LaFleur: Rodgers 'absolutely' has OK to audible· Page 2

gbguy20
Veteran Member

5 years ago

It's his fucking job to audible. Always has been always will be. Much rather have that than the QB who is too fucking dumb to adjust. How come it's not a powergrab or disobedience when all the other qbs in the league do it?

BAD EMAIL because the address couldn ot be found, or is unable to receive mail.

nerdmann
Premier Member

5 years ago

#12

Originally Posted by: gbguy20

Other QBs don't do it, in Matt's offense.

It's also Aaron's job to practice, get reps with the other players, but he didn't want to do that in preseason. Last year, in meaningless games, where he could rack up statistics, he was gung ho. I AM A TEAM LEADER, I'M GONNA BE OUT THERE WITH THE GUYS.

This year, with a Head Coach, when no official stats can be racked up, I JUST DON'T SEE THE POINT OF BEING OUT THERE. Maybe practice is better than preseason games. Maybe it's even better than preseason games.

Maybe other guys can get enough meaningful, gamelike reps with Aaron in practice. We're gonna find out in two days.

“Winning is not a sometime thing, it is an all the time thing. You don't do things right once in a while…you do them right all the time.”

earthquake
Member

5 years ago

#13

Shocking news, Nerd still has a crush on... I mean a grudge against Rodgers.

blank

Zero2Cool
Elite Member Topic Starter

5 years ago

#14

If any of the other players start trying to change plays at the line of scrimmage, they'll have increased responsibility too.

Originally Posted by: nerdmann

Increased, yes. Sole, NO.

QB's get way too much credit and way too much blame. Football is the absolute definition of TEAM sport. If you have shit around you, you are going to produce shit. Unless you are Barry Sanders, then, and only then, can you produce beauty while surrounded by shit. End of story.

Cheesey
Preferred Member

5 years ago

#15

Originally Posted by: nerdmann

True, not all other QBs do it....only the SMART ones do.
What about Aaron Jones....And Williams....Davonte Adams....and the other starters that didn’t play? Are they all lousy trouble makers that are trying to make a power grab? They MUST be, if what you are saying about Rodgers is true.
If Rodgers sees a certain defense that would hurt the play that was called, is he making a power grab by calling a audible? Or is he using his brain by changing the play to one that works?
I myself would rather have a QB that has enough experience and brains to be able to see what the defense is trying to do.
But thats just me I guess.

earthquake
Member

5 years ago

#16

Originally Posted by: Cheesey

See the problem here is that you're using logic and reason. Try to imagine that Rodgers is your ex-girlfriend and you're still really obsessed with h...him. You go through his trash at night looking for evidence that he's making too many audibles. You make fake social media accounts just so you can see what he's posting about. You write down everything he says so you can call it up out of context later to make him look bad.

blank

Cheesey
Preferred Member

5 years ago

#17

Originally Posted by: earthquake

Geez.....i only went through his trash a couple times......oh, wait....you didn’t mean me.....,,,😂 😂 😂

go.pack.go.
Veteran Member

5 years ago

#18

Originally Posted by: nerdmann

So none of the starters played in preseason because it was Rodgers’ decision I guess. How many teams in the NFL played 0 starters this preseason? I guess any of them who didn’t play must hate their team and only care about themselves.

And I guess the coaching staff had nothing to do with the decision to sit starters. Solely on the players.

If you think that is all true, then you my friend, are an idiot.

Oh, and Rodgers was going to play against the Raiders, along with the rest of the starters. Until the field was fucked up.

nerdmann
Premier Member

5 years ago

#19

Let's see if Aaron is willing to line up under center and hand the ball off.

“Winning is not a sometime thing, it is an all the time thing. You don't do things right once in a while…you do them right all the time.”

Zero2Cool
Elite Member Topic Starter

5 years ago

#20

Let's see if Aaron is willing to line up under center and hand the ball off.

Originally Posted by: nerdmann

Mike Florio, get the fuck out of here. Thank you.

🤣

Important Information:

The PACKERSHOME uses cookies. By continuing to browse this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. More Details Close

Fan Shout

Zero2Cool (2h) : Merry Christmas!

beast (11h) : Merry Christmas 🎄🎁

beast (19h) : Sounds like no serious injuries from the Saints game and Jacobs and Watson should play in the Vikings game

packerfanoutwest (24-Dec) : both games Watson missed, Packers won

Martha Careful (24-Dec) : I hope all of you have a Merry Christmas!

Mucky Tundra (24-Dec) : Oh I know about Jacobs, I just couldn't pass up an opportunity to mimic Zero lol

buckeyepackfan (24-Dec) : Jacobs was just sat down, Watson re-injured that knee that kept him out 1 game earlier

buckeyepackfan (24-Dec) : I needed .14 that's. .14 points for the whole 4th quarter to win and go to the SB. Lol

Mucky Tundra (24-Dec) : Jacobs gonna be OK???

Zero2Cool (24-Dec) : Watson gonna be OK???

packerfanoutwest (24-Dec) : Inactives tonight for the Pack: Alexander- knee Bullard - ankle Williams - quad Walker -ankle Monk Heath

packerfanoutwest (24-Dec) : No Jaire, but hopefully the front 7 destroys the line of scrimmage & forces Rattler into a few passes to McKinney.

packerfanoutwest (24-Dec) : minny could be #1 seed and the Lions #5 seed

Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : We'd have same Division and Conference records. Strength of schedule we edge them

Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I just checked. What tie breaker?

bboystyle (23-Dec) : yes its possible but unlikely. If we do get the 5th, we face the NFCS winner

Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : Ahh, ok.

bboystyle (23-Dec) : yes due to tie breaker

Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I mean, unlikely, yes, but mathematically, 5th is possible by what I'm reading.

Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : If Vikings lose out, Packers win out, Packers get 5th, right?

bboystyle (23-Dec) : Minny isnt going to lose out so 5th seed is out of the equation. We are playing for the 6th or 7th seed which makes no difference

Mucky Tundra (23-Dec) : beast, the ad revenue goes to the broadcast company but they gotta pay to air the game on their channel/network

beast (23-Dec) : If we win tonight the game is still relative in terms of 5th, 6th or 7th seed... win and it's 5th or 6th, lose and it's 6th or 7th

beast (23-Dec) : Mucky, I thought the ad revenue went to the broadcasting companies or the NFL, at least not directly

Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I think the revenue share is moot, isn't it? That's the CBA an Salary Cap handling that.

bboystyle (23-Dec) : i mean game becomes irrelevant if we win tonight. Just a game where we are trying to play spoilers to Vikings chance at the #1 seed

Mucky Tundra (23-Dec) : beast, I would guess ad revenue from more eyes watching tv

Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I would think it would hurt the home team because people would have to cancel last minute maybe? i dunno

beast (23-Dec) : I agree that it's BS for fans planning on going to the game. But how does it bring in more money? I'm guessing indirectly?

packerfanoutwest (23-Dec) : bs on flexing the game....they do it for the $$league$$, not the hometown fans

Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I see what you did there Mucky

Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : dammit. 3:25pm

Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : Packers Vikings flexed to 3:35pm

Mucky Tundra (23-Dec) : Upon receiving the news about Luke Musgrave, I immediately fell to the ground

Mucky Tundra (23-Dec) : Yeah baby!

Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : LUKE MUSGRAVE PLAYING TONIGHT~!~~~~WOWHOAAOHAOAA yah

Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I wanna kill new QB's ... blitz the crap out of them.

beast (23-Dec) : Barry seemed to get too conservative against new QBs, Hafley doesn't have that issue

Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : However, we seem to struggle vs new QB's

Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : Should be moot point, cuz Packers should win tonight.

packerfanoutwest (23-Dec) : ok I stand corrected

Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : Ok, yes, you are right. I see that now how they get 7th

Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : 5th - Packers win out, Vikings lose out. Maybe?

beast (23-Dec) : Saying no to the 6th lock.

beast (23-Dec) : No, with the Commanders beating the Eagles, Packers could have a good chance of 6th or 7th unless the win out

Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I think if Packers win, they are locked 6th with chance for 5th.

beast (23-Dec) : But it doesn't matter, as the Packers win surely win one of their remaining games

beast (23-Dec) : This is not complex, just someone doesn't want to believe reality

beast (23-Dec) : We already have told you... if Packers lose all their games (they won't, but if they did), and Buccaneers and Falcons win all theirs

Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I posted it in that Packers and 1 seed thread

Please sign in to use Fan Shout

2024 Packers Schedule

Friday, Sep 6 @ 7:15 PM

Eagles

29 - 34

Sunday, Sep 15 @ 12:00 PM

COLTS

16 - 10

Sunday, Sep 22 @ 12:00 PM

Titans

30 - 14

Sunday, Sep 29 @ 12:00 PM

VIKINGS

29 - 31

Sunday, Oct 6 @ 3:25 PM

Rams

24 - 19

Sunday, Oct 13 @ 12:00 PM

CARDINALS

34 - 13

Sunday, Oct 20 @ 12:00 PM

TEXANS

24 - 22

Sunday, Oct 27 @ 12:00 PM

Jaguars

30 - 27

Sunday, Nov 3 @ 3:25 PM

LIONS

14 - 24

Sunday, Nov 17 @ 12:00 PM

Bears

20 - 19

Sunday, Nov 24 @ 3:25 PM

49ERS

38 - 10

Thursday, Nov 28 @ 7:20 PM

DOLPHINS

30 - 17

Thursday, Dec 5 @ 7:15 PM

Lions

31 - 34

Sunday, Dec 15 @ 7:20 PM

Seahawks

30 - 13

Monday, Dec 23 @ 7:15 PM

SAINTS

34 - 0

Sunday, Dec 29 @ 3:25 PM

Vikings

Saturday, Jan 4 @ 11:00 PM

BEARS