Releasing Daniels?· Page 2

go.pack.go.
Veteran Member

5 years ago

Stupid move. One of the better DT’s in the league when healthy. Not to mention the leader he is in the locker room.

Don’t have much veteran leadership on the defensive side of the ball anymore. Tramon is about it, unless you count Martinez or Clark.

Zero2Cool
Elite Member

5 years ago

#12

No, The GM is the GM.
Gutekunst was just a Ted Thompson disciple, he won the power struggle when it was time for Ted to step down.

The GM is the one that makes the final decisions .

Other than Rodgers,

Lowry is the first player to get an extension that Ted Thompson drafted.

I will not be surprised to see Bulaga released before the end of TC.

Again, it's what every GM does.

Originally Posted by: buckeyepackfan

The GM is not the GM. It is not what it is. The green grass is not green.

Speaking of silliness, what power struggle? Mike Daniels was a guy who is of great character, but as I have said a few times ... he talked like Tarzan and often times disappeared on the field. People seem to mistake someone being quotable and loud as "leader" ... crazy.

buckeyepackfan
Veteran Member

5 years ago

#13

Originally Posted by: Zero2Cool

Dont think for a minute I care one way or another whether they keep anyone.

I'm just stating this is what GM's do.
They want to build their own teams.

As far as power struggle, all you have to do is look at who has stayed and who has left the past 2 years.

Im not going to rehash all this old news.

It is what it is.

Changes were wanted, changes have been made.

Time to see if the changes are going to work.

I was addicted to The Hokey Pokey, but I turned myself around!

Zero2Cool
Elite Member

5 years ago

#14

Originally Posted by: buckeyepackfan

I won't believe this for a second. GM's do not want to build their own teams. They want to carry the roster that got the previous GM fired.

buckeyepackfan
Veteran Member

5 years ago

#15

I won't believe this for a second. GM's do not want to build their own teams. They want to carry the roster that got the previous GM fired.

Originally Posted by: Zero2Cool

Ok
Sounds good to me.

I was addicted to The Hokey Pokey, but I turned myself around!

Zero2Cool
Elite Member

5 years ago

#16

Ok
Sounds good to me.

Originally Posted by: buckeyepackfan

I won the Internet Royal Rumble!!!!

Okay, enough of that. I am bummed to see Mike Daniels go, I just think we all kind of felt it was coming though.

sschind
Senior Member

5 years ago

#17

The GM is not the GM. It is not what it is. The green grass is not green.

Speaking of silliness, what power struggle? Mike Daniels was a guy who is of great character, but as I have said a few times ... he talked like Tarzan and often times disappeared on the field. People seem to mistake someone being quotable and loud as "leader" ... crazy.

Originally Posted by: Zero2Cool

I think his comments a few years ago before the start of the season made people more aware of him than his actual play did. Its not that he wasn't good he just wasn't 7 or 8 million good. Especially with the influx of front 7 guys we got this off season.

Cheesey
Preferred Member

5 years ago

#18

I won the Internet Royal Rumble!!!!

Okay, enough of that. I am bummed to see Mike Daniels go, I just think we all kind of felt it was coming though.

Originally Posted by: Zero2Cool

Oh Zero.....you SILLY boy!!!!😂

I’m bummed he’s gone too. Just saw it on the news that it’s official.
Let’s see what they can do with that 8 million now.
I guess the old saying is true, better to let them go a year early then a year too late.
I bet there were questions about his health that helped them decide. Something we might never know for sure.

earthquake
Member

5 years ago

#19

Wow....getting rid of our best D-lineman?

Originally Posted by: Cheesey

Oh man, did they cut Kenny Clark too?

blank

Mucky Tundra
Honored Member

5 years ago

#20

Surprised to see him gone and cut outright. Figured he would play out his contract and GB would let him walk next year. Also surprised because I read his QB pressure rating per snap and hurries were amongst the top in the league before his injury and his new role freed up stuff for Fackrell and Martinez. Figure we'll see Clark get a new contract by the start of the season.

“Nah. I like having the island. It’s pretty cool...not too many visitors”

"I’ve got it." -Aaron Rodgers

Important Information:

The PACKERSHOME uses cookies. By continuing to browse this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. More Details Close

Fan Shout

Zero2Cool (4m) : I would think it would hurt the home team because people would have to cancel last minute maybe? i dunno

beast (12m) : I agree that it's BS for fans planning on going to the game. But how does it bring in more money? I'm guessing indirectly?

packerfanoutwest (24m) : bs on flexing the game....they do it for the $$league$$, not the hometown fans

Zero2Cool (1h) : I see what you did there Mucky

Zero2Cool (1h) : dammit. 3:25pm

Zero2Cool (1h) : Packers Vikings flexed to 3:35pm

Mucky Tundra (1h) : Upon receiving the news about Luke Musgrave, I immediately fell to the ground

Mucky Tundra (1h) : Yeah baby!

Zero2Cool (1h) : LUKE MUSGRAVE PLAYING TONIGHT~!~~~~WOWHOAAOHAOAA yah

Zero2Cool (2h) : I wanna kill new QB's ... blitz the crap out of them.

beast (2h) : Barry seemed to get too conservative against new QBs, Hafley doesn't have that issue

Zero2Cool (3h) : However, we seem to struggle vs new QB's

Zero2Cool (3h) : Should be moot point, cuz Packers should win tonight.

packerfanoutwest (3h) : ok I stand corrected

Zero2Cool (4h) : Ok, yes, you are right. I see that now how they get 7th

Zero2Cool (4h) : 5th - Packers win out, Vikings lose out. Maybe?

beast (4h) : Saying no to the 6th lock.

beast (4h) : No, with the Commanders beating the Eagles, Packers could have a good chance of 6th or 7th unless the win out

Zero2Cool (4h) : I think if Packers win, they are locked 6th with chance for 5th.

beast (4h) : But it doesn't matter, as the Packers win surely win one of their remaining games

beast (4h) : This is not complex, just someone doesn't want to believe reality

beast (4h) : We already have told you... if Packers lose all their games (they won't, but if they did), and Buccaneers and Falcons win all theirs

Zero2Cool (4h) : I posted it in that Packers and 1 seed thread

Zero2Cool (4h) : I literally just said it.

packerfanoutwest (4h) : show us a scenario where Pack don't get in? bet you can't

Zero2Cool (4h) : Falcons, Buccaneers would need to win final two games.

Zero2Cool (4h) : Yes, if they win one of three, they are lock. If they lose out, they can be eliminated.

packerfanoutwest (4h) : as I just said,,gtheyh are in no matter what

Zero2Cool (4h) : Packers should get in. I just hope it's not 7th seed. Feels dirty.

packerfanoutwest (4h) : If packers lose out, no matter what, they are in

packerfanoutwest (4h) : both teams can not male the playoffs....falcon hold the tie breaker

packerfanoutwest (4h) : if bucs win out they win their division

beast (4h) : Fine, Buccaneers and Falcons can get ahead of us

packerfanoutwest (4h) : falcons are already ahead of us

beast (4h) : Packers will get in

beast (4h) : If Packers lose the rest of their games and Falcons win the rest of theirs, they could pass us... but not gonna happen

packerfanoutwest (5h) : they still are in the playoffs

packerfanoutwest (5h) : If Packers lose the remaining games,,,,at 10-7

Zero2Cool (6h) : We can say it. We don't play.

Mucky Tundra (8h) : But to say they are in is looking past the Saints

Mucky Tundra (8h) : That said, their odds are very favorable with a >99% chance of making the playoffs entering this week's games

Mucky Tundra (8h) : Packers are not in and have not clinched a playoff spot.

buckeyepackfan (8h) : Packers are in, they need to keep winning to improve their seed#.

Mucky Tundra (17h) : Getting help would have been nice, but helping ourselves should always be the plan

beast (18h) : Too bad Seahawks couldn't beat Vikings

bboystyle (18h) : We just need to win Monday night and were in

Mucky Tundra (21h) : Or ties, but let's be real here

Mucky Tundra (21h) : Other scenario was Falcons+Rams losses

Mucky Tundra (21h) : Needed a Falcons loss for a Seahawk loss to clinch

buckeyepackfan (21h) : Am I wring in saying if Tge Vikings beat The Seahawks, The Packers clinch?

Please sign in to use Fan Shout

2024 Packers Schedule

Friday, Sep 6 @ 7:15 PM

Eagles

29 - 34

Sunday, Sep 15 @ 12:00 PM

COLTS

16 - 10

Sunday, Sep 22 @ 12:00 PM

Titans

30 - 14

Sunday, Sep 29 @ 12:00 PM

VIKINGS

29 - 31

Sunday, Oct 6 @ 3:25 PM

Rams

24 - 19

Sunday, Oct 13 @ 12:00 PM

CARDINALS

34 - 13

Sunday, Oct 20 @ 12:00 PM

TEXANS

24 - 22

Sunday, Oct 27 @ 12:00 PM

Jaguars

30 - 27

Sunday, Nov 3 @ 3:25 PM

LIONS

14 - 24

Sunday, Nov 17 @ 12:00 PM

Bears

20 - 19

Sunday, Nov 24 @ 3:25 PM

49ERS

38 - 10

Thursday, Nov 28 @ 7:20 PM

DOLPHINS

30 - 17

Thursday, Dec 5 @ 7:15 PM

Lions

31 - 34

Sunday, Dec 15 @ 7:20 PM

Seahawks

30 - 13

Monday, Dec 23 @ 7:15 PM

SAINTS

Sunday, Dec 29 @ 3:25 PM

Vikings

Saturday, Jan 4 @ 11:00 PM

BEARS