nerdmann
6 years ago

Packers head coach Mike McCarthy reportedly met with team president and CEO Mark Murphy and expressed concerns Russ Ball wouldn't be aggressive in free agency, USA Today's Pete Dougherty reports. The meeting in theory caused Murphy to not promote Ball to general manager after Ted Thompson left the spot. Dougherty has doubts that the meeting [...]

Continue Reading @ Pro Football Rumors 

Pro Football Rumors wrote:



I'd like to meet with Murphy and "express concerns" that our backup QB will suck shit.

Dougherty's Article 

It's pretty clear Mike came out of this with extra juice, but that also puts him under the gun. Dude needs to get it done this year or people in the organization could be looking at him funny.
“Winning is not a sometime thing, it is an all the time thing. You don't do things right once in a while…you do them right all the time.”
beast
6 years ago
I could be completely wrong, but I always thought that they would put someone with a scouting background into the GM role (ie not Ball). So to me, it seems much more logical that Murphy changed the set-up to make it easier on BG, Mike McCarthy and Ball.

This way, it narrows the young guys' focus making it easier on him... and Mike McCarthy and Ball don't have to take orders from the young guy with a brand new position, suddenly directly over them, that could add to a lot more ego drama...
UserPostedImage
nerdmann
6 years ago

I could be completely wrong, but I always thought that they would put someone with a scouting background into the GM role (ie not Ball). So to me, it seems much more logical that Murphy changed the set-up to make it easier on BG, Mike McCarthy and Ball.

This way, it narrows the young guys' focus making it easier on him... and Mike McCarthy and Ball don't have to take orders from the young guy with a brand new position, suddenly directly over them, that could add to a lot more ego drama...

Originally Posted by: beast 



I don’t feel that it’s the HC’s place to be interviewing candidates for the new GM. I mean, was Rodgers in on the interview too?
“Winning is not a sometime thing, it is an all the time thing. You don't do things right once in a while…you do them right all the time.”
KRK
  • KRK
  • Veteran Member
6 years ago
I hope he WAS involved....at this point, he IS the franchise. If the last half of the year didn't teach you that, you need to wake up.
Further, unlike the selfish Brett F, he is brighter than most of the rest of the gang at 1265 and I would want his input.
Additionally, listening to his input NOW may help negotiate an extension, especially if he was to take less in order to win.
In Luce tua Videmus Lucem KRK
Zero2Cool
6 years ago
The problem with this headline and article is it's using Bob McGinn as the "reporting source" to which others reported that same report. This is where lack of transparency is a problem. However, idiot fans who find anything to bitch about are damn sure one of the reasons to keep things left unsaid. Even if Mark comes out saying, I had Russ Ball in mind for GM, but after interviews, I felt Brian was best for the Packers and yes, McCarthy felt Ball would not be aggressive in free agency as he's been suedo running the show the last 2-3 years while Ted was less 'energetic'".

Those idiot fans would start saying the inmates are running the asylum rather than respecting a CEO understanding and listening and being open to communication from those within the football operations. Of course, my view could be the idiotic one too. I just personally feel it's best to LISTEN to people and formulate a direction rather than sit in a box and dictate a direction and force everyone to follow it. After all, Mark isn't intimate with all the football operations so it would make sense to have meetings and open door discussions.


UserPostedImage
sschind
6 years ago

I don’t feel that it’s the HC’s place to be interviewing candidates for the new GM. I mean, was Rodgers in on the interview too?

Originally Posted by: nerdmann 



I didn't read anywhere that said Mike McCarthy interviewed anyone. I would like to think that anyone in the position to hire a GM (be it an owner or a CEO) would welcome input from someone as important to the organization as the head coach unless that coach was headed out the door.

Ball was the cap man in Green Bay correct? Its not inconceivable that the HC might think a former capologist might be more concerned with the money than with bringing in the needed talent.

Fan Shout
Zero2Cool (6h) : Could ban beast and I still don't think anyone catches him.
Mucky Tundra (20h) : Houston getting dog walked by Baltimore
packerfanoutwest (25-Dec) : Feliz Navidad!
Zero2Cool (25-Dec) : Merry Christmas!
beast (25-Dec) : Merry Christmas 🎄🎁
beast (24-Dec) : Sounds like no serious injuries from the Saints game and Jacobs and Watson should play in the Vikings game
packerfanoutwest (24-Dec) : both games Watson missed, Packers won
Martha Careful (24-Dec) : I hope all of you have a Merry Christmas!
Mucky Tundra (24-Dec) : Oh I know about Jacobs, I just couldn't pass up an opportunity to mimic Zero lol
buckeyepackfan (24-Dec) : Jacobs was just sat down, Watson re-injured that knee that kept him out 1 game earlier
buckeyepackfan (24-Dec) : I needed .14 that's. .14 points for the whole 4th quarter to win and go to the SB. Lol
Mucky Tundra (24-Dec) : Jacobs gonna be OK???
Zero2Cool (24-Dec) : Watson gonna be OK???
packerfanoutwest (24-Dec) : Inactives tonight for the Pack: Alexander- knee Bullard - ankle Williams - quad Walker -ankle Monk Heath
packerfanoutwest (24-Dec) : No Jaire, but hopefully the front 7 destroys the line of scrimmage & forces Rattler into a few passes to McKinney.
packerfanoutwest (24-Dec) : minny could be #1 seed and the Lions #5 seed
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : We'd have same Division and Conference records. Strength of schedule we edge them
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I just checked. What tie breaker?
bboystyle (23-Dec) : yes its possible but unlikely. If we do get the 5th, we face the NFCS winner
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : Ahh, ok.
bboystyle (23-Dec) : yes due to tie breaker
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I mean, unlikely, yes, but mathematically, 5th is possible by what I'm reading.
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : If Vikings lose out, Packers win out, Packers get 5th, right?
bboystyle (23-Dec) : Minny isnt going to lose out so 5th seed is out of the equation. We are playing for the 6th or 7th seed which makes no difference
Mucky Tundra (23-Dec) : beast, the ad revenue goes to the broadcast company but they gotta pay to air the game on their channel/network
beast (23-Dec) : If we win tonight the game is still relative in terms of 5th, 6th or 7th seed... win and it's 5th or 6th, lose and it's 6th or 7th
beast (23-Dec) : Mucky, I thought the ad revenue went to the broadcasting companies or the NFL, at least not directly
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I think the revenue share is moot, isn't it? That's the CBA an Salary Cap handling that.
bboystyle (23-Dec) : i mean game becomes irrelevant if we win tonight. Just a game where we are trying to play spoilers to Vikings chance at the #1 seed
Mucky Tundra (23-Dec) : beast, I would guess ad revenue from more eyes watching tv
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I would think it would hurt the home team because people would have to cancel last minute maybe? i dunno
beast (23-Dec) : I agree that it's BS for fans planning on going to the game. But how does it bring in more money? I'm guessing indirectly?
packerfanoutwest (23-Dec) : bs on flexing the game....they do it for the $$league$$, not the hometown fans
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I see what you did there Mucky
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : dammit. 3:25pm
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : Packers Vikings flexed to 3:35pm
Mucky Tundra (23-Dec) : Upon receiving the news about Luke Musgrave, I immediately fell to the ground
Mucky Tundra (23-Dec) : Yeah baby!
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : LUKE MUSGRAVE PLAYING TONIGHT~!~~~~WOWHOAAOHAOAA yah
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I wanna kill new QB's ... blitz the crap out of them.
beast (23-Dec) : Barry seemed to get too conservative against new QBs, Hafley doesn't have that issue
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : However, we seem to struggle vs new QB's
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : Should be moot point, cuz Packers should win tonight.
packerfanoutwest (23-Dec) : ok I stand corrected
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : Ok, yes, you are right. I see that now how they get 7th
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : 5th - Packers win out, Vikings lose out. Maybe?
beast (23-Dec) : Saying no to the 6th lock.
beast (23-Dec) : No, with the Commanders beating the Eagles, Packers could have a good chance of 6th or 7th unless the win out
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I think if Packers win, they are locked 6th with chance for 5th.
beast (23-Dec) : But it doesn't matter, as the Packers win surely win one of their remaining games
Please sign in to use Fan Shout
2024 Packers Schedule
Friday, Sep 6 @ 7:15 PM
Eagles
Sunday, Sep 15 @ 12:00 PM
COLTS
Sunday, Sep 22 @ 12:00 PM
Titans
Sunday, Sep 29 @ 12:00 PM
VIKINGS
Sunday, Oct 6 @ 3:25 PM
Rams
Sunday, Oct 13 @ 12:00 PM
CARDINALS
Sunday, Oct 20 @ 12:00 PM
TEXANS
Sunday, Oct 27 @ 12:00 PM
Jaguars
Sunday, Nov 3 @ 3:25 PM
LIONS
Sunday, Nov 17 @ 12:00 PM
Bears
Sunday, Nov 24 @ 3:25 PM
49ERS
Thursday, Nov 28 @ 7:20 PM
DOLPHINS
Thursday, Dec 5 @ 7:15 PM
Lions
Sunday, Dec 15 @ 7:20 PM
Seahawks
Monday, Dec 23 @ 7:15 PM
SAINTS
Sunday, Dec 29 @ 3:25 PM
Vikings
Saturday, Jan 4 @ 11:00 PM
BEARS
Recent Topics
3h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

25-Dec / Featured Content / Zero2Cool

25-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

25-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

25-Dec / GameDay Threads / bboystyle

24-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

24-Dec / Random Babble / beast

24-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

23-Dec / Random Babble / Martha Careful

22-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / packerfanoutwest

19-Dec / Random Babble / Zero2Cool

18-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

17-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / wpr

17-Dec / Featured Content / Zero2Cool

16-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

Headlines
Copyright © 2006 - 2024 PackersHome.com™. All Rights Reserved.