTS
Sunday, Sep 22 @ 12:00 PM
Titans
Sunday, Sep 29 @ 12:00 PM
VIKINGS
Sunday, Oct 6 @ 3:25 PM
Rams
Sunday, Oct 13 @ 12:00 PM
CARDINALS
Sunday, Oct 20 @ 12:00 PM
TEXANS
Sunday, Oct 27 @ 12:00 PM
Jaguars
Sunday, Nov 3 @ 3:25 PM
LIONS
Sunday, Nov 17 @ 12:00 PM
Bears
Sunday, Nov 24 @ 3:25 PM
49ERS
Thursday, Nov 28 @ 7:20 PM
DOLPHINS
Thursday, Dec 5 @ 7:15 PM
Lions
Sunday, Dec 15 @ 7:20 PM
Seahawks
Monday, Dec 23 @ 7:15 PM
SAINTS
Sunday, Dec 29 @ 3:25 PM
Vikings
Sunday, Jan 5 @ 12:00 PM
BEARS
Sunday, Jan 12 @ 3:30 PM
Eagles
Recent Topics
17-Apr / Random Babble / wpr

16-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

15-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / dfosterf

13-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / Martha Careful

12-Apr / Feedback, Suggestions and Issues / Zero2Cool

11-Apr / Feedback, Suggestions and Issues / Rockmolder

2-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

2-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / bboystyle

1-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / Mucky Tundra

1-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / wpr

31-Mar / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

30-Mar / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

29-Mar / Random Babble / wpr

28-Mar / Random Babble / Martha Careful

26-Mar / Random Babble / Mucky Tundra

Headlines
Copyright © 2006 - 2025 PackersHome.com™. All Rights Reserved.