Aaron Rodgers - Lets Hear It· Page 9

longtimefan
Registered

15 years ago

#81

Is this one better?

3867 passing yards

36 total TDs

16 interceptions

187 rushing yards

QB rating 92.6

Or this one?

4038 passing yards

32 total TDs

13 interceptions

207 rushing yards

QB rating 93.8

zombieslayer
Registered

15 years ago

#82

Is this one better?

3867 passing yards

36 total TDs

16 interceptions

187 rushing yards

QB rating 92.6

"longtimefan" wrote:

Or this one?

4038 passing yards

32 total TDs

13 interceptions

207 rushing yards

QB rating 93.8

Geez. Almost too close to call. I love total TDs. My favorite thing of all. TDs are your primary job as a QB. Get us in the end zone. Points. That's what you want. I think I'd go with the 36 TDs and the 16 INTs. I'd take 4 more TDs for 3 INTs, but that's just me.

My man Donald Driver

(thanks to Pack93z for the pic)
2010 will be seen as the beginning of the new Packers dynasty. 🇹🇹 🇲🇲 🇦🇷

Pack93z
Select Member

15 years ago

#83

You can throw out stats guy but there is only one stat that matters. So when it angers you he is being called Mr. 6-10 and then talking about how great his rating is you look somewhat hypocritical.

He is Mr. 6-10

If he doesn't like it he should become Mr. 16-0.

Shut me up Aaron and make me "get on board".

"dd80forever" wrote:

I wonder what Mr. 4-12 in Mississippi has to say about that.. since you know, he once achieved such a record. ;)

Truth is, at this point it is unfair to place him upon a mantel or trash... one season doesn't make a player..

"The oranges are dry; the apples are mealy; and the papayas... I don't know what's going on with the papayas!"

longtimefan
Registered

15 years ago

#84

Is this one better?

3867 passing yards

36 total TDs

16 interceptions

187 rushing yards

QB rating 92.6

"zombieslayer" wrote:

Or this one?

4038 passing yards

32 total TDs

13 interceptions

207 rushing yards

QB rating 93.8

"longtimefan" wrote:

1st one is Bretts 97 mvp year and 2nd is Rodger last year...

97 to me had the over all better offense..te, line, and rb wins hands down..wr are about the same..

but yet Rodgers came very close to producing the same numbers Brett did

Zero2Cool
Elite Member Topic Starter

15 years ago

#85

Truth is, at this point it is unfair to place him upon a mantel or trash... one season doesn't make a player..

"pack93z" wrote:

You haven't seen Aaron Rodgers bank account which says otherwise. 🙂

Pack93z
Select Member

15 years ago

#86

Truth is, at this point it is unfair to place him upon a mantel or trash... one season doesn't make a player..

"SlickVision" wrote:

You haven't seen Aaron Rodgers bank account which says otherwise. :)

"pack93z" wrote:

I think I would pass out at the sight of all the numbers.. lol.

But that there was a risk by a GM... utilizing cap space and paying out a player about 6 to 12 months too soon.

"The oranges are dry; the apples are mealy; and the papayas... I don't know what's going on with the papayas!"

MassPackersFan
Member

15 years ago

#87

And getting the deal done while the market didn't demand a bigger price tag.

zombieslayer
Registered

15 years ago

#88

"longtimefan" wrote:

Well, don't mean to be a jerk, but apples and oranges. Even only 10 years ago, defenders used to be able to cover WRs without drawing flags and DL were allowed to sack the QB.

It's seriously getting harder to be a defender every year.

That said, I stand by when I said get Aaron Rodgers an OL and he'll be a Pro Bowler. Plus, Mike McCarthy has to stop calling so many running plays when we're in the enemy red zone.

My man Donald Driver

(thanks to Pack93z for the pic)
2010 will be seen as the beginning of the new Packers dynasty. 🇹🇹 🇲🇲 🇦🇷

shield4life
Veteran Member

15 years ago

#89

Hey Zero you know the section that you compare Brett and A-rod I think you should of compared the first season of a-rod to the first season of brett instead of his last season. Might open some people's eyes.

Glad To Be A Packers Fan.

Zero2Cool
Elite Member Topic Starter

15 years ago

#90

"krazygangsta" wrote:

In all fairness, Rodgers got to sit behind a legend for three years. Favre had one year behidn, Chris Miller? Then a few games on the bench behind Don Majkowski then was forced to learn on the fly.

I don't think it would be a fair comparison. Rodgers was thrown into the ideal situation and played as you'd expect someone to in that situation.

Favre at times was ready to be yanked by Holmgren because of his mistakes. He learned from them on the field. Rodgers doesn't have that luxury. For him, it's put up or shut up. He has no cushion.

So, I just don't think the comparison of numbers would be fair. I did that comparison simply because I was curious.

Important Information:

The PACKERSHOME uses cookies. By continuing to browse this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. More Details Close

Fan Shout

Zero2Cool (4h) : Merry Christmas!

beast (13h) : Merry Christmas 🎄🎁

beast (21h) : Sounds like no serious injuries from the Saints game and Jacobs and Watson should play in the Vikings game

packerfanoutwest (24-Dec) : both games Watson missed, Packers won

Martha Careful (24-Dec) : I hope all of you have a Merry Christmas!

Mucky Tundra (24-Dec) : Oh I know about Jacobs, I just couldn't pass up an opportunity to mimic Zero lol

buckeyepackfan (24-Dec) : Jacobs was just sat down, Watson re-injured that knee that kept him out 1 game earlier

buckeyepackfan (24-Dec) : I needed .14 that's. .14 points for the whole 4th quarter to win and go to the SB. Lol

Mucky Tundra (24-Dec) : Jacobs gonna be OK???

Zero2Cool (24-Dec) : Watson gonna be OK???

packerfanoutwest (24-Dec) : Inactives tonight for the Pack: Alexander- knee Bullard - ankle Williams - quad Walker -ankle Monk Heath

packerfanoutwest (24-Dec) : No Jaire, but hopefully the front 7 destroys the line of scrimmage & forces Rattler into a few passes to McKinney.

packerfanoutwest (24-Dec) : minny could be #1 seed and the Lions #5 seed

Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : We'd have same Division and Conference records. Strength of schedule we edge them

Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I just checked. What tie breaker?

bboystyle (23-Dec) : yes its possible but unlikely. If we do get the 5th, we face the NFCS winner

Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : Ahh, ok.

bboystyle (23-Dec) : yes due to tie breaker

Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I mean, unlikely, yes, but mathematically, 5th is possible by what I'm reading.

Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : If Vikings lose out, Packers win out, Packers get 5th, right?

bboystyle (23-Dec) : Minny isnt going to lose out so 5th seed is out of the equation. We are playing for the 6th or 7th seed which makes no difference

Mucky Tundra (23-Dec) : beast, the ad revenue goes to the broadcast company but they gotta pay to air the game on their channel/network

beast (23-Dec) : If we win tonight the game is still relative in terms of 5th, 6th or 7th seed... win and it's 5th or 6th, lose and it's 6th or 7th

beast (23-Dec) : Mucky, I thought the ad revenue went to the broadcasting companies or the NFL, at least not directly

Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I think the revenue share is moot, isn't it? That's the CBA an Salary Cap handling that.

bboystyle (23-Dec) : i mean game becomes irrelevant if we win tonight. Just a game where we are trying to play spoilers to Vikings chance at the #1 seed

Mucky Tundra (23-Dec) : beast, I would guess ad revenue from more eyes watching tv

Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I would think it would hurt the home team because people would have to cancel last minute maybe? i dunno

beast (23-Dec) : I agree that it's BS for fans planning on going to the game. But how does it bring in more money? I'm guessing indirectly?

packerfanoutwest (23-Dec) : bs on flexing the game....they do it for the $$league$$, not the hometown fans

Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I see what you did there Mucky

Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : dammit. 3:25pm

Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : Packers Vikings flexed to 3:35pm

Mucky Tundra (23-Dec) : Upon receiving the news about Luke Musgrave, I immediately fell to the ground

Mucky Tundra (23-Dec) : Yeah baby!

Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : LUKE MUSGRAVE PLAYING TONIGHT~!~~~~WOWHOAAOHAOAA yah

Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I wanna kill new QB's ... blitz the crap out of them.

beast (23-Dec) : Barry seemed to get too conservative against new QBs, Hafley doesn't have that issue

Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : However, we seem to struggle vs new QB's

Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : Should be moot point, cuz Packers should win tonight.

packerfanoutwest (23-Dec) : ok I stand corrected

Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : Ok, yes, you are right. I see that now how they get 7th

Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : 5th - Packers win out, Vikings lose out. Maybe?

beast (23-Dec) : Saying no to the 6th lock.

beast (23-Dec) : No, with the Commanders beating the Eagles, Packers could have a good chance of 6th or 7th unless the win out

Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I think if Packers win, they are locked 6th with chance for 5th.

beast (23-Dec) : But it doesn't matter, as the Packers win surely win one of their remaining games

beast (23-Dec) : This is not complex, just someone doesn't want to believe reality

beast (23-Dec) : We already have told you... if Packers lose all their games (they won't, but if they did), and Buccaneers and Falcons win all theirs

Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I posted it in that Packers and 1 seed thread

Please sign in to use Fan Shout

2024 Packers Schedule

Friday, Sep 6 @ 7:15 PM

Eagles

29 - 34

Sunday, Sep 15 @ 12:00 PM

COLTS

16 - 10

Sunday, Sep 22 @ 12:00 PM

Titans

30 - 14

Sunday, Sep 29 @ 12:00 PM

VIKINGS

29 - 31

Sunday, Oct 6 @ 3:25 PM

Rams

24 - 19

Sunday, Oct 13 @ 12:00 PM

CARDINALS

34 - 13

Sunday, Oct 20 @ 12:00 PM

TEXANS

24 - 22

Sunday, Oct 27 @ 12:00 PM

Jaguars

30 - 27

Sunday, Nov 3 @ 3:25 PM

LIONS

14 - 24

Sunday, Nov 17 @ 12:00 PM

Bears

20 - 19

Sunday, Nov 24 @ 3:25 PM

49ERS

38 - 10

Thursday, Nov 28 @ 7:20 PM

DOLPHINS

30 - 17

Thursday, Dec 5 @ 7:15 PM

Lions

31 - 34

Sunday, Dec 15 @ 7:20 PM

Seahawks

30 - 13

Monday, Dec 23 @ 7:15 PM

SAINTS

34 - 0

Sunday, Dec 29 @ 3:25 PM

Vikings

Saturday, Jan 4 @ 11:00 PM

BEARS