beast
  • beast
  • Select Member Topic Starter
6 years ago

Cool. Where has mike Daniels been?

Originally Posted by: gbguy20 



He's still doing well and above average, just not his normal great self... I've been wondering if it's injuries, decline or just not as well fitted to the new scheme.

They're going to have a very interesting choice with Daniels.... because if I'm reading it right, they could save $8.5 million by cutting him.
UserPostedImage
Rockmolder
6 years ago

He's still doing well and above average, just not his normal great self... I've been wondering if it's injuries, decline or just not as well fitted to the new scheme.

They're going to have a very interesting choice with Daniels.... because if I'm reading it right, they could save $8.5 million by cutting him.

Originally Posted by: beast 



I don't see this happening, but combined with finally getting Matthews ($11,3 million cap) and Cobb ($12,7 million) off the books we would have some space under the cap.

A shame that a lot of it will have to go to Rodgers' ridiculous contract, as well as unexplainable stuff like Crosby's $5 mil a year league-leading cap hit and Graham's league-leading $13 mil cap hit in 2019.
go.pack.go.
6 years ago
A part of our problem over the years has been getting rid of our good players, and replacing them with average mid-round picks, just because it saves money. I’m tired of being so conservative.

And why does everyone want to get rid of Cobb? He’s one of the smartest receiver that we have, and he’s still got it. He can come out of the backfield, return kicks, and he does good on screens. Not to mention how he comes back to the ball when Rodgers is in trouble. It would be idiotic to let him walk. And he’s only 28.
UserPostedImage
gbguy20
6 years ago

A part of our problem over the years has been getting rid of our good players, and replacing them with average mid-round picks, just because it saves money. I’m tired of being so conservative.

And why does everyone want to get rid of Cobb? He’s one of the smartest receiver that we have, and he’s still got it. He can come out of the backfield, return kicks, and he does good on screens. Not to mention how he comes back to the ball when Rodgers is in trouble. It would be idiotic to let him walk. And he’s only 28.

Originally Posted by: go.pack.go. 



Can't afford him anymore. Our cap situation is ugly next year. Our top 3 receivers next year will be Adams, MVS and St. Brown, as Geronimo will be gone too. We'll have to draft another batch receivers next year to fill out the back end.
BAD EMAIL because the address couldn ot be found, or is unable to receive mail.
beast
  • beast
  • Select Member Topic Starter
6 years ago

I don't see this happening, but combined with finally getting Matthews ($11,3 million cap) and Cobb ($12,7 million) off the books we would have some space under the cap.

Originally Posted by: Rockmolder 

I think the Packers cap doesn't look that open as we'd hope for next year...

A part of our problem over the years has been getting rid of our good players, and replacing them with average mid-round picks, just because it saves money. I’m tired of being so conservative.

And why does everyone want to get rid of Cobb? He’s one of the smartest receiver that we have, and he’s still got it. He can come out of the backfield, return kicks, and he does good on screens. Not to mention how he comes back to the ball when Rodgers is in trouble. It would be idiotic to let him walk. And he’s only 28.

Originally Posted by: go.pack.go. 

Um, other than Hayward and Hyde which good players have we let go? ... because I see the opposite... they're overpaying their good players like Cobb... he's good, but not as good as he's got paid.

It would also be idiotic to keep over paying him... Cobb is good but has lost his explosiveness and is basically average when he's healthy, and he gets injured every single year... he's a #3 at best at this point and we're paying him starters money. Should of cut him instead of Nelson or cut both and saved the money for good starters.

Can't afford him anymore. Our cap situation is ugly next year. Our top 3 receivers next year will be Adams, MVS and St. Brown, as Geronimo will be gone too. We'll have to draft another batch receivers next year to fill out the back end.

Originally Posted by: gbguy20 


Geronimo might be back because he's a RFA (MIGHT)... also hopefully Moore will finally have things down after an offseason... it takes some WRs (Nelson and Adams) 3 years to break out.

UserPostedImage
wpr
  • wpr
  • Preferred Member
6 years ago

A part of our problem over the years has been getting rid of our good players, and replacing them with average mid-round picks, just because it saves money. I’m tired of being so conservative.

And why does everyone want to get rid of Cobb? He’s one of the smartest receiver that we have, and he’s still got it. He can come out of the backfield, return kicks, and he does good on screens. Not to mention how he comes back to the ball when Rodgers is in trouble. It would be idiotic to let him walk. And he’s only 28.

Originally Posted by: go.pack.go. 



It doesn't matter what they did in the past. Grute is in charge now. Past performance is not an indication of future results.
UserPostedImage
gbguy20
6 years ago
Forgot about Gmo being an rfa. Might be able to get him cheap, but probably not.
BAD EMAIL because the address couldn ot be found, or is unable to receive mail.
buckeyepackfan
6 years ago
After this season when Murphy cleans house, nobody is going to sign with Green Bay if they have a chance to go elsewhere .

You all wanted changes.

You are going to see the full results starting next year.
I was addicted to The Hokey Pokey, but I turned myself around!
gbguy20
6 years ago
Feel free to share how you came to that conclusion.
BAD EMAIL because the address couldn ot be found, or is unable to receive mail.
nerdmann
6 years ago

After this season when Murphy cleans house, nobody is going to sign with Green Bay if they have a chance to go elsewhere .

You all wanted changes.

You are going to see the full results starting next year.

Originally Posted by: buckeyepackfan 



Goot stays. He's gonna build his own team. Pettine's probably gonna be HC. Will need an OC to develop Kiser.
“Winning is not a sometime thing, it is an all the time thing. You don't do things right once in a while…you do them right all the time.”
Fan Shout
Zero2Cool (36m) : I wanna kill new QB's ... blitz the crap out of them.
beast (36m) : Barry seemed to get too conservative against new QBs, Hafley doesn't have that issue
Zero2Cool (1h) : However, we seem to struggle vs new QB's
Zero2Cool (1h) : Should be moot point, cuz Packers should win tonight.
packerfanoutwest (1h) : ok I stand corrected
Zero2Cool (1h) : Ok, yes, you are right. I see that now how they get 7th
Zero2Cool (1h) : 5th - Packers win out, Vikings lose out. Maybe?
beast (1h) : Saying no to the 6th lock.
beast (1h) : No, with the Commanders beating the Eagles, Packers could have a good chance of 6th or 7th unless the win out
Zero2Cool (1h) : I think if Packers win, they are locked 6th with chance for 5th.
beast (1h) : But it doesn't matter, as the Packers win surely win one of their remaining games
beast (1h) : This is not complex, just someone doesn't want to believe reality
beast (1h) : We already have told you... if Packers lose all their games (they won't, but if they did), and Buccaneers and Falcons win all theirs
Zero2Cool (1h) : I posted it in that Packers and 1 seed thread
Zero2Cool (1h) : I literally just said it.
packerfanoutwest (1h) : show us a scenario where Pack don't get in? bet you can't
Zero2Cool (2h) : Falcons, Buccaneers would need to win final two games.
Zero2Cool (2h) : Yes, if they win one of three, they are lock. If they lose out, they can be eliminated.
packerfanoutwest (2h) : as I just said,,gtheyh are in no matter what
Zero2Cool (2h) : Packers should get in. I just hope it's not 7th seed. Feels dirty.
packerfanoutwest (2h) : If packers lose out, no matter what, they are in
packerfanoutwest (2h) : both teams can not male the playoffs....falcon hold the tie breaker
packerfanoutwest (2h) : if bucs win out they win their division
beast (2h) : Fine, Buccaneers and Falcons can get ahead of us
packerfanoutwest (2h) : falcons are already ahead of us
beast (2h) : Packers will get in
beast (2h) : If Packers lose the rest of their games and Falcons win the rest of theirs, they could pass us... but not gonna happen
packerfanoutwest (2h) : they still are in the playoffs
packerfanoutwest (2h) : If Packers lose the remaining games,,,,at 10-7
Zero2Cool (4h) : We can say it. We don't play.
Mucky Tundra (5h) : But to say they are in is looking past the Saints
Mucky Tundra (5h) : That said, their odds are very favorable with a >99% chance of making the playoffs entering this week's games
Mucky Tundra (5h) : Packers are not in and have not clinched a playoff spot.
buckeyepackfan (6h) : Packers are in, they need to keep winning to improve their seed#.
Mucky Tundra (15h) : Getting help would have been nice, but helping ourselves should always be the plan
beast (15h) : Too bad Seahawks couldn't beat Vikings
bboystyle (15h) : We just need to win Monday night and were in
Mucky Tundra (19h) : Or ties, but let's be real here
Mucky Tundra (19h) : Other scenario was Falcons+Rams losses
Mucky Tundra (19h) : Needed a Falcons loss for a Seahawk loss to clinch
buckeyepackfan (19h) : Am I wring in saying if Tge Vikings beat The Seahawks, The Packers clinch?
Mucky Tundra (21-Dec) : Agreed; you stinks
Zero2Cool (21-Dec) : I'm not beating anyone. I stinks.
Mucky Tundra (21-Dec) : rough injury for tank dell. guy can't catch abreak
beast (21-Dec) : So far the college playoffs have sucked... One team absolutely dominates the other
beast (21-Dec) : Well even if you weren't positive towards a guy, you wouldn't nessarily want to tell the media that (if they don't know about it)
Martha Careful (21-Dec) : I think MLF want Love to look past the end half issues, and feel good about his play. Our coaches generally keep a very positive tone.
beast (21-Dec) : I think a great running game will do that for most QBs
packerfanoutwest (21-Dec) : Coach Matt LaFleur has said quarterback Jordan Love is playing the best football of his career.
beast (21-Dec) : Oh, that's how you keep beating buckeye, with cheating
Please sign in to use Fan Shout
2024 Packers Schedule
Friday, Sep 6 @ 7:15 PM
Eagles
Sunday, Sep 15 @ 12:00 PM
COLTS
Sunday, Sep 22 @ 12:00 PM
Titans
Sunday, Sep 29 @ 12:00 PM
VIKINGS
Sunday, Oct 6 @ 3:25 PM
Rams
Sunday, Oct 13 @ 12:00 PM
CARDINALS
Sunday, Oct 20 @ 12:00 PM
TEXANS
Sunday, Oct 27 @ 12:00 PM
Jaguars
Sunday, Nov 3 @ 3:25 PM
LIONS
Sunday, Nov 17 @ 12:00 PM
Bears
Sunday, Nov 24 @ 3:25 PM
49ERS
Thursday, Nov 28 @ 7:20 PM
DOLPHINS
Thursday, Dec 5 @ 7:15 PM
Lions
Sunday, Dec 15 @ 7:20 PM
Seahawks
Monday, Dec 23 @ 7:15 PM
SAINTS
Sunday, Dec 29 @ 12:00 PM
Vikings
Saturday, Jan 4 @ 11:00 PM
BEARS
Recent Topics
16m / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

42m / Random Babble / Martha Careful

55m / Green Bay Packers Talk / Martha Careful

22-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / packerfanoutwest

19-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

19-Dec / Random Babble / Zero2Cool

18-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

17-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / wpr

17-Dec / Featured Content / Zero2Cool

16-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

16-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / Martha Careful

16-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

16-Dec / Feedback, Suggestions and Issues / Mucky Tundra

16-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

16-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

Headlines
Copyright © 2006 - 2024 PackersHome.com™. All Rights Reserved.