Zero2Cool
15 years ago
It's easy for us to be impatient because we go about our daily lives expecting something to happen. The thing is, what is going on behind closed doors isn't known to us. A lot of people (myself including at times) forget that the Packers are surely focused primarily on the draft and potential draftee's. I'm willing to bet both Jennings and Collins get new deals sometime in or after May and before the start of the season.

Right now, the Packers have to be focusing on the draft this next month. No one should hold it against them that they are not talking contracts. In my opinion.
UserPostedImage
Cheesey
15 years ago

It's easy for us to be impatient because we go about our daily lives expecting something to happen. The thing is, what is going on behind closed doors isn't known to us. A lot of people (myself including at times) forget that the Packers are surely focused primarily on the draft and potential draftee's. I'm willing to bet both Jennings and Collins get new deals sometime in or after May and before the start of the season.

Right now, the Packers have to be focusing on the draft this next month. No one should hold it against them that they are not talking contracts. In my opinion.

"Zero2Cool" wrote:


Great points Zero!
Thats what i've been saying all along. Just because we as fans don't SEE anything, that does not mean nothing is happening behind closed doors at 1265 Lambeau Drive.
I bet they are working their butts off every day, for the draft AND for the guys that want their contracts taken care of. They are NOT just sitting there sitting on their collective thumbs.
UserPostedImage
warhawk
15 years ago

It's easy for us to be impatient because we go about our daily lives expecting something to happen. The thing is, what is going on behind closed doors isn't known to us. A lot of people (myself including at times) forget that the Packers are surely focused primarily on the draft and potential draftee's. I'm willing to bet both Jennings and Collins get new deals sometime in or after May and before the start of the season.

Right now, the Packers have to be focusing on the draft this next month. No one should hold it against them that they are not talking contracts. In my opinion.

"Cheesey" wrote:


Great points Zero!
Thats what i've been saying all along. Just because we as fans don't SEE anything, that does not mean nothing is happening behind closed doors at 1265 Lambeau Drive.
I bet they are working their butts off every day, for the draft AND for the guys that want their contracts taken care of. They are NOT just sitting there sitting on their collective thumbs.

"Zero2Cool" wrote:



I haven't forgotten it. I have said for weeks now that Ted Thompson has a lot on his plate to deal with internally. People want to look at the $30+ mil and wonder why he hasn't gone after some of these higher priced FA's.

He needs to make sure he has enough cash available to make attractive offers to players BEFORE they hit FA and the pain felt by signing a high dollar player that may not end up worth it doubles when he also ends up losing guys who we wanted to hold onto.

I look at the Canty non-signing as a blessing. Here is guy getting Kampman like dollars and has never come close to that type quality player. I can definately see why Ted Thompson is very cautious in making any kind of move like that. We have several guys coming up to deal with that they know they don't want to lose so how do you justify a big deal before knowing what the sticker price of what you want to keep is going to cost?

TT's almost compelled to hold back some because of guys like Kampman who could turn out phenominal and then again maybe not. If he DOES turn out to be super in this "D" the last thing you would want is to not have set back what's needed to hold onto him.

This situation is a lot trickier than just labeling the guy a dumbass because he won't strike big in FA.
"The train is leaving the station."
porky88
15 years ago

It's easy for us to be impatient because we go about our daily lives expecting something to happen. The thing is, what is going on behind closed doors isn't known to us. A lot of people (myself including at times) forget that the Packers are surely focused primarily on the draft and potential draftee's. I'm willing to bet both Jennings and Collins get new deals sometime in or after May and before the start of the season.

Right now, the Packers have to be focusing on the draft this next month. No one should hold it against them that they are not talking contracts. In my opinion.

"warhawk" wrote:


Great points Zero!
Thats what i've been saying all along. Just because we as fans don't SEE anything, that does not mean nothing is happening behind closed doors at 1265 Lambeau Drive.
I bet they are working their butts off every day, for the draft AND for the guys that want their contracts taken care of. They are NOT just sitting there sitting on their collective thumbs.

"Cheesey" wrote:



I haven't forgotten it. I have said for weeks now that Ted Thompson has a lot on his plate to deal with internally. People want to look at the $30+ mil and wonder why he hasn't gone after some of these higher priced FA's.

He needs to make sure he has enough cash available to make attractive offers to players BEFORE they hit FA and the pain felt by signing a high dollar player that may not end up worth it doubles when he also ends up losing guys who we wanted to hold onto.

I look at the Canty non-signing as a blessing. Here is guy getting Kampman like dollars and has never come close to that type quality player. I can definately see why Ted Thompson is very cautious in making any kind of move like that. We have several guys coming up to deal with that they know they don't want to lose so how do you justify a big deal before knowing what the sticker price of what you want to keep is going to cost?

Ted Thompson's almost compelled to hold back some because of guys like Kampman who could turn out phenominal and then again maybe not. If he DOES turn out to be super in this "D" the last thing you would want is to not have set back what's needed to hold onto him.

This situation is a lot trickier than just labeling the guy a dumbass because he won't strike big in FA.

"Zero2Cool" wrote:



Not signing Canty is one thing, but not signing a guy like Vonnie Holiday whom comes cheap and is a huge upgrade is another. Vonnie Holiday starts from day one in this defense. He's better than Jolly and Harrell whom are potentially the starters at the five with Jenkins as the other.

I'm tired of people saying it'll hurt the youth. I've been watching a lot of Packer games from the 90's and I saw Sean Jones and Reggie White in their late 30's anchor the Packer defense.

Signing a guy like Holiday would give the Packers more flexibility along the defensive line. Holiday alone allows the Packers to move Johnny Jolly to probably nose tackle behind Ryan Pickett and Justin Harrell to play behind Holiday as a backup rather than potentially forcing him in as a starter when he's just not healthy nor reliable enough to do so.

It's those types of guys that Thompson should be showing interest in and from all accounts, he hasn't. Perhaps he's eying up Tyson Jackson or Peria Jerry.

As far as missing out on Chris Canty. Chris Canty has the potential to be one of the best five techniques in the game today. He'll be a good DT for the Giants, but he could have played very well for the Packers. They knew that, but he was just to expensive. Canty will probably prove his worth down the road to the Giants.

It's not different than taking a guy like A.J. Hawk No. 5 and paying him boat loads of money. Hawk isn't worth what he's making in his rookie contract, but the Packers took him due to potential. The Giants signed Canty because of potential and paid him the money he could be worth down the road.

Another thing that is just a misconception is signing one free agent such as Chris Canty means that GB is going to have to part ways with either Nick Collins, Greg Jennings, or Aaron Kampman. That arguement is just plain wrong.

The Packers have more than enough money to keep their core guys intact.

Thompson isn't signing guys because he's worried about losing Jennings, Collins, or Kampman. He's not signing guys because free agency isn't apart of his philosophy unless he's backed into a corner. 4-12 being an example of that and why he may of went out and got Woodson and Pickett.

The writing is on the wall. I think he overates this football team quite a bit. I hope I'm wrong, but I can't see how Daryn Colledge at right tackle makes the team better.
Zero2Cool
15 years ago
I'd prefer Colledge at LT than RT.

I'm also thinking that the Packers Staff (not just Ted because more than he goes into the decision making process-he has final say) has over valued their current roster. Also too it should be thought of they surely don't want to release someone who might be good in the 3 - 4 defense. I think a lot of this sign this person sign that person is over the top. We don't even know what we have on our roster yet in this scheme. We have a staff that can predict what they think they have. Truly though, how can they know until they see them in action, any action?

It would be extremely foolish to go out an sign a bunch of guys that haven't played in the 3 - 4. Which is why I wanted us to sign Canty. He had proven he could play in the system, or one similar anyhow.

I'd like for us to be more active, but I'm glad were not because we need to see what we have before we make changes. Making lots of changes would be foolish before we see what we really have on our team.
UserPostedImage
ILikeThePackers39
15 years ago

It's easy for us to be impatient because we go about our daily lives expecting something to happen. The thing is, what is going on behind closed doors isn't known to us. A lot of people (myself including at times) forget that the Packers are surely focused primarily on the draft and potential draftee's. I'm willing to bet both Jennings and Collins get new deals sometime in or after May and before the start of the season.

Right now, the Packers have to be focusing on the draft this next month. No one should hold it against them that they are not talking contracts. In my opinion.

"porky88" wrote:


Great points Zero!
Thats what i've been saying all along. Just because we as fans don't SEE anything, that does not mean nothing is happening behind closed doors at 1265 Lambeau Drive.
I bet they are working their butts off every day, for the draft AND for the guys that want their contracts taken care of. They are NOT just sitting there sitting on their collective thumbs.

"warhawk" wrote:



I haven't forgotten it. I have said for weeks now that Ted Thompson has a lot on his plate to deal with internally. People want to look at the $30+ mil and wonder why he hasn't gone after some of these higher priced FA's.

He needs to make sure he has enough cash available to make attractive offers to players BEFORE they hit FA and the pain felt by signing a high dollar player that may not end up worth it doubles when he also ends up losing guys who we wanted to hold onto.

I look at the Canty non-signing as a blessing. Here is guy getting Kampman like dollars and has never come close to that type quality player. I can definately see why Ted Thompson is very cautious in making any kind of move like that. We have several guys coming up to deal with that they know they don't want to lose so how do you justify a big deal before knowing what the sticker price of what you want to keep is going to cost?

Ted Thompson's almost compelled to hold back some because of guys like Kampman who could turn out phenominal and then again maybe not. If he DOES turn out to be super in this "D" the last thing you would want is to not have set back what's needed to hold onto him.

This situation is a lot trickier than just labeling the guy a dumbass because he won't strike big in FA.

"Cheesey" wrote:



Not signing Canty is one thing, but not signing a guy like Vonnie Holiday whom comes cheap and is a huge upgrade is another. Vonnie Holiday starts from day one in this defense. He's better than Jolly and Harrell whom are potentially the starters at the five with Jenkins as the other.

I'm tired of people saying it'll hurt the youth. I've been watching a lot of Packer games from the 90's and I saw Sean Jones and Reggie White in their late 30's anchor the Packer defense.

Signing a guy like Holiday would give the Packers more flexibility along the defensive line. Holiday alone allows the Packers to move Johnny Jolly to probably nose tackle behind Ryan Pickett and Justin Harrell to play behind Holiday as a backup rather than potentially forcing him in as a starter when he's just not healthy nor reliable enough to do so.

It's those types of guys that Thompson should be showing interest in and from all accounts, he hasn't. Perhaps he's eying up Tyson Jackson or Peria Jerry.

As far as missing out on Chris Canty. Chris Canty has the potential to be one of the best five techniques in the game today. He'll be a good DT for the Giants, but he could have played very well for the Packers. They knew that, but he was just to expensive. Canty will probably prove his worth down the road to the Giants.

It's not different than taking a guy like A.J. Hawk No. 5 and paying him boat loads of money. Hawk isn't worth what he's making in his rookie contract, but the Packers took him due to potential. The Giants signed Canty because of potential and paid him the money he could be worth down the road.

Another thing that is just a misconception is signing one free agent such as Chris Canty means that GB is going to have to part ways with either Nick Collins, Greg Jennings, or Aaron Kampman. That arguement is just plain wrong.

The Packers have more than enough money to keep their core guys intact.

Thompson isn't signing guys because he's worried about losing Jennings, Collins, or Kampman. He's not signing guys because free agency isn't apart of his philosophy unless he's backed into a corner. 4-12 being an example of that and why he may of went out and got Woodson and Pickett.

The writing is on the wall. I think he overates this football team quite a bit. I hope I'm wrong, but I can't see how Daryn Colledge at right tackle makes the team better.

"Zero2Cool" wrote:



I wholeheartedly agree. It's one thing to freak out because they didn't throw huge money out for the flavor of the month FA guys - the people that do that are just knee-jerking. It's another thing entirely to say that faced with the opportunity of getting a proven 3-4 DE who would come cheaply, was once a valued member of the team, and WANTS to come back, we should take that opportunity.

I also think Ted overrates the current team - even w/out the scheme switch, we were obviously in trouble w/ our DL rotation last year, a fact that contributed greatly to the defensive collapse we all had to witness.

To repeat: I'm not screaming about how 'stupid Ted Thompson is ruining the team and he should be fired because he didn't sign Peppers!' - I'm just saying that I don't understand why you wouldn't sign a guy or two like Holiday, even if you were looking to draft that DE this year. Something tells me that having a veteran in the scheme would be even more beneficial in that case.

I do hope I'm wrong, or that the Holiday-level deals are still yet to come. But I'm concerned, and it's the offseason, so that's what we're talking about.
blank
Yerko
15 years ago

Lets not forget Ahman Green. I LOVED the guy, but it was obvious his time was over. I could be wrong, but wasn't it Mike Sherman that gave him his last big payday?
You have to, as a GM, know WHEN the time is right to cut ties.
We HAVE to get Jennings signed first, THEN get Collins. This stuff takes time, and too many people are impatient and seem to think all that has to be done to get it done is to cave into whatever the player wants. You HAVE to negociate, or you'll get ripped off and your cap space will dissapear fast.

"Cheesey" wrote:



Its because people play Madden on their video games now and they think the negotiation is a click of the "A" button away. :thumbright:
UserPostedImage
Fan Shout
packerfanoutwest (34m) : both games Watson missed, Packers won
Martha Careful (2h) : I hope all of you have a Merry Christmas!
Mucky Tundra (12h) : Oh I know about Jacobs, I just couldn't pass up an opportunity to mimic Zero lol
buckeyepackfan (12h) : Jacobs was just sat down, Watson re-injured that knee that kept him out 1 game earlier
buckeyepackfan (12h) : I needed .14 that's. .14 points for the whole 4th quarter to win and go to the SB. Lol
Mucky Tundra (12h) : Jacobs gonna be OK???
Zero2Cool (12h) : Watson gonna be OK???
packerfanoutwest (16h) : Inactives tonight for the Pack: Alexander- knee Bullard - ankle Williams - quad Walker -ankle Monk Heath
packerfanoutwest (16h) : No Jaire, but hopefully the front 7 destroys the line of scrimmage & forces Rattler into a few passes to McKinney.
packerfanoutwest (16h) : minny could be #1 seed and the Lions #5 seed
Zero2Cool (18h) : We'd have same Division and Conference records. Strength of schedule we edge them
Zero2Cool (18h) : I just checked. What tie breaker?
bboystyle (19h) : yes its possible but unlikely. If we do get the 5th, we face the NFCS winner
Zero2Cool (19h) : Ahh, ok.
bboystyle (19h) : yes due to tie breaker
Zero2Cool (19h) : I mean, unlikely, yes, but mathematically, 5th is possible by what I'm reading.
Zero2Cool (19h) : If Vikings lose out, Packers win out, Packers get 5th, right?
bboystyle (19h) : Minny isnt going to lose out so 5th seed is out of the equation. We are playing for the 6th or 7th seed which makes no difference
Mucky Tundra (20h) : beast, the ad revenue goes to the broadcast company but they gotta pay to air the game on their channel/network
beast (20h) : If we win tonight the game is still relative in terms of 5th, 6th or 7th seed... win and it's 5th or 6th, lose and it's 6th or 7th
beast (20h) : Mucky, I thought the ad revenue went to the broadcasting companies or the NFL, at least not directly
Zero2Cool (20h) : I think the revenue share is moot, isn't it? That's the CBA an Salary Cap handling that.
bboystyle (20h) : i mean game becomes irrelevant if we win tonight. Just a game where we are trying to play spoilers to Vikings chance at the #1 seed
Mucky Tundra (21h) : beast, I would guess ad revenue from more eyes watching tv
Zero2Cool (21h) : I would think it would hurt the home team because people would have to cancel last minute maybe? i dunno
beast (21h) : I agree that it's BS for fans planning on going to the game. But how does it bring in more money? I'm guessing indirectly?
packerfanoutwest (21h) : bs on flexing the game....they do it for the $$league$$, not the hometown fans
Zero2Cool (22h) : I see what you did there Mucky
Zero2Cool (22h) : dammit. 3:25pm
Zero2Cool (22h) : Packers Vikings flexed to 3:35pm
Mucky Tundra (22h) : Upon receiving the news about Luke Musgrave, I immediately fell to the ground
Mucky Tundra (22h) : Yeah baby!
Zero2Cool (23h) : LUKE MUSGRAVE PLAYING TONIGHT~!~~~~WOWHOAAOHAOAA yah
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I wanna kill new QB's ... blitz the crap out of them.
beast (23-Dec) : Barry seemed to get too conservative against new QBs, Hafley doesn't have that issue
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : However, we seem to struggle vs new QB's
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : Should be moot point, cuz Packers should win tonight.
packerfanoutwest (23-Dec) : ok I stand corrected
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : Ok, yes, you are right. I see that now how they get 7th
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : 5th - Packers win out, Vikings lose out. Maybe?
beast (23-Dec) : Saying no to the 6th lock.
beast (23-Dec) : No, with the Commanders beating the Eagles, Packers could have a good chance of 6th or 7th unless the win out
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I think if Packers win, they are locked 6th with chance for 5th.
beast (23-Dec) : But it doesn't matter, as the Packers win surely win one of their remaining games
beast (23-Dec) : This is not complex, just someone doesn't want to believe reality
beast (23-Dec) : We already have told you... if Packers lose all their games (they won't, but if they did), and Buccaneers and Falcons win all theirs
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I posted it in that Packers and 1 seed thread
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I literally just said it.
packerfanoutwest (23-Dec) : show us a scenario where Pack don't get in? bet you can't
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : Falcons, Buccaneers would need to win final two games.
Please sign in to use Fan Shout
2024 Packers Schedule
Friday, Sep 6 @ 7:15 PM
Eagles
Sunday, Sep 15 @ 12:00 PM
COLTS
Sunday, Sep 22 @ 12:00 PM
Titans
Sunday, Sep 29 @ 12:00 PM
VIKINGS
Sunday, Oct 6 @ 3:25 PM
Rams
Sunday, Oct 13 @ 12:00 PM
CARDINALS
Sunday, Oct 20 @ 12:00 PM
TEXANS
Sunday, Oct 27 @ 12:00 PM
Jaguars
Sunday, Nov 3 @ 3:25 PM
LIONS
Sunday, Nov 17 @ 12:00 PM
Bears
Sunday, Nov 24 @ 3:25 PM
49ERS
Thursday, Nov 28 @ 7:20 PM
DOLPHINS
Thursday, Dec 5 @ 7:15 PM
Lions
Sunday, Dec 15 @ 7:20 PM
Seahawks
Monday, Dec 23 @ 7:15 PM
SAINTS
Sunday, Dec 29 @ 3:25 PM
Vikings
Saturday, Jan 4 @ 11:00 PM
BEARS
Recent Topics
1h / Random Babble / Martha Careful

2h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Martha Careful

3h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

8h / GameDay Threads / Mucky Tundra

11h / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

23-Dec / Random Babble / Martha Careful

22-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / packerfanoutwest

19-Dec / Random Babble / Zero2Cool

18-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

17-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / wpr

17-Dec / Featured Content / Zero2Cool

16-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

16-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / Martha Careful

16-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

16-Dec / Feedback, Suggestions and Issues / Mucky Tundra

Headlines
Copyright © 2006 - 2024 PackersHome.com™. All Rights Reserved.