Nonstopdrivel
5 years ago

Did the Packers Make a Very, Very Expensive Mistake With Aaron Rodgers’ Contract?
 

New revelations about the Green Bay QB don’t show him in the best light.

Prior to last season, the Packers signed Aaron Rodgers to a four-year extension that guaranteed him more than $100 million and also made him the highest-paid quarterback in the NFL in the process.

After signing the deal, Rodgers, who had two years left on his deal at the time of the extension, led the Packers to a dismal 6-9-1 record that saw head coach Mike McCarthy get fired hours after the Green Bay’s embarrassing Week 13 loss to the Arizona Cardinals.

According to a new report from Bleacher Report, Rodgers was likely very happy about McCarthy’s dismissal because he held a grudge against his former coach dating back to 1995 when, while with the 49ers, McCarthy voted to draft Alex Smith instead of Rodgers.

Rodgers’ dissatisfaction with McCarthy reportedly manifested itself in various ways and, since so much of Rodgers’ money was guaranteed, the team could do little to get him in line.

Packers CEO Mark Murphy was so worried about the situation following McCarthy’s firing that he reportedly had to order Rodgers not to be a problem after Matt LaFleur was hired as his replacement.

As ProFootballTalk points out, Green Bay kind of painted itself into a corner with the huge deal and may have made a massive mistake.

“If the Packers hadn’t signed Rodgers to that extension, they’d have a great deal of leverage with him right now: They could tell him, If you’re the problem this season, you won’t be here next season, but if you get back to your MVP form, we’ll reward you with a lucrative contract extension,” ProFootballTalk notes. “As it is, the Packers have given Rodgers so much money that they couldn’t move on from him now if they wanted to: Rodgers’ huge signing bonus means he would have about a $45 million dead cap hit if he were traded. It’s simply not feasible.”



In my opinion, the answer to this question is yes. In their haste to score PR points by making Aaron Rodgers the highest paid player in league history, the Packers voluntarily relinquished all leverage for future disputes. If the organization was planning to move on from Mike McCarthy—which I believe was the correct decision, and probably long overdue—they should have held off on giving Rodgers a new contract until after he'd spent at least a year in the new coach's system, if only to see how well the two worked together. Instead, that enormous contract hangs like a millstone around their neck. Should the new marriage not work out, the Packers will have no choice but to make the new head coach the fall guy. Rodgers is simply too expensive to part ways with, despite only having a single ring to his name (not that that is entirely or even mostly his fault, of course). Very poor tactics on the part of Green Bay.
UserPostedImage
nerdmann
5 years ago

In my opinion, the answer to this question is yes. In their haste to score PR points by making Aaron Rodgers the highest paid player in league history, the Packers voluntarily relinquished all leverage for future disputes. If the organization was planning to move on from Mike McCarthy—which I believe was the correct decision, and probably long overdue—they should have held off on giving Rodgers a new contract until after he'd spent at least a year in the new coach's system, if only to see how well the two worked together. Instead, that enormous contract hangs like a millstone around their neck. Should the new marriage not work out, the Packers willhave no choice but to make the new head coach the fall guy. Rodgers is simply too expensive to part ways with, despite only having a single ring to his name (not that that is entirely or even mostly his fault, of course). Very poor tactics on the part of Green Bay.

Originally Posted by: Nonstopdrivel 



Agreed, but it is what it is. LeFluer can't be afraid to sit Aaron down if Aaron is not executing the system. I would rather ditch Aaron and eat the cap for a year or two than send the message that a player can leverage control over the franchise.

I think (and hope) that fans are now knowledgeable enough and Aaron is image conscious enough that if Aaron continues with the diva routine, fans themselves will have enough of it. This contract is only guaranteed for another year or two, correct? I think the first couple years were the ones where all that money was guaranteed, 4 years at the most. Perhaps someone could refresh us on that contract.

Rookies can't be having to "earn Aaron's trust" by running a different route from what was called. That bullshit needs to end.

Aaron has been a problem, but it was Mike's job to lead Aaron and get the productivity. He did not sit Aaron down, he allowed it to continue. So maybe he did get played by Aaron, but it was his job to not get played.

I guess we know why Murphy was taking all the responsibility for these moves on himself. Makes me trust him a little more.

“Winning is not a sometime thing, it is an all the time thing. You don't do things right once in a while…you do them right all the time.”
nerdmann
5 years ago
The team does have leverage. Just not as much as they COULD have.

They can't reward him with a pot of money, that's a shame. BUT they can take him out of games. Aaron is very conscious of his image. He does NOT want to be viewed as Jay Cutler 2.0.

Another thing Aaron wants is his statistics. You wanna keep rolling up those numbers? STFU and go get a ring. Otherwise, GTFO. What would the Jets give us for Aaron?
“Winning is not a sometime thing, it is an all the time thing. You don't do things right once in a while…you do them right all the time.”
gbguy20
5 years ago
This whole thing is bullshit. Rodgers has been under personal attack for the better part of two years all based on speculation that circulated so much it has begun to be presented as fact and has infiltrated it's way into literally everything packer related. This guy should boycott the media for the rest of his career. I wouldn't blame him one bit. I can't wait for him to light the world on fire this year and giving a silent fuck you to the world the whole time.
BAD EMAIL because the address couldn ot be found, or is unable to receive mail.
earthquake
5 years ago
I would say hindsight is 20:20, but we don't even have enough hindsight to make a reasonable judgement on his contract yet. In 2 or 3 years the contract could look like a steal, it could look fair, or it could look terrible. If you think you've got it figured out today, I would like to hear your lotto numbers and stock picks.

The flip side to this whole premise is that, had they not sorted out the contract, not only would they be dealing with the McCarthy drama, a new HC, they would also be playing chicken with their star QB. If you think what's gone on in the last years was dysfunctional, you don't even want to know what that would have looked like.
blank
Cheesey
5 years ago

This whole thing is bullshit. Rodgers has been under personal attack for the better part of two years all based on speculation that circulated so much it has begun to be presented as fact and has infiltrated it's way into literally everything packer related. This guy should boycott the media for the rest of his career. I wouldn't blame him one bit. I can't wait for him to light the world on fire this year and giving a silent fuck you to the world the whole time.

Originally Posted by: gbguy20 



This is true. They repeat it over and over and over, and that somehow in people’s minds, makes it “fact”.

Had the Packers NOT given him the huge contract, the same fans that are complaining about it would be screaming that the Packers didn’t do enough to keep Rodgers here.
Can’t win either way.
Is there some truth to all this? Probably some bits.
But we never will know just how much.
UserPostedImage
gbguy20
5 years ago
Can't think of any star player in the league who has been as vilified as Rodgers has been.
BAD EMAIL because the address couldn ot be found, or is unable to receive mail.
Zero2Cool
5 years ago
PR points? What the hell?? I'm not connecting those dots.

Aaron had to go through dropping from projected first overall to later in the round, then the Favre stuff and then this bullshit.

You all want the shit years of bad QB play back. Go root for the Bills.
UserPostedImage
Nonstopdrivel
5 years ago

Had the Packers NOT given him the huge contract, the same fans that are complaining about it would be screaming that the Packers didn’t do enough to keep Rodgers here.

Originally Posted by: Cheesey 


Speak for yourself, and let others speak for themselves. What you say would not have been true of me. I've long been vocal in my opposition to the absurdly large contacts that get handed out to quarterbacks.
UserPostedImage
nerdmann
5 years ago

I would say hindsight is 20:20, but we don't even have enough hindsight to make a reasonable judgement on his contract yet. In 2 or 3 years the contract could look like a steal, it could look fair, or it could look terrible. If you think you've got it figured out today, I would like to hear your lotto numbers and stock picks.

The flip side to this whole premise is that, had they not sorted out the contract, not only would they be dealing with the McCarthy drama, a new HC, they would also be playing chicken with their star QB. If you think what's gone on in the last years was dysfunctional, you don't even want to know what that would have looked like.

Originally Posted by: earthquake 



I was saying at the time, don't give it to him. I've also been calling for Mike to hold Aaron accountable, for years.

Hopefully the recent moves will solve the majority of our problems.
“Winning is not a sometime thing, it is an all the time thing. You don't do things right once in a while…you do them right all the time.”
Fan Shout
Zero2Cool (4m) : Any reason I'm catching a shot here about my intelligence?
Martha Careful (22h) : thank you Mucky for sticking up for me
Martha Careful (22h) : some of those people are smarter than you zero. However Pete Carroll is not
Mucky Tundra (24-Jan) : Rude!
beast (24-Jan) : Martha? 😋
Zero2Cool (24-Jan) : Raiders hired someone from the elderly home.
dfosterf (24-Jan) : I'm going with a combination of the two.
beast (24-Jan) : Either the Cowboys have no idea what they're doing, or they're targeting their former OC, currently the Eagles OC
Zero2Cool (23-Jan) : Fake news. Cowboys say no
Zero2Cool (23-Jan) : Mystery candidate in the Cowboys head coaching search believed to be Packers ST Coordinator Rich Bisaccia.
beast (23-Jan) : Also why do both NYC teams have absolutely horrible OL for over a decade?
beast (23-Jan) : I wonder why the Jets always hire defensive coaches to be head coach
Zero2Cool (22-Jan) : Still HC positions available out there. I wonder if Hafley pops up for one
Zero2Cool (22-Jan) : Trent Baalke is out as the Jaguars GM.
dfosterf (22-Jan) : Jeff Hafley would have been a better choice, fortunately they don't know that. Someone will figure that out next off season
Zero2Cool (22-Jan) : Aaron Glenn Planning To Take Jets HC Job
dfosterf (22-Jan) : Martha- C'est mon boulot! 😁
Zero2Cool (22-Jan) : Thank you
wpr (22-Jan) : Z, glad you are feeling better.
wpr (22-Jan) : My son and D-I-L work for UM. It's a way to pick on them.
Zero2Cool (22-Jan) : Thank you. I rarely get sick, and even more rarely sick to the point I can't work.
wpr (22-Jan) : Beast- back to yesterday, I CAN say OSU your have been Michigan IF the odds of making the playoffs were more urgent.
dfosterf (22-Jan) : Glad to hear you are feeling a bit better.
Zero2Cool (22-Jan) : I've been near death ill last several days, finally feel less dead and site issues.
Zero2Cool (22-Jan) : It is a big deal. This host is having issues. It's frustrating.
Martha Careful (22-Jan) : just kidding...it was down
Martha Careful (22-Jan) : you were blocked yesterday, due to a a recalcitrant demeanor yesterday in the penalty box for a recalcitrant demeanor
dfosterf (22-Jan) : Was that site shutdown on your end or mine? No big deal, just curious
beast (21-Jan) : That way teams like Indiana and SMU don't make the conference championships by simply avoiding all the other good teams in their own confere
beast (21-Jan) : Also, with these "Super Conferences" instead of a single conference champion, have 4 teams make a Conference playoffs.
beast (21-Jan) : Also in college football, is a bye week a good or bad thing?
Martha Careful (21-Jan) : The tournament format was fine. Seeding could use some work.
beast (21-Jan) : You can't assume Ohio State would of won the Michigan game...
beast (21-Jan) : Rankings were 1) Oregon 2) Georgia 3) Texas 4) Penn State 5) Notre Dame 6) Ohio State, none of the rest mattered
wpr (21-Jan) : Texas, ND and OSU would have been fighting for the final 2 slots.
wpr (21-Jan) : Oregon and Georgia were locks. Without the luxury of extra playoff berths, Ohios St would have been more focused on Michigan game.
wpr (21-Jan) : Zero, no. If there were only 4 teams Ohio State would have been one of them. Boise St and ASU would not have been selected.
Zero2Cool (21-Jan) : So that was 7 vs 8, that means in BCS they never would made it?
Martha Careful (21-Jan) : A great game. Give ND credit for coming back, although I am please with the outcome.
Mucky Tundra (21-Jan) : FG to make it academic
Mucky Tundra (21-Jan) : and there's the dagger
Mucky Tundra (21-Jan) : ooooo 8 point game with 4 minutes to go!
Mucky Tundra (21-Jan) : ooooooooohhhhhh he missed!
Mucky Tundra (21-Jan) : Ooooo that completion makes things VERY interesting
Mucky Tundra (21-Jan) : Game not over yet
beast (21-Jan) : Oh yeah, Georgia starting quarterback season ending elbow injury
beast (21-Jan) : Sadly something happened to Georgia... they should be playing in this game against Ohio State
beast (21-Jan) : I thought Ohio State and Texas were both better than Notre Dame & Penn State
Mucky Tundra (21-Jan) : Notre Lame getting rolled
Martha Careful (21-Jan) : Ohio State just got punched in the gut. Lets see how they respond
Please sign in to use Fan Shout
2024 Packers Schedule
Friday, Sep 6 @ 7:15 PM
Eagles
Sunday, Sep 15 @ 12:00 PM
COLTS
Sunday, Sep 22 @ 12:00 PM
Titans
Sunday, Sep 29 @ 12:00 PM
VIKINGS
Sunday, Oct 6 @ 3:25 PM
Rams
Sunday, Oct 13 @ 12:00 PM
CARDINALS
Sunday, Oct 20 @ 12:00 PM
TEXANS
Sunday, Oct 27 @ 12:00 PM
Jaguars
Sunday, Nov 3 @ 3:25 PM
LIONS
Sunday, Nov 17 @ 12:00 PM
Bears
Sunday, Nov 24 @ 3:25 PM
49ERS
Thursday, Nov 28 @ 7:20 PM
DOLPHINS
Thursday, Dec 5 @ 7:15 PM
Lions
Sunday, Dec 15 @ 7:20 PM
Seahawks
Monday, Dec 23 @ 7:15 PM
SAINTS
Sunday, Dec 29 @ 3:25 PM
Vikings
Sunday, Jan 5 @ 12:00 PM
BEARS
Sunday, Jan 12 @ 3:30 PM
Eagles
Recent Topics
34m / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

12h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Martha Careful

22h / Random Babble / Martha Careful

21-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / Mucky Tundra

21-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / Mucky Tundra

20-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / Martha Careful

20-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / bboystyle

20-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

20-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

19-Jan / Random Babble / Martha Careful

18-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

17-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / bboystyle

17-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

17-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / Martha Careful

16-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

Headlines
Copyright © 2006 - 2025 PackersHome.com™. All Rights Reserved.