DarkaneRules
6 years ago
I think taking care of our veterans should be more of a priority for the administration, than getting into Twitter fights with athletes.
Circular Arguments: They are a heck of an annoyance
Cheesey
6 years ago

I think taking care of our veterans should be more of a priority for the administration, than getting into Twitter fights with athletes.

Originally Posted by: DarkaneRules 



I think they can do both. Arnt they supposed to have freedom of speach too?
UserPostedImage
Zero2Cool
6 years ago

I think they can do both. Arnt they supposed to have freedom of speach too?

Originally Posted by: Cheesey 



What does Freedom of Speech  mean ?
UserPostedImage
Nonstopdrivel
6 years ago

Perhaps, but the flyovers, the flag waving, card sections, and other activities, which were prominently shoved in our faces to illustrate how pro-American the league was were likely charged to the Armed Forces by the NFL.

Originally Posted by: KRK 


I'm reasonably certain the NFL doesn't charge the armed forces for most of these perks. They give away tickets for service members to attend games and passes for them to pose on the sidelines, no doubt writing it off as a promotional expense. I'd be surprised if the league or teams didn't also provide the flags and other patriotic decorations; think about the demographic they're catering to. The military may very well well pay for the card displays that show recruiting slogans. I'm not sure about that. I would hope so.

I do know for a fact that the military does not charge for the flyovers. As eyewateringly expensive as they are (when I was in the army, the Air Force supposedly charged us $85,000 per plane, per pass for airborne jumps, and there were always multiple passes; I can only imagine what a formation of fighter jets would cost), the flyovers are not deemed to pose an additional expense to the taxpayer because they're incorporated right into the routine training schedule. That is to say, the pilots, many of whom are guardsman putting in their one weekend a month, are racking up their mandatory flight hours anyway. If they weren't flying over the stadium, they'd simply be flying somewhere else. Circling aimlessly over cornfields or patrolling some military base.

Consider the men in the air and the men on the field product placement, if you will.
UserPostedImage
Cheesey
6 years ago

What does Freedom of Speech  mean ?

Originally Posted by: Zero2Cool 



I believe it means you are free in this country to give your opinions about things without fear of being locked up or killed. That goes for all Americans, even those people in the government.

If giving their thoughts on things gains or loses them future votes, that’s their problem.
To me, I like it, as it lets me know what/ how the person REALLY thinks, instead of having to guess what their stand is. Many politicians slant what they are saying to fit whatever group they are talking to at the time. So you never really know what they stand for.
UserPostedImage
Zero2Cool
6 years ago

I believe it means you are free in this country to give your opinions about things without fear of being locked up or killed. That goes for all Americans, even those people in the government.

If giving their thoughts on things gains or loses them future votes, that’s their problem.
To me, I like it, as it lets me know what/ how the person REALLY thinks, instead of having to guess what their stand is. Many politicians slant what they are saying to fit whatever group they are talking to at the time. So you never really know what they stand for.

Originally Posted by: Cheesey 



I asked because I wasn't sure I was clear on it and researched it again myself. I included to links of sources in my previous reply.

Freedom of speech, Right, as stated in the 1st and 14th Amendments to the Constitution of the United States, to express information, ideas, and opinions free of government restrictions based on content.

That makes me believe that I can say "I hate Trump" without worry the Government is going to imprison me.

More reading of our Rights, I get the impression I can protest while I am at work, however, my employer has the Right to terminate my employment.

Right's go both ways.


UserPostedImage
wpr
  • wpr
  • Preferred Member
6 years ago

I'm reasonably certain the NFL doesn't charge the armed forces for most of these perks. They give away tickets for service members to attend games and passes for them to pose on the sidelines, no doubt writing it off as a promotional expense. I'd be surprised if the league or teams didn't also provide the flags and other patriotic decorations; think about the demographic they're catering to. The military may very well well pay for the card displays that show recruiting slogans. I'm not sure about that. I would hope so.

I do know for a fact that the military does not charge for the flyovers. As eyewateringly expensive as they are (when I was in the army, the Air Force supposedly charged us $85,000 per plane, per pass for airborne jumps, and there were always multiple passes; I can only imagine what a formation of fighter jets would cost), the flyovers are not deemed to pose an additional expense to the taxpayer because they're incorporated right into the routine training schedule. That is to say, the pilots, many of whom are guardsman putting in their one weekend a month, are racking up their mandatory flight hours anyway. If they weren't flying over the stadium, they'd simply be flying somewhere else. Circling aimlessly over cornfields or patrolling some military base.

Consider the men in the air and the men on the field product placement, if you will.

Originally Posted by: Nonstopdrivel 



No the teams (at least some of them) did charge the military for appearances. GB was one of the teams that charged. They weren't the worst offender but they did pick up a few hundred thousand for the privilege. NFL Inc not the teams refunded the money  only after it came out and became an embarrassment. IIR corporate was repaid by lowering the end of the year payouts to those teams.

edit- found the story from 2015  that gives the dollar amounts. GB was #6 taking in $600,000. It probably wasn't just for flyovers.
UserPostedImage
KRK
  • KRK
  • Veteran Member
6 years ago
Z and WPR....well stated...also
1. Whether its the NFL or teams charging the armed forces, to me that is a distinction without a difference, and I am still disappointed that armed forces were charged for the before game stuff.
2. Remember, the Consititution's 1st Amendment, as Z2C points out, prevents the GOVERNMENT from prohibiting speech, expression, et al., NOT an employer, or for that matter, an on-line service like twitter or facebook.
In Luce tua Videmus Lucem KRK
Porforis
6 years ago
This is akin to the pledge of allegiance in schools to me.

There was a time in American history where this pledge didn't exist

There was a time in American history where this pledge didn't exist as mandatory in schools

America survived, people managed to be patriotic and honor their country when not mandated to do so. The only difference in my mind here, is that with the pledge in school, you are dealing with children in an environment where they are being taught to learn. In the NFL with the national anthem - It's a football game with grown-ass adults.

I would just say "Just keep the players in the locker room" because hell, that's exactly what happened up until 2009 for primetime games and somehow the country didn't devolve into chaos and players weren't going out burning flags and committing treason but somehow I doubt most people would accept this.

The NFL should get rid of the anthem and use all of the saved money involved to support wounded veterans and other veteran-related causes. If you care that much about America that you're enraged when someone kneels during the anthem then I'd think you'd care enough to want to make actual change above symbolic gestures. By forcing grown-ass adults to participate in the anthem you're politicizing it as much as they are.
wpr
  • wpr
  • Preferred Member
6 years ago
Freedom of speech also let's us sit around and discuss how wrong "Those People" are.

For those who don't know it, "Those People" was the term General Robert E. Lee used when speaking of the Union army.
UserPostedImage
Fan Shout
packerfanoutwest (3h) : don't care
Zero2Cool (8h) : Lions shopping Jameson Williams?
packerfanoutwest (15h) : Packers General Manager Brian Gutekunst says Green Bay’s roster can win, even without adding anyone in the draft.
Zero2Cool (16h) : It's a poor design. New site has SignalR like our gameday chat
wpr (16h) : Ah today's Shout was very quick to post.
wpr (16h) : now 3
Zero2Cool (17h) : Who? What?
beast (22-Apr) : What is he supposed to say? He doesn't want players currently on the team?
Martha Careful (21-Apr) : meh
Zero2Cool (21-Apr) : Sounds like Walker and Wyatt will be with Packers for beyond 2026
Zero2Cool (21-Apr) : It's so awesome.
Zero2Cool (21-Apr) : new site fan shout post fast
wpr (21-Apr) : Slow posting in Fan shout.
wpr (21-Apr) : Only 4
wpr (21-Apr) : Only 4
Zero2Cool (21-Apr) : If only we had a topic to read about and discuss it. That's something new website must have!!!
dfosterf (21-Apr) : Justice Musqueda over at Acme Packing put up an excellent synopsis of the Packers 1st round options this am
wpr (19-Apr) : 5 days
beast (18-Apr) : 6 days
wpr (17-Apr) : 7 days
Zero2Cool (16-Apr) : sounds like Packers don't get good compensation, Jaire staying
dfosterf (16-Apr) : Nobody coming up with a keep, but at x amount
dfosterf (16-Apr) : Trade, cut or keep
dfosterf (16-Apr) : that from Jaire
dfosterf (16-Apr) : My guess is the Packers floated the concept of a reworked contract via his agent and agent got a f'
Zero2Cool (16-Apr) : Yes, and that is why I think Rob worded it how he did. Rather than say "agent"
dfosterf (16-Apr) : Same laws apply. Agent must present such an offer to Jaire. Cannot accept or reject without presenting it
Zero2Cool (16-Apr) : I'm thinking that is why Rob worded it how he did.
dfosterf (16-Apr) : The Packers can certainly still make the offer to the agent
dfosterf (16-Apr) : Laws of agency and definition of fiduciary responsibility
dfosterf (16-Apr) : Jaire is open to a reduced contract without Jaire's permission
dfosterf (16-Apr) : The agent would arguably violate the law if he were to tell the Packers
Zero2Cool (16-Apr) : That someone ... likely the agent.
Zero2Cool (16-Apr) : So, Jaire has not been offered nor rejected a pay reduction, but someone says he'd decline.
Zero2Cool (16-Apr) : Demovksy says t was direct communication with someone familiar with Jaire’s line of thinking at that moment.
Zero2Cool (16-Apr) : Demovsky just replied to me a bit ago. Jaire hasn't said it.
dfosterf (16-Apr) : Of course, that depends on the definition of "we"
dfosterf (16-Apr) : We have been told that they haven't because he wouldn't accept it. I submit we don't know that
dfosterf (16-Apr) : What is the downside in making a calculated reduced offer to Jaire?
Zero2Cool (15-Apr) : Packers are receiving interest in Jaire Alexander but a trade is not imminent
Zero2Cool (15-Apr) : Jalen Ramsey wants to be traded. He's never happy is he?
Zero2Cool (15-Apr) : two 1sts in 2022 and two 2nd's in 2023 and 2024
Zero2Cool (15-Apr) : Packers had fortunate last three drafts.
dfosterf (15-Apr) : I may have to move
dfosterf (15-Apr) : My wife just told the ancient Japanese sushi dude not enough rice under his fish
Zero2Cool (14-Apr) : I think a dozen is what I need
dfosterf (14-Apr) : Go fund me for this purpose just might work. A dozen nurses show up at 1265 to provide mental health assistance.
dfosterf (14-Apr) : Maybe send a crew of Angels to the Packers draft room on draft day.
Zero2Cool (14-Apr) : I am the Angel that gets visited.
dfosterf (14-Apr) : Visiting Angels has a pretty good reputation
Please sign in to use Fan Shout
2024 Packers Schedule
Friday, Sep 6 @ 7:15 PM
Eagles
Sunday, Sep 15 @ 12:00 PM
COLTS
Sunday, Sep 22 @ 12:00 PM
Titans
Sunday, Sep 29 @ 12:00 PM
VIKINGS
Sunday, Oct 6 @ 3:25 PM
Rams
Sunday, Oct 13 @ 12:00 PM
CARDINALS
Sunday, Oct 20 @ 12:00 PM
TEXANS
Sunday, Oct 27 @ 12:00 PM
Jaguars
Sunday, Nov 3 @ 3:25 PM
LIONS
Sunday, Nov 17 @ 12:00 PM
Bears
Sunday, Nov 24 @ 3:25 PM
49ERS
Thursday, Nov 28 @ 7:20 PM
DOLPHINS
Thursday, Dec 5 @ 7:15 PM
Lions
Sunday, Dec 15 @ 7:20 PM
Seahawks
Monday, Dec 23 @ 7:15 PM
SAINTS
Sunday, Dec 29 @ 3:25 PM
Vikings
Sunday, Jan 5 @ 12:00 PM
BEARS
Recent Topics
8h / Packers Draft Threads / Zero2Cool

10h / Random Babble / Martha Careful

10h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Martha Careful

16h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

22-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / dfosterf

17-Apr / Random Babble / wpr

16-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

13-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / Martha Careful

12-Apr / Feedback, Suggestions and Issues / Zero2Cool

11-Apr / Feedback, Suggestions and Issues / Rockmolder

2-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

2-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / bboystyle

1-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / Mucky Tundra

1-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / wpr

31-Mar / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

Headlines
Copyright © 2006 - 2025 PackersHome.com™. All Rights Reserved.