Texans to trade LB/DE Jadeveon Clowney in the next 24/48 hours· Page 3

buckeyepackfan
Veteran Member

5 years ago

#21

He got traded to the SeaSquaks.

Originally Posted by: Cheesey

Probably because that bitch Aaron Rodgers wouldn't take a pay cut!
😂😂😂😂

I was addicted to The Hokey Pokey, but I turned myself around!

beast
Select Member

5 years ago

#22

Okay, I was wrong... maybe the Packers should have traded for Clowney... it cost the Seahawks a 3rd round pick (which they might get back two year later in the form of a 3rd (or 4th) round comp pick if Clowney plays well and gets a new contract from another team (or not if the Seahawks agree to sign him long term).... but the Seahawks also got the Texans to pay for half of his 2019 salary!

Texans straight up screwed themselves on the Clowney decisions of when and where to trade him. Should of traded him when he could still sign multi-year deal that teams would have been more interested in him...

Dulak
Veteran Member

5 years ago

#23

Originally Posted by: beast

Sounds like a good deal even if he didnt pan out ... Hes more of a 4-3 guy thou right? Not a DT run stuffer?

earthquake
Member

5 years ago

#24

Originally Posted by: beast

From what I understand, he hadn't signed his franchise tender, which meant they couldn't trade him (until he did). He was essentially in control of where he was going to be traded to, which limited the Texan's leverage.

blank

beast
Select Member

5 years ago

#25

Originally Posted by: earthquake

True, but what killed the leverage even more is that the Texans didn't make the decision to trade him and start shopping him around while he could still sign a muli-year deal... if they could of signed Clowney to a multi-year deal, then they would of been willing to offer even more in trade and they could Clowny to sign the tender faster as well because he's getting his huge contract, not a one year thing.

Zero2Cool
Elite Member Topic Starter

5 years ago

#26

Originally Posted by: beast

What makes you believe Clowney would have agreed to be traded to the Packers?

beast
Select Member

5 years ago

#27

What makes you believe Clowney would have agreed to be traded to the Packers?

Originally Posted by: Zero2Cool

What makes you believe that I believe that?

I never said that and never thought about it, just said that my position that the Packers shouldn't of been interested at the point was wrong as the Texans have up a lot more than I ever thought they would. (Also I didn't realize teams could agree to split a contract payment like that).

So I'm saying that the Packers should have been interested... not saying a thing about Clowney interest.

gbguy20
Veteran Member

5 years ago

#28

Bill o brien looks like such a fool

BAD EMAIL because the address couldn ot be found, or is unable to receive mail.

Zero2Cool
Elite Member Topic Starter

5 years ago

#29

Originally Posted by: beast

This here.

Originally Posted by: beast

Initial reports were that the Packers were interested. But, Clowney's agent (I think) said he'd only sign the tender for one of two teams (Seattle and Eagles?). I'm fine with not going after Clowney, or not getting him. Can't say I've ever felt he was worth the hype and certainly don't think he's worth the tag salary.

beast
Select Member

5 years ago

#30

This here.

Initial reports were that the Packers were interested. But, Clowney's agent (I think) said he'd only sign the tender for one of two teams (Seattle and Eagles?). I'm fine with not going after Clowney, or not getting him. Can't say I've ever felt he was worth the hype and certainly don't think he's worth the tag salary.

Originally Posted by: Zero2Cool

Should have vs should have tried... It's close enough, guess I should have added an extra word in there.

I thought the initial reports were just speculation and fan rumors, first credible list I personally saw had 5 teams names and Packers weren't one.

But Seahawks are only paying half of the tag salary, which might make it worth it for a year.

Important Information:

The PACKERSHOME uses cookies. By continuing to browse this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. More Details Close

Fan Shout

packerfanoutwest (2h) : Inactives tonight for the Pack: Alexander- knee Bullard - ankle Williams - quad Walker -ankle Monk Heath

packerfanoutwest (2h) : No Jaire, but hopefully the front 7 destroys the line of scrimmage & forces Rattler into a few passes to McKinney.

packerfanoutwest (2h) : minny could be #1 seed and the Lions #5 seed

Zero2Cool (4h) : We'd have same Division and Conference records. Strength of schedule we edge them

Zero2Cool (4h) : I just checked. What tie breaker?

bboystyle (4h) : yes its possible but unlikely. If we do get the 5th, we face the NFCS winner

Zero2Cool (4h) : Ahh, ok.

bboystyle (4h) : yes due to tie breaker

Zero2Cool (4h) : I mean, unlikely, yes, but mathematically, 5th is possible by what I'm reading.

Zero2Cool (4h) : If Vikings lose out, Packers win out, Packers get 5th, right?

bboystyle (4h) : Minny isnt going to lose out so 5th seed is out of the equation. We are playing for the 6th or 7th seed which makes no difference

Mucky Tundra (5h) : beast, the ad revenue goes to the broadcast company but they gotta pay to air the game on their channel/network

beast (6h) : If we win tonight the game is still relative in terms of 5th, 6th or 7th seed... win and it's 5th or 6th, lose and it's 6th or 7th

beast (6h) : Mucky, I thought the ad revenue went to the broadcasting companies or the NFL, at least not directly

Zero2Cool (6h) : I think the revenue share is moot, isn't it? That's the CBA an Salary Cap handling that.

bboystyle (6h) : i mean game becomes irrelevant if we win tonight. Just a game where we are trying to play spoilers to Vikings chance at the #1 seed

Mucky Tundra (6h) : beast, I would guess ad revenue from more eyes watching tv

Zero2Cool (7h) : I would think it would hurt the home team because people would have to cancel last minute maybe? i dunno

beast (7h) : I agree that it's BS for fans planning on going to the game. But how does it bring in more money? I'm guessing indirectly?

packerfanoutwest (7h) : bs on flexing the game....they do it for the $$league$$, not the hometown fans

Zero2Cool (8h) : I see what you did there Mucky

Zero2Cool (8h) : dammit. 3:25pm

Zero2Cool (8h) : Packers Vikings flexed to 3:35pm

Mucky Tundra (8h) : Upon receiving the news about Luke Musgrave, I immediately fell to the ground

Mucky Tundra (8h) : Yeah baby!

Zero2Cool (8h) : LUKE MUSGRAVE PLAYING TONIGHT~!~~~~WOWHOAAOHAOAA yah

Zero2Cool (10h) : I wanna kill new QB's ... blitz the crap out of them.

beast (10h) : Barry seemed to get too conservative against new QBs, Hafley doesn't have that issue

Zero2Cool (10h) : However, we seem to struggle vs new QB's

Zero2Cool (10h) : Should be moot point, cuz Packers should win tonight.

packerfanoutwest (11h) : ok I stand corrected

Zero2Cool (11h) : Ok, yes, you are right. I see that now how they get 7th

Zero2Cool (11h) : 5th - Packers win out, Vikings lose out. Maybe?

beast (11h) : Saying no to the 6th lock.

beast (11h) : No, with the Commanders beating the Eagles, Packers could have a good chance of 6th or 7th unless the win out

Zero2Cool (11h) : I think if Packers win, they are locked 6th with chance for 5th.

beast (11h) : But it doesn't matter, as the Packers win surely win one of their remaining games

beast (11h) : This is not complex, just someone doesn't want to believe reality

beast (11h) : We already have told you... if Packers lose all their games (they won't, but if they did), and Buccaneers and Falcons win all theirs

Zero2Cool (11h) : I posted it in that Packers and 1 seed thread

Zero2Cool (11h) : I literally just said it.

packerfanoutwest (11h) : show us a scenario where Pack don't get in? bet you can't

Zero2Cool (11h) : Falcons, Buccaneers would need to win final two games.

Zero2Cool (11h) : Yes, if they win one of three, they are lock. If they lose out, they can be eliminated.

packerfanoutwest (11h) : as I just said,,gtheyh are in no matter what

Zero2Cool (11h) : Packers should get in. I just hope it's not 7th seed. Feels dirty.

packerfanoutwest (11h) : If packers lose out, no matter what, they are in

packerfanoutwest (11h) : both teams can not male the playoffs....falcon hold the tie breaker

packerfanoutwest (11h) : if bucs win out they win their division

beast (12h) : Fine, Buccaneers and Falcons can get ahead of us

Please sign in to use Fan Shout

2024 Packers Schedule

Friday, Sep 6 @ 7:15 PM

Eagles

29 - 34

Sunday, Sep 15 @ 12:00 PM

COLTS

16 - 10

Sunday, Sep 22 @ 12:00 PM

Titans

30 - 14

Sunday, Sep 29 @ 12:00 PM

VIKINGS

29 - 31

Sunday, Oct 6 @ 3:25 PM

Rams

24 - 19

Sunday, Oct 13 @ 12:00 PM

CARDINALS

34 - 13

Sunday, Oct 20 @ 12:00 PM

TEXANS

24 - 22

Sunday, Oct 27 @ 12:00 PM

Jaguars

30 - 27

Sunday, Nov 3 @ 3:25 PM

LIONS

14 - 24

Sunday, Nov 17 @ 12:00 PM

Bears

20 - 19

Sunday, Nov 24 @ 3:25 PM

49ERS

38 - 10

Thursday, Nov 28 @ 7:20 PM

DOLPHINS

30 - 17

Thursday, Dec 5 @ 7:15 PM

Lions

31 - 34

Sunday, Dec 15 @ 7:20 PM

Seahawks

30 - 13

Monday, Dec 23 @ 7:15 PM

SAINTS

Sunday, Dec 29 @ 3:25 PM

Vikings

Saturday, Jan 4 @ 11:00 PM

BEARS