Matchup [2018] Green Bay Packers at New England Patriots· Page 2

beast
Select Member

6 years ago

Pats don't have a run game

Originally Posted by: warhawk

They're 13th in the NFL with most rushing yards. Not the mention James White is leading their team in catches and yards (which some of those short passes are basically runs to get him in space first) ... so if Tramon is at FS, I'm guessing we're going to be seeing Whitehead in dime LB role at least while RB White is in the game.

Also it would be awesome if we could get Aaron Jones in space, toss him the ball in a one on one match-ups as well.

Just tough to beat those Pats at home. It would be great if we do. I do't think I dislike any team more than them.

Originally Posted by: warhawk

Last time they lose a home page was 10/01/17 (week 4) wow.

Week 1 they only scored 27 points at home... but since then, they've scored at least 38 points every home game this year!

Not counting the first or last week of the regular season, the last time they did not score at least 35 points at home was 10/29/17 (week 😎.

So historically speaking they're about to light up our defense

Cheesey
Preferred Member

6 years ago

#12

After the fight our guys showed last week, it gives me hope.
We will see just how our guys are, whether they show a strong showing or wimp out.

beast
Select Member

6 years ago

#13

I think one thing that made the Rams easier to slow down (and might make the Patriots easier) is that the ball is basically going to the RB over 50% of the time if you count all the runs and passes to the RBs... so if you limit the other guys and stop the RBs, then you give give their offense some troubles.

In the Patriots case, over 21% of attempted passes have completed to the RB (mainly James White, who is 7th in the entire NFL in number of catches, beating WR Adams by 3), so I'm expecting them to keep Whitehead at ILB at least while James White is at RB.

Also of the completed passes over 31.5% have been to RBs (of course you're more likely to miss longer passes to WRs than shorter passes to RBs... but still that seems pretty high).

Zero2Cool
Elite Member

6 years ago

#14

Originally Posted by: beast

I'm not sure if the Rams are easy to slow down. I believe the Packers held them to the 2nd lowest total they've scored in the season, and our offense spotted them a deuce. I'm more inclined to say the Packers did a good job. GASP. I know, I KNOW! How dare I ...

KRK
Veteran Member

6 years ago

#15

I was extremely heartened by the defensive game planning and effort last week, other than HHCD.

I hope we can see Burks at linebacker or perhaps Jones matching up with James White out of the backfield. Martinez simply can’t match up with him speed wise.

Perhaps I am being Pollyanna-ish, but I would not be surprised to see the Packers kick ass Sunday night and make a statement came out of this.

In Luce tua Videmus Lucem KRK

beast
Select Member

6 years ago

#16

I hope we can see Burks at linebacker or perhaps Jones matching up with James White out of the backfield. Martinez simply can’t match up with him speed wise.

Originally Posted by: KRK

Just to be clear, are you suggesting Whitehead and Burks as the two ILBers over Martinez?

I'd have to stick with Martinez... while Burks has more speed he also has a lot more mistake... where Martinez has seemed to have surprisingly little errors... which I think is important against RB White who seems to be great at forcing/tricking the defenders into a mistake.

I'm not sure if the Rams are easy to slow down.

Originally Posted by: Zero2Cool

I said easier, not easy.

Zero2Cool
Elite Member

6 years ago

#17

I said easier, not easy.

Originally Posted by: beast

I don't think you can have easier without first having easy. 🤔😜

beast
Select Member

6 years ago

#18

I don't think you can have easier without first having easy. 🤔😜

Originally Posted by: Zero2Cool

Of course you can... playing CB at an extremely high level in a power five conference is easier than playing CB at an extremely high level in the NFL ... but neither is easy.

KRK
Veteran Member

6 years ago

#19

I am Simply stating that in passing situations, Martinez is not a good match on White.

Accordingly I would rather see Burks or an extra DB to cover White

In Luce tua Videmus Lucem KRK

gbguy20
Veteran Member

6 years ago

#20

I want to see what Burks, breeland, josh Jackson and josh Jones can bring to the table at some point this season. We've had a lot of potential riding the pine so far this season.

BAD EMAIL because the address couldn ot be found, or is unable to receive mail.

Important Information:

The PACKERSHOME uses cookies. By continuing to browse this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. More Details Close

Fan Shout

Zero2Cool (8m) : GameDay Chat is open. Posting bits an tids in there.

Zero2Cool (9m) : Excellent Source: The Bears have a deal in place to move up to 5 if Jeanty is there.

Zero2Cool (56m) : Probably not until 10pm will be making pick

dfosterf (2h) : But it is still not tonight. Lol

wpr (2h) : Today is finally here.

dfosterf (3h) : I should have put it in quotes

dfosterf (3h) : It is the title of a you tube video.

dfosterf (3h) : I'm not assuming anything

beast (9h) : If they aren't doing it, then why are you assuming they know how to do it?

dfosterf (14h) : Mackelvie

dfosterf (14h) : Michael Macelvie- NFL teams know how to draft- Why don"t they?

dfosterf (15h) : Youtube

Zero2Cool (19h) : Packers were not selected for the 2025 Hall of Fame game.

dfosterf (22h) : PFOW Out of our division would be a good thing imo

Zero2Cool (23h) : Jameson Williams is done at 24 years old? What? He's a WR, not QB. I'm missing something here haha

wpr (23-Apr) : Tomorrow is almost here.

packerfanoutwest (23-Apr) : would you want him if Pack needed a back up qb?

packerfanoutwest (23-Apr) : JW is done......stick a fork in him

Zero2Cool (23-Apr) : You should. He goes to AFC that helps Packers.

packerfanoutwest (23-Apr) : don't care

Zero2Cool (22-Apr) : Lions shopping Jameson Williams?

packerfanoutwest (22-Apr) : Packers General Manager Brian Gutekunst says Green Bay’s roster can win, even without adding anyone in the draft.

Zero2Cool (22-Apr) : It's a poor design. New site has SignalR like our gameday chat

wpr (22-Apr) : Ah today's Shout was very quick to post.

wpr (22-Apr) : now 3

Zero2Cool (22-Apr) : Who? What?

beast (22-Apr) : What is he supposed to say? He doesn't want players currently on the team?

Martha Careful (21-Apr) : meh

Zero2Cool (21-Apr) : Sounds like Walker and Wyatt will be with Packers for beyond 2026

Zero2Cool (21-Apr) : It's so awesome.

Zero2Cool (21-Apr) : new site fan shout post fast

wpr (21-Apr) : Slow posting in Fan shout.

wpr (21-Apr) : Only 4

Zero2Cool (21-Apr) : If only we had a topic to read about and discuss it. That's something new website must have!!!

dfosterf (21-Apr) : Justice Musqueda over at Acme Packing put up an excellent synopsis of the Packers 1st round options this am

wpr (19-Apr) : 5 days

beast (18-Apr) : 6 days

wpr (17-Apr) : 7 days

Zero2Cool (16-Apr) : sounds like Packers don't get good compensation, Jaire staying

dfosterf (16-Apr) : Nobody coming up with a keep, but at x amount

dfosterf (16-Apr) : Trade, cut or keep

dfosterf (16-Apr) : that from Jaire

dfosterf (16-Apr) : My guess is the Packers floated the concept of a reworked contract via his agent and agent got a f'

Zero2Cool (16-Apr) : Yes, and that is why I think Rob worded it how he did. Rather than say "agent"

dfosterf (16-Apr) : Same laws apply. Agent must present such an offer to Jaire. Cannot accept or reject without presenting it

Zero2Cool (16-Apr) : I'm thinking that is why Rob worded it how he did.

dfosterf (16-Apr) : The Packers can certainly still make the offer to the agent

dfosterf (16-Apr) : Laws of agency and definition of fiduciary responsibility

dfosterf (16-Apr) : Jaire is open to a reduced contract without Jaire's permission

Please sign in to use Fan Shout

2024 Packers Schedule

Friday, Sep 6 @ 7:15 PM

Eagles

29 - 34

Sunday, Sep 15 @ 12:00 PM

COLTS

16 - 10

Sunday, Sep 22 @ 12:00 PM

Titans

30 - 14

Sunday, Sep 29 @ 12:00 PM

VIKINGS

29 - 31

Sunday, Oct 6 @ 3:25 PM

Rams

24 - 19

Sunday, Oct 13 @ 12:00 PM

CARDINALS

34 - 13

Sunday, Oct 20 @ 12:00 PM

TEXANS

24 - 22

Sunday, Oct 27 @ 12:00 PM

Jaguars

30 - 27

Sunday, Nov 3 @ 3:25 PM

LIONS

14 - 24

Sunday, Nov 17 @ 12:00 PM

Bears

20 - 19

Sunday, Nov 24 @ 3:25 PM

49ERS

38 - 10

Thursday, Nov 28 @ 7:20 PM

DOLPHINS

30 - 17

Thursday, Dec 5 @ 7:15 PM

Lions

31 - 34

Sunday, Dec 15 @ 7:20 PM

Seahawks

30 - 13

Monday, Dec 23 @ 7:15 PM

SAINTS

34 - 0

Sunday, Dec 29 @ 3:25 PM

Vikings

25 - 27

Sunday, Jan 5 @ 12:00 PM

BEARS

22 - 24