So let's ask ourselves, KNOWING the media is gonna seize upon any statement in order to create as much drama as possible, why even make a statement like that?

Originally Posted by: nerdmann 

Aaron is an 11 year veteran and TEAM LEADER on a franchise that is well known for its adherence to talking points.

Originally Posted by: nerdmann 

I don't know, maybe because literally no matter WHAT he says, shock-jocks will find some way to construe it as something negative, and you'll jump all over it?



A franchise that's well known for its adherence to talking points? Well known by whom? According to whom? Based on what? As compared to what? Do most teams shy away from talking points? Do you have any evidence to support this?

Originally Posted by: Porforis 

This is literally an article saying that there will be more articles in the future about something. That in itself should tell you that the writer had nothing better to write about, and he’s just a typical sports writer manufacturing stories to keep the clicks coming in the offseason.

Originally Posted by: go.pack.go. 

You sound like the Wiki editor trying to get random comments verified. *TSK*

Originally Posted by: wpr 

Because when people make confusing statements I don't agree with that imply it's based on something concrete I ask for more details?

Originally Posted by: Porforis 

Naturally. Asking people to prove their wild unsubstantiated innuendos is just plain cruel. 🤣

Originally Posted by: wpr