CubanPenguin
16 years ago
Just out of curiosity I took Rodgers' stats from the preseason that were shown on another thread and decided to work them out over the year. S
Since he only played roughly half of all his games i multiplied that by two then added it up if he had played 16 games and got some pretty good stats.

His yards would be 3488

with 12 TD's

and only four int's

This is also with him playing only one play vs. the Titans and a game against the 49ers that is pretty much a write off.

Just going by this though his yards would put him in 11th just behind cutler and ahead of Warner. Also he would be ahead of McNabb, Rothelesburger, Eli Manning and Phillip Rivers.

The TD's aren't very good but it would still put him in the top 20 tied with Jason Campbell at 19th.

Now I know he won't only have 4 Int's but if he did that would tie him for second with Jeff Garcia and right behind David Garrard who only has 3.

Now I don't know about you but if he ended the season with those stats I would be a very happy man.

What do you guys think?
blank
TheEngineer
16 years ago
A little bit difficult to judge considering the limited play time he got in preseason (he didn't get full games). Might be easier to use a TDs per attempt, average yards per attempt, etc numbers and scale it up to around 500 pass attempts for the season.
blank
Greg C.
16 years ago
The TD to INT ratio looks good, but the numbers are way too low. I agree with TheEngineer that it would be better to scale it to 500 attempts.

I really can't take preseason stats too seriously, anyway. The sample size is way too small and too many things are different about preseason games.
blank
Zero2Cool
16 years ago
I think we'd have to throw in a few more INT's to compensate for garbage time INT's (end of half chucks) and the lack of inexperience.
UserPostedImage
HoustonMatt
16 years ago
For what it's worth, which is essentially nothing, here's Rogers prorated numbers based on 540 passing attempts. Favre threw 535 times last year. I don't think we will throw as much again this year, but Rodgers had 54 attempts in the preseason, so, well.....it's just much easier to add a zero to the end of his numbers. Close enough.

4360 yds
30 tds
10 ints
68.5 completion percentage

I can't see him putting up those numbers for a whole season, but if he did, that would make us the best team in the NFC.
blank
Jacob
16 years ago
He could do better he could do worse, we'll just have to see, if he plays like he did in the dallas game.... :icon_smile:
all_about_da_packers
16 years ago
I'll go a little bit of a different route, based on Rodgers throwing 486 passes, which I think is a realistic number for him this season.

3924 passing yards
27 TDs
9 INTs
68.5 completion percentage

Those are damn good numbers IMO.

Compared to Favre last year ( 4,155 yds/ 28 TDs / 15 INTs / 66.5 😵 it'll be in the same ball park.

If Rodgers plays that well this season then we should have a good chance to match our 13-3 record from last year IMO.
The NFL: Where Greg Jennings Happens.
TheEngineer
16 years ago

I'll go a little bit of a different route, based on Rodgers throwing 486 passes, which I think is a realistic number for him this season.

3924 passing yards
27 TDs
9 INTs
68.5 completion percentage

Those are damn good numbers IMO.

Compared to Favre last year ( 4,155 yds/ 28 TDs / 15 INTs / 66.5 😵 it'll be in the same ball park.

If Rodgers plays that well this season then we should have a good chance to match our 13-3 record from last year IMO.

"all_about_da_packers" wrote:



Well well, looks like AADP got pretty close in his prediction. Except for the whole matching our 13-3 record thing.
blank
shield4life
16 years ago
We are and supposed to be a 13-3 team, we just didn't play like one. Which made us 6-10 team
Glad To Be A Packers Fan.
vegOmatic
16 years ago

What do you guys think?

"CubanPenguin" wrote:



You need to do that for all quarterbacks to see if it's a statistically valid method to determine expectations.
blank
Fan Shout
Martha Careful (6h) : thank you Mucky for sticking up for me
Martha Careful (6h) : some of those people are smarter than you zero. However Pete Carroll is not
Mucky Tundra (9h) : Rude!
beast (10h) : Martha? 😋
Zero2Cool (14h) : Raiders hired someone from the elderly home.
dfosterf (16h) : I'm going with a combination of the two.
beast (18h) : Either the Cowboys have no idea what they're doing, or they're targeting their former OC, currently the Eagles OC
Zero2Cool (23-Jan) : Fake news. Cowboys say no
Zero2Cool (23-Jan) : Mystery candidate in the Cowboys head coaching search believed to be Packers ST Coordinator Rich Bisaccia.
beast (23-Jan) : Also why do both NYC teams have absolutely horrible OL for over a decade?
beast (23-Jan) : I wonder why the Jets always hire defensive coaches to be head coach
Zero2Cool (22-Jan) : Still HC positions available out there. I wonder if Hafley pops up for one
Zero2Cool (22-Jan) : Trent Baalke is out as the Jaguars GM.
dfosterf (22-Jan) : Jeff Hafley would have been a better choice, fortunately they don't know that. Someone will figure that out next off season
Zero2Cool (22-Jan) : Aaron Glenn Planning To Take Jets HC Job
dfosterf (22-Jan) : Martha- C'est mon boulot! 😁
Zero2Cool (22-Jan) : Thank you
wpr (22-Jan) : Z, glad you are feeling better.
wpr (22-Jan) : My son and D-I-L work for UM. It's a way to pick on them.
Zero2Cool (22-Jan) : Thank you. I rarely get sick, and even more rarely sick to the point I can't work.
wpr (22-Jan) : Beast- back to yesterday, I CAN say OSU your have been Michigan IF the odds of making the playoffs were more urgent.
dfosterf (22-Jan) : Glad to hear you are feeling a bit better.
Zero2Cool (22-Jan) : I've been near death ill last several days, finally feel less dead and site issues.
Zero2Cool (22-Jan) : It is a big deal. This host is having issues. It's frustrating.
Martha Careful (22-Jan) : just kidding...it was down
Martha Careful (22-Jan) : you were blocked yesterday, due to a a recalcitrant demeanor yesterday in the penalty box for a recalcitrant demeanor
dfosterf (22-Jan) : Was that site shutdown on your end or mine? No big deal, just curious
beast (21-Jan) : That way teams like Indiana and SMU don't make the conference championships by simply avoiding all the other good teams in their own confere
beast (21-Jan) : Also, with these "Super Conferences" instead of a single conference champion, have 4 teams make a Conference playoffs.
beast (21-Jan) : Also in college football, is a bye week a good or bad thing?
Martha Careful (21-Jan) : The tournament format was fine. Seeding could use some work.
beast (21-Jan) : You can't assume Ohio State would of won the Michigan game...
beast (21-Jan) : Rankings were 1) Oregon 2) Georgia 3) Texas 4) Penn State 5) Notre Dame 6) Ohio State, none of the rest mattered
wpr (21-Jan) : Texas, ND and OSU would have been fighting for the final 2 slots.
wpr (21-Jan) : Oregon and Georgia were locks. Without the luxury of extra playoff berths, Ohios St would have been more focused on Michigan game.
wpr (21-Jan) : Zero, no. If there were only 4 teams Ohio State would have been one of them. Boise St and ASU would not have been selected.
Zero2Cool (21-Jan) : So that was 7 vs 8, that means in BCS they never would made it?
Martha Careful (21-Jan) : A great game. Give ND credit for coming back, although I am please with the outcome.
Mucky Tundra (21-Jan) : FG to make it academic
Mucky Tundra (21-Jan) : and there's the dagger
Mucky Tundra (21-Jan) : ooooo 8 point game with 4 minutes to go!
Mucky Tundra (21-Jan) : ooooooooohhhhhh he missed!
Mucky Tundra (21-Jan) : Ooooo that completion makes things VERY interesting
Mucky Tundra (21-Jan) : Game not over yet
beast (21-Jan) : Oh yeah, Georgia starting quarterback season ending elbow injury
beast (21-Jan) : Sadly something happened to Georgia... they should be playing in this game against Ohio State
beast (21-Jan) : I thought Ohio State and Texas were both better than Notre Dame & Penn State
Mucky Tundra (21-Jan) : Notre Lame getting rolled
Martha Careful (21-Jan) : Ohio State just got punched in the gut. Lets see how they respond
Mucky Tundra (21-Jan) : Notre Lame vs the Luckeyes, bleh
Please sign in to use Fan Shout
2024 Packers Schedule
Friday, Sep 6 @ 7:15 PM
Eagles
Sunday, Sep 15 @ 12:00 PM
COLTS
Sunday, Sep 22 @ 12:00 PM
Titans
Sunday, Sep 29 @ 12:00 PM
VIKINGS
Sunday, Oct 6 @ 3:25 PM
Rams
Sunday, Oct 13 @ 12:00 PM
CARDINALS
Sunday, Oct 20 @ 12:00 PM
TEXANS
Sunday, Oct 27 @ 12:00 PM
Jaguars
Sunday, Nov 3 @ 3:25 PM
LIONS
Sunday, Nov 17 @ 12:00 PM
Bears
Sunday, Nov 24 @ 3:25 PM
49ERS
Thursday, Nov 28 @ 7:20 PM
DOLPHINS
Thursday, Dec 5 @ 7:15 PM
Lions
Sunday, Dec 15 @ 7:20 PM
Seahawks
Monday, Dec 23 @ 7:15 PM
SAINTS
Sunday, Dec 29 @ 3:25 PM
Vikings
Sunday, Jan 5 @ 12:00 PM
BEARS
Sunday, Jan 12 @ 3:30 PM
Eagles
Recent Topics
6h / Random Babble / Martha Careful

7h / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

21-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / Mucky Tundra

21-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / Mucky Tundra

20-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / Martha Careful

20-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / bboystyle

20-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

20-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

19-Jan / Random Babble / Martha Careful

18-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

17-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / bboystyle

17-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

17-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / Martha Careful

16-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / Mucky Tundra

16-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

Headlines
Copyright © 2006 - 2025 PackersHome.com™. All Rights Reserved.